Concurrent Training and Detraining: brief Review on the Effect of Exercise Intensities

Abstract

Concurrent resistance and aerobic training (CT) has been applied to optimize both strength and aerobic performance. However, it should be carefully prescribed, as there are some factors, as the training intensity, which have strong influence on training adaptations. Thus, we conducted a systematic review to analyze the scientific evidence regarding aerobic and resistance exercise intensities during CT and their effect on performance outcomes. The effects of exercise intensity on a subsequent detraining period were also assessed. Nine studies met the inclusion criteria, the risk of bias was assessed, and the percentage of changes and effect sizes were quantified. CT improved running times (10 m, 30 m and 10 km) and strength performance (one-repetition maximum, countermovement jump) regardless of exercise intensity used (4–47%, ES=0.4–2.8). Nevertheless, higher aerobic training intensities (≥ lactate threshold intensity) resulted in higher aerobic gains (5–10%, ES=0.3–0.6), and greater neuromuscular adaptations were found when higher resistance loads (≥ 70% of maximal strength) were used (10–14%, ES=0.4–1.3). Most training-induced gains were reversed after 2–4 weeks of detraining. Although further research is needed, it seems that higher intensities of aerobic or resistance training induce greater aerobic or neuromuscular gains, respectively. Nevertheless, it seems that higher resistance training loads should be combined with lower aerobic training intensities for increased strength gains and minimal losses after detraining.

Key words

combined endurance and strength training - training intensity - training effect - exercise physiology - strength and aerobic gains - exercise cessation

• References

• 1 Joo CH. The effects of a short term detraining and retraining on physical fitness in elite soccer players. PLoS One 2018; 13: e0196212
• 2 Schumann M, Yli-Peltola K, Abbiss CR, Häkkinen K. Cardiorespiratory adaptations during concurrent aerobic and strength training in men and women. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0139279
• 3 Davis WJ, Wood DT, Andrews RG, Elkind LM, Davis WB. Concurrent training enhances athletes’ cardiovascular and cardiorespiratory measures. J Strength Cond Res 2008; 22: 1503-1514
• 4 Davis WJ, Wood DT, Andrews RG, Elkind LM, Davis WB. Concurrent training enhances athletes’ strength, muscle endurance, and other measures. J Strength Cond Res 2008; 22: 1487-1502
• 5 Garcia-Pallares J, Izquierdo M. Strategies to optimize concurrent training of strength and aerobic fitness for rowing and canoeing. Sports Med 2011; 41: 329-343
• 6 Izquierdo-Gabarren M, Gonzalez De Txabarri Exposito R, Garcia-pallares J, Sánchez-medina L, De Villarreal ES, Izquierdo M. Concurrent endurance and strength training not to failure optimizes performance gains. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2010; 42: 1191-1199
• 7 Silva RF, Cadore EL, Kothe G, Guedes M, Alberton CL, Pinto SS, Pinto RS, Trindade G, Kruel LF. Concurrent training with different aerobic exercises. Int J Sports Med 2012; 33: 627-634
• 8 Alves AR, Marta CC, Neiva HP, Izquierdo M, Marques MC. Concurrent training in prepubescent children: the effects of 8 weeks of strength and aerobic training on explosive strength and VO₂max. J Strength Cond Res 2016; 30: 2019-2032
• 9 Cadore EL, Pinto RS, Pinto SS, Alberton CL, Correa CS, Tartaruga MP, Silva EM, Almeida AP, Trindade GT, Kruel LF. Effects of strength, endurance, and concurrent training on aerobic power and dynamic neuromuscular economy in elderly men. J Strength Cond Res 2011; 25: 758-766
• 10 Docherty D, Sporer B. A proposed model for examining the interference phenomenon between concurrent aerobic and strength training. Sports Med 2000; 30: 385-394
• 11 Gravelle BL, Blessing DL. Physiological adaptation in women concurrently training for strength and endurance. J Strength Cond Res 2000; 14: 5-13
• 12 Hakkinen K, Alen M, Kraemer WJ, Gorostiaga E, Izquierdo M, Rusko H, Mikkola J, Hakkinen A, Valkeinen H, Kaarakainen E, Romu S, Erola V, Ahtiainen J, Paavolainen L. Neuromuscular adaptations during concurrent strength and endurance training versus strength training. Eur J Appl Physiol 2003; 89: 42-52
• 13 Leveritt M, Abernethy PJ, Barry BK, Logan PA. Concurrent strength and endurance training: A review. Sports Med 1999; 28: 413-427
• 14 McCarthy JP, Pozniak MA, Agre JC. Neuromuscular adaptations to concurrent strength and endurance training. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2002; 34: 511-519
• 15 Sale DG, MacDougall JD, Jacobs I, Garner S. Interaction between concurrent strength and endurance training. J Appl Physiol (1985) 1990; 68: 260-270
• 16 Bishop D, Jenkins DG. The effects of strength training on endurance performance and muscle characteristics. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1999; 31: 886-891
• 17 Chtara M, Chamari K, Chaouachi M, Chaouachi A, Koubaa D, Feki Y, Millet G, Amri M. Effects of intra-session concurrent endurance and strength training sequence on aerobic performance and capacity. Br J Sports Med 2005; 39: 555-560
• 18 McCarthy JP, Agre JC, Graf BK, Pozniak MA, Vailas AC. Compatibility of adaptive responses with combining strength and endurance training. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1995; 27: 429-436
• 19 Millet GP, Jaouen B, Borrani F, Candau R. Effects of concurrent endurance and strength training on running economy and VO₂ kinetics. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2002; 34: 1351-1359
• 20 Paavolaiınen L, Hakkinen K, Hamalainen I, Nummela A, Rusko H. Explosive-strength training improves 5-km running time by improving running economy and muscle power. J Appl Physiol (1985) 1999; 86: 1527-1533
• 21 Coffey VG, Hawley JA. Concurrent exercise training: do opposites distract?. J Physiol 2017; 595: 2883-2896
• 22 Fyfe JJ, Bishop DJ, Stepto NK. Interference between concurrent resistance and endurance exercise: molecular bases and the role of individual training variables. Sports Med 2014; 44: 743-762
• 23 Schoenfeld BJ. The mechanisms of muscle hypertrophy and their application to resistance training. J Strength Cond Res 2010; 24: 2857-2872
• 24 Hennessy L, Watson A. The interference effects of training for strength and endurance simultaneously. J Strength Cond Res 1994; 8: 12-19
• 25 Jones T, Howatson G, Russell M, French DN. Performance and neuromuscular adaptations following differing ratios of concurrent strength and endurance training. J Strength Cond Res 2013; 27: 3342-3351
• 26 Karavirta L, Hakkinen A, Sillanpaa E, García-López D, Kauhanen A, Haapasaari A, Alen M, Pakarinen A, Kraemer WJ, Izquierdo M, Gorostiaga E, Hakkinen K. Effects of combined endurance and strength training on muscle strength, power, and hypertrophy in 40-67-year-old men. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2011; 21: 402-411
• 27 Methenitis S. A brief review on concurrent training: from laboratory to the field. Sports (Basel) 2018; 6: E127
• 28 Wilson JM, Marin PJ, Rhea MR, Wilson SMC, Loenneke JP, Anderson JC. Concurrent training: a meta-analysis examining interference of aerobic and resistance exercises. J Strength Cond Res 2012; 26: 2293-2307
• 29 Sousa AC, Marinho DA, Gil MH, Izquierdo M, Rodríguez-Rosell D, Neiva HP, Marques MC. Concurrent training followed by detraining: does the resistance training intensity matter?. J Strength Cond Res 2018; 32: 632-642
• 30 Sousa AC, Neiva HP, Gil MH, Izquierdo M, Rodríguez-Rosell D, Marques MC, Marinho DA. Concurrent training and detraining: the influence of different aerobic intensities. J Strength Cond Res 2019;
• 31 Faigenbaum AD, Kraemer WJ, Blimkie CJ, Jeffreys I, Micheli LJ, Nitka M, Rowland TW. Youth resistance training: updated position statement paper from the national strength and conditioning association. J Strength Cond Res 2009; 23: S60-S79
• 32 Mujika I, Padilla S. Detraining: loss of training-induced physiological and performance adaptations. Part I: short term insufficient training stimulus. Sports Med 2000; 30: 79-87
• 33 Issurin VB. New horizons for the methodology and physiology of training periodization. Sports Med 2010; 40: 189-206
• 34 Sabag A, Najafi A, Michael S, Esgin T, Halaki M, Hackett D. The compatibility of concurrent high intensity interval training and resistance training for muscular strength and hypertrophy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Sports Sci 2018; 36: 2472-2483
• 35 Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, Shekelle P, Stewart LA. PRISMA-P Group Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev 2015; 4: 1
• 36 Harriss DJ, Macsween A, Atkinson G. Standards for ethics in sport and exercise science research: 2018 Update. Int J Sports Med 2017; 38: 1126-1131
• 37 Esteve-Lanao J, Foster C, Seiler S, Lucia A. Impact of training intensity distribution on performance in endurance athletes. J Strength Cond Res 2007; 21: 943-949
• 38 Higgins JP, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011].The Cochrane Collaboration; Eds. 2011. Available from www.handbook.cochrane.org (accessed on 28th November 2018)
• 39 Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the behavioural sciences. Hillsdale. : NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers; 1988: 531
• 40 Hopkins W, Marshall S, Batterham A, Hanin J. Progressive statistics for studies in sports medicine and exercise science. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2009; 41: 3-13
• 41 Fyfe JJ, Bartlett JD, Hanson ED, Stepto NK, Bishop DJ. Endurance training intensity does not mediate interference to maximal lower-body strength gain during shot-term concurrent training. Front Physiol 2016; 7: 487
• 42 Petré H, Lofving P, Psilander N. The effect of two different concurrent training programs on strength and power gains in highly-trained individuals. J Sports Sci Med 2018; 17: 167-173
• 43 Varela-Sanz A, Tuimil JL, Abreu L, Boullosa DA. Does concurrent training intensity distribution matter?. J Strength Cond Res 2016; 31: 181-195
• 44 Wong P, Chaouachi A. Effect of preseason concurrent muscular strength and high-intensity interval training in professional soccer players. J Strength Cond Res 2010; 24: 653-660
• 45 Beni MA. Determine the effect of concurrent strength-endurance training on aerobic power and body composition in Non-athletic male students. Ann. Biol Res 2012; 3: 395-401
• 46 Kang J, Ratamess N. Which comes first? Resistance before aerobic exercise or vice versa?. ACSMs Health Fit J 2014; 18: 9-14
• 47 Alves JV, Saavedra F, Simão R, Novaes J, Rhea MR, Green D, Reis VM. Does aerobic and strength exercise sequence in the same session affect the oxygen uptake during and post-exercise?. J Strength Cond Res 2012; 26: 1872-1878
• 48 Balsalobre-Fernández C, Santos-Concejero J, Grivas GV. Effects of strength training on running economy in highly trained runners: a systematic review with meta-analysis of controlled trials. J Strength Cond Res 2016; 30: 2361-2368
• 49 Botonis PG, Toubekis AG, Platanou TI. Concurrent strength and interval endurance training in elite water polo players. J Strength Cond Res 2016; 30: 126-133
• 50 Crowley E, Harrison AJ, Lyons M. The impact of resistance training on swimming performance: A systematic review. Sports Med 2017; 47: 2285-2307
• 51 Rønnestad BR, Mujika I. Optimizing strength training for running and cycling endurance performance: A review. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2014; 24: 603-612
• 52 Gollnick PD, Piehl K, Saltin B. Selective glycogen depletion pattern in human muscle fibres after exercise of varying intensity and at varying pedalling rates. J Physiol 1974; 241: 45-57
• 53 Thomson JA, Green HJ, Houston ME. Muscle glycogen depletion patterns in fast twitch fibre subgroups of man during submaximal and supramaximal exercise. Pflugers Arch 1979; 379: 105-108
• 54 Coffey VG, Jemiolo B, Edge J, Garnham AP, Trappe SW, Hawley JA. Effect of consecutive repeated sprint and resistance exercise bouts on acute adaptive responses in human skeletal muscle. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2009; 297: R1441-R1451
• 55 Egan B, Zierath JR. Exercise metabolism and the molecular regulation of skeletal muscle adaptation. Cell Metab 2013; 17: 162-184