Evidenzbasierte-personalisierte Psychotherapie: psychometrisches Feedback in der Praxis

Anne-Katharina Deisenhofer; Kaitlyn Boyle; Wolfgang Lutz

doi:10.1055/a-0771-7901

PiD - Psychotherapie im Dialog, Inhaltsverzeichnis

PiD - Psychotherapie im Dialog 2019; 20(04): 28-33
DOI: 10.1055/a-0771-7901

Aus der Praxis

Evidenzbasierte-personalisierte Psychotherapie: psychometrisches Feedback in der Praxis

Anne-Katharina Deisenhofer

,

Kaitlyn Boyle

,

Wolfgang Lutz

Abstract

Technische Entwicklungen der letzten 20 Jahre eröffnen neue Chancen und Möglichkeiten in Bezug auf Datenerhebungen, grafische Verlaufsrückmeldungen und Unterstützungsmöglichkeiten in der psychotherapeutischen Praxis. Dieser Beitrag gibt einen Überblick über den aktuellen Stand der Feedbackforschung und zeigt, wie eine evidenzbasierte und personalisierte Psychotherapiepraxis mit psychometrischem Feedback aussehen kann.

Volltext

Referenzen

Literatur
1 Lambert MJ, Ogles BM. The efficacy and effectiveness of psychotherapy. In: Lambert MJ. ed. Bergin and Garfield’s handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change. 5th ed.. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2004: 139-193
2 Hofmann SG, Asnaani A, Vonk IJ. et al. The efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy: a review of meta-analyses. Cognit Ther Res 2012; 36: 427-440 doi:10.1007/S10608–013–9595–3
3 Wampold BE, Imel ZE, Flückiger C. Die Psychotherapie-Debatte: Was Psychotherapie wirksam macht. Göttingen: Hogrefe; 2018. doi: 10.1024/85681–000
4 Hansen N, Lambert MJ, Forman EM. The psychotherapy dose-response effect and its implications for treatment delivery services. Clin Psychol Sci Pract 2002; 9: 329-343 doi:10.1093/clipsy.9.3.329
5 Walfish S, McAlister B, O’donnell P. et al. An investigation of self-assessment bias in mental health providers. Psychol Rep 2012; 110: 639-644 doi:10.2466/02.07.17.PR0.110.2.639–644
6 Castonguay LG, Barkham M, Lutz W. et al. Practice oriented research: Approaches and applications. In Lambert MJ. ed. Bergin and Garfield’s handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change. 6th ed.. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2013: 85-133
7 Bar-Kalifa E, Atzil-Slonim D, Rafaeli E. et al. Therapist-client agreement in assessments of clients’ functioning. J Consult Clin Psychol 2016; 84: 1127-1134 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000157
8 Kendrick T, El-Gohary M, Stuart B. et al. Routine use of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) for improving treatment of common mental health disorders in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 7: 1-103
9 Delgadillo J, de Jong K, Lucock M. et al. Feedback-informed treatment versus usual psychological treatment for depression and anxiety: a multisite, open-label, cluster randomised controlled trial. Lancet Psychiatry 2018; 5: 564-572 doi:10.1016/S2215–0366(18)30162–7
10 Lambert MJ, Whipple JL, Kleinstäuber M. Collecting and delivering progress feedback. A meta-analysis of routine outcome monitoring. Psychotherapy 2018; 55: 520-537 doi:10.1037/pst0000167
11 Lambert M. Presidential address: What we have learned from a decade of research aimed at improving psychotherapy outcome in routine care. Psychother Res 2007; 17: 1-14 doi: 10.1080/10503300601032506
12 Cuijpers P, Christensen H. Are personalised treatments of adult depression finally within reach?. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci 2017; 26: 40-42 doi:10.1017/S204579601600007X
13 Lutz W, Zimmermann D, Müller VN. et al. Randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effects of personalized prediction and adaptation tools on treatment outcome in outpatient psychotherapy: study protocol. BMC psychiatry 2017; 17: 306 doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888–017–1464–2
14 De Jong K, van Sluis P, Nugter MA. et al. Understanding the differential impact of outcome monitoring: Therapist variables that moderate feedback effects in a randomized clinical trial. Psychother Res 2012; 22: 464-474 doi:10.1080/10503307.2012.673023
15 Simon W, Lambert MJ, Harris MW. et al. Providing patient progress information and clinical support tools to therapists: Effects on patients at risk of treatment failure. Psychother Res 2012; 22: 638-647 doi:10.1080/10503307.2012.698918
16 Lutz W, Rubel J, Schiefele AK. et al. Feedback and therapist effects in the context of treatment outcome and treatment length. Psychother Res 2015; 25: 647-660 doi:10.1080/10503307.2015.1053553
17 Lutz W, Rubel JA, Schwartz B. et al. Towards integrating personalized feedback research into clinical practice: Development of the Trier Treatment Navigator (TTN). Behav Res Ther 2019; 8 doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2019.103438
18 Lutz W, Neu R, Rubel JA. Evaluation und Effekterfassung in der Psychotherapie. In Hautzinger M, Hahlweg K, Margraf J. et al., Hrsg. Standards der Psychotherapie Band 5. Göttingen: Hogrefe; 2019. doi:10.1026/02912–000
19 Boyle K, Deisenhofer AK, Rubel JA. et al. Assessing Treatment Integrity in Personalized CBT; The Inventory of Therapeutic Interventions and Skills. Cogn Behav Ther 2019; 2: 1-18 doi: 10.1080/16506073.2019.1625945
20 APA Presidential Task Force on Evidence-Based Practice. Evidence-Based Practice in Psychology. Am Psychol 2006; 61: 271-285
21 Weck F, Kaufmann YM, Höfling V. Competence feedback improves CBT competence in trainee therapists: A randomized controlled pilot study. Psychother Res 2017; 27: 501-509 doi:10.1080/10503307.2015.1132857
22 Zimmermann D, Rubel J, Page AC. et al. Therapist effects on and predictors of non-consensual dropout in psychotherapy. Clin Psychol Psychother 2016; 24: 312-321 doi:10.1002/cpp.2022