GebFra - DGGG-Gesellschaftsausgaben, Table of Contents Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2018; 78(06): 548-550DOI: 10.1055/a-0635-6942 DGGG Mitteilungen aus der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe e. V. (DGGG) Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York Positionspapier – Position der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe zur außerklinischen Geburtshilfe Recommend Article Abstract Buy Article Full Text References Literatur 1 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee opinion No. 669: Planned home birth. Obstet Gynecol 2017; 129: 779-780 2 AQUA Institut für angewandte Qualitätsförderung und Forschung im Gesundheitswesen. Bundesauswertung zum Verfahrensjahr 2013 – 16/1-Geburtshilfe. Göttingen: AQUA; 2014 3 Arabin B, Chervenak FA, McCullough LB. Die geplante Hausgeburt in industrialisierten Ländern: Bürokratische Traumvorstellung vs. professionelle Verantwortlichkeit. Z Geburtsh Neonatol 2013; 217: 7-13 4 Arabin B. Risikobewusste Alternativen zur außerklinischen Geburt. Frauenarzt 2016; 57: 338-343 5 Bastian H, Keirse M, Lancaster P. et al. Perinatal death associated with planned home birth in Australia: population based study. BMJ 1998; 317: 384-388 6 Beckmann L, Dorin L, Metzing S. et al. Die Geburt im außerklinischen Setting – Unterschiede im maternalen und neonatalen Outcome von zweitgebärenden Frauen mit Status nach Sectio caesarea gegenüber Erstgebärenden. Z Geburtsh Neonatol 2015; 219: 281-288 7 Blix E, Huitfeldt AS, Øian P. et al. Outcomes of planned home births and planned hospital births in low-risk women in Norway between 1990 and 2007: a retrospective cohort study. Sex Reprod Healthc 2012; 3: 147-153 8 Brocklehurst P, Hardy P, Hollowell J. et al. Birthplace in England Collaborative Group. Perinatal and maternal outcomes by planned place of birth for healthy women with low risk pregnancies: the Birthplace in England national prospective cohort study. BMJ 2011; 343: d7400 9 Chervenak FA, McCullough LB, Grünebaum A. et al. Planned Home Birth in the United States and Professionalism: A Critical Assessment. J Clin Ethics 2013; 24: 184-191 10 Chervenak FA, McCullough LB, Grünebaum A. et al. Early and total neonatal mortality in relation to birth setting in the United States 2006–2009. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 211: 390.e1-390.7 11 Cheyney M, Bovbjerg M, Everson C. et al. Outcomes of care for 16,924 planned home births in the United States: the Midwives Alliance of North America Statistics Project, 2004 to 2009. J Midwifery Womens Health 2014; 59: 17-27 12 Crotty M, Ramsay AT, Smart R. et al. Planned homebirths in South Australia 1976–1987. Med J Aust 1990; 153: 664-671 13 Davis D, Baddock S, Pairman S. et al. Planned Place of Birth in New Zealand: Does it Affect Mode of Birth and Intervention Rates Among Low-Risk Women?. Birth 2011; 38: 111-119 14 De Jonge A, Geerts CC, van der Goes BY. et al. Perinatal mortality and morbidity up to 28 days after birth among 743 070 low-risk planned home and hospital births: a cohort study based on three merged national perinatal databases. BJOG 2014; 15 Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe. DGGG-Stellungnahme zur Hausgeburtshilfe. Frauenarzt 1990; 3: 246 16 Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe. DGGG-Stellungnahme: Hausgeburt-Risiken erhöht. Online:. https://www.dggg.de/presse-news/pressemitteilungen/mitteilung/hausgeburten-erhoehtes-risiko-pressemitteilung-der-deutschen-gesellschaft-fuer-gynaekologie-und-geburtshilfe-dggg-und-des-berufsverbandes-der-frauenaerzte-bvf-56 17 Evers AC, Brouwers HA, Hukkelhoven CW. et al. Perinatal mortality and severe morbidity in low and high risk term pregnancies in the Netherlands: prospective cohort study. BMJ 2010; 341: c5639 18 Grünebaum A, McCullough LB, Sapra KJ. et al. Early and total neonatal mortality in relation to birth setting in the United States, 2006 – 2009. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 211: 390.e1-390.e7 19 Grünebaum A, McCullough LB, Sapra KJ. et al. Planned home births: The need for additional contraindications. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017; 216: 401.e1-401.e8 20 Heller G, Bauer E, Schill S. et al. Decision-to-Delivery Time and Perinatal Complications in Emergency Cesarean Section. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2017; 114: 589-596 21 Hollowell J, Pillas D, Rowe R. et al. The impact of maternal obesity on intrapartum outcomes in otherwise low risk women: secondary analysis of the Birthplace national prospective cohort study. BJOG 2014; 121: 343-355 22 Home birth–proceed with caution. Lancet 2010; 376: 303 23 Janssen PA, Saxell L, Ryan EM. et al. Outcomes of planned home births versus planned hospital births after regulation of midwifery in British Columbia. CMAJ 2002; 166: 315-323 24 Janssen PA, Saxell L, Page LA. et al. Outcomes of planned home birth with registered midwife versus planned hospital birth with midwife or physician. CMAJ 2009; 181: 377-383 25 Kennare RM, Keirse M, Tucker GR. et al. Planned home and hospital births in South Australia, 1991–2006: differences in outcomes. Med J Aust 2009; 192: 76-80 26 Li Y, Townend J, Rowe R. et al. Perinatal and maternal outcomes in planned home and obstetric unit births in women at ‘higher risk of complications: secondary analysis of the Birthplace national prospective cohort study. BJOG 2015; 122: 741-753 27 Li Y, Townend J, Rowe R. et al. The effect of maternal age and planned place of birth on intrapartum outcomes in healthy women with straightforward pregnancies: secondary analysis of the Birthplace national prospective cohort study. BMJ Open 2014; 4: 1-14 28 Lindgren HE, Rådestad IJ, Christensson K. et al. Outcome of planned home births compared to hospital births in Sweden between 1992 and 2004. A population-based register study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2008; 87: 751-759 29 Monk A, Tracy M, Foureur M. et al. Evaluating Midwifery Units (EMU): a prospective cohort study of freestanding midwifery units in New South Wales, Australia. BMJ Open 2014; 4: 1-11 30 Mori R, Dougherty M, Whittle M. An estimation of intrapartum-related perinatal mortality rates for booked home births in England and Wales between 1994 and 2003. BJOG 2008; 115: 554-559 31 Gesellschaft für Qualität in der außerklinischen Geburtshilfe e.V. (QUAG). Außerklinische Geburtshilfe in Deutschland – Qualitätsbericht 2016. Online:. http://www.quag.de/quag/publikationen.htm Stand: 14.05.2018 32 Reis U. Hausgeburten im Vergleich mit Klinikgeburten. Die Hebamme 2015; 28: 108-112 33 Snowden JM, Tilden EL, Snyder J. et al. Planned Out-of-Hospital Birth and Birth Outcomes. N Engl J Med 2015; 373: 2642-2653 34 van der Kooy J, Birnie E, Denktas S. et al. Planned home compared with planned hospital births: mode of delivery und Perinatal mortality rates, an observational study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2017; 17: 177 35 van Haaren-ten Haken T, Hendrix M, Smits LJ. et al. The influence of preferred place of birth on the course of pregnancy and labor among healthy nulliparous women: a prospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2015; 15: 33 36 Vedam S, Schummers L, Stoll K. et al. The Canadian Birth Place Study: Describing maternity practice and providersʼ exposure to home birth. Midwifery 2012; 28: 600-608
