Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-1020-3932
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage, transpapillary drainage, or percutaneous drainage in high risk acute cholecystitis patients: a systematic review and comparative meta-analysis
Publication History
submitted 08 April 2019
accepted after revision 03 September 2019
Publication Date:
23 October 2019 (online)
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/endoscopy/202002/lookinside/thumbnails/17845_10-1055-a-1020-3932-1.jpg)
Abstract
Background Endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage (ETGBD) and endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUSGBD) are alternatives to percutaneous gallbladder drainage (PCGBD) for patients with acute cholecystitis who are unfit for surgery. Data comparing these modalities are limited and have reported conflicting results.
Methods We searched multiple databases from inception to May 2019 to identify studies that reported on ETGBD, EUSGBD, and PCGBD in the management of acute cholecystitis in patients with a high surgical risk. Aims were to compare the pooled rates of technical success, clinical success, adverse events, and disease recurrence.
Results 1223 patients (22 studies), 557 patients (14 studies), and 13 351 patients (46 studies) were treated by ETGBD, EUSGBD, and PCGBD, respectively. The pooled technical and clinical successes were: ETGBD 83 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] 80.1 – 85.5, I 2 = 29) and 88.1 % (95 %CI 83.6 – 91.4, I 2 = 50), respectively; EUSGBD 95.3 % (95 %CI 92.8 – 96.9, I 2 = 0) and 96.7 % (95 %CI 94.0 – 98.2, I 2 = 0), respectively; and PCGBD 98.7 % (95 %CI 98.0 – 99.1, I 2 = 0) and 89.3 % (95 %CI 86.6 – 91.5, I 2 = 84), respectively. Clinical success with EUSGBD was significantly superior to the other approaches. All complications were comparable between the groups. Pancreatitis occurred with ETGBD in 5.1 % (95 %CI 3.5 – 7.3), whereas bleeding and perforation occurred with EUSGBD in 4.3 % (95 %CI 2.7 – 6.8) and 3.7 % (95 %CI 2.3 – 6.0), respectively. Stent migration occurred with PCGBD in 7.4 % (95 %CI 5.5 – 10.0).
Conclusion EUSGBD demonstrated better clinical success than ETGBD and PCGBD in the management of acute cholecystitis patients at high surgical risk.
-
References
- 1 Csikesz NG, Tseng JF, Shah SA. Trends in surgical management for acute cholecystitis. Surgery 2008; 144: 283-289
- 2 Winbladh A, Gullstrand P, Svanvik J. et al. Systematic review of cholecystostomy as a treatment option in acute cholecystitis. HPB (Oxford) 2009; 11: 183-193
- 3 Itoi T, Takada T, Hwang TL. et al. Percutaneous and endoscopic gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis: international multicenter comparative study using propensity score-matched analysis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2017; 24: 362-368
- 4 Chikara L, Shimoyama T, Igarashi T. et al. Comparable efficacy of endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage and percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage in acute cholecystitis. Endosc Int Open 2018; 6: E594-E601
- 5 Irani S, Ngamruengphong S, Teoh A. et al. Similar efficacies of endoscopic ultrasound gallbladder drainage with a lumen-apposing metal stent versus percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017; 15: 738-745
- 6 Jang JW, Lee SS, Song TJ. et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided transmural and percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage are comparable for acute cholecystitis. Gastroenterology 2012; 142: 805-811
- 7 Teoh AYB, Serna C, Penas I. et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage reduces adverse events compared with percutaneous cholecystostomy in patients who are unfit for cholecystectomy. Endoscopy 2017; 49: 130-138
- 8 Tyberg A, Saumoy M, Sequeiros EV. et al. EUS-guided versus percutaneous gallbladder drainage: Isn’t it time to convert?. J Clin Gastroenterol 2018; 52: 79-84
- 9 Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J. et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 2009; 151: 264-269
- 10 Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC. et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 2000; 283: 2008-2012
- 11 Stang A. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle–Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol 2010; 25: 603-605
- 12 Thompson SG, Pocock SJ. Can meta-analyses be trusted?. Lancet 1991; 338: 1127-1130
- 13 Yokoe M, Hata J, Takada T. et al. Tokyo Guidelines 2018: diagnostic criteria and severity grading of acute cholecystitis (with videos). J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2018; 25: 41-54
- 14 Cotton PB, Eisen GM, Aabakken L. et al. A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: 446-454
- 15 DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986; 7: 177-188
- 16 Sutton AJ, Abrams KR, Jones DR. et al. Methods for meta-analysis in medical research. New York: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.; 2000: 205-228
- 17 Higgins J, Thompson SG, Spiegelhalter DJ. A re‐evaluation of random‐effects meta‐analysis. J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc 2009; 172: 137-159
- 18 Riley RD, Higgins JP, Deeks JJ. Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses. BMJ 2011; 342: d549
- 19 Mohan BP, Adler DG. Heterogeneity in systematic review and meta-analysis: how to read between the numbers. Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 89: 902-903
- 20 Kanwal F, White D. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in clinical gastroenterology and hepatology. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 10: 1184-1186
- 21 Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ. et al. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003; 327: 557
- 22 Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R. et al. GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence – inconsistency. J Clin Epidemiol 2011; 64: 1294-1302
- 23 Easterbrook PJ, Gopalan R, Berlin JA. et al. Publication bias in clinical research. Lancet 1991; 337: 867-872
- 24 Duval S, Tweedie R. Trim and fill: a simple funnel-plot–based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics 2000; 56: 455-463
- 25 Rothstein HR, Sutton AJ, Borenstein M. Publication bias in meta-analysis: prevention, assessment and adjustments. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2006
- 26 Choi JH, Lee SS, Choi JH. et al. Long-term outcomes after endoscopic ultrasonography-guided gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis. Endoscopy 2014; 46: 656-661
- 27 de la Serna-Higuera C, Pérez-Miranda M, Gil-Simón P. et al. EUS-guided transenteric gallbladder drainage with a new fistula-forming, lumen-apposing metal stent. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 77: 303-308
- 28 Dollhopf M, Larghi A, Will U. et al. EUS-guided gallbladder drainage in patients with acute cholecystitis and high surgical risk using an electrocautery-enhanced lumen-apposing metal stent device. Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 86: 636-643
- 29 Feretis C, Apostolidis N, Mallas E. et al. Endoscopic drainage of acute obstructive cholecystitis in patients with increased operative risk. Endoscopy 1993; 25: 392-395
- 30 Inoue T, Okumura F, Kachi K. et al. Long-term outcomes of endoscopic gallbladder stenting in high-risk surgical patients with calculous cholecystitis (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 83: 905-913
- 31 Irani S, Baron TH, Grimm IS. et al. EUS-guided gallbladder drainage with a lumen-apposing metal stent (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 82: 1110-1115
- 32 Itoi T, Sofuni A, Itokawa F. et al. Endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage in patients with acute cholecystitis in whom percutaneous transhepatic approach is contraindicated or anatomically impossible (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 68: 455-460
- 33 Kahaleh M, Perez-Miranda M, Artifon EL. et al. International collaborative study on EUS-guided gallbladder drainage: Are we ready for prime time?. Dig Liver Dis 2016; 48: 1054-1057
- 34 Kedia P, Sharaiha RZ, Kumta NA. et al. Endoscopic gallbladder drainage compared with percutaneous drainage. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 82: 1031-1036
- 35 Kjaer DW, Kruse A, Funch-Jensen P. Endoscopic gallbladder drainage of patients with acute cholecystitis. Endoscopy 2007; 39: 304-308
- 36 Lee TH, Park DH, Lee SS. et al. Outcomes of endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder stenting for symptomatic gallbladder diseases: a multicenter prospective follow-up study. Endoscopy 2011; 43: 702-708
- 37 Maekawa S, Nomura R, Murase T. et al. Endoscopic gallbladder stenting for acute cholecystitis: a retrospective study of 46 elderly patients aged 65 years or older. BMC Gastroenterol 2013; 13: 65
- 38 McCarthy ST, Tujios S, Fontana RJ. et al. Endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder stent placement is safe and effective in high-risk patients without cirrhosis. Dig Dis Sci 2015; 60: 2516-2522
- 39 Mutignani M, Iacopini F, Perri V. et al. Endoscopic gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis: technical and clinical results. Endoscopy 2009; 41: 539-546
- 40 Nakatsu T, Okada H, Saito K. et al. Endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage (ETGBD) for the treatment of acute cholecystitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 1997; 4: 31-35
- 41 Oh D, Song TJ, Cho DH. et al. EUS-guided cholecystostomy versus endoscopic transpapillary cholecystostomy for acute cholecystitis in high-risk surgical patients. Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 89: 289-298
- 42 Takagi W, Ogura T, Sano T. et al. EUS-guided cholecystoduodenostomy for acute cholecystitis with an anti-stent migration and anti-food impaction system; a pilot study. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2016; 9: 19-25
- 43 Tamada K, Seki H, Sato K. et al. Efficacy of endoscopic retrograde cholecystoendoprosthesis (ERCCE) for cholecystitis. Endoscopy 1991; 23: 2-3
- 44 Walter D, Teoh AY, Itoi T. et al. EUS-guided gall bladder drainage with a lumen-apposing metal stent: a prospective long-term evaluation. Gut 2016; 65: 6-8
- 45 Abi-Haidar Y, Sanchez V, Williams SA. et al. Revisiting percutaneous cholecystostomy for acute cholecystitis based on a 10-year experience. Arch Surg 2012; 147: 416-422
- 46 Al-Jundi W, Cannon T, Antakia R. et al. Percutaneous cholecystostomy as an alternative to cholecystectomy in high risk patients with biliary sepsis: a district general hospital experience. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2012; 94: 99-101
- 47 Anderson JE, Chang DC, Talamini MA. A nationwide examination of outcomes of percutaneous cholecystostomy compared with cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis, 1998–2010. Surg Endosc 2013; 27: 3406-3411
- 48 Atar E, Bachar GN, Berlin S. et al. Percutaneous cholecystostomy in critically ill patients with acute cholecystitis: complications and late outcome. Clin Radiol 2014; 69: e247-e252
- 49 Bakkaloglu H, Yanar H, Guloglu R. et al. Ultrasound guided percutaneous cholecystostomy in high-risk patients for surgical intervention. World J Gastroenterol 2006; 12: 7179-7182
- 50 Boules M, Haskins IN, Farias-Kovac M. et al. What is the fate of the cholecystostomy tube following percutaneous cholecystostomy?. Surg Endosc 2017; 31: 1707-1712
- 51 Carrafiello G, D’Ambrosio A, Mangini M. et al. Percutaneous cholecystostomy as the sole treatment in critically ill and elderly patients. Radiol Med 2012; 117: 772-779
- 52 Cha BH, Song HH, Kim YN. et al. Percutaneous cholecystostomy is appropriate as definitive treatment for acute cholecystitis in critically ill patients: a single center, cross-sectional study. Korean J Gastroenterol 2014; 63: 32-38
- 53 Chang YR, Ahn YJ, Jang JY. et al. Percutaneous cholecystostomy for acute cholecystitis in patients with high comorbidity and re-evaluation of treatment efficacy. Surgery 2014; 155: 615-622
- 54 Chok KSH, Chu FSK, Cheung TT. et al. Results of percutaneous transhepatic cholecystostomy for high surgical risk patients with acute cholecystitis. ANZ J Surg 2010; 80: 280-283
- 55 Chou CK, Lee KC, Chan CC. et al. Early percutaneous cholecystostomy in severe acute cholecystitis reduces the complication rate and duration of hospital stay. Medicine (Baltimore) 2015; 94: e1096
- 56 El-Gendi A, El-Shafei M, Emara D. Emergency versus delayed cholecystectomy after percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage in Grade II acute cholecystitis patients. J Gastrointest Surg 2017; 21: 284-293
- 57 Flexer S, Peter M, Durham-Hall A. et al. Patient outcomes after treatment with percutaneous cholecystostomy for biliary sepsis. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2014; 96: 229-233
- 58 Griniatsos J, Petrou A, Pappas P. et al. Percutaneous cholecystostomy without interval cholecystectomy as definitive treatment of acute cholecystitis in elderly and critically ill patients. South Med J 2008; 101: 586-590
- 59 Higa JT, Sahar N, Kozarek RA. et al. EUS-guided gallbladder drainage with a lumen-apposing metal stent versus endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage for the treatment of acute cholecystitis (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 90: 483-492
- 60 Horn T, Christensen SD, Kirkegard J. et al. Percutaneous cholecystostomy is an effective treatment option for acute calculous cholecystitis: a 10-year experience. HPB (Oxford) 2015; 17: 326-331
- 61 Hsieh YC, Chen CK, Su CW. et al. Outcome after percutaneous cholecystostomy for acute cholecystitis: a single-center experience. J Gastrointest Surg 2012; 16: 1860-1868
- 62 Hung Y-L, Chong S-W, Cheng C-T. et al. Natural course of acute cholecystitis in patients treated with percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage without elective cholecystectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 2019; DOI: 10.1007/s11605-019-04213-0.
- 63 Itoi T, Kawakami H, Katanuma A. et al. Endoscopic nasogallbladder tube or stent placement in acute cholecystitis: a preliminary prospective randomized trial in Japan (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81: 111-118
- 64 Jang WS, Lim JU, Joo KR. et al. Outcome of conservative percutaneous cholecystostomy in high-risk patients with acute cholecystitis and risk factors leading to surgery. Surg Endosc 2015; 29: 2359-2364
- 65 Li M, Li N, Ji W. et al. Percutaneous cholecystostomy is a definitive treatment for acute cholecystitis in elderly high-risk patients. Am Surg 2013; 79: 524-527
- 66 Lin WC, Chang CW, Chu CH. Percutaneous cholecystostomy for acute cholecystitis in high-risk elderly patients. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2016; 32: 518-525
- 67 Macri A, Scuderi G, Saladino E. et al. Acute gallstone cholecystitis in the elderly: treatment with emergency ultrasonographic percutaneous cholecystostomy and interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2006; 20: 88-91
- 68 McKay A, Abulfaraj M, Lipschitz J. Short- and long-term outcomes following percutaneous cholecystostomy for acute cholecystitis in high-risk patients. Surg Endosc 2012; 26: 1343-1351
- 69 Melloul E, Denys A, Demartines N. et al. Percutaneous drainage versus emergency cholecystectomy for the treatment of acute cholecystitis in critically ill patients: does it matter?. World J Surg 2011; 35: 826-833
- 70 Morse BC, Smith JB, Lawdahl RB. et al. Management of acute cholecystitis in critically ill patients: contemporary role for cholecystostomy and subsequent cholecystectomy. Am Surg 2010; 76: 708-712
- 71 Nasim S, Khan S, