Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-0820-6256
Degenerative Cartilage Lesions of the Medial Knee Compartment. Associated Factors, Operative Options, and Preliminary Results from the CartilageRegistry DGOU
Article in several languages: English | deutschPublication History
Publication Date:
08 February 2019 (online)
Abstract
Purpose This study was aimed to determine the impact of bioregenerative operations in case of degenerative cartilage lesions within the media knee compartment.
Material and Methods The CartilageRegistry DGOU was founded in 2013. At the deadline August 2016 a total of 1847 patients were included. A total of 23.3% (n = 432) was suffering from a degenerative cartilage lesion in the medial compartment. Follow-up was performed after 6, 12, and 24 months (online evaluation). The patients were asked for their subject feeling as well as the KOOS (Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score) was determined.
Results Most of the patients (n = 358) suffered from a single femoral lesion. In 25 cases single tibial and in 49 cases combined defects (“kissing lesions”) were addressed by different treatment options: 39.9% autologous chondrocyte transplantation, in 8.1% in combination with a spongiosa plasty. Other treatments were drilling, microfracturing with or without matrix. In 17.9% the surgeons had chosen combined methods. The bioregenerative treatment was combined with a concomitant operation in 39.7% in patients with medial, in 56.0% in patients with a tibial, and in 67.9% in patients with combined defects. The mostly performed additional operations were osteotomies. There were no gender differences at baseline or during follow-up. The history of patients with femoral defects was shorter than in the other groups. The patients with medial defects judged the subjective outcome significant more frequently better after 6, 12, or 24 months compared with the other groups. The KOOS raised from baseline (median 52 points) to a median of 75 after 6, to 78 points after 12, and to 80 points after 24 months. Patients with femoral defects had a better KOOS-outcome in tendency. Revision operations were required in 7.1%.
Conclusions The treatment of degenerative cartilage lesions (respective early OA) by bioregenerative procedures are well-established measures. These treatments are sufficient to produce high patientsʼ satisfaction and acceptable short/midterm results.
-
References/Literatur
- 1 Spahn G, Hofmann GO. [Focal cartilage defects within the medial knee compartment. predictors for osteoarthritis progression]. Z Orthop Unfall 2014; 152: 480-488
- 2 Angele P, Madry H, Kon E. Early OA: point of no return or a chance for regenerative approaches. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2016; 24: 1741-1742
- 3 Madry H, Kon E, Condello V. et al. Early osteoarthritis of the knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2016; 24: 1753-1762
- 4 Körner D, Kohler P, Schröter S. et al. Pain in osteochondral lesions of the ankle – an investigation based on data from the German Cartilage Registry (KnorpelRegister DGOU). Z Orthop Unfall 2018; 156: 160-167
- 5 Pestka JM, Luu NH, Sudkamp NP. et al. Revision surgery after cartilage repair: data from the German Cartilage Registry (KnorpelRegister DGOU). Orthop J Sports Med 2018; 6: 2325967117752623
- 6 Mueller-Rath R, Miltner O, Hochrein A. et al. The German Arthroscopy Registry (DART). Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2017; 25: 3657-3660
- 7 Körner D, Gueorguiev B, Niemeyer P. et al. Parameters influencing complaints and joint function in patients with osteochondral lesions of the ankle-an investigation based on data from the German Cartilage Registry (KnorpelRegister DGOU). Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2017; 137: 367-373
- 8 Maurer J, Grotejohann B, Jenkner C. et al. A registry for evaluation of efficiency and safety of surgical treatment of cartilage defects: The German Cartilage Registry (KnorpelRegister DGOU). JMIR Res Protoc 2016; 5: e122
- 9 Niemeyer P, Feucht MJ, Fritz J. et al. Cartilage repair surgery for full-thickness defects of the knee in Germany: indications and epidemiological data from the German Cartilage Registry (KnorpelRegister DGOU). Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2016; 136: 891-897
- 10 Spahn G, Fritz J, Albrecht D. et al. Characteristics and associated factors of Klee cartilage lesions: preliminary baseline-data of more than 1000 patients from the German cartilage registry (KnorpelRegister DGOU). Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2016; 136: 805-810
- 11 Niemeyer P, Schweigler K, Grotejohann B. et al. [The German Cartilage Registry (KnorpelRegister DGOU) for evaluation of surgical treatment for cartilage defects: experience after six months including first demographic data]. Z Orthop Unfall 2015; 153: 67-74
- 12 Spahn G, Fritz J, Albrecht D. et al. [Coincidence and therapy of dysalignments and degenerative knee cartilage lesions. Results from the German CartilageRegistry DGOU]. Z Orthop Unfall 2017; 155: 457-467
- 13 Roos EM, Lohmander LS. The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): from joint injury to osteoarthritis. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2003; 1: 64
- 14 Spahn G, Klinger HM, Muckley T. et al. Four-year results from a randomized controlled study of knee chondroplasty with concomitant medial meniscectomy: mechanical debridement versus radiofrequency chondroplasty. Arthroscopy 2010; 26: S73-80
- 15 Ebrahimi N, Jalaie S, Salsabili N. et al. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score in patients with isolated meniscus injury; validity and reliability. J Res Med Sci 2017; 22: 55
- 16 Hancock KJ, Glass N, Anthony CA. et al. Performance of PROMIS for healthy patients undergoing meniscal surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2017; 99: 954-958
- 17 Meric G, Gracitelli GC, McCauley JC. et al. Osteochondral Allograft MRI Scoring System (OCAMRISS) in the knee: interobserver agreement and clinical application. Cartilage 2015; 6: 142-149
- 18 Statistisches Bundesamt. Vollstationär behandelte Patientinnen und Patienten in Krankenhäusern 2015. Im Internet: https://www.destatis.de/DE/PresseService/Presse/Pressemitteilungen/2016/08/PD16_283_231.html Stand: 11.01.2019
- 19 Mayr H. AGA Instruktorenumfrage Thema Knorpel 2009. Im Internet: http://www.aga-online.ch/userfiles/File/Knorpelumfrage 2009 05 10 2010.pdf Stand: 11.01.2019
- 20 Vogt S, Angele P, Arnold M. et al. Practice in rehabilitation after cartilage therapy: an expert survey. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2013; 133: 311-320
- 21 Mella C, Nuñez A, Villalon I. Treatment of acetabular chondral lesions with microfracture technique. SICOT J 2017; 3: 45
- 22 Frehner F, Benthien JP. Microfracture: state of the art in cartilage surgery?. Cartilage 2018; 9: 339-345 doi:10.1177/1947603517700956
- 23 Riddle DL, Singh JA, Harmsen WS. et al. Clinically important body weight gain following knee arthroplasty: a five-year comparative cohort study. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2013; 65: 669-677
- 24 International Cartilage Regeneration & Joint Preservation Society (ICRS). ICRS Patient Registry. Stand 2017. Im Internet: https://cartilage.org/society/icrs-patient-registry/ Stand: 11.01.2019
- 25 Gille J, Behrens P, Volpi P. et al. Outcome of Autologous Matrix Induced Chondrogenesis (AMIC) in cartilage knee surgery: data of the AMIC Registry. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2013; 133: 87-93