PDF herunterladen
Rofo 2020; 192(01): 27-37
DOI: 10.1055/a-0998-4116
Consensus
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Structured Reporting in Cross-Sectional Imaging of the Heart: Reporting Templates for CMR Imaging of Cardiomyopathies (Myocarditis, Dilated Cardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy, Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy and Siderosis)

Artikel in mehreren Sprachen: English | deutsch
Alexander Christian Bunck
1   Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
,
Bettina Baeßler
1   Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
2   Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
,
Christian Ritter
3   Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
,
Jan Robert Kröger
1   Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
,
Thorsten Persigehl
1   Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
,
Daniel Pinto Santos
1   Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
,
Michael Steinmetz
4   Department of Pediatric Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
,
Adelheid Niehaus
5   Department of Thoracic, Cardiac and Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
,
Fabian Bamberg
6   Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
,
Meinrad Beer
7   Department of Radiology, University-Hospital Ulm, Germany
,
Sebastian Ley
8   Department of Radiology, Internistisches Klinikum München-Süd, München, Germany
,
Klaus Tiemann
9   Clinic of Internal Medicine I, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, München, Germany
,
Philipp Beerbaum
10   Department of Pediatric Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
,
David Maintz
1   Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
,
Joachim Lotz
3   Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

17. Dezember 2018

01. August 2019

Publikationsdatum:
09. Oktober 2019 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
   Lizenzen und Reprints

Erratum zu diesem Artikel:

Strukturierte Befundung in der Schnittbilddiagnostik des Herzens: Befundvorlagen für die MRT bei Kardiomyopathien (Myokarditis, dilatative Kardiomyopathie, hypertrophe Kardiomyopathie, arrhythmogene rechtsventrikuläre Kardiomyopathie und Siderose)Rofo 2020; 192(01): e1-e1
DOI: 10.1055/a-1034-2379

Abstract

Backround Structured reports have numerous benefits through standardizing the way imaging findings are reported and communicated. Nevertheless, the adoption of structured reports in everyday radiological practice is still limited. In view of the irrefutable benefits, various national and international radiological societies have started initiatives which aim at promoting a broader use of structured reports. Up to now, no consented templates in German language existed for the reporting of cross-sectional imaging studies of the heart.

Method Upon invitation of the working group for Cardiovascular Imaging of the German Society of Radiology a panel of radiologists, cardiologists, pediatric cardiologists and cardiothoracic surgeons, experts on the field of cardiovascular imaging and structured reporting, met for two interdisciplinary consensus meetings at the University Hospital Cologne in 2018. The aim of these meetings was to develop and agree on templates for the reporting of MR and CT studies of various cardiovascular disease entities.

Results During the meetings the panel of experts developed and reached consensus on 11 different templates for the structured reporting of the following: myocarditis, dilated cardiomyopathy, hypertrophic (obstructive) cardiomyopathy, arrythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy, siderosis, ischemia and vitality imaging, tetralogy of Fallot, aortic coarctation, coronary CT and CT for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) planning. The first five templates are presented in this publication and are currently being transferred to a HTML 5/IHR MRRT compatible format. Subsequently, the templates will be made available for free use on the website www.befundung.drg.de.

Conclusion For the first time, consented templates in German language for the structured reporting of cross-sectional imaging studies of the heart are presented. These templates are aimed at providing a constant level of high reporting quality and increasing the efficiency of the generation and communication of imaging reports.

Key points: 

  • Structured reporting offers numerous benefits by standardizing generation and communication of imaging reports.

  • For the first time templates in German language for the structured reporting of CMR imaging studies of cardiomyopathies are presented

  • These templates will be made available on the website www.befundung.drg.de and can be commented via agit-sr@googlegroups.com.

Citation Format

  • Bunck AC, Baeßler B, Ritter C et al. Structured Reporting in Cross-Sectional Imaging of the Heart: Reporting Templates for CMR Imaging of Cardiomyopathies (Myocarditis, Dilated Cardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy, Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular cardiomyopathy and Siderosis). Fortschr Röntgenstr 2020; 192: 27 – 37

Key words

structured reporting - heart - cardiomyopathy - CMR
 

  • References

  • 1 Schwartz LH, Panicek DM, Berk AR. et al. Improving communication of diagnostic radiology findings through structured reporting. Radiology 2011; 260: 174-181
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Bosmans JM, Weyler JJ, De Schepper AM. et al. The radiology report as seen by radiologists and referring clinicians: results of the COVER and ROVER surveys. Radiology 2011; 259: 184-195
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Franconeri A, Fang J, Carney B. et al. Structured vs narrative reporting of pelvic MRI for fibroids: clarity and impact on treatment planning. Eur Radiol 2018; 28: 3009-3017
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Gassenmaier S, Armbruster M, Haasters F. et al. Structured reporting of MRI of the shoulder – improvement of report quality?. Eur Radiol 2017; 27: 4110-4119
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Patel A, Rockall A, Guthrie A. et al. Can the completeness of radiological cancer staging reports be improved using proforma reporting? A prospective multicentre non-blinded interventional study across 21 centres in the UK. BMJ Open 2018; 8: e018499
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 European Society of Radiology (ESR). ESR paper on structured reporting in radiology. Insights Imaging Februar 2018; 9: 1-7
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Douglas PS, Hendel RC, Cummings JE. et al. ACCF/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/HRS/NASCI/RSNA/SAIP/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR 2008 Health Policy Statement on Structured Reporting in Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 53: 76-90
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Morgan TA, Helibrun ME, Kahn CE. Reporting Initiative of the Radiological Society of North America: Progress and New Directions. Radiology 2014; 273: 642-645
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Deutschsprachige RadLex-Version veröffentlicht [Internet]. 2018 Mai. Verfügbar unter: https://www.drg.de/de-DE/4291/radlex-deutsch/
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 IHE Radiology Technical Committee. IHE Radiology Technical Framework Supplement – Management of Radiology Report Templates (MRRT), Rev. 1.7 – Trial Implementation [Internet]. Verfügbar unter: https://www.ihe.net/uploadedFiles/Documents/Radiology/IHE_RAD_Suppl_MRRT.pdf
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Hundley WG, Bluemke D, Bogaert JG. et al. Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance guidelines for reporting cardiovascular magnetic resonance examinations. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2009; 11: 5
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Pinto dos Santos D, Hempel JM, Mildenberger P. et al. Structured Reporting in Clinical Routine. RöFo – Fortschritte Auf Dem Geb Röntgenstrahlen Bildgeb Verfahr [Internet] 13. August 2018 [zitiert 9. Dezember 2018]. Verfügbar unter: http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI:10.1055/a-0636-3851
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Kramer CM, Barkhausen J, Flamm SD. et al. Standardized cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) protocols 2013 update. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2013; 15: 91
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Kramer CM, Barkhausen J, Flamm SD. et al. Standardized cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) protocols, society for cardiovascular magnetic resonance: board of trustees task force on standardized protocols. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2008; 10: 35
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Fratz S, Chung T, Greil GF. et al. Guidelines and protocols for cardiovascular magnetic resonance in children and adults with congenital heart disease: SCMR expert consensus group on congenital heart disease. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2013; 15: 51
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Schulz-Menger J, Bluemke DA, Bremerich J. et al. Standardized image interpretation and post processing in cardiovascular magnetic resonance: Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) Board of Trustees Task Force on Standardized Post Processing. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2013; 15: 35
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Anderson TJT, Lu N, Brook OR. Disease-Specific Report Templates for Your Practice. J Am Coll Radiol 2017; 14: 1055-1057
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Marcus FI, McKenna WJ, Sherrill D. et al. Diagnosis of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia: Proposed Modification of the Task Force Criteria. Eur Heart J 2010; 31: 806-814
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Friedrich MG, Sechtem U, Schulz-Menger J. et al. Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Myocarditis: A JACC White Paper. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 53: 1475-1487
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Ferreira VM, Schulz-Menger J, Holmvang G. et al. Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Nonischemic Myocardial Inflammation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018; 72: 3158-3176
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Kawel-Boehm N, Maceira A, Valsangiacomo-Buechel ER. et al. Normal values for cardiovascular magnetic resonance in adults and children. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson [Internet] Dezember 2015 [zitiert 18. November 2018]; 17(1). Verfügbar unter: http://jcmr-online.com/content/17/1/29
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Messroghli DR, Moon JC, Ferreira VM. et al. Clinical recommendations for cardiovascular magnetic resonance mapping of T1, T2, T2* and extracellular volume: A consensus statement by the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) endorsed by the European Association for Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI). J Cardiovasc Magn Reson [Internet] Dezember 2017 [zitiert 15. Dezember 2018]; 19(1). Verfügbar unter: https://jcmr-online.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12968-017-0389-8
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Ferreira PF, Gatehouse PD, Mohiaddin RH. et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance artefacts. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2013; 15: 41
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Araoz P, Glockner J, Mcgee K. et al. 3 Tesla MR imaging provides improved contrast in first-pass myocardial perfusion imaging over a range of gadolinium doses. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2005; 7: 559-564
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Utz W, Niendorf T, Wassmuth R. et al. Contrast–dose relation in first-pass myocardial MR perfusion imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007; 25: 1131-1135
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V. et al. Standardized Myocardial Segmentation and Nomenclature for Tomographic Imaging of the Heart. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2002; 4: 203-210
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Te Riele ASJM, James CA, Philips B. et al. Mutation-Positive Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Dysplasia/Cardiomyopathy: The Triangle of Dysplasia Displaced: ARVD/C: The Triangle of Dysplasia Displaced. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2013; 24: 1311-1320
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Deutsche Röntgengesellschaft e. V. Nutzungslizenz Befundvorlagen der DRG [Internet]. Verfügbar unter: https://www.befundung.drg.de/de-DE/3478/creative-commons-lizenz-cc-by-nc-nd/
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Assomull RG, Prasad SK, Lyne J. et al. Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, Fibrosis, and Prognosis in Dilated Cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 48: 1977-1985
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Kumar S, Van Ness G, Bender A. et al. Standardized Goal-Directed Valsalva Maneuver for Assessment of Inducible Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Obstruction in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2018; 31: 791-798
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Mahrholdt H, Wagner A, Judd RM. et al. Delayed enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance assessment of non-ischaemic cardiomyopathies. Eur Heart J 2005; 26: 1461-1474
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Noureldin RA, Liu S, Nacif MS. et al. The diagnosis of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2012; 14: 17
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Gotschy A, Saguner AM, Niemann M. et al. Right ventricular outflow tract dimensions in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia – a multicentre study comparing echocardiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Eur Heart J – Cardiovasc Imaging 2018; 19: 516-523
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Rastegar N, Te Riele ASJM, James CA. et al. Fibrofatty Changes: Incidence at Cardiac MR Imaging in Patients with Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Dysplasia/Cardiomyopathy. Radiology 2016; 280: 405-412
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Chandarana H, Lim RP, Jensen JH. et al. Hepatic Iron Deposition in Patients With Liver Disease: Preliminary Experience With Breath-Hold Multiecho T2*-Weighted Sequence. Am J Roentgenol 2009; 193: 1261-1267
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar