Response to Letter to the Editor

Ultraschall Med 2019; 40(06): 772
DOI: 10.1055/a-0967-5282

Letter to the Editor

Josef Wisser

¹Clinic of Obstetrics, University-Hospital Zürich

,

Jouzas Kurmanavicius

¹Clinic of Obstetrics, University-Hospital Zürich

,

Johannes Knitza

²Clinic of Internal Medicine 3, University Hospital Erlangen, Germany

References
1 Knitza J, Kurmanavicius J, Faschingbauer F. et al. Comparison of Current Swiss Fetal Biometry Reference Charts with Reference Charts from 1999. Are Fetuses Getting Bigger?. Ultraschall in Med 2018;
2 Kurmanavicius J, Wright EM, Royston P. et al. Fetal ultrasound biometry: 1. Head reference values. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1999; 106: 126-135
3 Salomon LJ, Bernard JP, Duyme M. et al. The impact of choice of reference charts and equations on the assessment of fetal biometry. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005; 25: 559-565
4 Balsyte D, Schaffer L, Burkhardt T. et al. Continuous independent quality control for fetal ultrasound biometry provided by the cumulative summation technique. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010; 35: 449-455