Download PDF
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2019; 236(06): 751-755
DOI: 10.1055/a-0901-7692
Übersicht
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Biomechanik und Augeninnendruck bei Hornhauterkrankungen

Corneal Biomechanics and Measurement of Intraocular Pressure Measurement in Pathological Corneas
Jan Luebke
Klinik für Augenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg
,
Philip Christian Maier
Klinik für Augenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

eingereicht 27 March 2019

akzeptiert 23 April 2019

Publication Date:
13 June 2019 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Die Messung des Augeninnendruckes ist vor allem bei Erkrankungen und iatrogenen Veränderungen der Hornhaut eine fehler- und abweichungsanfällige Untersuchung. Es existiert eine Vielzahl an unterschiedlichen Messmethoden, die auf unterschiedliche Art und Weise die Hornhaut und ihre Biomechanik einbeziehen. Die Abweichungen von der bisher als Goldstandard akzeptierten Goldmann-Applanationstonometrie sind in unterschiedlichem Maße von der Beschaffenheit der Hornhaut abhängig. Für unterschiedliche Erkrankungen/Veränderungen variieren diese für die einzelnen Methoden. Eine bei veränderten Hornhäuten klar zu bevorzugende Messmethode existiert nicht, die Kenntnis über die einzelnen Abweichungsverhältnisse ist daher wichtig, um Augeninnendruckwerte individuell einschätzen und einordnen zu können.

Abstract

Measuring the intraocular pressure in eyes with corneal diseases or after corneal interventions often results in false values due to abnormal corneal biomechanics. Many different approaches are used to compensate for these abnormal corneal biomechanic properties, with varying measuring methods. There are differences when these alternative measuring methods are compared to the gold standard, applanation tonometry according to Goldmann. These differences vary between the methods and with different corneal changes. There is no clear recommendation on a precise method that is suitable for every pathological cornea. Therefore it is important to know the different variations and to include them in the analysis of every patientʼs intraocular pressure analysis.

Schlüsselwörter

Augeninnendruck - Hornhaut - korneale Biomechanik - Applanationstonometrie

Key words

intraocular pressure - cornea - corneal biomechanics - applanation tonometry
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Goldmann H, Schmidt T. [Applanation tonometry]. Ophthalmologica 1957; 134: 221-242
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Reinhard T, Sundmacher R. Determining real IOP values. J Cataract Refract Surg 1999; 25: 157-158
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Feizi S, Jafarinasab MR, Karimian F. et al. Central and peripheral corneal thickness measurement in normal and keratoconic eyes using three corneal pachymeters. J Ophthalmic Vis Res 2014; 9: 296-304
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Kohlhaas M, Spörl E, Böhm AG. et al. [Applanation tonometry in “normal” patients and patients after LASIK]. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 2005; 222: 823-826
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Erickson DH, Goodwin D, Rollins M. et al. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry and their relationship to corneal properties, refractive error, and ocular pulse amplitude. Optometry 2009; 80: 169-174
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Mansoori T, Balakrishna N. Effect of central corneal thickness on intraocular pressure and comparison of Topcon CT-80 non-contact tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry. Clin Exp Optom 2018; 101: 206-212
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Anton A, Neuburger M, Jordan JF. et al. Änderung des Augeninnendrucks und der CorVis-Parameter nach LASIK. Ophthalmologe 2017; 114: 445-449
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Feltgen N, Leifert D, Funk J. Correlation between central corneal thickness, applanation tonometry, and direct intracameral IOP readings. Br J Ophthalmol 2001; 85: 85-87
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Simon G, Small RH, Ren Q. et al. Effect of corneal hydration on Goldmann applanation tonometry and corneal topography. Refract Corneal Surg 1993; 9: 110-117
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Madjlessi F, Marx W, Reinhard T. et al. Impressions- und Applanationstonometrie bei pathologischen Hornhäuten im Vergleich mit der intraokularen Nadeldruckmessung. Ophthalmologe 2000; 97: 478-481
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Hamilton KE, Pye DC, Kao L. et al. The effect of corneal edema on dynamic contour and Goldmann tonometry. Optom Vis Sci 2008; 85: 451-456
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Neuburger M, Maier P, Böhringer D. et al. The impact of corneal edema on intraocular pressure measurements using Goldmann applanation tonometry, Tono-Pen XL, iCare, and ORA: an in vitro model. J Glaucoma 2013; 22: 584-590
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Firat PG, Orman G, Doganay S. et al. Influence of corneal parameters in keratoconus on IOP readings obtained with different tonometers. Clin Exp Optom 2013; 96: 233-237
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Cairns R, Graham K, OʼGallagher M. et al. Intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements in keratoconic patients: Do variations in IOP respect variations in corneal thickness and corneal curvature?. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2019; 42: 216-219 doi:10.1016/j.clae.2018.11.007
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Rosentreter A, Athanasopoulos A, Schild AM. et al. Rebound, applanation, and dynamic contour tonometry in pathologic corneas. Cornea 2013; 32: 313-318
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Mendez-Hernandez C, Arribas-Pardo P, Cuiña-Sardiña R. et al. Measuring intraocular pressure in patients with keratoconus with and without intrastromal corneal ring segments. J Glaucoma 2017; 26: 71-76
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Özcura F, Yıldırım N, Tambova E. et al. Evaluation of Goldmann applanation tonometry, rebound tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in keratoconus. J Optom 2017; 10: 117-122
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Steinberg J, Katz T, Mousli A. et al. Corneal biomechanical changes after crosslinking for progressive keratoconus with the corneal visualization Scheimpflug Technology. J Ophthalmol 2014; 2014: 579190 doi:10.1155/2014/579190
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Goldich Y, Marcovich A, Barkana Y. et al. Clinical and corneal biomechanical changes after collagen cross-linking with riboflavin and UV irradiation in patients with progressive keratoconus. Cornea 2012; 31: 609-614
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Spoerl E, Terai N, Scholz F. et al. Detection of biomechanical changes after corneal cross-linking using Ocular Response Analyzer software. J Refract Surg 2011; 27: 452-457
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Vinciguerra P, Albè E, Mahmoud AM. et al. Intra- and postoperative variation in ocular response analyzer parameters in keratoconic eyes after corneal cross-linking. J Refract Surg 2010; 26: 669-676
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Clemmensen K, Hjortdal J. Intraocular pressure and corneal biomechanics in Fuchsʼ endothelial dystrophy and after posterior lamellar keratoplasty. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 2014; 92: 350-354
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 del Buey MA, Cristóbal JA, Ascaso FJ. et al. Biomechanical properties of the cornea in Fuchsʼ corneal dystrophy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009; 50: 3199-3202
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Chou CY, Jordan CA, McGhee CNJ. et al. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurement using 4 different instruments following penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 2012; 153: 412-418
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Ménage MJ, Kaufman PL, Croft MA. et al. Intraocular pressure measurement after penetrating keratoplasty: minified Goldmann applanation tonometer, pneumatonometer, and Tono-Pen versus manometry. Br J Ophthalmol 1994; 78: 671-676
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Chang DTW, Pantcheva MB, Noecker RJ. Corneal thickness and intraocular pressure in edematous corneas before and after Descemet stripping with automated endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea 2010; 29: 1125-1130
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Achiron A, Blumenfeld O, Avizemer H. et al. Intraocular pressure measurement after DSAEK by iCare, Goldmann applanation and dynamic contour tonometry: a comparative study. J Fr Ophtalmol 2016; 39: 822-828
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Maier AK, Gundlach E, Pahlitzsch M. et al. Intraocular pressure measurements after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. J Glaucoma 2017; 26: 258-265
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Kaufmann C, Bachmann LM, Thiel MA. Intraocular pressure measurements using dynamic contour tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003; 44: 3790-3794
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Tsai AS, Loon SC. Intraocular pressure assessment after laser in situ keratomileusis: a review. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2012; 40: 295-304
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 McCafferty S, Levine J, Schwiegerling J. et al. Goldmann applanation tonometry error relative to true intracameral intraocular pressure in vitro and in vivo. BMC Ophthalmol 2017; 17: 215
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar