Verbesserung motorischen Lernens in der
                    Neurorehabilitation

Gabriele Wulf; Rebecca Lewthwaite

doi:10.1055/a-0890-3832

neuroreha, Inhaltsverzeichnis

neuroreha 2019; 11(03): 101-106
DOI: 10.1055/a-0890-3832

Schwerpunkt

Verbesserung motorischen Lernens in der Neurorehabilitation

Optimierung von Übungsbedingungen

Gabriele Wulf

,

Rebecca Lewthwaite

Abstract

Drei Faktoren haben großen Einfluss auf das motorische Lernen: Leistungserwartung, Autonomie und externer Fokus der Aufmerksamkeit. Kommen sie zusammen, addieren sie sich in ihrer Wirkung. Therapeuten können diese Effekte in der neurologischen Rehabilitation leicht nutzen.

Volltext

Referenzen

Literatur
1 Ballester BR, Maier M, San Segundo Mozo RM. et al. Counteracting learned non-use in chronic stroke patients with reinforcement-induced movement therapy. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 2016; 13: 74
2 Chiviacowsky S, Wulf G. Self-controlled feedback: Does it enhance learning because performers get feedback when they need it?. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 2002; 73: 408-415
3 Chiviacowsky S, Wulf G. Feedback after good trials enhances learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 2007; 78: 40-47
4 Chiviacowsky S, Wulf G, Lewthwaite R. et al. Motor learning benefits of self-controlled practice in persons with Parkinson’s disease. Gait & Posture 2012; 35: 601-605
5 Chua LK, Wulf G, Lewthwaite R. Onward and upward: Optimizing motor performance. Human Movement Science 2018; 60: 107-114
6 Fasoli SE, Trombly CA, Tickle-Degnen L. et al. Effect of instructions on functional reach in persons with and without cerebrovascular accident. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 2002; 56: 380-390
7 Hooyman A, Wulf G, Lewthwaite R. Impacts of autonomy-supportive versus controlling instructional language on motor learning. Human Movement Science 2014; 36: 190-198
8 Jaitner D, Mess F. Participation can make a difference to be competitive in sports: A systematic review on the relation between complex motor development and self-controlled learning settings. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching. 2019 doi: 10.1177/1747954118825063
9 Lewthwaite R, Chiviacowsky S, Drews R. et al. Choose to move: The motivational impact of autonomy support on motor learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2015; 22: 1383-1388
10 Lewthwaite R, Wulf G. Optimizing motivation and attention for motor performance and learning. Current Opinions in Psychology 2017; 31: 28-34
11 Lewthwaite R, Winstein CJ, Lane CJ. et al. Accelerating stroke recovery: Secondary outcomes from the Interdisciplinary Comprehensive Arm Rehabilitation Evaluation (ICARE) clinical trial. Neural Rehabilitation and Neural Repair 2018; 32: 150-165
12 Mückel S, Mehrholz J. Immediate effects of two attention strategies on trunk control on patients after stroke: A randomized controlled pilot trial. Clinical Rehabilitation 2014; 28: 632-636
13 Palmer K, Chiviacowsky S, Wulf G. Enhanced expectancies facilitate golf putting. Psychology of Sport and Exercise 2016; 22: 229-232
14 Saemi E, Porter JM, Ghotbi-Varzaneh A. et al. Knowledge of results after relatively good trials enhances self-efficacy and motor learning. Psychology of Sport and Exercise 2012; 13: 378-382
15 Schmidt RA, Lee TD, Winstein CJ. et al. Motor Control and Learning. 6th ed.. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2019
16 Shafizadeh M, Platt GK, Bahram A. Effects of focus of attention and type of practice on learning and self-efficacy in dart throwing. Perceptual and Motor Skills 2013; 117: 182-192
17 Steel KA, Mudie K, Sandoval R. et al. Can video self-modeling improve affected limb reach and grasp ability in stroke patients?. Journal of Motor Behavior 2018; 50: 117-126
18 Taub E, Crago JE, Burgio LD. et al. An operant approach to rehabilitation medicine: Overcoming learned nonuse by shaping. Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior 1994; 61: 281-293
19 Trempe M, Sabourin M, Proteau L. Success modulates consolidation of a visuomotor adaptation task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2012; 38: 52-60
20 Winstein C, Lewthwaite R, Blanton SR. et al. Infusing contemporary motor learning research into neurorehabilitation practice: A historical framework with the Accelerated Skill Acquisition Program exemplar. Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy 2014; 38: 190-200
21 Wulf G, McNevin NH, Shea CH. The automaticity of complex motor skill learning as a function of attentional focus. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2001; 54A: 1143-1154
22 Wulf G, Landers M, Lewthwaite R. et al. External focus instructions reduce postural instability in individuals with Parkinson disease. Physical Therapy 2009; 89: 162-168
23 Wulf G, Chiviacowsky S, Lewthwaite R. Altering mindset can enhance motor learning in older adults. Psychology and Aging 2012; 27: 14-21
24 Wulf G. Attentional focus and motor learning: A review of 15 years. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology 2013; 6: 77-104
25 Wulf G, Adams N. Small choices can enhance balance learning. Human Movement Science 2014; 38: 235-240
26 Wulf G, Freitas HE, Tandy RD. Choosing to exercise more: Small choices can increase exercise engagement. Psychology of Sport and Exercise 2014; 15: 268-271
27 Wulf G, Lewthwaite R. Optimizing Performance through Intrinsic Motivation and Attention for Learning: The OPTIMAL theory of motor learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2016; 23: 1382-1414
28 Wulf G, Lewthwaite R, Cardozo P. et al. Triple play: Additive contributions of enhanced expectancies, autonomy support, and external attentional focus to motor learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2018; 71: 824-834