RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/a-0806-7537
Metabolic Costs During Backward Running with Body Weight Support
Publikationsverlauf
accepted 15. November 2018
Publikationsdatum:
04. Februar 2019 (online)
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/sportsmed/201904/lookinside/thumbnails/7160_10-1055-a-0806-7537-1.jpg)
Abstract
We investigated metabolic costs, rating of perceived exertion (RPE), stride frequency (SF), and preferred speed (PS) during forward and backward running at different levels of body weight support (BWS). Participants completed forward and backward running on a lower body positive pressure treadmill at their preferred speed for forward and backward running at 0%BWS, 20%BWS, and 50%BWS. Oxygen uptake (V̇O2), heart rate (HR), RPE, SF, and PS were measured. HR, RPE, and SF during forward and backward running decreased with increasing BWS (P<0.05).V̇O2 during both forward and backward running at 50%BWS was significantly lower than when running at 0%BWS (P<0.01). However, PS during forward and backward running increased with increasing BWS (P<0.01). Furthermore,V̇O2 was different between running directions only when running at 0%BWS (P<0.01). HR and RPE were not different between running directions (P>0.05). SF during backward running was higher than that of forward running (P<0.01). PS during backward running was lower than when running forward (P<0.001). Our observations suggest that individuals may select PS and SF during running with BWS in a way that resulted in similar metabolic costs, regardless of direction of locomotion.
-
References
- 1 American College of Sports Medicine. ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription. 10th edition Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2017: 152
- 2 Borg GA. Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1982; 14: 377-381
- 3 Flynn TW, Connery SM, Smutok MA, Zeballos RJ, Weisman IM. Comparison of cardiopulmonary responses to forward and backward walking and running. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1994; 26: 89-94
- 4 Flynn TW, Soutas-Little RW. Mechanical power and muscle action during forward and backward running. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1993; 17: 108-112
- 5 Gojanovic B, Shultz R, Feihl F, Matheson G. Overspeed HIIT in lower-body positive pressure treadmill improves running performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2015; 47: 2571-2578
- 6 Grabowski AM, Kram R. Effects of velocity and weight support on ground reaction forces and metabolic power during running. J Appl Biomech 2008; 24: 288-297
- 7 Harriss DJ, Macsween A, Atkinson G. Standards for ethics in sport and exercise science research: 2018 update. Int J Sports Med 2017; 38: 1126-1131
- 8 Hoffman MD, Donaghe HE. Physiological responses to body weight-supported treadmill exercise in healthy adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2011; 92: 960-966
- 9 Hoogkamer W, Meyns P, Duysens J. Steps forward in understanding backward gait: From basic circuits to rehabilitation. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 2014; 42: 23-29
- 10 Kline JR, Raab S, Coast JR, Bounds RG, McNeill DK, de Heer HD. Conversion table for running on lower body positive pressure treadmills. J Strength Cond Res 2015; 29: 854-862
- 11 Masumoto K, Joerger J, Mercer JA. Influence of stride frequency manipulation on muscle activity during running with body weight support. Gait Posture 2018; 61: 473-478
- 12 Masumoto K, Soucy MT, Bailey JP, Mercer JA. Muscle activity during backward and forward running with body weight support. Hum Mov Sci 2017; 55: 276-286
- 13 McNeill DK, de Heer HD, Williams CP, Coast JR. Metabolic accommodation to running on a body weight-supported treadmill. Eur J Appl Physiol 2015; 115: 905-910
- 14 Schieb DA. Kinematic accommodation of novice treadmill runners. Res Q Exercise Sport 1986; 57: 1-7
- 15 Terblanche E, Cloete WA, du Plessis PA, Sadie JN, Strauss A, Unger M. The metabolic transition speed between backward walking and running. Eur J Appl Physiol 2003; 90: 520-525
- 16 Terblanche E, Page C, Kroff J, Venter RE. The effect of backward locomotion training on the body composition and cardiorespiratory fitness of young women. Int J Sports Med 2005; 26: 214-219