Intramedullary Nailing and Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Plate Osteosynthesis in Treatment of Displaced Clavicular Mid-shaft Fractures: A Prospective Study

Hang Yuan; Ran Wang; Jie Zheng; Yonghong Yang

doi:10.1055/a-1008-9943

Zeitschrift für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Table of Contents

Z Orthop Unfall 2020; 158(06): 604-610
DOI: 10.1055/a-1008-9943

Original Article

Intramedullary Nailing and Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Plate Osteosynthesis in Treatment of Displaced Clavicular Mid-shaft Fractures: A Prospective Study

Comparison of IMN and MIPO in Clavicular Mid-shaft FracturesIntramedulläre Vernagelung (IMN) und minimalinvasive perkutane Plattenosteosynthese (MIPO) in der Behandlung des dislozierten Bruchs des mittleren Klavikulaschafts: eine prospektive StudiesVergleich zwischen IMN und MIPO beim dislozierten Bruch des mittleren Klavikulaschafts

Hang Yuan

¹Department of Orthopedics, Zhejiang Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China

,

Ran Wang

²Department of Orthopedics, Peopleʼs Liberation Army 903 Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China

,

Jie Zheng

²Department of Orthopedics, Peopleʼs Liberation Army 903 Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China

,

Yonghong Yang

¹Department of Orthopedics, Zhejiang Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China

²Department of Orthopedics, Peopleʼs Liberation Army 903 Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China

› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Objective To compare the difference between MIPO and IMN methods in the treatment of displaced clavicular mid-shaft fractures.

Methods A total 163 patients were consecutively enrolled and randomly divided into the MIPO group or the IMN group. Clinical characteristics and outcomes including age, gender, causes of fractures, and AO/OTA type as well as hospitalization time, healing time, and postoperative complications were analyzed. Constant-Murley scores and DASH scores were used for assessment of shoulder joint and upper extremity function, respectively.

Results In this study, 82 cases received MIPO and 81 cases received IMN. The mean operation time, mean bleeding volume, mean hospitalization time, and mean healing time showed no significant difference between the MIPO and IMN groups. At 3 months after surgery, Constant-Murley scores were significantly higher and DASH scores were significantly lower in the MIPO group than the IMN group. No significant difference was observed for both indexes at 6 months. The fracture nonunion rate was significantly lower in the MIPO group. No significant difference was found in other complications.

Conclusion Both methods were effective for the treatment of displaced clavicular mid-shaft fractures. However, the MIPO method might be better for recovery of shoulder and upper extremity function in the short term and might have a lower nonunion rate.

Zusammenfassung

Zielsetzung Ein Vergleich zwischen den MIPO- und IMN-Methoden bei der Behandlung des dislozierten Bruchs des mittleren Klavikulaschafts.

Patienten und Methoden Insgesamt 163 Patienten wurden fortlaufend aufgenommen und in die MIPO- und IMN-Gruppen randomisiert eingeteilt. Die folgenden klinischen Parameter wurden analysiert: Alter, Geschlecht, Ursache des Bruchs, AO/OTA Typ, Hospitalisierungszeit, Heilungsdauer und postoperative Komplikationen. Die Funktion des Schultergelenks und der oberen Extremität wurde anhand des Constant-Murley-, bzw. des DASH-Scores, geschätzt.

Ergebnisse In dieser Studie wurden 82 Patienten mit der MIPO-Methode und 81 mit der IMN-Methode behandelt. Es ergab sich keinen signifikanten Unterschied zwischen den MIPO- und IMN Gruppen in Bezug auf die mittlere Operationsdauer, die mittlere Hospitalisierungszeit oder die mittlere Heilungszeit. Drei Monate nach der Operation war der Constant-Murley-Score signifikant höher und der DASH-Score signifikant niedriger in der MIPO-Gruppe als in der IMN-Gruppe. Nach 6 Monaten gab es keinen signifikanten Unterschied zwischen den Scores. Die Rate der Nichtvereinigung des Bruchs war signifikant niedriger in der MIPO-Gruppe. Bei anderen Komplikationen gab es keinen signifikanten Unterschied.

Schlussfolgerung Beide Methoden waren wirksam bei der Behandlung des dislozierten Bruchs des mittleren Klavikulaschafts. Die MIPO-Methode zeigt sich jedoch vielleicht besser für die kurzfristige Wiederherstellung der Funktion der Schulter und oberen Extremität mit dazu einer niedrigeren Rate der Nichtvereinigung.

Key words

orthopedics (I) - intramedullary nailing - invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis - displaced clavicular mid-shaft fractures

Schlüsselwörter

Orthopädie (I) - intramedulläre Vernagelung - invasive perkutane Plattenosteosynthese - dislozierter Bruch des mittleren Klavikulaschafts

Full Text

References

References
1 Hill JM, Mcguire MH, Crosby LA. Closed treatment of displaced middle-third fractures of the clavicle gives poor results. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1997; 79: 537-539
2 Stegeman SA, Roeloffs CW, van den Bremer J. et al. The relationship between trauma mechanism, fracture type, and treatment of midshaft clavicular fractures. Eur J Emerg Med 2013; 20: 268-272
3 Korompilias AV, Lykissas MG, Kostas-Agnantis IP. et al. Approach to radial nerve palsy caused by humerus shaft fracture: is primary exploration necessary?. Injury 2013; 44: 323-326
4 Zhao JG, Wang J, Long L. Surgical Versus Conservative Treatments for Displaced Midshaft Clavicular Fractures: A Systematic Review of Overlapping Meta-Analyses. Medicine (Baltimore) 2015; 94: e1057
5 Naveen BM, Joshi GR, Harikrishnan B. Management of mid-shaft clavicular fractures: comparison between non-operative treatment and plate fixation in 60 patients. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2017; 12: 11-18
6 Stegeman SA, Fernandes NC, Krijnen P. et al. Online radiographic survey of midshaft clavicular fractures: no consensus on treatment for displaced fractures. Acta Orthop Belg 2014; 80: 82-87
7 Khorami M, Fakour M, Mokarrami H. et al. The Comparison of Results of Treatment of Midshaft Clavicle Fracture between Operative Treatment with Plate and Non-Operative Treatment. Arch Bone Jt Surg 2014; 2: 210-214
8 Liu W, Xiao J, Ji F. et al. Intrinsic and extrinsic risk factors for nonunion after nonoperative treatment of midshaft clavicle fractures. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2015; 101: 197-200
9 Virtanen KJ, Remes V, Pajarinen J. et al. Sling compared with plate osteosynthesis for treatment of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures: a randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012; 94: 1546-1553
10 Mckee RC, Whelan DB, Schemitsch EH. et al. Operative Versus Nonoperative Care of Displaced Midshaft Clavicular Fractures: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012; 94: 675-684
11 Wijdicks FJG, Van der Meijden OA, Millett PJ. et al. Systematic review of the complications of plate fixation of clavicle fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2012; 132: 617-625
12 Liporace FA, Stadler CM, Yoon RS. Problems, tricks, and pearls in intramedullary nailing of proximal third tibial fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2013; 27: 56-62
13 Sohn HS, Jeon YS, Lee JH. et al. Clinical comparison between open plating and minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for displaced proximal humeral fractures: A prospective randomized controlled trial. Injury 2017; 48: 1175-1182
14 Jiamton C, Apivatthakakul T. The safety and feasibility of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) on the medial side of the femur: A cadaveric injection study. Injury 2015; 46: 2170-2176
15 Vidović D, Matejčić A, Ivica M. et al. Minimally-invasive plate osteosynthesis in distal tibial fractures: Results and complications. Injury 2015; 46: S96-S99
16 Bong MR, Kummer FJ, Koval KJ. et al. Intramedullary nailing of the lower extremity: biomechanics and biology. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2007; 15: 97
17 Metsemakers WJ, Handojo K, Reynders P. et al. Individual risk factors for deep infection and compromised fracture healing after intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures: a single centre experience of 480 patients. Injury 2015; 46: 740-745
18 Lian K, Wang L, Lin D. et al. Minimally invasive plating osteosynthesis for mid-distal third humeral shaft fractures. Orthopedics 2013; 36: E1025-E1032
19 Saengsin J, Vaseenon T, Pattamapaspong N. et al. Effectiveness of sonography assisted minimal invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) compare with fluoroscope assisted in femoral shaft fracture: A cadaveric study. Injury 2017; 48: 1758-1763
20 Kim JW, Kim HU, Oh CW. et al. A Prospective Randomized Study on Operative Treatment for Simple Distal Tibial Fractures-Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis Versus Minimal Open Reduction and Internal Fixation. J Orthop Trauma 2018; 32: e19-e24
21 Al-Sadek TA, Niklev D, Al-Sadek A. Midshaft Clavicular Fractures – Osteosynthesis with Minimally Invasive Technique. Open Access Maced J Med Sc 2016; 4: 647-649
22 Sohn HS, Kim WJ, Shon MS. Comparison between open plating versus minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for acute displaced clavicular shaft fractures. Injury 2015; 46: 1577-1584
23 Calbiyik M, Ipek D, Taskoparan M. Prospective randomized study comparing results of fixation for clavicular shaft fractures with intramedullary nail or locking compression plate. Int Orthop 2016; 41: 1-7
24 Xue XH, Yan SG, Cai XZ. et al. Intramedullary nailing versus plating for extra-articular distal tibial metaphyseal fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Injury 2014; 45: 667-676
25 Hussain MS, Dailey SK, Avilucea FR. Stable Fixation and Immediate Weight-bearing Following Combined Retrograde Intramedullary Nailing (IMN) and Open Reduction Internal Fixation(ORIF) of Non-comminuted Distal Interprosthetic Femur Fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2018; 32: e237-e240 doi:10.1097/BOT.0000000000001154
26 Smekal V, Irenberger A, Struve P. et al. Elastic stable intramedullary nailing versus nonoperative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures-a randomized, controlled, clinical trial. J Orthop Trauma 2009; 17: 106-112
27 Smekal V, Alexander Irenberger A, El Attal R. Elastic stable intramedullary nailing is best for mid-shaft clavicular fractures without comminution: results in 60 patients. Injury 2011; 42: 324-329
28 Kulkarni VS, Kulkarni MS, Kulkarni GS. et al. Comparison between antegrade intramedullary nailing (IMN), open reduction plate osteosynthesis (ORPO) and minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) in treatment of humerus diaphyseal fractures. Injury 2017; 48 (Suppl. 02) S8
29 Zehir S, Zehir R, Şahin E. et al. Comparison of novel intramedullary nailing with mini-invasive plating in surgical fixation of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2015; 135: 339-344
30 Davies G, Yeo G, Meta M. et al. Case-Match Controlled Comparison of Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis and Intramedullary Nailing for the Stabilization of Humeral Shaft Fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2016; 30: 612-617
31 Zhao JG, Wang J, Wang C. et al. Intramedullary nail versus plate fixation for humeral shaft fractures: a systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses. Medicine (Baltimore) 2015; 94: e599