Download PDF
Hebamme 2019; 32(04): 45-50
DOI: 10.1055/a-0953-4155
Fortbildung
Junges Forum
Geburt
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Terminüberschreitung – Einleiten oder Abwarten?

Kerstin Müller
,
Julia Leinweber
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
02 September 2019 (online)

Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Mehr als ein Drittel der Kinder kommen in Deutschland nach Schwangerschaftswoche 40 + 0 auf die Welt. Der folgende Beitrag wägt das Vorgehen bei Terminüberschreitung auf Basis eines integrativen Literaturreviews ab, erläutert Ursachen und Risiken und zeigt auf, warum abwartendes Verhalten eine sinnvolle Alternative zur steigenden Zahl an Geburtseinleitungen sein kann.

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Alfirevic Z, Aflaifel N, Weeks A. Oral misoprostol for induction of labour. The Cochrane databse of systematic reviews. 2014 ; Abstract
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Balchin I, Whittaker JC, Steer PJ. et al. Are reported preterm birth rates reliable? An analysis of interhospital differences in the calculation of the weeks of gestation at delivery and preterm birth rate. BJOG 2004; 111 (02) : 160-163
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Coad J, Dustall M. Geburtsbeginn. In: Coad J, Dustall M. Hrsg. Anatomie und Physiologie für die Geburtshilfe. 1.. Auflage München: 2007. Urban & Fischer Verlag; 360-369
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 4 Coates R, Cupples G, Scamell A. et al. Women’s experiences of induction of labour: Qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis. Midwifery 2019; 69: 17-28
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Davey M, King J. Ceasarean section following induction of labour in uncomplicated first births- a population-based cross-sectional analysis of 42,950 births. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2016; 16: 92
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe e. V. Leitlinie Vorgehen bei Terminüberschreitung und Übertragung. Im Internet: https://www.awmf.org/uploads/tx_szleitlinien/015-065l_S1_Termin%C3%BCberschreitung_%C3%9Cbertragung_02-2014-verlaengert_01.pdf ; Stand: Februar 2014
  • 7 Deutsche Gesellschaft für Hebammenwissenschaft e. V. Terminüberschreitung: Stellungnahme zur S1-Leitlinie. Die Hebamme 2016; 6: 389-396
    Thieme ConnectSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Gardosi J, Giddings S, Clifford S. et al. Association between reduced stillbirth rates in England and regional uptake of accreditation training in customised fetal growth assessment. BMJ Open 2013; 3 (12) : 1-11
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Gardosi J, Vanner T, Francis A. Gestational age and induction of labour for prolonged pregnancy. Birth Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1997; 104 (07) : 792-797
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 10 Gatward H, Simpson M, Woodhart L. et al. Women’s experiences of being induced for post-date pregnancy. Women Birth 2009; 23 (01) : 3-9
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Gülmezoglu AM, Crowther CA, Middleton P. et al. Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term. Cochrane Library. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012; 1-95
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 12 Harder U, Hauser R. Terminüberschreitung und Übertragung. In: Harder U, Geist C, Stiefel A. Hrsg. Hebammenkunde. Lehrbuch für Schwangerschaft, Geburt, Wochenbett und Beruf. 5.. Aufl Stuttgart: Hippokrates; 2013: 386
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 13 Harris R, Ayers S. What makes labour and birth traumatic? A survey of intrapartum “hotspots”. Pschology & Health 2012; 27 (10) : 1166-1177
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 14 Helgadóttir LB, Torowski G, Skjeldestad FE. et al. Classification of stillbirths: women’s health and risk factors by cause of death. a case-control study. Acta Obstetrica et Gynecologica Scandinavica 2012; 92 (03) : 325-333
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 15 Hilder L, Costeloe K, Thilaganathan B. et al. Prolonged pregnancy: Evaluating gestation-specitic risks of fetal and infant mortality. British Jornal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1998; 105 (02) : 169-173
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 16 Hovi M, Raatikainen K, Heiskanen N. et al. Obstetric outcome in post-term pregnancies: time for reappraisal in clinical managment. Achta Obstetrica et Gynecologica 2006; 85 (07) : 805-509
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 17 Institut für Qualitätssicherung und Transparenz im Gesundheitswesen (IQTIG). Bundesauswertung zum Erfasssungsjahr 2017 Geburthilfe Qualitätsindikatoren. Im Internet: https://iqtig.org/downloads/auswertung/2017/16n1gebh/QSKH_16n1-GEBH_2017_BUAW_V02_2018-08-01.pdf; Stand: 01. 08.2018
  • 18 Johnson DP, Davis NR, Brown AJ. Risk of cesarean delivery after induction at term in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2003; 188 (06) : 1565-1569
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Joseph KS, Rouleau J, Kramer MS. et al. Investigation of an increase in postpartum haemorrhage in Canada. BJOG 2007; 114 (06) : 751-759
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Kim J, Stirling KJ, Cooper ME. et al. Sequence variants in oxytocin pathway genes and preterm birth: a candidate gene association study. BMC Medical Genetics 2013; 14: 77
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Kistka Z A-F, Palomar L, Boslaugh SE. et al. Risk for postterm delivery after previous postterm delivery. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2007; 196 (03) : 241e1-241e6
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Knight M, Tuffnell D, Brocklehurst P. et al. Incidence and risk factors for amniotic-fluid embolism. Obstetrics and gynecology 2010; 115 (05) : 910-917
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Loytved C, Berger C, Bosch C. et al. Was meinte Naegele mit seiner Regel? Die Hebamme 2009; 22 (03) : 142-148
    Thieme ConnectSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Loytved C. In 280 Tagen zur Geburt? Terminbestimmung in Europa. Hebammenforum 2009. 9: 708-713
  • 25 Middleton P, Shepherd E, C.rowther CA. et al. Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2018; 5
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 26 National Institute for Health and Clinical Exellence (NICE). Inducing labour. Im Internet: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg70/resources/inducing-labour-pdf-975621704389; Stand: 23.07.2008
  • 27 Olesen AW, Westergaard JG, Olsen J. et al. Prenatal risk indicators of a prolonged pregnancy. The Danish Birth Cohort 1998-2001. Acta Obstetrica et Gynaecologica Scandinavia 2006; 85 (11) : 1338-1341
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 28 Rossen J, Økland I, Nilsen OB. et al. Is there an increase of postpartum hemorrhage and is severe hemorrhage asociated with more frequent usw ob obstetric interventinos? Obstetric & Gynecology Survey 2010; 89 (10) : 18-20
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 29 Saccone G, Berghella V. Induction of labor at full-term in pregnant women with uncomplicated singleton pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2019; 213 (05) : 629-636
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 30 Schneider H. Husslein P. Schneider KTM. Hrsg. Die Geburtshilfe. Aufl. 4. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer; 2011
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 31 Schwarz C, Schäfers R, Loytved C. et al. Temporal trends in fetal motality at and beyond term and induction of labor in Germany 2005-2012. Data from German routine perintal monitoring. Gynecology & Obstetrics 2016; 293: 335-343
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 32 Schwarz C, Stahl K. Hrsg. Grundlagen der evidenzbasierten Betreuung. 2.. Aufl. Hannover: Elwin Staude Verlag; 2013
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 33 Schwarz C. Dem Wahnsinn Einhalt gebieten? - Die aktuelle US-amerikanische Leitlinie zur Senkung der Kaiserschnittrate. Die Hebamme 2014; 2: 84-90
    Thieme ConnectSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Schwarz C. Wie spät ist zu spät? Geburtseinleitung oder beobachtendes Abwarten am Termin? Dr. med. Mabuse; 2017; 233: 28-30
    PubMed
  • 35 Sørbye IK, Wanigaratne S, Urquia ML. et al. Variations in gestational length and preterm delivery by race, ethnicity and migration. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology 2016; 32: 60-68
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 36 Souter V, Painter I. Sitcov et al. Maternal and newborn outcomes with elective induction of labor at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2019; 220 (03) : 273.e1-273.e11
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 37 Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network Writing Group. Causes of death among stillbirths. JAMA 2011; 306 (22) : 2459-2468
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 38 Tjong C. Einzelfallanalysen von Totgeburten. Im Internet: https://edoc.hu-berlin.de/bitstream/handle/18452/15573/Tjong.pdf?sequence=1 ; Stand: 12.06.2003
  • 39 Tveit JV, Saastad E, Stray-Pedersen B. et al. Reduction of late stillbirth with the indroduction of fetal movement informtion and guidelines - a clinical quality improvement. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2009; 9: 32
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 40 Vahratian A, Zhang J, Troendle JF. et al. Labor progession and risk of cesarean delivery in electively induced nulliparas. Obstetrics & Gynecology 2005; 105 (04) : 698-704
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 41 Venturini D. Kaiserschnitt, vaginale und natürliche Geburt: Erleben und Verarbeiten aus psychotherapeutischer Sicht. 1.. Aufl. Berlin: Springer; 2019
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 42 Vogel I. Die Geburtseinleitung: Risikoarme Vermeidung und sinnvolle Anwendung. Die Hebamme 2014; 27 (03) : 170-174
    Thieme ConnectSearch in Google Scholar
  • 43 Vogel M. Atlas der morphologischen Plazentadiagnostik. 2.. Aufl. Berlin: Springer; 1996
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 44 Vrouenraets FP, Roumen FJ, Dehing CJ. et al. Bishop score and risk of cesarean delivery after induction in nulliparous women. Obstetrics & Gynecology 2005; 105 (04) : 690-697
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 45 Whittemore R, Knafl K. The integrative review: update mehodology. Journal of advanced nursing 2015; 52 (05) : 546-553
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 46 Whitworth M, Bricker L, Neilson JP. et al. Ultrasound for fetal assessment in early pregnancy. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015 7. CD007058 .
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 47 World Health Organization (WHO). WHO recommendations: intrapartum care for positive childbirth experience. Im Internet: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/260178/9789241550215-eng.pdf;jsessionid=78C4A4F79D0DD64BC540C1D9256B525D?sequence=1 ; Stand: 2018