Endoscopy 2018; 50(09): 896-909
DOI: 10.1055/a-0637-8806
Review
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

A systematic review of advanced endoscopy-assisted lithotripsy for retained biliary tract stones: laser, electrohydraulic or extracorporeal shock wave

Joyce V. Veld   *
1   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
,
Nadine C. M. van Huijgevoort   *
1   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
,
Marja A. Boermeester
2   Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
,
Marc G. Besselink
2   Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
,
Otto M. van Delden
3   Department of Interventional Radiology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
,
Paul Fockens
1   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
,
Jeanin E. van Hooft
1   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

submitted 10. November 2017

accepted after revision 12. März 2018

Publikationsdatum:
10. Juli 2018 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Siehe auch:

Video Comment on Joyce V. Veld et al.Endoscopy 2018; 50(09): v32-v32
DOI: 10.1055/a-0656-6498

Abstract

Background When conventional endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones is impossible or fails, advanced endoscopy-assisted lithotripsy can be performed by electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL), laser lithotripsy, or extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL). No systematic review has compared efficacy and safety between these techniques.

Methods A systematic search was performed in PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and EMBASE for studies investigating EHL, laser lithotripsy, and ESWL in patients with retained biliary tract stones.

Results After screening 795 studies, 32 studies with 1969 patients undergoing EHL (n = 277), laser lithotripsy (n = 426) or ESWL (n = 1266) were included. No randomized studies were available. Although each advanced lithotripsy technique appeared to be highly effective, laser lithotripsy had a higher complete ductal clearance rate (95.1 %) than EHL (88.4 %) and ESWL (84.5 %; P  < 0.001). In addition, a higher stone fragmentation rate was reported for laser lithotripsy (92.5 %) than for EHL (75.5 %) and ESWL (89.3 %; P < 0.001). The post-procedural complication rate was significantly higher for patients treated with EHL (13.8 %) than for patients treated with ESWL (8.4 %) or laser lithotripsy (9.6 %; P = 0.04). Data on the recurrence rate of the biliary tract stones were lacking.

Conclusion This systematic review revealed that laser lithotripsy appeared to be the most successful advanced endoscopy-assisted lithotripsy technique for retained biliary tract stones, although randomized studies are lacking.

* These authors contributed equally to this work.


Supplemental Fig. e3, Supplemental Table e2, Supplemental Table e8 – e11

 

  • References

  • 1 Trikudanathan G, Navaneethan U, Parsi MA. Endoscopic management of difficult common bile duct stones. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19: 165-173
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Chang WH, Chu CH, Wang TE. et al. Outcome of simple use of mechanical lithotripsy of difficult common bile duct stones. World J Gastroenterol 2005; 11: 593-596
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Garg PK, Tandon RK, Ahuja V. et al. Predictors of unsuccessful mechanical lithotripsy and endoscopic clearance of large bile duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 59: 601-605
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Chen DW, Tung-Ping Poon R, Liu CL. et al. Immediate and long-term outcomes of hepatectomy for hepatolithiasis. Surgery 2004; 135: 386-393
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 DiSario J, Chuttani R, Croffie J. et al. Biliary and pancreatic lithotripsy devices. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 65: 750-756
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Larizgoitia I, Pons JM. A systematic review of the clinical efficacy and effectiveness of the holmium:YAG laser in urology. BJU Int 1999; 84: 1-9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Jakobs R, Adamek HE, Maier M. et al. Fluoroscopically guided laser lithotripsy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for retained bile duct stones: a prospective randomised study. Gut 1997; 40: 678-682
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J. et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol 2009; 62: 1006-1012
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 OCEBM Levels of Evidence Working Group. The Oxford 2011 Levels of Evidence 2. Oxford Centre of Evidence Based Medicine. Available from: https://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=5653
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Wells GA, Shea B, O’Connell D. et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. 2000 Available from: http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Bhandari S, Maydeo A. Endoscopic management of radio-opaque bile duct stones. Indian J Gastroenterol 2015; 34: 458-462
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Cecinato P, Fuccio L, Azzaroli F. et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for difficult common bile duct stones: a comparison between 2 different lithotripters in a large cohort of patients. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81: 402-409
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Aljebreen AM, Alharbi OR, Azzam N. et al. Efficacy of spyglass-guided electrohydraulic lithotripsy in difficult bile duct stones. Saudi J Gastroenterol 2014; 20: 366-370
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Moura EG, Franzini T, Moura RN. et al. Cholangioscopy in bile duct disease: a case series. Arq Gastroenterol 2014; 51: 250-254
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Lenze F, Heinzow HS, Herrmann E. et al. Clearance of refractory bile duct stones with extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy: higher failure rate in obese patients. Scand J Gastroenterol 2014; 49: 209-214
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Patel SN, Rosenkranz L, Hooks B. et al. Holmium-yttrium aluminum garnet laser lithotripsy in the treatment of biliary calculi using single-operator cholangioscopy: a multicenter experience (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 79: 344-348
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Tao T, Zhang QJ, Zhang M. et al. Using cholecystokinin to facilitate endoscopic clearance of large common bile duct stones. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20: 10121-10127
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Alameel T, Bain V, Sandha G. Clinical application of a single-operator direct visualization system improves the diagnostic and therapeutic yield of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Can J Gastroenterol 2013; 27: 15-19
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Prachayakul V, Aswakul P, Kachintorn U. Electrohydraulic lithotripsy as an highly effective method for complete large common bile duct stone clearance. J Interv Gastroenterol 2013; 3: 59-63
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Sauer BG, Cerefice M, Swartz DC. et al. Safety and efficacy of laser lithotripsy for complicated biliary stones using direct choledochoscopy. Dig Dis Sci 2013; 58: 253-256
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Akerman S, Rahman M, Bernstein DE. Direct cholangioscopy: the North Shore experience. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 24: 1406-1409
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Kalaitzakis E, Webster GJ, Oppong KW. et al. Diagnostic and therapeutic utility of single-operator peroral cholangioscopy for indeterminate biliary lesions and bile duct stones. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 24: 656-664
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Lee TY, Cheon YK, Choe WH. et al. Direct cholangioscopy-based holmium laser lithotripsy of difficult bile duct stones by using an ultrathin upper endoscope without a separate biliary irrigating catheter. Photomed Laser Surg 2012; 30: 31-36
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Draganov PV, Lin T, Chauhan S. et al. Prospective evaluation of the clinical utility of ERCP-guided cholangiopancreatoscopy with a new direct visualization system. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 971-979
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Kim HI, Moon JH, Choi HJ. et al. Holmium laser lithotripsy under direct peroral cholangioscopy by using an ultra-slim upper endoscope for patients with retained bile duct stones (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74: 1127-1132
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Liu F, Jin ZD, Zou DW. et al. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic biliary lithotripsy using FREDDY laser with a radiopaque mark under fluoroscopic guidance. Endoscopy 2011; 43: 918-921
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Maydeo A, Kwek BE, Bhandari S. et al. Single-operator cholangioscopy-guided laser lithotripsy in patients with difficult biliary and pancreatic ductal stones (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74: 1308-1314
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Lee JE, Moon JH, Choi HJ. et al. Endoscopic treatment of difficult bile duct stones by using a double-lumen basket for laser lithotripsy – a case series. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 169-172
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Cho YD, Cheon YK, Moon JH. et al. Clinical role of frequency-doubled double-pulsed yttrium aluminum garnet laser technology for removing difficult bile duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 70: 684-689
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Moon JH, Ko BM, Choi HJ. et al. Direct peroral cholangioscopy using an ultra-slim upper endoscope for the treatment of retained bile duct stones. Am J Gastroenterol 2009; 104: 2729-2733
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Tandan M, Reddy DN, Santosh D. et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of large difficult common bile duct stones: efficacy and analysis of factors that favor stone fragmentation. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009; 24: 1370-1374
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Kim TH, Oh HJ, Choi CS. et al. Clinical usefulness of transpapillary removal of common bile duct stones by frequency doubled double pulse Nd:YAG laser. World J Gastroenterol 2008; 14: 2863-2866
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Chen YK, Pleskow DK. SpyGlass single-operator peroral cholangiopancreatoscopy system for the diagnosis and therapy of bile-duct disorders: a clinical feasibility study (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 65: 832-841
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Jakobs R, Pereira-Lima JC, Schuch AW. et al. Endoscopic laser lithotripsy for complicated bile duct stones: is cholangioscopic guidance necessary?. Arq Gastroenterol 2007; 44: 137-140
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Conigliaro R, Camellini L, Zuliani CG. et al. Clearance of irretrievable bile duct and pancreatic duct stones by extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy, using a transportable device: effectiveness and medium-term results. J Clin Gastroenterol 2006; 40: 213-219
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Farrell JJ, Bounds BC, Al-Shalabi S. et al. Single-operator duodenoscope-assisted cholangioscopy is an effective alternative in the management of choledocholithiasis not removed by conventional methods, including mechanical lithotripsy. Endoscopy 2005; 37: 542-547
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Arya N, Nelles SE, Haber GB. et al. Electrohydraulic lithotripsy in 111 patients: a safe and effective therapy for difficult bile duct stones. Am J Gastroenterol 2004; 99: 2330-2334
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Moon JH, Cha SW, Ryu CB. et al. Endoscopic treatment of retained bile-duct stones by using a balloon catheter for electrohydraulic lithotripsy without cholangioscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 60: 562-566
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Shamamian P, Grasso M. Management of complex biliary tract calculi with a holmium laser. J Gastrointest Surg 2004; 8: 191-199
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Hui CK, Lai KC, Ng M. et al. Retained common bile duct stones: a comparison between biliary stenting and complete clearance of stones by electrohydraulic lithotripsy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2003; 17: 289-296
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Sackmann M, Holl J, Sauter GH. et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for clearance of bile duct stones resistant to endoscopic extraction. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 53: 27-32
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Ragheb S, Choong CK, Gowland S. et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for difficult common bile duct stones: initial New Zealand experience. N Z Med J 2000; 113: 377-378
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Neuhaus H, Zillinger C, Born P. et al. Randomized study of intracorporeal laser lithotripsy versus extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy for difficult bile duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc 1998; 47: 327-334
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Hochberger J, Bayer J, May A. et al. Laser lithotripsy of difficult bile duct stones: results in 60 patients using a rhodamine 6G dye laser with optical stone tissue detection system. Gut 1998; 43: 823-829
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Jakobs R, Maier M, Kohler B. et al. Peroral laser lithotripsy of difficult intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile duct stones: laser effectiveness using an automatic stone-tissue discrimination system. Am J Gastroenterol 1996; 91: 468-473
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Amplatz S, Piazzi L, Felder M. et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for clearance of refractory bile duct stones. Dig Liver Dis 2007; 39: 267-272
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Ellis RD, Jenkins AP, Thompson RP. et al. Clearance of refractory bile duct stones with extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy. Gut 2000; 47: 728-731
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Adamek HE, Maier M, Jakobs R. et al. Management of retained bile duct stones: a prospective open trial comparing extracorporeal and intracorporeal lithotripsy. Gastrointest Endosc 1996; 44: 40-47
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Sethi A, Chen YK, Austin GL. et al. ERCP with cholangiopancreatoscopy may be associated with higher rates of complications than ERCP alone: a single-center experience. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 251-256
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Yates J, Zabbo A, Pareek G. A comparison of the FREDDY and holmium lasers during ureteroscopic lithotripsy. Lasers Surg Med 2007; 39: 637-640
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Zhou Y, Wu XD, Zha WZ. et al. Three modalities on common bile duct exploration. Z Gastroenterol 2017; 55: 856-860
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Jakobs R, Hartmann D, Kudis V. et al. Risk factors for symptomatic stone recurrence after transpapillary laser lithotripsy for difficult bile duct stones using a laser with a stone recognition system. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006; 18: 469-473
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Riemann JF, Seuberth K, Demling L. Mechanical lithotripsy of common bile duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc 1985; 31: 207-210
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Hoshi H, Sakai Y. Clinical study on causative factors and recurrence of choledocholithiasis. Diagn Ther Endosc 1996; 3: 81-91
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar