Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-0834-6459
Kritik beim Einsatz der medikamentösen Osteoporose-Therapie
Critical vue on the medical treatment of osteoporosisPublication History
15 January 2019
15 January 2019
Publication Date:
24 May 2019 (online)
Zusammenfassung
Studien über neue Medikamente für Osteoporose berichteten über die Verhütung von radiologischen Wirbelkörper (WK)-Frakturen, aber meist mit einer zu freien Definition dieser Frakturen. Radiologische Frakturen sind häufiger als die klinischen WK-Frakturen, was die Studien erleichtert, aber sie sind zu einem Drittel asymptomatisch. Die Resultate solcher Studien wurden auch oft verschönert mit der Angabe der relativen Fraktur-Verminderung, und nicht mit der wirklichen Verminderung der Frakturinzidenz. Damit konnte eine wirkliche Frakturinzidenz-Verminderung von nur 1 % als 50 % angegeben werden. Was Hüftfrakturen angeht, ist der NNT (Number Needed to Treat), die Anzahl von Patienten, die behandelt werden müssen um eine Fraktur zu verhüten, sehr oft so hoch, dass ein günstiges Kosten/Nutzen-Verhältnis fraglich wird. Meistens ist er wahrscheinlich auch zu hoch für WK-Frakturen bei Patienten ohne vorgängige WK-Fraktur. Die Erwähnung des NNT wird nicht nur von der Pharma-Industrie vermieden, sondern auch von den meisten Autoren. Weiterhin wird oft nicht das beste und preisgünstigste Medikament verschrieben (orale versus parenterale Bisphosphonate, Calcium mit Vitamin D versus Vitamin D und Calciumreiche Nahrung). Es ist auch bedauerlich, dass Fluor von der Pharma-Industrie nicht unterstützt wurde, und dass das Medikament wegen der toxischen Dosen verurteilt wurde. Die positiven Studien mit kleinen, hoch wirksamen Dosen wurden außer Acht gelassen.
Abstract
Studies on new drugs for osteoporosis report on their effect against radiological vertebral fracture, mostly with a too tolerant definition of these fractures. Radiological fractures are more frequent than clinical fractures, which makes the studies easier to perform. But one third is asymptomatic. The results were also often artificially improved by the indication of the relative decrease of fractures and not of the real decrease of the fracture incidence. By this a real decrease of 1 % can be presented as 50 %. The NNT (Number Needed to Treat), the number of patients who have to be treated for preventing one single, is in general so high , that the cost/effectiveness ratio concerning hip fractures remains questionable, and probably very often also for vertebral fractures in patients without previous fractures. The indication of the NNT is not only avoided by the Pharma industry, but also by most authors. – In addition, very often not the best and the most advantageous drugs were prescribed (oral versus parenteral bisphosphonates, Calcium with Vitamin D versus Vitamin D and calcium rich food). It is also regrettable that Fluor was not supported by the pharma industry, and that this drug was condemned only because of its toxic doses. The positive studies with small and highly effective doses were disregarded.
-
Literatur
- 1 Genant HK, Loy CV, van Kuijk C. et al. Vertebral fracture assessment using a semiquantitative technique. J Bone Min Res 1995; 8: 1137-1148
- 2 Reginster JY, Minne HW, Sorensen O. et al. Randomized trial of the effects of risedronate on vertebral fractures in women with established postmenopausal osteoporosis. Vertebral Efficacy with Risedronate Therapy (VERT) Study Group. Osteoporos Int 2000; 11 (01) 83-91
- 3 Ware JE, Gandek B. Overview of the SF-36 health survey and the international quality of life assessment (IQOLA) project. J Clin Epidemiol 1998; 51: 903-912
- 4 Black DM, Cummings SR, Karpf DB. et al. Randomised trial of effect of alendronate on risk of fracture in women with existing vertebral fractures. Lancet 1996; 348: 1535-1541
- 5 Liberman UA, Weiss SR, Bröll J, Minne HW, Quan H. et al. Alendronate Phase III Osteoporosis Treatment Study Group. Effect of oral alendronate on bone mineral density and the incidence of fractures in postmenopausal osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 1995; 333: 1437-1443
- 6 Reginster JY, Seeman B, De Vernejoul MC. et al. Strontium Ranelate Reduces the Risk of Nonvertebral Fractures in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis. Treatment of Peripheral Osteoporosis (TROPOS) Study. J Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 2005; 90 (05) 2816-2822
- 7 Meunier PJ, Roux C, Seeman E. et al. The effects of strontium ranelate on the risk of vertebral fracture in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 2004; 350: 459-468
- 8 Black DM, Delmas PD, Eastell R. et al. Once-Yearly Zoledronic Acid for Treatment of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis. New England J Medicine 2007; 356: 1809-1822
- 9 Harris ST, Watts NB, Genant HK. et al. Effects of risedronate treatment on vertebral and non-vertebral fractures in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 1999; 282: 1344-1352
- 10 Lyles KW, Colon-Emeric CS, Magaziner JS. et al. Zoledronic acid and clinical fractures and mortality after hip fracture. New Engl J Medicine 2007; 357: 1799-1809
- 11 Chapuy MC, Arlot ME, Duboeuf F. et al. Vitamin D3 and calcium to prevent hip fractures in the elderly women. N Engl J Med 1992; 327: 1637-1642
- 12 Neer RM, Arnaud CD, Zanchetta JR. et al. Effect of parathyroid hormone (1–34) on fractures and bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. New England J Medicine 2001; 344: 1434-1441
- 13 Cummings SR, Martin JS, McClung MR. et al. Denosumab for Prevention of Fractures in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis. New England J Medicine 2009; 361: 756-765
- 14 Murad MH, Drake MT, Mullan RJ. Comparative Effectiveness of Drug Treatments to Prevent Fragility Fractures: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. J Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 2012; 97 (06) 1871-1880
- 15 Siris ES, Harris ST, Rosen CJ. et al. Adherence to bisphosphonate therapy and fracture rates in osteoporotic women: relationship to vertebral and nonvertebral fractures from 2 US claims databases. Mayo Clin Proc 2006; 81: 1013-1022
- 16 Heaney RP, Nordin BEC. Calcium effects on phosphorus absorption: implications for the prevention and co-therapy of osteoporosis. J Am Coll Nutr 2002; 21: 239-244
- 17 Tang BMP, Eslick GD, Nowson C. et al. Use of calcium or calcium in combination with vitamin D supplementation to prevent fractures and bone loss in people aged 50 years and older: a meta-analysis. Lancet 2007; 370: 657-666
- 18 Curham GC, Willett WC, Speizer FE. et al. Comparison of dietary calcium with supplemental calcium and other nutrients as factors affecting the risk of kidney stones in women. Ann Int Med 1997; 126: 497-504
- 19 Meunier PM, Sebert JL, Reginster JY. et al. Fluoride Salts are no Better at Preventing New Vertebral Fractures than Calcium-Vitamin D in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis: The FAVOStudy. Osteoporosis Int 1998; 8: 4-12
- 20 Pak CYC, Sakhaee K, Adams-Huet B. et al. Treatment of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis with Slow-Release Sodium Fluoride: Final Report of a Randomized Controlled Trial. Annals Int. Med 1995; 123 (06) 401
- 21 Ringe JD, Kipshoven C, Cöster A, Umbach R. Therapy of Established Postmenopausal Osteoporosis with Monofluorophosphate plus Calcium: Dose-Related Effects on Bone Density and Fracture Rate. Osteoporosis Int 1999; 9: 171-178