Diagnostic yield of magnetically assisted capsule endoscopy versus gastroscopy in recurrent and refractory iron deficiency anemia

Abstract

Background Small-bowel capsule endoscopy is advocated and repeat upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy should be considered for evaluation of recurrent or refractory iron deficiency anemia (IDA). A new device that allows magnetic steering of the capsule around the stomach (magnetically assisted capsule endoscopy [MACE]), followed by passive small-bowel examination might satisfy both requirements in a single procedure.

Methods In this prospective cohort study, MACE and esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) were performed in patients with recurrent or refractory IDA. Comparisons of total (upper GI and small bowel) and upper GI diagnostic yields, gastric mucosal visibility, and patient comfort scores were the primary end points.

Results 49 patients were recruited (median age 64 years; 39 % male). Combined upper and small-bowel examination using the new capsule yielded more pathology than EGD alone (113 vs. 52; P < 0.001). In upper GI examination (proximal to the second part of the duodenum, D2), MACE identified more total lesions than EGD (88 vs. 52; P < 0.001). There was also a difference if only IDA-associated lesions (esophagitis, altered/fresh blood, angioectasia, ulcers, and villous atrophy) were included (20 vs. 10; P = 0.04). Pathology distal to D2 was identified in 17 patients (34.7 %). Median scores (0 – 10 for none – extreme) for pain (0 vs. 2), discomfort (0 vs. 3), and distress (0 vs. 4) were lower for MACE than for EGD (P < 0.001).

Conclusion Combined examination of the upper GI tract and small bowel using the MACE capsule detected more pathology than EGD alone in patients with recurrent or refractory IDA. MACE also had a higher diagnostic yield than EGD in the upper GI tract and was better tolerated by patients.

• References

• 1 Kepczyk T, Kadakia SC. Prospective evaluation of gastrointestinal tract in patients with iron-deficiency anemia. Dig Dis Sci 1995; 40: 1283-1289
• 2 McIntyre AS, Long RG. Prospective survey of investigations in outpatients referred with iron deficiency anaemia. Gut 1993; 34: 1102-1107
• 3 Riccioni ME, Urgesi R, Spada C. et al. Unexplained iron deficiency anaemia: Is it worthwhile to perform capsule endoscopy?. Dig Liver Dis 2010; 42: 560-566
• 4 Goddard AF, James MW, McIntyre AS. et al. Guidelines for the management of iron deficiency anaemia. Gut 2011; 60: 1309-1316
• 5 Pennazio M, Spada C, Eliakim R. et al. Small-bowel capsule endoscopy and device-assisted enteroscopy for diagnosis and treatment of small-bowel disorders: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline. Endoscopy 2015; 47: 352-376
• 6 Koulaouzidis A, Rondonotti E, Giannakou A. et al. Diagnostic yield of small-bowel capsule endoscopy in patients with iron-deficiency anemia: a systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 76: 983-992
• 7 Enns RA, Hookey L, Armstrong D. et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the use of video capsule endoscopy. Gastroenterology 2017; 152: 497-514
• 8 Zaman A, Katon RM. Push enteroscopy for obscure gastrointestinal bleeding yields a high incidence of proximal lesions within reach of a standard endoscope. Gastrointest Endosc 1998; 47: 372-376
• 9 Descamps C, Schmit A, Van Gossum A. “Missed” upper gastrointestinal tract lesions may explain “occult” bleeding. Endoscopy 1999; 31: 452-455
• 10 Tee HP, Kaffes AJ. Non-small-bowel lesions encountered during double-balloon enteroscopy performed for obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16: 1885-1889
• 11 Fry LC, Bellutti M, Neumann H. et al. Incidence of bleeding lesions within reach of conventional upper and lower endoscopes in patients undergoing double-balloon enteroscopy for obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2009; 29: 342-349
• 12 Lara LF, Bloomfeld RS, Pineau BC. The rate of lesions found within reach of esophagogastroduodenoscopy during push enteroscopy depends on the type of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Endoscopy 2005; 37: 745-750
• 13 Ladas SD, Triantafyllou K, Spada C. et al. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE): recommendations (2009) on clinical use of video capsule endoscopy to investigate small-bowel, esophageal and colonic diseases. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 220-227
• 14 Kavic SM, Basson MD. Complications of endoscopy. Am J Surg 2001; 181: 319-332
• 15 Ben-Menachem T, Decker GA, Early DS. et al. Adverse events of upper GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 76: 707-718
• 16 Campo R, Brullet E, Montserrat A. et al. Identification of factors that influence tolerance of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1999; 11: 201-204
• 17 Irvine AJ, Sanders DS, Hopper A. et al. How does tolerability of double balloon enteroscopy compare to other forms of endoscopy?. Frontline Gastroenterol 2016; 7: 41-46
• 18 Hale MF, Rahman I, Drew K. et al. Magnetically steerable gastric capsule endoscopy is equivalent to flexible endoscopy in the detection of markers in an excised porcine stomach model: results of a randomized trial. Endoscopy 2015; 47: 650-653
• 19 Hale MF, Drew K, Sidhu R. et al. Does magnetically assisted capsule endoscopy improve small bowel capsule endoscopy completion rate? A randomised controlled trial. Endosc Int Open 2016; 4: E215-221
• 20 Rahman I, Pioche M, Shim CS. et al. Magnetic-assisted capsule endoscopy in the upper GI tract by using a novel navigation system (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 83: 889-895
• 21 Gralnek IM, Rabinovitz R, Afik D. et al. A simplified ingestion procedure for esophageal capsule endoscopy: initial evaluation in healthy volunteers. Endoscopy 2006; 38: 913-918
• 22 Beg S, Ragunath K, Wyman A. et al. Quality standards in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a position statement of the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) and Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland (AUGIS). Gut 2017; 66: 1886-1899
• 23 Elphick DA, Donnelly MT, Smith KS. et al. Factors associated with abdominal discomfort during colonoscopy: a prospective analysis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009; 21: 1076-1082
• 24 van Rijn JC, Reitsma JB, Stoker J. et al. Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 343-350
• 25 Menon S, Trudgill N. How commonly is upper gastrointestinal cancer missed at endoscopy? A meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open 2014; 2: E46-50
• 26 Spencer HL, Lobo AJ, Riley SA. Variations in the reporting of endoscopies by different endoscopists. Clin Med (Lond) 2007; 7: 23-27
• 27 Asfeldt AM, Straume B, Paulssen EJ. Impact of observer variability on the usefulness of endoscopic images for the documentation of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Scand J Gastroenterol 2007; 42: 1106-1112
• 28 Denzer UW, Rösch T, Hoytat B. et al. Magnetically guided capsule versus conventional gastroscopy for upper abdominal complaints: a prospective blinded study. J Clin Gastroenterol 2015; 49: 101-107
• 29 Liao Z, Hou X, Lin-Hu EQ. et al. Accuracy of magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy, compared with conventional gastroscopy, in detection of gastric diseases. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016; 14: 1266-1273.e1
• 30 Marelli L, Jaboli FM, Jackson L. et al. A pilot study comparing ESO-2 capsule endoscopy with conventional upper endoscopy for the assessment of uncomplicated heartburn and dyspepsia. Frontline Gastroenterol 2013; 4: 96-101
• 31 Choi EH, Mergener K, Semrad C. et al. A multicenter, prospective, randomized comparison of a novel signal transmission capsule endoscope to an existing capsule endoscope. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 78: 325-332
• 32 Gralnek IM, Adler SN, Yassin K. et al. Detecting esophageal disease with second-generation capsule endoscopy: initial evaluation of the PillCam ESO 2. Endoscopy 2008; 40: 275-279
• 33 Meltzer AC, Ward MJ, Gralnek IM. et al. The cost-effectiveness analysis of video capsule endoscopy compared to other strategies to manage acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage in the ED. Am J Emerg Med 2014; 32: 823-832
• 34 Koulaouzidis A, Iakovidis DK, Karargyris A. et al. Wireless endoscopy in 2020: Will it still be a capsule?. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21: 5119-5130