CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2019; 79(04): 389-395
DOI: 10.1055/a-0774-8617
GebFra Science
Original Article/Originalarbeit
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Influence of Different Methods of Intrapartum Analgesia on the Progress of Labour and on Perinatal Outcome

Article in several languages: English | deutsch
Javier U. Ortiz
1   Sektion für Geburtshilfe und Perinatalmedizin, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, München, Germany
,
Thomas Hammerl
1   Sektion für Geburtshilfe und Perinatalmedizin, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, München, Germany
,
Maria Wasmaier
2   Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, München, Germany
,
Valerie Wienerroither
1   Sektion für Geburtshilfe und Perinatalmedizin, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, München, Germany
,
Bernhard Haller
3   Institut für Medizinische Informatik, Statistik und Epidemiologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, München, München
,
Moritz Hamann
1   Sektion für Geburtshilfe und Perinatalmedizin, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, München, Germany
,
Bettina Kuschel*
1   Sektion für Geburtshilfe und Perinatalmedizin, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, München, Germany
,
Silvia M. Lobmaier*
1   Sektion für Geburtshilfe und Perinatalmedizin, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, München, Germany
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

received 23 March 2018
revised 25 October 2018

accepted 27 October 2018

Publication Date:
01 February 2019 (online)

Abstract

Background Various methods of intrapartum analgesia are available these days. Pethidine, meptazinol and epidural analgesia are among the most commonly used techniques. A relatively new one is patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with remifentanil, although the experiences published so far in Germany are limited. Our goal was to study the influence of these analgesic techniques (opioids vs. patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with remifentanil vs. epidural analgesia) on the second stage of labour and on perinatal outcome.

Material and Methods We conducted a retrospective study with 254 parturients. The women were divided into 4 groups based on the analgesic technique and matched for parity, maternal age and gestational age (opioids n = 64, patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with remifentanil n = 60, epidural analgesia n = 64, controls without the medicinal products mentioned n = 66). Maternal, fetal and neonatal data were analysed.

Results The expulsive stage was prolonged among both primiparas and multiparas with patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with remifentanil (79 [74] vs. 44 [55] min, p = 0.016, and 28 [68] vs. 10 [11] min, p < 0.001, respectively) and epidural analgesia (90 [92] vs. 44 [55] min, p = 0.004, and 22.5 [73] vs. 10 [11] min, p = 0.003, respectively) compared with the controls. The length of the pushing stage was similar among primiparas in all groups but prolonged compared with the controls in multiparas with patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with remifentanil (15 [17] vs. 5 [7] min, p = 0.001) and epidural analgesia (10 [15] vs. 5 [7] min, p = 0.006). The Apgar, umbilical arterial pH and base excess values were similar between the groups, as were the rates of acidosis and neonatal intensive care unit admission.

Conclusion Parturients with patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with remifentanil and epidural analgesia showed a prolonged expulsive stage compared with the opioid group and controls. The short-term neonatal outcome was not influenced by the three methods examined.

* B. Kuschel and S. M. Lobmaier are equal last authors.