Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Laryngorhinootologie 2019; 98(S 01): S220-S252
DOI: 10.1055/a-0755-2688
Referat
Eigentümer und Copyright ©Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2019

Medical Data Management – Approach, Concepts, Strategic and Operative Implications

Article in several languages: deutsch | English
Matthias P. Schönermark
1   Managing Director, SKC Beratungsgesellschaft mbH, Hannover
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
03 April 2019 (online)

Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

The collection, analysis and management of clinical data with electronic applications has already widely been used. The digitalization of medical records is expected to bear significant potentials for the increase of clinical efficiency and effectiveness. This has led to numerous legal initiatives by policymakers and healthcare systems in many countries to secure the spatially inclusive and comprehensive establishment of electronic health records in preferably all medical entities. The following article describes the principles of electronic medical data management and exemplifies the different approaches which are followed internationally. Furthermore, it discusses how medical data management systems create value in terms of higher clinical quality or lower treatment and administrative costs. And finally, the strategic and operative implications are deducted and concrete opportunities for action are described how the introduction of electronic health records may be optimally structured.

Key words

Electronic Health Record - Digital Strategy - Digital Transformation - Electronic Medical Record - EHR - Hospital
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Moore GE. Cramming more components onto integrated circuits. Electronics 1965; 38: 1-4
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Lundstrom M. Moore's law forever?. Science 2003; 299: 210-211
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Hansen M, Miron-Shatz T, Lau A, Paton C. Big data in science and healthcare: a review of recent literature and perspectives. Yearbook of medical informatics 2014; 23: 21-26
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Poole D, Mackworth A, Goebel R. Computational Intelligence and Knowledge. In: Poole D, Mackworth A, Goebel R. (Hrsg.) Computational Intelligence. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1998: 1-21
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 5 Bishop C. Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. Berlin: Springer; 2007: 1-738
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 6 Tveter D. The Pattern Recognition Basis of Artificial Intelligence. Los Alamitos: Wiley-IEEE Computer Society Press; 1998: 1-388
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 7 Finlay S. Predictive Analytics, Data Mining and Big Data: Myths, Misconceptions and Methods. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2014: 1-243
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 8 Roberts J, Lilien G. Explanatory and Predictive Models of Consumer Behavior. In: Eliashberg J, Lilien G. (Hrsg.) Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science; 1993: 27-82
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 9 Russell S. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. Boston: Addison Wesley; 2016: 1-1132
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 10 Rogers D. Changes in Strategic Assumptions from the Analog to the Digital Age. In: Rogers D, (Hrsg.). The Digital Transformation Playbook. New York: Columbia University Press; 2016 11
    PubMed
  • 11 Schönermark M. Digital Health. HNO 2016; 64: 175-178
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Perkins K, Meeker M. 2018;Internet Trends 2018 (30.05.2018), online im Internet: URL https://www.kleinerperkins.com/perspectives/internet-trends-report-2018 Abrufdatum: 12.09.2018
    PubMed
  • 13 Stephens ZD, Lee SY. Faghri F et al. Big data: astronomical or genomical?. PLoS biology 2015; 13: e1002195
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Grobholz R. Digitale Pathologie: Die Zeit ist reif!. Der Pathologe 2018; 39: 228-235
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Kasper D, Fauci A, Longo D, Braunwald E, Hauser S, Jameson J. Introduction to Clinical Medicine. In: Kasper D, Fauci A, Longo D, Braunwald E, Hauser S, Jameson J. (Hrsg.) Principles of Internal Medicine. New York City: McGraw-Hill Professional; 2004: 1-70
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 16 Blumenthal D, Glaser JP. Information technology comes to medicine. The New England Journal of Medicine 2007; 356: 2527-2534
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Hood L. Systems biology and p4 medicine: past, present, and future. Rambam Maimonides medical journal 2013; 4: e0012
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 The Wall Street Journal, Hernandez D, Greenwald T (2018), Can Watson cure cancer? (11.08.2018), online im Internet: URL Abrufdatum: 10.09.2018
    PubMed
