Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2020; 80(02): 190-199
DOI: 10.1055/a-0918-6118
GebFra Science
Original Article/Originalarbeit
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Predictors for the Early Termination of a Psychological Intervention During Treatment with Assisted Reproductive Technologies

Prädiktoren für das vorzeitige Beenden einer psychologischen Intervention während einer reproduktionsmedizinischen Behandlung Article in several languages: English | deutsch
Marie Bernd
1   Institute of Medical Psychology, Centre for Psychosocial Medicine, University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
,
Maren Schick
1   Institute of Medical Psychology, Centre for Psychosocial Medicine, University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
,
Sabine Rösner
2   Department of Gynecological Endocrinology and Fertility Disorders, University Womenʼs Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
,
Ariane Germeyer
2   Department of Gynecological Endocrinology and Fertility Disorders, University Womenʼs Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
,
Thomas Strowitzki
2   Department of Gynecological Endocrinology and Fertility Disorders, University Womenʼs Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
,
Markus Moessner
3   Center for Psychotherapy Research, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
,
Stephanie Bauer
3   Center for Psychotherapy Research, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
,
Beate Ditzen
1   Institute of Medical Psychology, Centre for Psychosocial Medicine, University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
,
Tewes Wischmann
1   Institute of Medical Psychology, Centre for Psychosocial Medicine, University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

received 29 March 2019
revised 25 April 2019

accepted 11 May 2019

Publication Date:
21 February 2020 (online)

Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Introduction Assisted reproductive technologies are typically perceived by couples as being an emotional burden. The objective of the study “Positive Ausrichtung bei unerfülltem Kinderwunsch” [Positive adjustment in infertility] (PACI) is to examine the efficacy and acceptance of a smartphone-supported psychosocial intervention during infertility treatment. In this investigation, the early drop-out of study subjects from the study is of primary interest. The objective of the investigation was to find predictors for ending a psychological intervention prematurely.

Materials and Methods There are data available from an eight-month randomised, controlled study in which 141 patients and their partners participated. Sociodemographic and fertility-related data were collected at the start of the study. The couples received the ScreenIVF questionnaire at two points in time. As part of a post-evaluation, a survey was conducted on the efficacy of the psychological online intervention. To analyse the data, a dyadic data structure was used in order to determine connections within the study subject couples between the selected stress indicators and the drop-out. In addition, a “risk score” as a possible predictor for the drop-out was tested.

Results The descriptive observation of the sample indicates in this interim assessment that the study subjects recruited are less stressed patient couples. Actor–partner interdependence models indicate statistically significant connections between the stress indicators of anxiety, little social support and helplessness and an early drop-out.

Conclusions The statistically significant effects found in this study with regard to the stress indicators in connection with drop-outs from psychosocial intervention studies indicate that it is advisable to continue to seek measures for people undergoing stressful medical treatments in order to motivate and support them and thus optimally utilise the opportunities of a medical treatment. The number of patients who endure their ART treatment may also increase as a result, which could lead in turn to increased patient satisfaction over the long term (and thus possibly to higher pregnancy rates).

Key words

psychosocial intervention - ART - drop-out predictors - APIM model - risk score for early drop out
 

  • References/Literatur

  • 1 Verhaak CM, Smeenk JM, van Minnen A. et al. A longitudinal, prospective study on emotional adjustment before, during and after consecutive fertility treatment cycles. Hum Reprod 2005; 20: 2253-2260
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Lancastle D, Boivin J. A feasibility study of a brief coping intervention (PRCI) for the waiting period before a pregnancy test during fertility treatment. Hum Reprod 2008; 23: 2299-2307
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Boivin J, Lancastle D. Medical waiting periods: imminence, emotions and coping. Womens Health (Lond) 2010; 6: 59-69
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Wischmann T, Stammer H, Scherg H. et al. Psychosocial characteristics of infertile couples: a study by the ‘Heidelberg Fertility Consultation Service’. Hum Reprod 2001; 16: 1753-1761
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Domar AD, Gross J, Rooney K. et al. Exploratory randomized trial on the effect of a brief psychological intervention on emotions, quality of life, discontinuation, and pregnancy rates in in vitro fertilization patients. Fertil Steril 2015; 104: 440-451
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Gameiro S, Boivin J, Peronace L. et al. Why do patients discontinue fertility treatment? A systematic review of reasons and predictors of discontinuation in fertility treatment. Hum Reprod Update 2012; 18: 652-669
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Olivius C, Friden B, Borg G. et al. Why do couples discontinue in vitro fertilization treatment? A cohort study. Fertil Steril 2004; 81: 258-261
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Rajkhowa M, Mcconnell A, Thomas GE. Reasons for discontinuation of IVF treatment: a questionnaire study. Hum Reprod 2006; 21: 358-363
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Brandes M, van der Steen JO, Bokdam SB. et al. When and why do subfertile couples discontinue their fertility care? A longitudinal cohort study in a secondary care subfertility population. Hum Reprod 2009; 24: 3127-3135
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Domar AD, Smith K, Conboy L. et al. A prospective investigation into the reason why insured United States patients drop out of in vitro fertilization treatment. Fertil Steril 2010; 94: 1457-1459
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Gameiro S, Verhaak CM, Kremer J. et al. Why we should talk about compliance with assisted reproductive technologies (ART): a systematic review and meta-analysis of ART compliance rates. Hum Reprod Update 2013; 19: 124-135
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Olivius C, Friden B, Borg G. et al. Psychological aspects of discontinuation of in vitro fertilization treatment. Fertil Steril 2004; 81: 276
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Schröder AK, Katalinic A, Diedrich K. et al. Cumulative pregnancy rates and drop-out rates in a German IVF programme: 4102 cycles in 2130 patients. RBM Online 2004; 8: 600-606
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Verberg MFG, Eijkemans MJC, Heijnen EMEQ. et al. Why do couples drop-out from IVF treatment? A prospective cohort study. Hum Reprod 2008; 23: 2050-2055
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Verhagen TEM, Dumoulin JCM, Evers JLH. et al. What is the most accurate estimate of pregnancy rates in IVF drop outs?. Hum Reprod 2008; 23: 1793-1799
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Boivin J, Domar A, Shapiro D. et al. Tackling burden in ART: an integrated approach for medical staff. Hum Reprod 2012; 27: 941-950
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Gameiro S, Boivin J, Domar A. Optimal IVF in 2020 should reduce treatment burden and enhance care delivery for patients and staff. Fertil Steril 2013; 100: 302-394
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Verhaak CM, Lintsen AME, Evers AWM. et al. Who is at risk of emotional problems and how do you know? Screening of women going for IVF treatment. Hum Reprod 2010; 25: 1234-1240
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Folkman S, Lazarus RS. The relationship between coping and emotion: implications for theory and research. Soc Sci Med 1988; 26: 309-317
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Ockhuijsen HDL, van den Hoogen A, Eijkemans MJC. et al. Clarifying the benefits of the positive reappraisal coping intervention for women waiting for the outcome of IVF. Human Reprod 2014; 29: 2712-2718
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 De Klerk C, Hunfeld JAM, Duivenvoorden HJ. et al. Effectiveness of a psychosocial counselling intervention for first-time IVF couples: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod 2005; 20: 1333-1338
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Domar AD, Clapp D, Slawsby EA. et al. Impact of group psychological interventions on pregnancy rates in infertile women. Fertil Steril 2000; 73: 805-811
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Verhaak CM, Smeenk JM, Evers AW. et al. Predicting emotional response to unsuccessful fertility treatment: a prospective study. J Behav Med 2005; 28: 181-190
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Volmer L, Rösner S, Toth B. et al. Infertile partnersʼ coping strategies are interrelated – Implications for targeted psychological counseling. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 2017; 77: 52-58
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Spielberger CD. Manual for the State-trait Anxiety Scale. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press; 1983
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 26 Beck AT, Guth D, Steer RA. et al. Screening for major depression disorders in medical inpatients with the Beck Depression Inventory for primary care. Behav Res Ther 1997; 35: 785-791
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Evers AW, Kraaimaat FW, van Lankveld W. et al. Beyond unfavorable thinking: The illness cognition questionnaire for chronic diseases. J Consult. Clin Psychol 2001; 69: 1026-1036
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Van Dam-Baggen R, Kraaimaat FW. The Inventarisation inventory to measure sociale integration: a self report inventory to assess social support. Gedragstherapie 1992; 25: 27-45
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Schick M, Roesner S, Germeyer A. et al. Smartphone-supported Positive Adjustment Coping Intervention (PACI) for couples undergoing fertility treatment: a randomised controlled trial protocol. BMJ Open 2019; 0: e025288
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Kenny DA, Judd CM. A general procedure for the estimation of interdependence. Psychol Bull 1996; 119: 138-148
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Kenny DA, Kashy DA, Cook WL. Dyadic Data Analysis. New York, NY: The Guilford Press; 2006
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 32 R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Wien: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2018. Online: http://www.R-project.org/ last access: 15.08.2018
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 33 Rosseel Y. lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling. J Stat Softw 2012;
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Junghans C, Feder G, Hemingway H. et al. Recruiting patients to medical research: double blind randomised trial of “opt-in” versus “opt-out” strategies. BMJ 2005; 331: 940
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Treweek S, Pitkethly M, Cook J. et al. Strategies to improve recruitment to randomised controlled trials. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; (04) MR000013
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 36 Wippermann C. Kinderlose Frauen und Männer: Ungewollte oder gewollte Kinderlosigkeit im Lebenslauf und Nutzung von Unterstützungsangeboten. Berlin: Bundesministerium für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend; 2014
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 37 Datta J, Palmer MJ, Tanton C. et al. Prevalence of infertility and help seeking among 15 000 women and men. Hum Reprod 2016; 31: 2108-2118
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 38 Berlin-Institut für Bevölkerung und Entwicklung. Ungewollt kinderlos. Was kann die moderne Medizin gegen den Kindermangel in Deutschland tun? (Juni 2007). Online: https://www.berlin-institut.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Studien/Ungewollt_kinderlos_Webversion.pdf last access: 13.09.2018
    PubMed
  • 39 Terävä AN, Gissler M, Hemminki E. et al. Infertility and the use of infertility treatments in Finland: prevalence and socio-demographic determinants 1992–2004. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2008; 136: 61-66
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 40 Wischmann T. ‘Your count is zero’–counselling the infertile man. Hum Fertil (Camb) 2013; 16: 35-39
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 41 Wright J, Duchesne C, Sabourin S. et al. Psychological distress and infertility: men and women respond differently. Fertil Steril 1991; 55: 100-108
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 42 Carmeli YS, Birbaum-Carmeli D. The predicament of masculinity: towards understanding the male experience of infertility treatments. Sex Roles 1994; 30: 663-677
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 43 OʼDonnell E. Making room for men in infertility counseling. Sexuality, Reproduction and Menopause 2007; 5: 28-32
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 44 Folkman S, Moskowitz JT. Positive affect and the other side of coping. Am Psychol 2000; 55: 647-654
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 45 Folkman S. Positive psychological states and coping with severe stress. Soc Sci Med 1997; 45: 1207-1221
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 46 Park CL, Folkman S. The role of meaning in the context of stress and coping. Gen Rev Psychol 1997; 2: 115-144
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 47 Folkman S, Greer S. Promoting psychological well-being in the face of serious illness: when theory, research and practice inform each other. Psychooncology 2000; 9: 11-19
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 48 Kentenich H, Brähler E, Kowalcek I, Strauß B, Thorn P, Weblus AJ, Wischmann T, Stöbel-Richter Y. Hrsg. Leitlinie psychosomatisch orientierte Diagnostik und Therapie bei Fertilitätsstörungen. Gießen: Psychosozial-Verlag; 2014
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 49 Kreuzer VK, Kimmel M, Schiffner J. et al. Mögliche Gründe für einen Therapieabbruch: eine Analyse von 571 071 Behandlungszyklen aus dem Deutschen IVF-Register. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 2018; 78: 984-990
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar