Subscribe to RSS
![](/products/assets/desktop/img/oa-logo.png)
DOI: 10.1055/a-0774-8617
Influence of Different Methods of Intrapartum Analgesia on the Progress of Labour and on Perinatal Outcome
Article in several languages: English | deutschPublication History
received 23 March 2018
revised 25 October 2018
accepted 27 October 2018
Publication Date:
01 February 2019 (online)
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/gebfra/201904/lookinside/thumbnails/10-1055-a-0774-8617_gf_en-1.jpg)
Abstract
Background Various methods of intrapartum analgesia are available these days. Pethidine, meptazinol and epidural analgesia are among the most commonly used techniques. A relatively new one is patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with remifentanil, although the experiences published so far in Germany are limited. Our goal was to study the influence of these analgesic techniques (opioids vs. patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with remifentanil vs. epidural analgesia) on the second stage of labour and on perinatal outcome.
Material and Methods We conducted a retrospective study with 254 parturients. The women were divided into 4 groups based on the analgesic technique and matched for parity, maternal age and gestational age (opioids n = 64, patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with remifentanil n = 60, epidural analgesia n = 64, controls without the medicinal products mentioned n = 66). Maternal, fetal and neonatal data were analysed.
Results The expulsive stage was prolonged among both primiparas and multiparas with patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with remifentanil (79 [74] vs. 44 [55] min, p = 0.016, and 28 [68] vs. 10 [11] min, p < 0.001, respectively) and epidural analgesia (90 [92] vs. 44 [55] min, p = 0.004, and 22.5 [73] vs. 10 [11] min, p = 0.003, respectively) compared with the controls. The length of the pushing stage was similar among primiparas in all groups but prolonged compared with the controls in multiparas with patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with remifentanil (15 [17] vs. 5 [7] min, p = 0.001) and epidural analgesia (10 [15] vs. 5 [7] min, p = 0.006). The Apgar, umbilical arterial pH and base excess values were similar between the groups, as were the rates of acidosis and neonatal intensive care unit admission.
Conclusion Parturients with patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with remifentanil and epidural analgesia showed a prolonged expulsive stage compared with the opioid group and controls. The short-term neonatal outcome was not influenced by the three methods examined.
* B. Kuschel and S. M. Lobmaier are equal last authors.
-
References/Literatur
- 1 Lederman RP, Lederman E, Work BA. et al. The relationship of maternal anxiety, plasma catecholamines, and plasma cortisol to progress in labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1978; 132: 495-500
- 2 Jones L, Othman M, Dowswell T. et al. Pain management for women in labour: an overview of systematic reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; (03) CD009234 doi:10.1002/14651858
- 3 Singer J, Jank A, Amara S. et al. Efficacy and effects of parenteral pethidine or meptazinol and regional analgesia for pain relief during delivery. A comparative observational study. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 2016; 76: 964-971
- 4 Schnabel A, Hahn N, Muellenbach R. et al. Geburtshilfliche Analgesie in deutschen Kliniken. Remifentanil als Alternative zur Regionalanalgesie. Anaesthesist 2011; 60: 995-1001
- 5 Shmueli A, Salman L, Orbach-Zinger S. et al. The impact of epidural analgesia on the duration of the second stage of labor. Birth 2018; DOI: 10.1111/birt.12355.
- 6 Jelting Y, Weibel S, Afshari A. et al. Patient-controlled analgesia with remifentanil vs. alternative parenteral methods for pain management in labour: a Cochrane systematic review. Anaesthesia 2017; 34: 408-410
- 7 Engel N, Velde M, Nijhuis J. et al. Labour analgesia effects on foetal heart rate. A mini-review. Open J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 1: 113-120
- 8 Frambach T, Wirbelauer J, Schelling P. et al. Remifentanil zur geburtshilflichen Schmerzerleichterung per patientenkontrolliertem Analgesieverfahren: Fallserie und Diskusion medikolegaler Aspekte. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol 2010; 214: 145-150
- 9 Ayres-de-Campos D, Spong CY, Chandraharan E. et al. FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: cardiotocography. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2015; 131: 13-24
- 10 Anim-Somuah M, Smyth RM, Jones L. Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; (12) CD000331 doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000331.pub3
- 11 Cheng YW, Shaffer BL, Nicholson JM. et al. Second stage of labor and epidural use: a larger effect than previously suggested. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123: 527-535
- 12 Miller AC. The effects of peridural analgesia on uterine activity and labor. Int J Obstet Anesth 1997; 6: 2-18
- 13 Newton ER, Schroeder BC, Knape KG. et al. Epidural Analgesia and uterine function. Obstet Gynecol 1995; 85: 749-755
- 14 Hasegawa J, Farina A, Turchi G. et al. Effects of epidural analgesia on labor length, instrumental delivery, and neonatal short-term outcome. J Anesth 2013; 27: 43-47
- 15 Friedman EA. Primigravid labor; a graphicostatistical analysis. Obstet Gynecol 1955; 6: 567-589
- 16 Friedman EA. Labor in multiparas; a graphicostatistical analysis. Obstet Gynecol 1956; 8: 691-703
- 17 Friedman EA. The functional divisons of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1971; 109: 274-280
- 18 Shen MK, Wu ZF, Zhu AB. et al. Remifentanil for labour analgesia: a double-blinded, randomised controlled trial of maternal and neonatal effects of patient-controlled analgesia versus continuos infusion. Anaesthesia 2013; 68: 236-244
- 19 Roelants F, De Franceschi E, Veyckemans F. et al. Patient-controlled intravenous analgesia using remifentanil in the parturient. Can J Anaesth 2001; 48: 175-178
- 20 Ismail MT, Hassanin MZ. Neuraxial analgesia versus intravenous remifentanil for pain relief in early labor in nulliparous women. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2012; 286: 1375-1381
- 21 Freeman LM, Bloemenkamp KW, Franssen MT. et al. Patient controlled analgesia with remifentanil versus epidural analgesia in labour: randomised multicenter equivalente trial. BMJ 2015; 350: h846
- 22 Ullman R, Smith LA, Burns E. et al. Parenteral opioids for maternal pain relief in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; (09) CD007396 doi:10.1002/14651858.CD007396.pub2
- 23 Reynolds F. The effects of maternal labour analgesia on the fetus. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynecol 2010; 24: 289-302
- 24 Thakor AS, Giussani DA. Effects of acute acidemia on the fetal cardiovascular defense to acute hypoxemia. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2009; 296: R90-R99
- 25 Chaillet N, Belaid L, Crochetière C. et al. Nonpharmacologic approaches for pain management during labor compared with usual care: a meta-analysis. Birth 2014; 41: 122-137
- 26 Wulff V, Hepp P, Fehm T. et al. Music in obstetrics: an intervention option to reduce tension, pain and stress. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 2017; 77: 967-975
- 27 Smith CA, Levett KM, Collins CT. et al. Massage, reflexology and other manual methods for pain management in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018; (03) CD009290 doi:10.1002/14651858