Interventionelle Therapie der Bifurkationsstenosen – Schritt für Schritt

Ziel einer interventionellen Rekonstruktion von Bifurkationsstenosen ist, die ursprüngliche Fluidhämodynamik der Bifurkation wiederherzustellen und die Plaque abzudecken. Der vorliegende Beitrag soll dabei als Entscheidungshilfe für die interventionelle Rekonstruktion von Bifurkationsstenosen dienen und mögliche Techniken Schritt für Schritt vorstellen sowie deren Für und Wider im Einzelfall darstellen.

Schlüsselwörter

Bifurkationsstenose - Plaquelokalisation - Ein-/Doppel-Stent-Technik - Finet-Formel - Kissing-Balloon

Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
08. Dezember 2020

• Literatur

• 1 Brar SS, Gray WA, Dangas G. et al. Bifurcation stenting with drug-eluting stents: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. EuroIntervention 2009; 4: 475-484
• 2 Louvard Y, Thomas M, Dzavik V. et al. Classification of coronary artery bifurcation lesions and treatments: time for a consensus. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2008; 71: 175-183
• 3 Medina A, Suárez de Lezo J, Pan M. A new classification of coronary bifurcation lesions. Rev Esp Cardiol 2006; 59: 183
• 4 Banning AP, Lassen JF, Burzotta F. et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention for obstructive bifurcation lesions: the 14th consensus document from the European Bifurcation Club. EuroIntervention 2019; 15: 90-98
• 5 Ng J, Foin N, Ang HY. et al. Over-expansion capacity and stent design model: An update with contemporary DES platforms. Int J Cardiol 2016; 221: 171-179 doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.06
• 6 Maeng M, Holm NR, Erglis A. et al. Long-term results after simple versus complex stenting of coronary artery bifurcation lesions: Nordic Bifurcation Study 5-year follow-up results. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 62: 30-34
• 7 Hildick-Smith D, Behan MW, Lassen JF. et al. The EBC TWO Study (European Bifurcation Coronary TWO): A Randomized Comparison of Provisional T-Stenting Versus a Systematic 2 Stent Culotte Strategy in Large Caliber True Bifurcations. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2016; 9: e003643
• 8 Behan MW, Holm NR, de Belder AJ. et al. Coronary bifurcation lesions treated with simple or complex stenting: 5-year survival from patient-level pooled analysis of the Nordic Bifurcation Study and the British Bifurcation Coronary Study. Eur Heart J 2016; 37: 1923-1928
• 9 Chen SL, Zhang JJ, Han Y. et al. Double Kissing Crush Versus Provisional Stenting for Left Main Distal Bifurcation Lesions: DKCRUSH-V Randomized Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017; 70: 2605-2617
• 10 Burzotta F, Gwon HC, Hahn JY. et al. Modified T-stenting with intentional protrusion of the side-branch stent within the main vessel stent to ensure ostial coverage and facilitate final kissing balloon: the T-stenting and small protrusion technique (TAP-stenting). Report of bench testing and first clinical Italian-Korean two-centre experience. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2007; 70: 75-82
• 11 Koo BK, De Bruyne B. FFR in bifurcation stenting: what have we learned?. EuroIntervention 2010; 6 Suppl J: J94-J98
• 12 Chevalier B, Glatt B, Royer T. et al. Placement of coronary stents in bifurcation lesions by the “culotte” technique. Am J Cardiol 1998; 82: 943-949
• 13 Chen SL, Santoso T, Zhang JJ. et al. Clinical Outcome of Double Kissing Crush Versus Provisional Stenting of Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions: The 5-Year Follow-Up Results From a Randomized and Multicenter DKCRUSH-II Study (Randomized Study on Double Kissing Crush Technique Versus Provisional Stenting Technique for Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions). Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2017; 10: e004497
• 14 Chen SL, Xu B, Han YL. et al. Clinical Outcome After DK Crush Versus Culotte Stenting of Distal Left Main Bifurcation Lesions: The 3-Year Follow-Up Results of the DKCRUSH-III Study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2015; 8: 1335-1342
• 15 Räber L, Mintz GS, Koskinas KC. et al. Clinical use of intracoronary imaging. Part 1: guidance and optimization of coronary interventions. An expert consensus document of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions. EuroIntervention 2018; 14: 656-677
• 16 Burzotta F, Lassen JF, Banning AP. et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention in left main coronary artery disease: the 13th consensus document from the European Bifurcation Club. EuroIntervention 2018; 14: 112-120
• 17 Ford TJ, McCartney P, Corcoran D. et al. Single-Versus 2-Stent Strategies for Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials With Long-Term Follow-up. J Am Heart Assoc 2018; 7 DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.118.008730.
• 18 Fearon WF, Nishi T, De Bruyne B. et al. FAME 2 Trial Investigators. Clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with stable coronary artery disease: three-year follow-up of the FAME 2 trial (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation). Circulation 2018; 137: 480-487
• 19 an Nunen LX, Zimmermann FM, Tonino PA. et al. FAME Study Investigators. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guidance of PCI in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (FAME): 5-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2015; 386: 1853-1860