Download PDF
Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie up2date 2020; 15(06): 514-520
DOI: 10.1055/a-0925-2190
SOP / Arbeitsablauf

SOP Verletzungen des Beckens

Dennis Wincheringer
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints All articles of this category

Einleitung

Die Inzidenz von Beckenringfrakturen liegt bei etwa 3% aller Frakturen. Sie sind somit eher seltene Verletzungen. Bei mehrfach verletzten Patienten steigt sie jedoch auf ca. 25% und bei der Subgruppe verkehrsbedingter Todesfälle auf bis zu 42% an [1]. Aufgrund ihrer hohen Letalitätsrate von bis zu 20% bedürfen sie eines strukturierten Therapiealgorithmus.



Publication History

Article published online:
12 November 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Hauschild O, Strohm PC, Culemann U. et al. Mortality in patients with pelvic fractures: results from the German pelvic injury register. J Trauma 2008; 64: 449-455
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Holstein JH, Culemann U, Pohlmann T. et al. What are predictors of mortality in patients with pelvic fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012; 470: 2090-2097
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Tosounidis G, Culemann U, Stengel D. et al. [Complex pelvic trauma in elderly patients]. Unfallchirurg 2010; 113: 281-286
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Culemann U, Scola A, Tosounidis G. et al. [Concept for treatment of pelvic ring injuries in elderly patients. A challenge]. Unfallchirurg 2010; 113: 258-271
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 American College of Surgeons. Committee on trauma: advanced trauma life support for physicians. Am Coll Surg 2004; 98
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Köhler D, Pohlemann T. Operative treatment of the peripelvic Morel-Lavallée lesion. Oper Orthop Traumatol 2011; 23: 15-20
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Shlamovitz GZ, Mower WR, Bergman J. et al. How (un)useful is the pelvic ring stability examination in diagnosing mechanically unstable pelvic fractures in blunt trauma patients?. J Trauma 2009; 66: 815-820
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Pehle B, Nast-Kolb D, Oberbeck R. et al. [Significance of physical examination and radiography of the pelvis during treatment in the shock emergency room]. Unfallchirurg 2003; 106: 642-648
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Grotz MRW, Allami MK, Harwood P. et al. Open pelvic fractures: epidemiology, current concept of management and outcome. Injury 2005; 36: 1-13
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Edeiken-Monroe BS, Browner BD, Jackson H. The role of standard roentgenograms in the evaluation of instability of pelvic ring disruption. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989; 240: 63-76
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Pennal GF, Tile M, Waddel JP. et al. Pelvic disruption: assessment and classification. Clin Orthop 1980; 151: 12-21
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Denis F, Davis S, Comfort T. Sacral fractures: an important problem. Retrospective analysis of 236 cases. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988; 227: 67-81
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Kido A, Inoue F, Takakura Y. et al. Statistical analysis of fatal bleeding pelvic fracture patients with severe associated injuries. J Orthop Sci 2008; 13: 21-24
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Burkhardt M, Nienaber U, Pizanis A. et al. Acute management and outcome of multiple trauma patients with pelvic disruptions. Crit Care 2012; 16: R163
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Jeremitsky E, St Germain N, Kao AH. et al. Risk of pulmonary embolism in trauma patients: Not all created equal. Surgery 2013; 154: 810-814 discussion 814–815
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar