Download PDF
Zahnmedizin up2date 2019; 13(01): 79-98
DOI: 10.1055/a-0826-8328
Prothetik
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Der Stift im Wurzelkanal – differenzialtherapeutische Überlegungen

Ralf Krug
,
Gabriel Krastl
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
16 February 2019 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints All articles of this category

Wurzelkanalbehandelte Zähne wurden oftmals „reflexartig“ aus vermeintlichen Stabilisierungsgründen mit einem Stift restauriert. In der restaurativen Zahnheilkunde gibt es zahlreiche Möglichkeiten, die den Stift im Wurzelkanal bedingen oder relativieren können. Ziel der hier vorgestellten differenzialtherapeutischen Aspekte ist es, dass wurzelkanalbehandelte Zähne – bei korrekter Indikation oftmals auch ohne Stift – langfristig restauriert werden können.
Kernaussagen

  • Endodontisch behandelte Zähne können von einem Stift im Wurzelkanal profitieren, insbesondere bei tief zerstörten Zähnen.

  • Dennoch tragen zahlreiche weitere Aspekte zu ihrer langfristig stabilen Restauration bei.

  • Oberste Priorität sollte stets der Erhalt gesunder Zahnhartsubstanz sein.

  • Vor allem ein Ferrule-Design sollte bei Überkronung stets vorhanden sein, ggf. müssen die Voraussetzungen dafür erst durch eine spezifische Vorbehandlung geschaffen werden.

  • Bei einem adäquaten Ferrule nimmt die Relevanz eines Stiftes im Wurzelkanal deutlich ab.

  • Als geeignete Techniken gelten hierfür die chirurgische Kronenverlängerung und die Extrusion (chirurgisch, mit Magnet) der Zahnwurzel. Sie sind entsprechend ihrer Indikationsbereiche zu prüfen und gegeneinander abzuwägen.

  • Auch wenn die Anwendung dieser Techniken sicherlich keine Standardbehandlung darstellt, können sie für den Behandler eine wertvolle therapeutische Option sein, tief zerstörte Zähne sicher und vorhersagbar – mit oder ohne Stift – zu erhalten.

Schlüsselwörter

Wurzelkanal - Stiftversorgung - Teilüberkronung - Extrusion - Ferrule-Design
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Naumann M, Schmitter M, Frankenberger R. et al. “Ferrule comes first. Post is second!” Fake news and alternative facts? A systematic review. J Endod 2018; 44: 212-219
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Edelhoff D, Heidemann D, Kern M. et al. Aufbau endodontisch behandelter Zähne. Gemeinsame Stellungnahme der DGZMK, der DGZPW und der DGZ. Dt Zahn Z 2003; 58: 199
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Bitter K, Noetzel J, Stamm O. et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing the effects of post placement on failure rate of postendodontic restorations: Preliminary results of a mean period of 32 months. J Endod 2009; 35: 1477-1482
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 von Stein-Lausnitz M, Bruhnke M, Rosentritt M. et al. Direct restoration of endodontically treated maxillary central incisors: post or no post at all?. Clin Oral Investig 2019; 23: 381-389
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Krishan R, Paque F, Ossareh A. Impacts of conservative endodontic cavity on root canal instrumentation efficacy and resistance to fracture assessed in incisors, premolars, and molars. J Endod 2014; 40: 1160-1166
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Plotino G, Grande NM, Isufi A. et al. Fracture strength of endodontically treated teeth with different access cavity designs. J Endod 2017; 43: 995-1000
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Azim AA, Griggs JA, Huang GT. The Tennessee study: factors affecting treatment outcome and healing time following nonsurgical root canal treatment. Int Endod J 2016; 49: 6-16
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Moreira DM, Almeida JF, Ferraz CC. et al. Structural analysis of bovine root dentin after use of different endodontics auxiliary chemical substances. J Endod 2009; 35: 1023-1027
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Farina AP, Cecchin D, Barbizam JV. et al. Influence of endodontic irrigants on bond strength of a self-etching adhesive. Austr End J 2011; 37: 26-30
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Morris MD, Lee KW, Agee KA. et al. Effects of sodium hypochlorite and rc-prep on bond strengths of resin cement to endodontic surfaces. J Endod 2001; 27: 753-757
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Santos JN, Carrilho MR, De Goes MF. et al. Effect of chemical irrigants on the bond strength of a self-etching adhesive to pulp chamber dentin. J Endod 2006; 32: 1088-1090
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Violich DR, Chandler NP. The smear layer in endodontics – a review. Int Endod J 2010; 43: 2-15
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Bitter K, Eirich W, Neumann K. et al. Effect of cleaning method, luting agent and preparation procedure on the retention of fibre posts. Int Endod J 2012; 45: 1116-1126
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Bitter K, Perdigão J, Exner M. et al. Reliability of fibre post bonding to root canal dentin after simulated clinical function in vitro. Oper Dent 2012; 37: 397-405
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Juloski J, Radovic I, Goracci C. et al. Ferrule effect: A literature review. J Endod 2012; 38: 11-19
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Schmitter M, Sterzenbach G, Faggion jr. CM. et al. A flood tide of systematic reviews on endodontic posts: methodological assessment using of r-amstar. Clin Oral Investig 2013; 17: 1287-1294
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Duret B, Reynaud M, Duret F. [A new concept of corono-radicular reconstruction, the composipost (2)]. Chir Dent Fr 1990; 60: 69-77
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Sterzenbach G, Franke A, Naumann M. Rigid versus flexible dentine-like endodontic posts-clinical testing of a biomechanical concept: Seven-year results of a randomized controlled clinical pilot trial on endodontically treated abutment teeth with severe hard tissue loss. J Endod 2012; 38: 1557-1563
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Naumann M, Sterzenbach G, Dietrich T. et al. Dentin-like versus rigid endodontic post: 11-year randomized controlled pilot trial on no-wall to 2-wall defects. J Endod 2017; 43: 1770-1775
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Figueiredo FE, Martins-Filho PR, Faria-E-Silva AL. Do metal post-retained restorations result in more root fractures than fibre post-retained restorations? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endod 2015; 41: 309-316
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Akkayan B, Gulmez T. Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post systems. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 87: 431-437
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Bitter K, Kielbassa AM. Post-endodontic restorations with adhesively luted fibre-reinforced composite post systems: A review. Am J Dent 2007; 20: 353-360
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Krastl G, Zitzmann NU, Weiger R. Adhäsivaufbau bei wurzelkanalgefüllten Zähnen. Zahnmedizin up2date 2008; 4: 323-346
