Wiederherstellung einer komplex atrophierten Freiendsituation mittels individualisierten Titangitters (ReOss®) zur festsitzenden implantatprothetischen Versorgung

Alexander Volkmann; Irene Göllnitz; Amely Hartmann

doi:10.1055/a-0872-9267

ZWR - Das Deutsche Zahnärzteblatt, Table of Contents

ZWR - Das Deutsche Zahnärzteblatt 2019; 128(04): 171-178
DOI: 10.1055/a-0872-9267

Fortbildung | Implantologie

Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Wiederherstellung einer komplex atrophierten Freiendsituation mittels individualisierten Titangitters (ReOss^®) zur festsitzenden implantatprothetischen Versorgung

Authors

Alexander Volkmann
Irene Göllnitz
Amely Hartmann

Abstract

Zum Ersatz von verloren gegangenen Zähnen haben sich Implantate sehr gut bewährt [1]. Insbesondere nach langer Zahnlosigkeit, nach Explantation oder nach Trauma ist das Knochenangebot für eine Implantation häufig nicht geeignet. Die funktionellen und ästhetischen Standards für eine prothetische Versorgung sind dann häufig nicht gewährleistet. Zudem korrelieren der Langzeiterfolg und die Stabilität der Implantate mit der Quantität und Qualität des Knochenangebots [2]. Aufgrund dessen sind Augmentationen bei einer ausgeprägten Knochendefektsituation vor einer Implantation häufig unvermeidbar. Dabei stellen horizontale und insbesondere vertikale Knochendefekte eine Herausforderung für den behandelnden Zahnarzt oder Chirurgen dar.

Full Text

References

Literatur
1 Moraschini V, Poubel LA, Ferreira VF. et al. Evaluation of survival and success rates of dental implants reported in longitudinal studies with a follow-up period of at least 10 years: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015; 44: 377-388
2 Al-Nawas B, Schiegnitz E. Augmentation procedures using bone substitute materials or autogenous bone – a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Oral Implantol 2014; 7 (Suppl. 02) S219-S234
3 Boyne PJ. Restoration of osseous defects in maxillofacial casualities. J Am Dent Assoc 1969; 78: 767-776
4 Seiler M, Kaemmerer PW, Peetz M. et al. Customized Titanium Lattice Structure in Three-Dimensional Alveolar Defect: An Initial Case Letter. J Oral Implantol 2018; 44: 219-224
5 Seiler M, Peetz M, Hartmann A. et al. Individualized CAD/CAM-produced titanium scaffold for alveolar bone augmentation: a retrospective analysis of dehiscence events in relation to demographic and surgical parameters. J Oral Science Rehabilitation 2018; 4: 38-46
6 Simion M, Dahlin C, Rocchietta I. et al. Vertical ridge augmentation with guided bone regeneration in association with dental implants: an experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007; 18: 86-94
7 Buser D, Halbritter S, Hart C. et al. Early implant placement with simultaneous guided bone regeneration following single-tooth extraction in the esthetic zone: 12-month results of a prospective study with 20 consecutive patients. J Periodontol 2009; 80: 152-162
8 Tinti C, Parma-Benfenati S, Manfrini F. Spacemaking metal structures for nonresorbable membranes in guided bone regeneration around implants. Two case reports. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1997; 17: 53-61
9 Parma-Benfenati S, Roncati M, Galletti P. et al. Resorbable dome device and guided bone regeneration: an alternative bony defect treatment around implants. A case series. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2014; 34: 749-755
10 Merli M, Moscatelli M, Mariotti G. et al. Bone level variation after vertical ridge augmentation: resorbable barriers versus titanium-reinforced barriers. A 6-year double-blind randomized clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014; 29: 905-913
11 Moura RV, Kojima AN, Saraceni CHC. et al. Evaluation of the Accuracy of Conventional and Digital Impression Techniques for Implant Restorations. J Prosthodont 2019; 28: e530-e535
12 Ciocca L, Ragazzini S, Fantini M. et al. Work flow for the prosthetic rehabilitation of atrophic patients with a minimal-intervention CAD/CAM approach. J Prosthet Dent 2015; 114: 22-26
13 Sumida T, Otawa N, Kamata YU. et al. Custom-made titanium devices as membranes for bone augmentation in implant treatment: Clinical application and the comparison with conventional titanium mesh. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2015; 43: 2183-2188
14 Vrielinck L, Sun Y, Schepers S. et al. Osseous reconstruction using an occlusive titanium membrane following marginal mandibulectomy: proof of principle. J Craniofac Surg 2014; 25: 1112-1114
15 Rasia-dal Polo M, Poli PP, Rancitelli D. et al. Alveolar ridge reconstruction with titanium meshes: a systematic review of the literature. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2014; 19: e639-e646
16 Roccuzzo M, Ramieri G, Bunino M. et al. Autogenous bone graft alone or associated with titanium mesh for vertical alveolar ridge augmentation: a controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007; 18: 286-294
17 Aytac S, Ozbek S, Kahveci R. et al. Titanium mesh fracture in mandibular reconstruction. J Craniofac Surg 2005; 16: 1120-1122
18 Lindfors LT, Tervonen EA, Sandor GK. et al. Guided bone regeneration using a titanium-reinforced ePTFE membrane and particulate autogenous bone: the effect of smoking and membrane exposure. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010; 109: 825-830
19 Keestra JA, Barry O, Jong L. et al. Long-term effects of vertical bone augmentation: a systematic review. J Appl Oral Sci 2016; 24: 3-17
20 Misch CM. Comparison of intraoral donor sites for onlay grafting prior to implant placement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997; 12: 767-776
21 Hammerle CH, Karring T. Guided bone regeneration at oral implant sites. Periodontology 2000 1998; 17: 151-175
22 Simion M, Baldoni M, Zaffe D. Jawbone enlargement using immediate implant placement associated with a split-crest technique and guided tissue regeneration. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1992; 12: 462-473
23 Oda T, Sawaki Y, Ueda M. Experimental alveolar ridge augmentation by distraction osteogenesis using a simple device that permits secondary implant placement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000; 15: 95-102
24 Chappuis V, Cavusoglu Y, Buser D. et al. Lateral Ridge Augmentation Using Autogenous Block Grafts and Guided Bone Regeneration: A 10-Year Prospective Case Series Study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2017; 19: 85-96
25 Rasia-dal Polo M, Poli PP, Rancitelli D. et al. Alveolar ridge reconstruction with titanium meshes: a systematic review of the literature. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2014; 19: e639-e646
26 Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Felice P. et al. The efficacy of horizontal and vertical bone augmentation procedures for dental implants – a Cochrane systematic review. Eur J Oral Implantol 2009; 2: 167-184
27 Canullo L, Trisi P, Simion M. Vertical ridge augmentation around implants using e-PTFE titanium-reinforced membrane and deproteinized bovine bone mineral (bio-oss): A case report. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2006; 26: 355-361
28 Volkmann A, Göllnitz I. Eine individualisierte 3D-gedruckte Lösung für komplexe Knochenaugmentationen: Rekonstruktion von komplexen Knochendefekten mit CAD/CAM-designten und -gefertigten Titangittern. Dentale Implantologie und Parotontologie 2018.
29 Sagheb K, Schiegnitz E, Moergel M. et al. Clinical outcome of alveolar ridge augmentation with individualized CAD-CAM-produced titanium mesh. Int J Implant Dent 2017; 3: 36
30 Pellegrino G, Lizio G, Corinaldesi G. et al. Titanium Mesh Technique in Rehabilitation of Totally Edentulous Atrophic Maxillae: A Retrospective Case Series. J Periodontol 2016; 87: 519-528
31 Seiler M, Peetz M, Hartmann A. et al. Individualized CAD/CAM-produced titanium scaffold for alveolar bone augmentation: a retrospective analysis of dehiscence events in relation to demographic and surgical parameters. J Oral Science Rehabilitation 2018; 4: 38-46