Download PDF
Notaufnahme up2date 2019; 1(01): 9-14
DOI: 10.1055/a-0926-0386
SOP / Arbeitsablauf
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

SOP Akute Dyspnoe

Christiane Rosin
,
Gilbert Krähenbühl
,
Gregory Mansella
Subject Editor: Wissenschaftlich verantwortlich gemäß Zertifizierungsbestimmungen für diesen Beitrag ist Dr. med. Gregory Mansella, Basel.
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
25 October 2019 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints All articles of this category

Dyspnoe ist ein alarmierendes Leitsymptom und bedarf aufgrund seiner verschiedensten Ursachen einer breiten differenzialdiagnostischen Abklärung sowie bei kritischem Patientenzustand gleichzeitig ersten therapeutischen Maßnahmen. Um unter Zeitdruck Fehlbeurteilungen zu minimieren, ist eine standardisierte Patientenbeurteilung essenziell.
Fazit

Patienten mit akuter Dyspnoe in der Zentralen Notaufnahme stellen aufgrund der breiten Differenzialdiagnosen eine Herausforderung dar. Hauptaufgabe des betreuenden Notfallteams ist die Optimierung der Sauerstoffversorgung, das rasche Erkennen und die Therapie der lebensbedrohlichen Ursachen einer Dyspnoe. Ein standardisiertes Vorgehen ohne Zeitverlust kann für die Prognose des Patienten entscheidend sein.

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Simon PM, Schwartzstein RM, Weiss JW. et al. Distinguishable sensations of breathlessness induced in normal volunteers. Am Rev Respir Dis 1989; 140: 1021-1027
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Ray P, Birolleau S, Lefort Y. et al. Acute respiratory failure in the elderly: etiology, emergency diagnosis and prognosis. Crit Care 2006; 10: R82
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Bingisser R, Dietrich M, Nieves OrtegaR. et al. Systematically assessed symptoms as outcome predictors in emergency patients. Eur J Intern Med 2017; 45: 8-12
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Bingisser R. Algorithms and protocols for acute dyspnea in the Emergency Department. Ther Umsch 2009; 66: 632-634
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Strauss R, Ewig S, Richter K. et al. The prognostic significance of respiratory rate in patients with pneumonia: a retrospective analysis of data from 705,928 hospitalized patients in Germany from 2010-2012. Dtsch Ärztebl Int 2014; 111: 503-508, i-v
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Chu DK, Kim LH, Young PJ. et al. Mortality and morbidity in acutely ill adults treated with liberal versus conservative oxygen therapy (IOTA): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2018; 391: 1693-1705
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Siemieniuk RAC, Chu DK, Kim LH. et al. Oxygen therapy for acutely ill medical patients: a clinical practice guideline. BMJ 2018; 363: k4169
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Gutierrez Garcia I, Pérez Cañadas P, Martínez Uriarte J. et al. D-dimer during pregnancy: establishing trimester-specific reference intervals. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 2018; 78: 439-442
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Thygesen K, Mair J, Katus H. et al. Recommendations for the use of cardiac troponin measurement in acute cardiac care. Eur Heart J 2010; 31: 2197-2204
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Maisel A, Mueller C, Adams KJr. et al. State of the art: using natriuretic peptide levels in clinical practice. Eur J Heart Fail 2008; 10: 824-839
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Adler C, Baldus S. Troponin elevation-does every patient require coronary angiography?. Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed 2019; DOI: 10.1007/s00063-019-0593-4.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 McNamara RM, Cionni DJ. Utility of the peak expiratory flow rate in the differentiation of acute dyspnea. Cardiac vs. pulmonary origin. Chest 1992; 101: 129-132
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Volpicelli G, Elbarbary M, Blaivas M. et al. International evidence-based recommendations for point-of-care lung ultrasound. Intensive Care Med 2012; 38: 577-591
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Collins SP, Lindsell CJ, Storrow AB. et al. Prevalence of negative chest radiography results in the emergency department patient with decompensated heart failure. Ann Emerg Med 2006; 47: 13-18
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Basi SK, Marrie TJ, Huang JQ. et al. Patients admitted to hospital with suspected pneumonia and normal chest radiographs: epidemiology, microbiology, and outcomes. Am J Med 2004; 117: 305-311
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Wimalasena Y, Kocierz L, Strong D. et al. Lung ultrasound: a useful tool in the assessment of the dyspnoeic patient in the emergency department. Fact or fiction?. Emerg Med J 2018; 35: 258-266
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Wnorowski AM, Halpern EJ. Diagnostic Yield of Triple-Rule-Out CT in an Emergency Setting. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2016; 207: 295-301
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Mehran R, Dangas GD, Weisbord SD. Contrast-Associated Acute Kidney Injury. N Engl J Med 2019; 380: 2146-2155
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Malatesha G, Singh NK, Bharija A. et al. Comparison of arterial and venous pH, bicarbonate, PCO2 and PO2 in initial emergency department assessment. Emerg Med J 2007; 24: 569-571
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Whiles BB, Deis AS, Simpson SQ. Increased Time to Initial Antimicrobial Administration Is Associated With Progression to Septic Shock in Severe Sepsis Patients. Crit Care Med 2017; 45: 623-629
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar