Situation of Adolescent Contraceptive Use in Germany

Abstract

Introduction Would adolescent girls in Germany choose a different method of contraception to the combined oral contraceptive if provided with the appropriate information? Is there a need for long-acting contraception among our adolescent girls? How satisfied are female patients with the information they receive at their respective gynaecology practices, and how much do the girls know about different methods of contraception?

Materials and Methods In the study “Thinking About Needs in COntraception” (TANCO), not only female patients, but also their respective gynaecologists were surveyed online about current methods of contraception, their satisfaction with these methods, and also their level of knowledge concerning the individual methods of contraception, the situation related to advice about different contraceptive options and their general satisfaction with gynaecological care. This article presents the data from the subset of adolescent girls aged 14 to 19 years (n = 2699) out of the total of 18 521 women surveyed.

Results The girls surveyed were familiar with at least the name of more than five different methods of contraception (average 5.3). The doctors assumed that the respondents would know only 4.2 different methods. When asked explicitly about how the individual methods of contraception work, clear deficits became evident. This applies not only to the entire population of respondents, but also the users of the respective contraceptive method. In addition, a strong interest in long-acting contraception emerged from the survey, particularly among young women.

Discussion The data from the TANCO study reveal a clear discrepancy between the existing contraception almost exclusively in the form of the contraceptive pill and the contraceptive options considered by adolescent girls if they are thoroughly informed. The need for education into alternatives to the pill is high, as is the willingness to use such alternatives after receiving information – much higher than the figures suggested by the gynaecologists.

Key words

adolescents - contraception - long-acting contraception - knowledge - adolescents

• References/Literatur

• 1 Alkema L, Kantorova V, Menozzi C. et al. National, regional, and global rates and trends in contraceptive prevalence and unmet need for family planning between 1990 and 2015: a systemic and comprahensive analysis. Lancet 2013; 381: 1642-1652
• 2 Bode H, Heßling A. Jugendsexualität 2015. Die Perspektive der 14- bis 25-Jährigen. Ergebnisse einer aktuellen Repräsentativen Wiederholungsbefragung. Köln: Bundeszentrale für gesundheitliche Aufklärung; 2015
• 3 Secura GM, Allsworth JE, Madden T. et al. The Contraceptive CHOICE Project: reducing barriers to long-acting reversible contraception. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 203: 115.e1-115.e7
• 4 Oppelt PG, Baier F, Fahlbusch C. et al. What do patients want to know about contraception and which method would they prefer?. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2017; 295: 1483-1491
• 5 Madden T, Mullersman JL, Omvig KJ. et al. Structured contraceptive counseling provided by the Contraceptive CHOICE Project. Contraception 2013; 88: 243-249
• 6 Mestad R, Secura G, Allsworth JE. et al. Acceptance of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods by adolescent participants in the Contraceptive CHOICE Project. Contraception 2011; 84: 493-498
• 7 McNicholas C, Madden T, Secura G. et al. The contraceptive CHOICE project round up: what we did and what we learned. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2014; 57: 635-643
• 8 Gemzell-Danielsson K, Dermout S, Lukkari-Lax E. et al. A phase III single-arm study of a new 13.5 mg levonorgestrel intrauterine contraceptive system in postmenarcheal adolescents: an evaluation of efficacy, bleeding, user satisfaction, and placement. Fertil Steril 2014; 102: e141-e142
• 9 Rosenberg MJ, Waugh MS, Meehan TE. Use and misuse of oral contraceptives: risk indicators for poor pill taking and discontinuation. Contraception 1995; 51: 283-288
• 10 Brynhildsen J. Combined hormonal contraceptives: prescribing patterns, compliance, and benefits versus risks. Ther Adv Drug Saf 2014; 5: 201-213
• 11 Aubeny E, Buhler M, Colau JC. et al. Oral contraception: patterns of non-compliance. The Coraliance study. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2002; 7: 155-161
• 12 Schweickhardt A, Fritzsche K. Kursbuch ärztliche Kommunikation: Grundlagen und Fallbeispiele aus Klinik und Praxis; mit 15 Tabellen. Deutscher Ärzteverlag; 2007