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Naumann M, Blankenstein F, Kiessling S. et al. Risk factors for failure of glass fibre-reinforced composite post restorations: A prospective observational clinical study. Eur J Oral Sci 2005; 113: 519-524
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Naumann M, Koelpin M, Beuer F. et al. 10-year survival evaluation for glass-fibre-supported postendodontic restoration: A prospective observational clinical study. J Endod 2012; 38: 432-435
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Costa RG, De Morais EC, Campos EA. et al. Customized fibre glass posts. Fatigue and fracture resistance. Am J Dent 2012; 25: 35-38
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Anchieta RB, Rocha EP, Almeida EO. et al. Influence of customized composite resin fibreglass posts on the mechanics of restored treated teeth. Int Endod J 2012; 45: 146-155
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Genovese K, Lamberti L, Pappalettere C. Finite element analysis of a new customized composite post system for endodontically treated teeth. J Biomech 2005; 38: 2375-2389
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Cagidiaco MC, Garcia-Godoy F, Vichi A. et al. Placement of fibre prefabricated or custom made posts affects the 3-year survival of endodontically treated premolars. Am J Dent 2008; 21: 179-184
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Ferrari M, Vichi A, Fadda GM. et al. A randomized controlled trial of endodontically treated and restored premolars. J Dent Res 2012; 91: 72S-78S
    Google Scholar
  • 31 Bergman B, Lundquist P, Sjogren U. et al. Restorative and endodontic results after treatment with cast posts and cores. J Prosth Dentistry 1989; 61: 10-15
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Jung RE, Kalkstein O, Sailer I. et al. A comparison of composite post buildups and cast gold post-and-core buildups for the restoration of nonvital teeth after 5 to 10 years. Int J Prosthodont 2007; 20: 63-69
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Sarkis-Onofre R, de Castilho Jacinto R, Boscato N. et al. Cast metal vs. Glass fibre posts: A randomized controlled trial with up to 3 years of follow up. J Dent 2014; 42: 582-587
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Cloet E, Debels E, Naert I. Controlled clinical trial on the outcome of glass fibre composite cores versus wrought posts and cast cores for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth: A 5-year follow-up study. Int J Prosthodont 2017; 30: 71-79
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Maccari PC, Cosme DC, Oshima HM. et al. Fracture strength of endodontically treated teeth with flared root canals and restored with different post systems. J Esthet Restor Dent 2007; 19: 30-36 discussion 37
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Heydecke G, Peters MC. The restoration of endodontically treated, single-rooted teeth with cast or direct posts and cores: A systematic review. J Prosth Dent 2002; 87: 380-386
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Schmitter M, Hamadi K, Rammelsberg P. Survival of two post systems–five-year results of a randomized clinical trial. Quintessence Int 2011; 42: 843-850
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Schmitter M, Lippenberger S, Rues S. et al. Fracture resistance of incisor teeth restored using fibre-reinforced posts and threaded metal posts: Effect of post length, location, pretreatment and cementation of the final restoration. Int Endod J 2010; 43: 436-442
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Rathke A, Haj-Omer D, Muche R. et al. Effectiveness of bonding fibre posts to root canals and composite core build-ups. Eur J Oral Sci 2009; 117: 604-610
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Bitter K, Perdigao J, Exner M. et al. Reliability of fibre post bonding to root canal dentin after simulated clinical function in vitro. Oper Dent 2012; 37: 397-405
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Goracci C, Ferrari M. Current perspectives on post systems: A literature review. Austr Dent J 2011; 56: 77-83
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Gu XH, Mao CY, Liang C. et al. Does endodontic post space irrigation affect smear layer removal and bonding effectiveness?. Eur J Oral Sci 2009; 117: 597-603
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Sarkis-Onofre R, Skupien JA, Cenci MS. et al. The role of resin cement on bond strength of glass-fibre posts luted into root canals: A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies. Oper Dent 2014; 39: E31-E44
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Bitter K, Schubert A, Neumann K. et al. Are self-adhesive resin cements suitable as core build-up materials? Analyses of maximum load capability, margin integrity, and physical properties. Clin Oral Investig 2016; 20: 1337-1345
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Lang H, Korkmaz Y, Schneider K. et al. Impact of endodontic treatments on the rigidity of the root. J Dent Res 2006; 85: 364-368
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Krastl G, Gugger J, Deyhle H. et al. Impact of adhesive surface and volume of luting resin on fracture resistance of root filled teeth. Int Endod J 2011; 44: 432-439
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Krastl G. Die postendodontischer Restauration – Wurzelkanalstifte: wann und wie?. Endodontie 2005; 14: 129-142
    Google Scholar
  • 48 Junqueira RB, de Carvalho RF, Marinho CC. et al. Influence of glass fibre post length and remaining dentine thickness on the fracture resistance of root filled teeth. Int Endod J 2017; 50: 569-577
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Shu X, Mai QQ, Blatz M. et al. Direct and indirect restorations for endodontically treated teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis, IAAD 2017 consensus conference paper. J Adhes Dent 2018; 20: 183-194
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Dammaschke T, Nykiel K, Sagheri D. et al. Influence of coronal restorations on the fracture resistance of root canal-treated premolar and molar teeth: A retrospective study. Aust Endod J 2013; 39: 48-56
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Federlin M, Hiller KA, Schmalz G. Controlled, prospective clinical split-mouth study of cast gold vs. ceramic partial crowns: 5,5 year results. Am J Dent 2010; 23: 161-167
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Naumann M, Schmitter M, Krastl G. Postendodontic restoration: Endodontic post-and-core or no post at all?. J Adhes Dent 2018; 20: 19-24
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Sedrez-Porto JA, Rosa WL, da Silva AF. et al. Endocrown restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent 2016; 52: 8-14
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Bindl A, Mormann WH. Clinical evaluation of adhesively placed cerec endo-crowns after 2 years – preliminary results. J Adhes Dent 1999; 1: 255-265
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Decerle N, Bessadet M, Munoz-Sanchez ML. et al. Evaluation of cerec endocrowns: A preliminary cohort study. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2014; 22: 89-95
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Otto T. Computer-aided direct all-ceramic crowns: Preliminary 1-year results of a prospective clinical study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2004; 24: 446-455
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Behring J, Cujé J, Hergt A. et al. Erhalt tief zerstörter Zähne – eine Entscheidungshilfe. Endodontie 2017; 26: 437-444
    Google Scholar
  • 58 Goldberg PV, Higginbottom FL, Wilson TG. Periodontal considerations in restorative and implant therapy. Periodontol 2000 2001; 25: 100-109
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Lanning SK, Waldrop TC, Gunsolley JC. et al. Surgical crown lengthening: Evaluation of the biological width. J Periodontol 2003; 74: 468-474
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Krug R, Connert T, Soliman S. et al. Surgical extrusion with an atraumatic extraction system: A clinical study. J Prosthet Dent 2018; 120: 879-885
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Oikarinen KS, Stoltze K, Andreasen JO. Influence of conventional forceps extraction and extraction with an extrusion instrument on cementoblast loss and external root resorption of replanted monkey incisors. J Periodontal Res 1996; 31: 337-344
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Reich S, Krug R, Krastl G. Die chirurgische Extrusion bei Kronen-Wurzel-Fraktur – eine Falldarstellung. Endodontie 2017; 26: 411-416
    Google Scholar
  • 63 Caliskan MK, Turkun M, Gomel M. Surgical extrusion of crown-root-fractured teeth: A clinical review. Int Endod J 1999; 32: 146-151
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 64 Moura LF, Lima MD, Moura MS. et al. Treatment of a crown-root fracture with intentional replantation – case report with 16-year follow-up. Int Endod J 2012; 45: 955-960
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 65 Elkhadem A, Mickan S, Richards D. Adverse events of surgical extrusion in treatment for crown-root and cervical root fractures: A systematic review of case series/reports. Dent Traumatol 2014; 30: 1-14
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 66 Bondemark L, Kurol J, Hallonsten AL. et al. Attractive magnets for orthodontic extrusion of crown-root fractured teeth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997; 112: 187-193
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 67 Kolpin M, Sterzenbach G, Naumann M. Composite filling or single crown? The clinical dilemma of how to restore endodontically treated teeth. Quintessence Int 2014; 45: 457-466
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 68 Camargo PM, Melnick PR, Camargo LM. Clinical crown lengthening in the esthetic zone. J Calif Dent Assoc 2007; 35: 487-498
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 69 Carvalho CV, Bauer FP, Romito GA. et al. Orthodontic extrusion with or without circumferential supracrestal fibreotomy and root planing. Int J Period Restorative Dent 2006; 26: 87-93
    Google Scholar
  • 70 Hergt A, Christofzik D. Die Magnetextrusion. Endodontie 2017; 26: 423-435
    Google Scholar
  • 71 Mehl C, Wolfart S, Kern M. Orthodontic extrusion with magnets: A case report. Quintessence Int 2008; 39: 371-379
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 72 Wirsching E. Extrusion eines frakturierten Zahnes mittels Magneten und nachfolgende Restauration. ZWR 2011; 120: 248-254
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar