Zentralbl Chir 2019; 144(02): 153-162
DOI: 10.1055/a-0638-8295
Original Article/Originalarbeit
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Video Tutorials Increase Precision in Minimally Invasive Surgery Training – a Prospective Randomised Trial and Follow-up Study

Artikel in mehreren Sprachen: English | deutsch
Michael Thomaschewski
Klinik für Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein Campus Lübeck, Deutschland
,
Hamed Esnaashari
Klinik für Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein Campus Lübeck, Deutschland
,
Anna Höfer
Klinik für Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein Campus Lübeck, Deutschland
,
Lotta Renner
Klinik für Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein Campus Lübeck, Deutschland
,
Claudia Benecke
Klinik für Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein Campus Lübeck, Deutschland
,
Markus Zimmermann
Klinik für Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein Campus Lübeck, Deutschland
,
Tobias Keck
Klinik für Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein Campus Lübeck, Deutschland
,
Tilman Laubert
Klinik für Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein Campus Lübeck, Deutschland
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
11. September 2018 (online)

Abstract

Background Simulation-based practice has become increasingly important in minimally invasive surgery (MIS) training. Nevertheless, personnel resources for demonstration and mentoring simulation-based practice are limited. Video tutorials could be a useful tool to overcome this dilemma. However, the effect of video tutorials on MIS training and improvement of MIS skills is unclear.

Methods A prospective randomised trial (n = 24 MIS novices) was conducted. A video-trainer with three different tasks (#1 – 3) was used for standardised goal-directed MIS training. The subjects were randomised to two groups with standard instructional videos (group A, n = 12) versus comprehensive video tutorials for each training task watched at specific times of repetition (group B, n = 12). Performance was analysed using the MISTELS score. At the beginning and following the curriculum, an MIS cholecystectomy (CHE) was performed on a porcine organ model and analysed using the GOALS score. After 18 weeks, participants performed 10 repetitions of tasks #1 – 3 for follow-up analysis.

Results More participants completed tasks #1 and #2 in group B (83.3 and 75%) than in group A (66.7 and 50%, ns). For task #2, there was a significant improvement in precision in group B (p < 0.001). For the entire cohort, the GOALS-Scores were 12.9 before and 18.9 after the curriculum (p < 0.001), with no significant difference between groups. Upon follow-up, 84.2% (task#1), 26.3% (task#2) and 100% (task#3) of MIS novices were able to reach the defined goals (A vs. B ns). There was a trend for a better MISTELS score in group B upon follow-up.

Conclusions Standardised comprehensive video tutorials watched frequently throughout practice can significantly improve precision in MIC training. This aspect should be incorporated in MIS training.

 
  • References/Literatur

  • 1 Zendejas B, Brydges R, Hamstra SJ. et al. State of the evidence on simulation-based training for laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review. Ann Surg 2013; 257: 586-593
  • 2 Buckley CE, Kavanagh DO, Traynor O. et al. Is the skillset obtained in surgical simulation transferable to the operating theatre?. Am J Surg 2014; 207: 146-157
  • 3 Laubert T, Esnaashari H, Auerswald P. et al. Conception of the Lübeck Toolbox curriculum for basic minimally invasive surgery skills. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2018; 403: 271-278
  • 4 Ahlberg G, Enochsson L, Gallagher AG. et al. Proficiency-based virtual reality training significantly reduces the error rate for residents during their first 10 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Am J Surg 2007; 193: 797-804
  • 5 Nugent E, Shirilla N, Hafeez A. et al. Development and evaluation of a simulator-based laparoscopic training program for surgical novices. Surg Endosc 2013; 27: 214-221
  • 6 Ritter EM, Scott DJ. Design of a proficiency-based skills training curriculum for the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery. Surg Innov 2007; 14: 107-112
  • 7 Nagendran M, Toon CD, Davidson BR. et al. Laparoscopic surgical box model training for surgical trainees with no prior laparoscopic experience. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; (01) CD010479
  • 8 Gurusamy KS, Nagendran M, Toon CD. et al. Laparoscopic surgical box model training for surgical trainees with limited prior laparoscopic experience. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; (03) CD010478
  • 9 Grantcharov TP, Kristiansen VB, Bendix J. et al. Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training. Br J Surg 2004; 91: 146-150
  • 10 Seymour NE, Gallagher AG, Roman SA. et al. Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Ann Surg 2002; 236: 458-463
  • 11 Mota P, Carvalho N, Carvalho-Dias E. et al. Video-based surgical learning: improving trainee education and preparation for surgery. J Surg Educ 2018; 75: 828-835
  • 12 Pape-Koehler C, Immenroth M, Sauerland S. et al. Multimedia-based training on Internet platforms improves surgical performance: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 2013; 27: 1737-1747
  • 13 Nousiainen M, Brydges R, Backstein D. et al. Comparison of expert instruction and computer-based video training in teaching fundamental surgical skills to medical students. Surgery 2008; 143: 539-544
  • 14 Fraser SA, Klassen DR, Feldman LS. et al. Evaluating laparoscopic skills: setting the pass/fail score for the MISTELS system. Surg Endosc 2003; 17: 964-967
  • 15 Vassiliou MC, Feldman LS, Andrew CG. et al. A global assessment tool for evaluation of intraoperative laparoscopic skills. Am J Surg 2005; 190: 107-113
  • 16 Stefanidis D, Acker CE, Swiderski D. et al. Challenges during the implementation of a laparoscopic skills curriculum in a busy general surgery residency program. J Surg Educ 2008; 65: 4-7
  • 17 van Dongen KW, van der Wal WA, Rinkes IH. et al. Virtual reality training for endoscopic surgery: voluntary or obligatory?. Surg Endosc 2008; 22: 664-667
  • 18 Gostlow H, Marlow N, Babidge W. et al. Systematic review of voluntary participation in simulation-based laparoscopic skills training: motivators and barriers for surgical trainee attendance. J Surg Educ 2017; 74: 306-318
  • 19 Shetty S, Zevin B, Grantcharov TP. et al. Perceptions, training experiences, and preferences of surgical residents toward laparoscopic simulation training: a resident survey. J Surg Educ 2014; 71: 727-733
  • 20 van Empel PJ, Verdam MG, Strypet M. et al. Voluntary autonomous simulator based training in minimally invasive surgery, residentsʼ compliance and reflection. J Surg Educ 2012; 69: 564-570
  • 21 Van Sickle KR, Gallagher AG, Smith CD. The effect of escalating feedback on the acquisition of psychomotor skills for laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 2007; 21: 220-224
  • 22 Boyle E, Al-Akash M, Gallagher AG. et al. Optimising surgical training: use of feedback to reduce errors during a simulated surgical procedure. Postgrad Med J 2011; 87: 524-528
  • 23 Scott DJ, Ritter EM, Tesfay ST. et al. Certification pass rate of 100 % for fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery skills after proficiency-based training. Surg Endosc 2008; 22: 1887-1893
  • 24 Kowalewski KF, Hendrie JD, Schmidt MW. et al. Validation of the mobile serious game application Touch Surgery for cognitive training and assessment of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2017; 31: 4058-4066
  • 25 Nickel F, Brzoska JA, Gondan M. et al. Virtual reality training versus blended learning of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial with laparoscopic novices. Medicine (Baltimore) 2015; 94: e764
  • 26 Stefanidis D, Korndorffer jr. JR, Heniford BT. et al. Limited feedback and video tutorials optimize learning and resource utilization during laparoscopic simulator training. Surgery 2007; 142: 202-206
  • 27 Abbott EF, Thompson W, Pandian TK. et al. Personalized video feedback and repeated task practice improve laparoscopic knot-tying skills: Two controlled trials. Acad Med 2017; 92: S26-S32
  • 28 Gallagher AG, Jordan-Black JA, OʼSullivan GC. Prospective, randomized assessment of the acquisition, maintenance, and loss of laparoscopic skills. Ann Surg 2012; 256: 387-393
  • 29 Wenger L, Richardson C, Tsuda S. Retention of fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery (FLS) proficiency with a biannual mandatory training session. Surg Endosc 2015; 29: 810-814
  • 30 Stefanidis D, Korndorffer jr. JR, Markley S. et al. Proficiency maintenance: impact of ongoing simulator training on laparoscopic skill retention. J Am Coll Surg 2006; 202: 599-603
  • 31 Moulton CA, Dubrowski A, Macrae H. et al. Teaching surgical skills: what kind of practice makes perfect?: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Surg 2006; 244: 400-409
  • 32 Bjerrum F, Maagaard M, Led Sorensen J. et al. Effect of instructor feedback on skills retention after laparoscopic simulator training: follow-up of a randomized trial. J Surg Educ 2015; 72: 53-60
  • 33 Kowalewski KF, Garrow CR, Proctor T. et al. LapTrain: multi-modality training curriculum for laparoscopic cholecystectomy-results of a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 2018; DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-6110-7.
  • 34 Gheza F, Raimondi P, Solaini L. et al. Impact of one-to-one tutoring on fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery (FLS) passing rate in a single center experience outside the United States: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 2018; DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-6185-1.
  • 35 Poudel S, Kurashima Y, Watanabe Y. et al. Impact of 3D in the training of basic laparoscopic skills and its transferability to 2D environment: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 2017; 31: 1111-1118