Adhäsive

Ein Großteil der heute praxisüblichen Behandlungsverfahren in Zahnerhaltung, Prothetik und Kieferorthopädie beruht auf effektiver Adhäsivtechnik [1] – [4]. Dabei sind es gerade die minimalinvasiven Techniken, die massiv von erfolgreicher Adhäsivtechnik profitieren und durch sie erst möglich werden [4], [5], [6], [7].

• Literatur

• 1 Bergenholtz G, Cox CF, Loesche WJ. et al. Bacterial leakage around dental restorations: its effect on the dental pulp. J Oral Pathol 1982; 11: 439-450
• 2 Bortolotto T, Onisor I, Krejci I. et al. Effect of cyclic loading under enzymatic activity on resin-dentin interfaces of two self-etching adhesives. Dent Mater 2008; 24: 178-184
• 3 Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 1955; 34: 849-853
• 4 Perdigao J, Frankenberger R, Rosa BT. et al. New trends in dentin/enamel adhesion. Am J Dent 2000; 13: 25D-30D
• 5 De Munck J, Van LK, Peumans M. et al. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. J Dent Res 2005; 84: 118-132
• 6 Frankenberger R, Kern M. Dentin adhesives create a positive bond to dental hard tissue. Int J Comput Dent 2003; 6: 187-192
• 7 Frankenberger R, Kramer N, Lohbauer U. et al. Marginal integrity: is the clinical performance of bonded restorations predictable in vitro?. J Adhes Dent 2007; 9 (Suppl. 01) 107-116
• 8 Frankenberger R, Tay FR. Self-etch vs. etch-and-rinse adhesives: effect of thermo-mechanical fatigue loading on marginal quality of bonded resin composite restorations. Dent Mater 2005; 21: 397-412
• 9 Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Inokoshi S. et al. Factors affecting adhesion to mineralized tissues. Oper Dent 1992; (Suppl. 05) 111-124
• 10 Van Meerbeek B, Perdigao J, Lambrechts P. et al. The clinical performance of adhesives. J Dent 1998; 26: 1-20
• 11 Frankenberger R, Lohbauer U, Roggendorf MJ. et al. Selective enamel etching reconsidered: Better than etch-and-rinse and self etch?. J Adhes Dent 2008; 10: 339-344
• 12 Pashley DH. The effects of acid etching on the pulpodentin complex. Oper Dent 1992; 17: 229-242
• 13 Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y. et al. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 2003; 28: 215-235
• 14 Frankenberger R, Perdigao J, Rosa BT. et al. “No-bottle” vs. “multi-bottle” dentin adhesives–a microtensile bond strength and morphological study. Dent Mater 2001; 17: 373-380
• 15 Van Meerbeek B, Kanumilli P, De Munck J. et al. A randomized controlled study evaluating the effectiveness of a two-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective phosphoric-acid etching of enamel. Dent Mater 2005; 21: 375-383
• 16 Van Meerbeek B, Kanumilli PV, De Munck J. et al. A randomized, controlled trial evaluating the three-year clinical effectiveness of two etch & rinse adhesives in cervical lesions. Oper Dent 2004; 29: 376-385
• 17 Van Meerbeek B, Inokoshi S, Braem M. et al. Morphological aspects of the resin-dentin interdiffusion zone with different dentin adhesive systems. J Dent Res 1992; 71: 1530-1540
• 18 Tay FR, Pashley DH. Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching systems. I: Depth of penetration beyond dentin smear layers. Dent Mater 2001; 17: 296-308
• 19 Frankenberger R, Kramer N, Petschelt A. Technique sensitivity of dentin bonding: effect of application mistakes on bond strength and marginal adaptation. Oper Dent 2000; 25: 324-330
• 20 Loguercio AD, de Paula EA, Hass V. et al. A new universal simplified adhesive: 36-Month randomized double-blind clinical trial. J Dent 2015; 43: 1083-1092