  • 19 mhealthIntelligence. Wicklund E. 2018; Microsoft Ends mHealth App Experiment, Shuts Down HealthVault (19.01.2018), online im Internet: URL: https://mhealthintelligence.com/news/microsoftends-mhealth-app-experiment-shuts-down-healthvault Abrufdatum: 10.09.2018
    PubMed
  • 20 The New York Times, Lohr S (2018), Google to End Health Records Service After It Fails to Attract Users (24.06.2011), online im Internet: URL: https://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/25/technology/25health.html?%20r=1 Abrufdatum: 10.09.2018
    PubMed
  • 21 CNBC. Farr C. 2018; As Amazon moves into health care, here's what we know — and what we suspect — about its plans (27.03.2018), online im Internet: URL https://www.cnbc.com/2018/03/27/amazons-moves-into-health-what-we-know.html Abrufdatum: 10.09.2018
    PubMed
  • 22 CNBC. Farr C. 2018; Apple is launching medical clinics to deliver the 'world's best health care experience' to its employees (27.02.2018), online im Internet: URL https://www.cnbc.com/2018/02/27/apple-launching-medical-clinics-for-employees.html Abrufdatum: 10.09.2018
    PubMed
  • 23 Healthcare Informatics. Landi H. 2018; Facebook, NYU Collaborating on the Use of AI to Improve MRIs (22.08.2018), online im Internet: URL https://www.healthcare-informatics.com/news-item/innovation/facebook-nyu-collaborating-use-ai-improve-mris Abrufdatum: 10.09.2018
    PubMed
  • 24 Weber T, Bertschek I, Ohnemus J, Ebert M. Monitoring-Report Wirtschaft DIGITAL 2018-Kurzfassung. Berlin: Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie; 2018
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 25 Berner ES, Detmer DE, Simborg D. Will the wave finally break? A brief view of the adoption of electronic medical records in the United States. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2005; 12: 3-7
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 McDonald CJ, Overhage JM, Tierney WM. et al. The Regenstrief medical record system: a quarter century experience. International journal of medical informatics 1999; 54: 225-253
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Henry J, Pylypchuk Y, Searcy T, Patel V. Adoption of electronic health record systems among US non-federal acute care hospitals: 2008-2015. ONC. Data Brief 2016; 35: 1-9
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Grand View Research. 2018; Electronic Health Records (EHR) Market Analysis By Product (Client Server-based, Web-based), By Type (Acute, Ambulatory, Post-Acute) By End-use (Hospitals, Ambulatory Care), And Segment Forecasts, 2018 – 2025 (04.2017), online im Internet: URL https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/electronic-health-records-ehr-market Abrufdatum: 10.09.2018
    PubMed
  • 29 Porter ME. Value-based health care delivery. Annals of surgery 2008; 248: 144-150
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Rowe JW. Pay-for-performance and accountability: related themes in improving health care. Annals of internal medicine 2006; 145: 695-699
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Herzlinger RE. Let's put consumers in charge of health care. Harvard Business Review 7/2002
    PubMed
  • 32 Porter ME. What is value in health care?. New England Journal of Medicine 2010; 363: 2477-2481
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Porter ME, Lee TH. From volume to value in health care: the work begins. Jama 2016; 316: 1047-1048
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Payne TH, Corley S, Cullen TA. et al. Report of the AMIA EHR-2020 Task Force on the status and future direction of EHRs. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2015; 22: 1102-1110
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Fridsma DB. Health informatics: A required skill for 21st century clinicians. 2018; 362: k3043
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 36 Xu S, Papier A. Returning to (Electronic) Health Records That Guide and Teach. The American Journal of Medicine 2018; 131: 723-725
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 37 Shanafelt T, Hasan O. Dyrbye L et al. Changes in burnout and satisfaction with work-life balance in physicians and the general US working population between 2011 and 2014. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2015; 90: 1600-1613
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 38 Wachter RM, Howell MD. Resolving the productivity paradox of health information technology: A time for optimism. JAMA 2018; 320: 25-26
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 39 Rathert C, Mittler JN, Banerjee S, McDaniel J. Patient-centered communication in the era of electronic health records: What does the evidence say?. Patient Education and Counseling 2017; 100: 50-64
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 40 McDonald CJ, Overhage JM, Mamlin BW, Dexter PD, Tierney WM. Physicians, information technology, and health care systems: a journey, not a destination. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2004; 11: 121-124
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 41 Gittell JH, Weiss L. Coordination networks within and across organizations: A multi-level framework. Journal of Management Studies 2004; 41: 127-153
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 42 Herzlinger RE. Why innovation in health care is so hard. Harvard business review 5/2006
    PubMed
  • 43 Shannon CE, Weaver W. The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press; 1949: 1-125
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 44 Wittgenstein L. Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell; 1953: 1-250
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 45 Lindberg DA. Section II. Health sciences libraries. National Library of Medicine: The view at 150 years. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1987; 38: 34-39
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 46 McDonald CJ. Protocol-based computer reminders, the quality of care and the non-perfectibility of man. New England Journal of Medicine 1976; 295: 1351-1355
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 47 Gordon D, Geiger G, Lowe N, Jickling J. What is an electronic patient record?. Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium: American Medical Informatics Association 1998; 240-244
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 48 Detmer DE, Steen EB, Dick RS. The Computer-Based Patient Record: An Essential Technology for Health Care. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press; 1997: 1-256
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 49 Garg AX, Adhikari NK, McDonald H. et al. Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. Jama 2005; 293: 1223-1238
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 50 Kimble C. Electronic health records: cure-all or chronic condition?. Global Business and Organizational Excellence 2014; 33: 63-74
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 51 Krüger-Brand H. Patientenakten im mobilen Zugriff. Deutsches Ärzteblatt 2018; 115: B1196
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 52 Beerheide R. Bundesregierung: Diskussion um Spahn-Gesetz. Deutsches Ärzteblatt 2018; 115: B721
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 53 Moja L, Kwag KH, Lytras T. et al. Effectiveness of computerized decision support systems linked to electronic health records: a systematic review and meta-analysis. American Journal of Public Health 2014; 104: e12-e22
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 54 Wang CJ, Huang A. Integrating technology into health care: what will it take?. Journal of the American Medical Association 2012; 307: 569-570
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 55 Prescient and Strategic Intelligence, (2018), Electronic Health Record Market Overview (06.2018), online im Internet: URL https://www.psmarketresearch.com/market-analysis/electronic-medical-recordsmarket Abrufdatum: 13.09.2018
    PubMed
  • 56 Hassey A, Gerrett D, Wilson A. A survey of validity and utility of electronic patient records in a general practice. Bmj 2001; 322: 1401-1405
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 57 Hippisley-Cox J, Pringle M, Cater R. et al. The electronic patient record in primary care—regression or progression?. A cross sectional study 2003; 326: 1439-1443
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 58 Nguyen L, Bellucci E, Nguyen LT. Electronic health records implementation: an evaluation of information system impact and contingency factors. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2014; 83: 779-796
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 59 Winthereik BR, Van Der Ploeg I, Berg M. The electronic patient record as a meaningful audit tool: accountability and autonomy in general practitioner work. Science, Technology and Human Values 2007; 32: 6-25
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 60 Rashbass J. The patient-owned, population-based electronic medical record: a revolutionary resource for clinical medicine. Jama 2001; 285: 1769
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 61 Tsai CC, Starren J. Patient participation in electronic medical records. Jama 2001; 285: 1765
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 62 Kimble C, Grenier C, Goglio-Primard K. Innovation and knowledge sharing across professional boundaries: Political interplay between boundary objects and brokers. International Journal of Information Management 2010; 30: 437-444
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 63 Østerlund C. Mapping medical work: documenting practices across multiple medical settings. Journal of the Center for Information Studies 2004; 5: 35-43
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 64 Menachemi N, Collum TH. Benefits and drawbacks of electronic health record systems. Risk Management and Healthcare Policy 2011; 4: 47-55
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 65 Koppel R, Metlay J, Cohen A. et al. Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors. Jama 2005; 293: 1197-1203
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 66 Koppel R. What do we know about medication errors made via a CPOE system versus those made via handwritten orders?. Journal of Critical Care 2005; 9: 427-428
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 67 Sidorov J. It ain’t necessarily so: the electronic health record and the unlikely prospect of reducing health care costs. Health Affairs 2006; 25: 1079-1085
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 68 Kripalani S, LeFevre F, Phillips CO, Williams MV, Basaviah P, Baker DW. Deficits in communication and information transfer between hospital-based and primary care physicians: implications for patient safety and continuity of care. Jama 2007; 297: 831-841
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 69 El Morabet N, Uitvlugt EB, van den Bemt BJ, van den Bemt PM, Janssen MJ, Karapinar-Çarkit F. Prevalence and Preventability of Drug-Related Hospital Readmissions: A Systematic Review. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 2018; 66: 602-608
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 70 Haass A, Walter S, Ragoschke-Schumm A. et al. Zeit ist Hirn. Der. Nervenarzt 2014; 85: 189-194
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 71 Heuschmann P, Busse O, Wagner M. et al. Schlaganfallhäufigkeit und Versorgung von Schlaganfallpatienten in Deutschland. Aktuelle Neurologie 2010; 37: 333-340
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 72 Murie-Fernández M, Ortega-Cubero S, Carmona-Abellán M, Meyer M, Teasell R. “Time is brain”: only in the acute phase of stroke?. Neurología (English Edition) 2012; 27: 197-201
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 73 Charles K, Cannon M, Hall R, Coustasse A. Can utilizing a computerized provider order entry (CPOE) system prevent hospital medical errors and adverse drug events?. Perspectives in Health Information Management 2014; 11: 1b
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 74 Dalton K, O’Brien G, O’Mahony D, Byrne S. Computerised interventions designed to reduce potentially inappropriate prescribing in hospitalised older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Age and ageing 2018; 47: 670-678
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 75 Forrester S, Hepp Z, Roth J, Wirtz H, Devine E. Cost-effectiveness of a computerized provider order entry system in improving medication safety ambulatory care. Value in Health 2014; 17: 340-349
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 76 Hillestad R, Bigelow J, Bower A. et al. Can electronic medical record systems transform health care? Potential health benefits, savings, and costs. Health affairs 2005; 24: 1103-1117
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 77 Nuckols T, Smith-Spangler C, Morton S. et al. The effectiveness of computerized order entry at reducing preventable adverse drug events and medication errors in hospital settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Systematic reviews 2014; 3: 56
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 78 Schmitt K, Wofford D. Financial analysis projects clear returns from electronic medical records. Healthcare Financial Management 2002; 56: 52-57
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 79 Vermeulen K, van Doormaal J, Zaal R. et al. Cost-effectiveness of an electronic medication ordering system (CPOE/CDSS) in hospitalized patients. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2014; 83: 572-580
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 80 Westbrook J, Gospodarevskaya E, Li L. et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of a hospital electronic medication management system. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2015; 22: 784-793
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 81 Wu R, Laporte A, Ungar W. Cost-effectiveness of an electronic medication ordering and administration system in reducing adverse drug events. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 2007; 13: 440-448
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 82 Rifkin DE. Electronic medical records: saving trees, saving lives. JAMA 2001; 285: 1764-1769
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 83 Adler-Milstein J, Salzberg C, Franz C, Orav EJ, Newhouse JP, Bates DW. Effect of electronic health records on health care costs: longitudinal comparative evidence from community practices. Annals of Internal Medicine 2013; 159: 97-104
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 84 Zlabek JA, Wickus JW, Mathiason MA. Early cost and safety benefits of an inpatient electronic health record. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2011; 18: 169-172
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 85 Wang SJ, Middleton B, Prosser LA. et al. A cost-benefit analysis of electronic medical records in primary care. The American journal of medicine 2003; 114: 397-403
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 86 Lim MC, Patel RP, Lee VS, Weeks PD, Barber MK, Watnik MR. The long-term financial and clinical impact of an electronic health record on an academic ophthalmology practice. Journal of Ophthalmology 2015; 2015: 329819
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 87 Triantafillou P. Making electronic health records support quality management: A narrative review. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2017; 104: 105-119
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 88 Zdon L, Middleton B. Ambulatory electronic records implementation cost benefit: an enterprise case study. Healthcare Information and Management Systems. Society 1999; 4: 97-117
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 89 Ury A. The business case for an electronic medical record system. Group Practice. Journal 2000; 49: 1-6
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 90 Kian L, Stewart M, Bagby C, Robertson J. Justifying the cost of a computer-based patient record. Journal of the Healthcare Financial Management Association 1995; 49: 58-60
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 91 Heeks R. Health information systems: Failure, success and improvisation. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2006; 75: 125-137
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 92 Christensen C, Hall T, Dillon K, Duncan D. Know your customers" jobs to be done". Harvard Business Review 2016; 94: 52-64
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 93 Shah N, Steyerberg E, Kent D. Big data and predictive analytics: Recalibrating expectations. JAMA 2018; 320: 27-28
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 94 European Coordination Committee of the Radiological, Electromedical and Healthcare IT Industry. 2018; A contribution to the blueprint on digital transformation of health and care: Digital health roadmap to support integrated care (05.2017), online im Internet: URL https://www.cocir.org/uploads/media/17023_COC_Blueprint_24-04-17.pdf Abrufdatum: 17.09.2018
    PubMed
  • 95 van Staa T-P, Goldacre B, Buchan I, Smeeth L. Big health data: the need to earn public trust. BMJ 2016; 354: i3636
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 96 Fry CL, Spriggs M, Arnold M, Pearce C. Unresolved ethical challenges for the australian personally controlled electronic health record (PCEHR) system: key informant interview findings. AJOB Empirical. Bioethics 2014; 5: 30-36
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 97 Thiru K, Hassey A, Sullivan F. Systematic review of scope and quality of electronic patient record data in primary care. BMJ 2003; 326: 1070
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 98 Deutsches Ärzteblatt, Krüger-Brand H. Osterloh F. 2017; Elektronische Patientenakte: Viele Modelle – noch keine Strategie (2017), online im Internet: URL: https://www.aerzteblatt.de/archiv/194137/Elektronische-Patientenakte-Viele-Modelle-noch-keine-Strategie Abrufdatum: 13.09.2018
    PubMed
  • 99 Pirtle C, Ehrenfeld J. Blockchain for Healthcare: The Next Generation of Medical Records?. Journal of Medical Systems 2018; 42: 172
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 100 Zhang P, White J, Schmidt D, Lenz G, Rosenbloom S. Fhirchain: Applying blockchain to securely and scalably share clinical data. Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal 2018; 16: 267-278
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 101 Holmgren A, Patel V, Adler-Milstein J. Progress in interoperability: measuring US hospitals’ engagement in sharing patient data. Health Affairs 2017; 36: 1820-1827
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 102 Mandel JC, Kreda DA, Mandl KD, Kohane IS, Ramoni RB. SMART on FHIR: a standards-based, interoperable apps platform for electronic health records. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2016; 23: 899-908
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 103 Häyrinen K, Saranto K, Nykänen P. Definition, structure, content, use and impacts of electronic health records: a review of the research literature. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2008; 77: 291-304
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 104 Pettit L. Understanding EMRAM and how it can be used by policy-makers, hospital CIOs and their IT teams. World Hospitals Health Services 2013; 49: 7-9
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 105 Kharrazi H, Gonzalez C, Lowe K, Huerta T, Ford E. Forecasting the maturation of electronic health record functions among US hospitals: retrospective analysis and predictive model. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2018; 20: e10458
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 106 Simborg DW, Detmer DE, Berner ES. The wave has finally broken: now what?. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2013; 20: e21-e25
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 107 King J, Patel V, Jamoom E, Furukawa M. Clinical benefits of electronic health record use: national findings. Health Research and Educational Trust 2014; 49: 392-404
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 108 Magsamen-Conrad K, Checton M. Technology and Health Care: Efficiency, Frustration, and Disconnect in the Transition to Electronic Medical Records. GSTF Journal on Media & Communications 2014; 1: 23-27
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 109 Sinsky C, Colligan L, Li L. et al. Allocation of physician time in ambulatory practice: a time and motion study in 4 specialties. Annals of Internal Medicine 2016; 165: 753-760
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 110 Blijleven V, Koelemeijer K, Jaspers M. Identifying and eliminating inefficiencies in information system usage: A lean perspective. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2017; 107: 40-47
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 111 Clarke A, Adamson J, Watt I, Sheard L, Cairns P, Wright J. The impact of electronic records on patient safety: a qualitative study. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2016; 16: 62
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 112 Rose D, Richter LT, Kapustin J. Patient experiences with electronic medical records: lessons learned. Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners 2014; 26: 674-680
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 113 Is digital medicine different?. The Lancet 2018; 392: 95
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 114 Yen P, McAlearney A, Sieck C, Hefner J, Huerta T. Health information technology (HIT) adaptation: refocusing on the journey to successful HIT implementation. JMIR Medical Informatic 2017; 5: e28
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 115 Carspecken CW, Sharek PJ, Longhurst C, Pageler N. A clinical case of electronic health record drug alert fatigue: consequences for patient outcome. Journal of Pediatrics 2013; 131: e1970-e1973
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 116 Hutson M. Hackers easily fool artificial intelligences. Science 2018; 361: 215
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 117 Erlich Y, Narayanan A. Routes for breaching and protecting genetic privacy. Nature Reviews Genetics 2014; 15: 409-421
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 118 Cohen I, Mello M. HIPAA and protecting health information in the 21st century. Jama 2018; 320: 231-232
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 119 Frewen H, Brown E, Jenkins M, O'Donovan A. Failure mode and effects analysis in a paperless radiotherapy department. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology 2018 published online
    PubMed
  • 120 Takian A, Sheikh A, Barber N. We are bitter, but we are better off: case study of the implementation of an electronic health record system into a mental health hospital in England. BCM. Health Services Research 2012; 12: 484
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 121 Black AD, Car J, Pagliari C. et al. The impact of eHealth on the quality and safety of health care: a systematic overview. PLOS Medicine 2011; 8: e1000387
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 122 Larsen E, Mydske PK. Developing electronic cooperation tools: A case from Norwegian health care. Interactive Journal of Medical Research 2013; 2: 1-13
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 123 Porter ME, Teisberg EO. How physicians can change the future of health care. Jama 2007; 297: 1103-1111
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 124 Mandl KD, Szolovits P, Kohane IS. Public standards and patientsʼ control: how to keep electronic medical records accessible but private. Bmj 2001; 322: 283-287
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 125 Pyper C, Amery J, Watson M, Crook CJBJGP. Patientsʼ experiences when accessing their on-line electronic patient records in primary care. British Journal of General Practice 2004; 54: 38-43
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 126 White A, Danis M. Enhancing patient-centered communication and collaboration by using the electronic health record in the examination room. Journal of the American Medical Association 2013; 309: 2327-2328
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 127 Schlesinger M, Grob R, Shaller D. et al. Taking patients’ narratives about clinicians from anecdote to science. The New England Journal of Medicine 2015; 675-679
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 128 Lulejian A, Cantor MN. Measuring patient and staff satisfaction before and after implementation of a paperless registration system. Journal of Healthcare Management 2018; 63: e20-e30
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 129 Smallheer BAJNC. Technology and monitoring patients at the bedside. Nursing Clinics of North America 2015; 50: 257-268
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 130 Chen R-F, Hsiao J-L. An investigation on physicians’ acceptance of hospital information systems: a case study. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2012; 81: 810-820
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 131 Weed LL. Medical records that guide and teach. The New England Journal of Medicine 1968; 278: 593-600
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 132 Das S, Eisenberg LD, House JW. et al. Meaningful use of electronic health records in otolaryngology: recommendations from the American Academy of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery Medical Informatics Committee. Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery 2011; 144: 135-141
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 133 Miller RH, West C, Brown TM, Sim I, Ganchoff C. The value of electronic health records in solo or small group practices. Health Affairs 2005; 24: 1127-1137
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 134 Abdolrasulnia M, Menachemi N, Shewchuk RM, Ginter PM, Duncan WJ, Brooks RG. Market effects on electronic health record adoption by physicians. Health Care Management Review 2008; 33: 243-252
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 135 Blijleven V, Koelemeijer K, Wetzels M, Jaspers M. Workarounds emerging from electronic health record system usage: Consequences for patient safety, effectiveness of care, and efficiency of care. JMIR. Human Factors 2017; 4: 1-18
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 136 Hollingworth W, Devine EB, Hansen RN. et al. The impact of e-prescribing on prescriber and staff time in ambulatory care clinics: a time–motion study. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2007; 14: 722-730
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 137 Flanagan ME, Saleem JJ, Millitello LG, Russ AL, Doebbeling BN. Paper- and computer-based workarounds to electronic health record use at three benchmark institutions. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2013; 20: e59-e66
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 138 Scantlebury A, Sheard L, Watt I, Cairns P, Wright J, Adamson J. Exploring the implementation of an electronic record into a maternity unit: a qualitative study using Normalisation Process Theory. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2017; 17: 4
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 139 Burgin A, O'rourke R, Tully MP. Learning to work with electronic patient records and prescription charts: experiences and perceptions of hospital pharmacists. Research in Social Administrative Pharmacy 2014; 10: 741-755
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 140 Bossen C, Jensen LG, Udsen FW. Evaluation of a comprehensive EHR based on the DeLone and McLean model for IS success: approach, results, and success factors. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2013; 82: 940-953
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 141 Upadhyay DK, Sittig DF, Singh H. Ebola US Patient Zero: lessons on misdiagnosis and effective use of electronic health records. Diagnosis 2014; 1: 283-287
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 142 Eleftheriou I, Embury SM, Moden R, Dobinson P, Brass A. Data journeys: Identifying social and technical barriers to data movement in large, complex organisations. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 2018; 78: 102-122
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 143 McKinsey & Company. Goran J, LaBerge L. 2018; Culture for a digital age (07.2017), online im Internet: URL https://de.slideshare.net/HugoASaenzJ/mckinsey-culture-for-a-digital-age Abrufdatum: 20.09.2018
    PubMed
  • 144 Ben-Zion R, Pliskin N, Fink L. Critical success factors for adoption of electronic health record systems: literature review and prescriptive analysis. Journal of Information Systems Management 2014; 31: 296-312
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 145 McAlearney AS, Hefner JL, Sieck C, Rizer M, Huerta TR. Evidence-based management of ambulatory electronic health record system implementation: An assessment of conceptual support and qualitative evidence. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2014; 83: 484-494
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 146 Leidner DE, Preston D, Chen D. An examination of the antecedents and consequences of organizational IT innovation in hospitals. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 2010; 19: 154-170
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 147 Feldman SS, Buchalter S, Hayes LW. Health information technology in healthcare quality and patient safety: literature review. JMIR Medical Informatics 2018; 6: e10264
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 148 Bardach SH, Real K, Bardach DR. Perspectives of healthcare practitioners: An exploration of interprofessional communication using electronic medical records. Journal of Interprofessional Care 2017; 31: 300-306
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 149 Greenhalgh T, Morris L, Wyatt JC, Thomas G, Gunning K. Introducing a nationally shared electronic patient record: case study comparison of Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2013; 82: e125-e138
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 150 Coiera E. When conversation is better than computation. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2000; 7: 277-286
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 151 Lintern G, Motavalli A. Healthcare information systems: the cognitive challenge. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2018; 18: 3
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 152 Lewis M, Baxter R, Pouder R. The development and deploymentof electronic personal health records: A strategic positioning perspective. Journal of Health Organization and Management 2013; 27: 577-600
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar