Download PDF
Augenheilkunde up2date 2018; 8(02): 139-149
DOI: 10.1055/a-0598-8068
Glaukom
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Chirurgische Möglichkeiten der Glaukomtherapie

Surgical Options in Glaucoma Management
Thomas S. Dietlein
,
André Rosentreter
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
17 May 2018 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints All articles of this category

Zusammenfassung

Die Glaukomchirurgie erfährt einen Innovationsschub insbesondere durch neue Mikroimplantate. Auch lange bestehende glaukomchirurgische Verfahren, wie die Trabekulektomie oder die Drainageimplantatchirurgie, erleben eine Aufwertung durch eine Verbesserung ihres Risiko-Nutzen-Profils. Dieser Beitrag gibt einen Überblick über die aktuellen chirurgischen Optionen der Glaukombehandlung.

Abstract

During the last few years, there has been a considerable capacity of innovations in glaucoma surgery owing to new micro-stents increasing the aqueous outflow via transscleral routes, via the trabecular meshwork or the suprachoroidal space. These interventions can be easily performed in combination with small-incision cataract surgery. Even the well-known filtering procedures, trabeculectomy and drainage device surgery, formerly perceived as being outdated, re-achieve better reputation owing to refinements in surgical technique and improved surgical experience. Although enthusiasm is understandable, considering the technical advances, we must wait for clinical long-term results and compare the new procedures with the established ones.

Kernaussagen

  • In der chirurgischen Behandlung des Offenwinkelglaukoms besitzt die Trabekulektomie mit Mitomycin C weiter einen überragenden Platz in der primären Behandlung.

  • Allerdings wird ihr dieser Platz in der kombinierten Glaukom-Katarakt-Chirurgie mehr und mehr streitig gemacht von den kammerwinkelchirurgischen Verfahren.

  • Letztere können mit wenig Zeitaufwand und Risiko in die Kleinschnittkataraktchirurgie integriert werden.

  • Bei den komplizierten Glaukomen setzt sich auch in Deutschland zunehmend die Drainageimplantatchirurgie durch, während die Zyklodestruktion eher abnimmt.

  • Bei aller Euphorie über die chirurgischen Innovationen muss mit kritischem Abstand abgewartet werden, welches der neueren chirurgischen Verfahren langfristig dem klinischen Vergleich mit den etablierten Verfahren standhält.

Schlüsselwörter

Augendruck - Glaukomchirurgie - Glaukomimplantat - Trabekulektomie

Key words

intraocular pressure - glaucoma surgery - glaucoma drainage device - trabeculectomy
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 [Anonymous] The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS): 7. The relationship between control of intraocular pressure and visual field deterioration. The AGIS Investigators. Am J Ophthalmol 2000; 130: 429-440
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Anderson DR, Drance SM, Schulzer M. et al. Factors that predict the benefit of lowering intraocular pressure in normal tension glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 2003; 136: 820-829
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Dietlein TS, Moalem Y, Lappas A. et al. [Glaucoma filtering surgery in the elderly over eighty years old: an analysis of postoperative risks]. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 2014; 231: 1224-1229
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Dietlein TS, Moalem Y, Schild AM. et al. [Subconjunctival or general anaesthesia in trabeculectomy – a retrospective analysis of the bleeding risk from a glaucoma surgeonʼs point of view]. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 2012; 229: 826-829
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 European Glaucoma Society. Terminology and Guidelines for Glaucoma. 4th ed. 2014.. Im Internet: http://www.eugs.org/eng/EGS_guidelines4.asp Stand: 01.12.2016
  • 6 Gedde SJ, Schiffman JC, Feuer WJ. et al. Treatment outcomes in the Tube Versus Trabeculectomy (TVT) study after five years of follow-up. Am J Ophthalmol 2012; 153: 789-803
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Landers J, Martin K, Sarkies N. et al. A twenty-year follow-up study of trabeculectomy: risk factors and outcomes. Ophthalmology 2012; 119: 694-702
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Jayaram H, Strouthidis NG, Kamal DS. Trabeculectomy for normal tension glaucoma: outcomes using the Moorfields safer surgery technique. Br J Ophthalmol 2016; 100: 332-338
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Khaw PT, Chiang M, Shah P. et al. Enhanced trabeculectomy: the Moorfields safer surgery system. Dev Ophthalmol 2012; 50: 1-28
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Yassin SA. Bleb-related infection revisited: a literature review. Acta Ophthalmol 2016; 94: 122-134
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Dietlein TS, Jacobi PC, Krieglstein GK. Prognosis of primary ab externo surgery for primary congenital glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 1999; 83: 317-322
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Pérez-Torregrosa VT, Olate-Pérez Á, Cerdà-Ibáñez M. et al. Combined phacoemulsification and XEN45 surgery from a temporal approach and 2 incisions. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol 2016; 91: 415-421
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Wang YW, Wang PB, Zeng C. et al. Comparison of the Ahmed glaucoma valve with the Baerveldt glaucoma implant: a meta-analysis. BMC Ophthalmol 2015; 15: 132
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Rosentreter A, Mellein AC, Konen WW. et al. Capsule excision and Ologen implantation for revision after glaucoma drainage device surgery. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2010; 248: 1319-1324
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Beck AD, Lynn MJ, Crandall J. et al. Surgical outcomes with 360-degree suture trabeculotomy in poor-prognosis primary congenital glaucoma and glaucoma associated with congenital anomalies or cataract surgery. J AAPOS 2011; 15: 54-58
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Dao JB, Sarkisian SR, Freedman SF. Illuminated microcatheter-facilitated 360-degree trabeculotomy for refractory aphakic and juvenile open-angle glaucoma. J Glaucoma 2014; 23: 449-454
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Lüke C, Dietlein TS, Lüke M. et al. A prospective trial of phaco-trabeculotomy combined with deep sclerectomy versus phaco-trabeculectomy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2008; 246: 1163-1168
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Grover DS, Godfrey DG, Smith O. et al. Gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy, ab interno trabeculotomy. Ophthalmology 2014; 121: 855-861
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Cagini C, Peruzzi C, Fiore T. et al. Canaloplasty: current value in the management of glaucoma. J Ophthalmol 2016; 2016: 7080475
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Ayyala RS, Chaudhry AL, Okogbaa CB. et al. Comparison of surgical outcomes between canaloplasty and trabeculectomy at 12 monthsʼ follow-up. Ophthalmology 2011; 118: 2427-2433
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Matlach J, Dhillon C, Hain J. et al. Trabeculectomy versus canaloplasty (TVC study) in the treatment of patients with open-angle glaucoma: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Acta Ophthalmol 2015; 93: 753-761
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Rękas M, Byszewska A, Petz K. et al. Canaloplasty versus non-penetrating deep sclerectomy – a prospective, randomised study of the safety and efficacy of combined cataract and glaucoma surgery; 12-month follow-up. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2015; 253: 591-599
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Kalin-Hadju E, Hammamji K, Gagné S. et al. Outcome of viscodilation and tensioning of Schlemmʼs canal for uveitic glaucoma. Can J Ophthalmol 2014; 49: 414-419
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Seuthe AM, Ivanescu C, Leers S. et al. Modified canaloplasty with suprachoroidal drainage versus conventional canaloplasty – 1-year results. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2016; 254: 1591-1597
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Quaranta L, Biagioli E, Riva I. et al. Effect of trabeculectomy and canaloplasty on intra-ocular pressure modifications after postural changes in open-angle glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol 2014; 92: e498-e499
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Dinslage S, Rosentreter A, Schild AM. et al. [Combined phacoemulsification with trabecular aspiration with differing outcomes in pseudoexfoliative glaucoma – a retrospective study]. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 2012; 229: 641-644
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Katz LJ, Erb C, Carceller GA. et al. Prospective, randomized study on one, two or three trabecular bypass stents in open-angle glaucoma subjects on topical hypotensive medication. Clin Ophthalmol 2015; 11: 2313-2320
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 28 Pfeiffer N, Garcia-Feijoo J, Martinez-de-la-Casa JM. et al. A randomized trial of a Schlemmʼs canal microstent with phacoemulsification for reducing intraocular pressure in open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology 2015; 122: 1283-1293
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Kerr NM, Wang J, Barton K. Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery as primary stand-alone surgery for glaucoma. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2017; 393-400 doi:10.1111/ceo.12888
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Seibold LK, Soohoo JR, Ammar DA. et al. Preclinical investigation of ab interno trabeculectomy using a novel dual-blade device. Am J Ophthalmol 2013; 155: 524-529
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Gonnermann J, Bertelmann E, Pahlitzsch M. et al. Contralateral eye comparison study in MICS & MIGS: Trabectome ® vs. iStent inject ® . Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2017; 255: 359-365
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Mosaed S, Dustin L, Minckler DS. Comparative outcomes between newer and older surgeries for glaucoma. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 2009; 107: 127-135
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Kaplowitz K, Bussel II, Honkanen R. et al. Review and meta-analysis of ab-interno trabeculectomy outcomes. Br J Ophthalmol 2016; 100: 594-600
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Garcia-Feijoo J, Rau M, Grisanti S. et al. Supraciliary micro-stent implantation for open-angle glaucoma failing topical therapy: 1-year results of a multicenter study. Am J Ophthalmol 2015; 159: 1075-1081
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Pastor SA, Singh K, Lee DA. et al. Cyclophotocoagulation: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology 2001; 108: 2130-2138
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 36 Golan S, Kurtz S. Diode laser cyclophotocoagulation for nanophthalmic chronic angle closure glaucoma. J Glaucoma 2015; 24: 127-129
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 37 Ghosh S, Manvikar S, Ray-Chaudhuri N. et al. Efficacy of transscleral diode laser cyclophotocoagulation in patients with good visual acuity. Eur J Ophthalmol 2014; 24: 375-381
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 38 Gorsler I, Thieme H, Meltendorf C. Cyclophotocoagulation and cyclocryocoagulation as primary surgical procedures for open-angle glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2015; 253: 2273-2277
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 39 Chen TC, Chen PP, Francis BA. et al. Pediatric glaucoma surgery. A report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology 2014; 121: 2107-2115
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar