Download PDF
Nervenheilkunde 2019; 38(01): 23-28
DOI: 10.1055/a-0772-5174
Schwerpunkt
Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Die dunkle Seite von Geschwisterbeziehungen

Der Einfluss von Konflikten, Rivalität und Gewalt auf die psychische Belastung in einer retrospektiven Online-BefragungThe dark side of sibling relationshipsThe influence of conflicts, rivalry and violence on psychological well-being using a retrospective online survey
Susanne Witte
1   Deutsches Jugendinstitut, München
2   Klinik für Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie/Psychotherapie Universitätsklinikum Ulm
,
Sabine Walper
1   Deutsches Jugendinstitut, München
,
Jörg M. Fegert
2   Klinik für Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie/Psychotherapie Universitätsklinikum Ulm
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
22 February 2019 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

ZUSAMMENFASSUNG

Häufig kommt es in Geschwisterbeziehungen zu Feindseligkeit und Rivalität sowie körperlicher und psychischer Gewalt. Diese haben zum Teil langanhaltende Auswirkungen auf die psychische Befindlichkeit. Vorangegangene Forschungsarbeiten haben bisher jedoch meist nur eine Dimension der negativen Interaktionsmuster, z. B. körperliche Gewalt, untersucht. Anhand einer Stichprobe von 4568 Erwachsenen, die zu ihrer Geschwisterbeziehung in der Kindheit und ihrer aktuellen psychischen Belastung befragt wurden, wird die Häufigkeit und das Ausmaß unterschiedlicher negativer Interaktionsmuster in der Geschwisterbeziehung beleuchtet. Merkmale der Geschwisterkonstellation, die diese begünstigen, werden herausgestellt sowie Zusammenhänge mit der aktuellen psychischen Belastung aufgezeigt. Die Ergebnisse verweisen darauf, dass es in Geschwisterbeziehungen zu einem hohen Ausmaß an Konflikten kommt. Auch die Häufigkeit von körperlicher Gewalt und Feindseligkeit unter Geschwistern ist als hoch einzuschätzen. Für alle Skalen negativer Merkmale ist ein geringer Altersabstand zwischen den Geschwistern besonders vorhersagekräftig. Im Hinblick auf die psychische Belastung im Erwachsenenalter sind vor allem Rivalität und Feindseligkeit zwischen den Geschwistern sowie Ausschluss durch das Geschwister prädiktiv. Bei der Interpretation der Ergebnisse sind Besonderheiten der Stichprobe, wie Alters- und Geschlechtsverteilung, sowie das retrospektive Design zu beachten.

ABSTRACT

Often sibling relationships are characterized by hostility and rivalry as well as physical and emotional violence, which lead to long-term consequences for the psychological well-being. Previous research has mainly focused on one specific component of those negative features of the sibling relationship, e. g. physical violence. Using a sample of 4568 adults, who answered a questionnaire regarding their sibling relationship during childhood and their current psychological well-being, the extent of different negative qualities of sibling relationship is demonstrated. Characteristics of the sibling constellation, which increase those, are shown. Furthermore, their influence on the current psychological well-being is analyzed. The results show that the amount of conflicts experienced in sibling relationships is high. The same applies to the extent of physical violence and hostility. A short age difference between siblings is predictive of all dimensions of negative relationship qualities. Rivalry and hostility between siblings and violence experienced by a sibling are predictive of the current psychological well-being. The results have to be interpreted in light of the limitations of the sample. These are the age and gender distribution as well as the retrospective design.

Schlüsselwörter

Geschwister - körperliche und psychische Gewalt - Konflikt - psychische Gesundheit

Key words

Siblings - physical and emotional violence - conflict - psychological well-being
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Bank SP, Kahn MD. Geschwister-Bindung. München: Dt. Taschenbuch-Verlag; 1994
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Kosonen M. Siblings as providers of support and care during middle childhood: children’s perceptions. Child Soc 1996; 10 (Suppl. 04) 267-79.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Campione-Barr N, Lindell AK, Giron SE, Killoren SE, Greer KB. Domain differentiated disclosure to mothers and siblings and associations with sibling relationship quality and youth emotional adjustment. Developmental Psychology 2015; 51 (Suppl. 09) 1278-91.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Oliva A, Arranz E. Sibling relationships during adolescence. European Journal of Developmental Psychology 2005; 2 (Suppl. 03) 253-70.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Voorpostel M, van der Lippe T. Support between siblings and between friends: Two worlds apart?. J Marriage and Family 2007; 69 (Suppl. 05) 1271-82.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Abuhatoum S, Howe N. Power in sibling conflict during early and middle childhood. Social Development 2013; 22 (Suppl. 04) 738-54.
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Campione-Barr N, Smetana JG. “Who said you could wear my sweater?” Adolescent siblings’ conflicts and associations with relationship quality. Child Dev 2010; 81 (Suppl. 02) 464-71.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Thompson JA, Halberstadt AG. Children’s accounts of sibling jealousy and their implicit theories about relationships. Social Development 2008; 17 (Suppl. 03) 488-511.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Felson RB. Aggression and violence between siblings. Social Psychology Quarterly 1983; 46 (Suppl. 04) 271-85.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Roscoe B, Goodwin MP, Kennedy D. Sibling violence and agonistic interactions experienced by early adolescents. Journal of Family Violence 1987; 2 (Suppl. 02) 121-37.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Libal R, Deegener G. Häufigkeit unterschiedlicher Gewalterfahrungen in Kindheit und Jugend sowie Beziehungen zum psychischen Befinden im Erwachsenenalter. In: Deegener G. (Ed.) Kindesmisshandlung und Vernachlässigung. Göttingen: Hogrefe; 2005: 59-93.
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Tucker CJ, Finkelhor D, Shattuck AM, Turner H. Prevalence and correlates of sibling victimization types. Child Abuse Negl 2013; 37 (Suppl. 04) 213-23.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Hollingsworth J, Glass J, Heisler KW. Empathy deficits in siblings of severely scapegoated children. Journal of Emotional Abuse 2008; 7 (Suppl. 04) 69-88.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Green AH. Child abuse by siblings. Child Abuse Negl 1984; 8 (Suppl. 03) 311-7.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 McGuire S, McHale SM, Updegraff KA. Children’s perceptions of the sibling relationship in middle childhood: Connections within and between family relationships. Personal Relationships 1996; 3 (Suppl. 03) 229-39.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Punch S. ‘You can do nasty things to your brothers and sisters without a reason’: Siblings’ backstage behaviour. Child Soc 2008; 22 (Suppl. 05) 333-44.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Buhrmester D, Furman W. Perceptions of sibling relationships during middle childhood and adolescence. Child Dev 1990; 61 (Suppl. 05) 1387-98.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Buist KL, Deković M, Prinzie P. Sibling relationship quality and psychopathology of children and adolescents: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review 2013; 33 (Suppl. 01) 97-106.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Graham-Bermann SA, Cutler SE, Litzenberger BW, Schwartz WE. Perceived conflict and violence in childhood sibling relationships and later emotional adjustment. J Fam Psychol 1994; 8 (Suppl. 01) 85-97.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Kramer L, Kowal AK. Sibling relationship quality from birth to adolescence: The enduring contributions of friends. J Fam Psychol 2005; 19 (Suppl. 04) 503-11.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Samek DR, Rueter MA. Considerations of elder sibling closeness in predicting younger sibling substance use: Social learning versus social bonding explanations. J Fam Psychol 2011; 25 (Suppl. 06) 931-41.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Finkelhor D, Turner H, Ormrod R. Kid’s stuff: The nature and impact of peer and sibling violence on younger and older children. Child Abuse Negl 2006; 30 (Suppl. 12) 1401-21.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Bank L, Burraston B, Snyder J. Sibling conflict and ineffective parenting as predictors of adolescent boys’ antisocial behavior and peer difficulties: additive and interactional effects. J Res Adolesc 2004; 14 (Suppl. 01) 99-125.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Furman W, Buhrmester D. The Network of Relationships Inventory: Behavioral Systems Version. International Journal of Behavioral Development 2009; 33 (Suppl. 05) 470-8.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Clarke DE, Kuhl EA. DSM-5 cross-cutting symptom measures: A step towards the future of psychiatric care?. World Psychiatry: Official Journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) 2014; 13(3): 314-6.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Witte S. Geschwister im Kontext von Misshandlung, Missbrauch und Vernachlässigung: Risikokonstellationen, Qualität der Geschwisterbeziehung und aktuelle psychische Belastung. Weinheim: Beltz; 2018
    Google Scholar
  • 27 Walper S, Thönissen C, Wendt E-V, Bergau B. Geschwisterbeziehungen in riskanten Familienkonstellationen: Ergebnisse aus entwicklungs- und familienpsychologischen Studien. München: Sozialpädag. Inst; 2009
    Google Scholar
  • 28 Häuser W, Schmutzer G, Brähler E, Glaesmer H. Maltreatment in childhood and adolescence: Results from a survey of a representative sample of the German population. Deutsches Ärzteblatt 2011; 108 (Suppl. 17) 287-94.
    Google Scholar
  • 29 Rowntree M. Responses to sibling sexual abuse: Are they as harmful as the abuse?. Australian Social Work 2007; 60 (Suppl. 03) 347-61.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Bernstein DP. et al. Development and validation of a brief screening version of the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire. Child Abuse Negl 2003; 27 (Suppl. 02) 169-190.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Choi JY. et al. The effects of childhood abuse on symptom complexity in a clinical sample: Mediating effects of emotion regulation difficulties. Child Abuse Negl 2014; 38 (Suppl. 08) 1213-1319.
    Google Scholar
  • 32 de Carvalho HW. et al. Childhood trauma is associated with maladaptive personality traits. Child Abuse Negl 2015; 44: 18-25.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Grassi-Oliveira R, Cogo-Moreira H, Salum GA, Brietzke E, Viola TW, Manfro GG. et al. Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ) in Brazilian Samples of Different Age Groups: Findings from Confirmatory Factor Analysis.
    Google Scholar