Revisionsendoprothetik im Kniegelenk: Symptomatik, Diagnostik und Therapie

Ein stetiger Anstieg der Lebenserwartung, eine Zunahme der Prävalenz von Risikofaktoren für Kniegelenkarthrose und auch ein stärkeres Verlangen nach Aktivität im hohen Alter sind für eine höhere Nachfrage nach primären Knie-Totalendoprothesen (K-TEP) verantwortlich. Komplikationen können niemals ausgeschlossen werden – weder kurzfristig nach der Operation noch nach mehreren Jahren. Der Anstieg an primären K-TEPs spiegelt sich somit ebenfalls in einem Anstieg an Revisionseingriffen wider.

Schlüsselwörter

Totalendoprothetik des Kniegelenks - Revisionsendoprothetik - aseptische Lockerung - periprothetische Infektion

• Literatur

• 1 Lohmander LS, Roos EM. Clinical update: treating osteoarthritis. Lancet 2007; 370: 2082-2084
• 2 Abdel MP, Morrey ME, Jensen MR. et al. Increased long-term survival of posterior cruciate-retaining versus posterior cruciate-stabilizing total knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011; 93: 2072-2078
• 3 Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E. et al. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89: 780-785
• 4 Robertsson O, Ranstam J, Sundberg M. et al. The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register: a review. Bone Joint Res 2014; 3: 217-222
• 5 Fehring TK, Odum S, Griffin WL. et al. Early failures in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001; 392: 315-318
• 6 Khan M, Osman K, Green G. et al. The epidemiology of failure in total knee arthroplasty: avoiding your next revision. Bone Joint J 2016; 98-B(1 Suppl A): 105-112
• 7 Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH. et al. Insall Award paper. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002; 404: 7-13
• 8 Thiele K, Perka C, Matziolis G. et al. Current failure mechanisms after knee arthroplasty have changed: polyethylene wear is less common in revision surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2015; 97: 715-720
• 9 Hamilton DF, Howie CR, Burnett R. et al. Dealing with the predicted increase in demand for revision total knee arthroplasty: challenges, risks and opportunities. Bone Joint J 2015; 97-B: 723-728
• 10 Claassen L, Ettinger M, Plaass C. et al. Diagnostic value of bone scintigraphy for aseptic loosening after total knee arthroplasty. Technol Health Care 2014; 22: 767-773
• 11 Solomon LB, Stamenkov RB, MacDonald AJ. et al. Imaging periprosthetic osteolysis around total knee arthroplasties using a human cadaver model. J Arthroplasty 2012; 27: 1069-1074
• 12 Heyse TJ, Chong le R, Davis J. et al. MRI analysis for rotation of total knee components. Knee 2012; 19: 571-575
• 13 Heyse TJ, Chong le R, Davis J. et al. MRI analysis of the component-bone interface after TKA. Knee 2012; 19: 290-294
• 14 Bottner F, Wegner A, Winkelmann W. et al. Interleukin-6, procalcitonin and TNF-alpha: markers of peri-prosthetic infection following total joint replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007; 89: 94-99
• 15 Del Pozo JL, Patel R. Clinical practice. Infection associated with prosthetic joints. N Engl J Med 2009; 361: 787-794
• 16 Berbari E, Mabry T, Tsaras G. et al. Inflammatory blood laboratory levels as markers of prosthetic joint infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010; 92: 2102-2109
• 17 Gollwitzer H, Diehl P, Gerdesmeyer L. et al. Diagnostische Strategien bei Verdacht auf periprothetische Infektion einer Kniegelenktotalendoprothese: Literaturübersicht und aktuelle Empfehlungen. Orthopäde 2006; 35: 904-916
• 18 Bedair H, Ting N, Jacovides C. et al. The Mark Coventry Award: diagnosis of early postoperative TKA infection using synovial fluid analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011; 469: 34-40
• 19 Parvizi J, McKenzie JC, Cashman JP. Diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection using synovial C-reactive protein. J Arthroplasty 2012; 27: 12-16
• 20 Tetreault MW, Wetters NG, Moric M. et al. Is synovial C-reactive protein a useful marker for periprosthetic joint infection?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014; 472: 3997-4003
• 21 Pupaibool J, Fulnecky EJ, Swords jr. RL. et al. Alpha-defensin-novel synovial fluid biomarker for the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection. Int Orthop 2016; 40: 2447-2452
• 22 Scott WN, Diduch DR, Iorio R, Long WJ. Insall & Scott Surgery of the Knee. Milton CN: Elsevier; 2018
• 23 Atkins BL, Athanasou N, Deeks JJ. et al. Prospective evaluation of criteria for microbiological diagnosis of prosthetic-joint infection at revision arthroplasty. The OSIRIS Collaborative Study Group. J Clin Microbiol 1998; 36: 2932-2939
• 24 Banit DM, Kaufer H, Hartford JM. Intraoperative frozen section analysis in revision total joint arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002; 401: 230-238
• 25 Nagra NS, Hamilton TW, Ganatra S. et al. One-stage versus two-stage exchange arthroplasty for infected total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2016; 24: 3106-3114
• 26 Frommelt L. Antibiotic Choices in Bone Surgery – local Therapy using antibiotic-loaded Bone Cement. In: Walenkamp GHIM. Hrsg. Local Antibiotics in Arthroplasty. State of the Art from an interdisciplinary View. Stuttgart, New York: Thieme; 2007: 59-64
• 27 Mahmud T, Lyons MC, Naudie DD. et al. Assessing the gold standard: a review of 253 two-stage revisions for infected TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012; 470: 2730-2736
• 28 Kim YH, Choi Y, Kim JS. Treatment based on the type of infected TKA improves infection control. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011; 469: 977-984
• 29 Morawietz L, Krenn V. Das Spektrum histopathologischer Veränderungen in endoprothetisch versorgten Gelenken. Pathologe 2014; 35 (Suppl. 02) 218-224
• 30 Sendi P, Zimmerli W. Challenges in periprosthetic knee-joint infection. Int J Artif Organs 2011; 34: 947-956
• 31 Musculoskeletal Infection Society. International consensus on periprosthetic joint infection. Musculoskeletal Infection Society; 2013. Im Internet: https://www.msis-na.org/international-consensus/ Stand: 07.12.2018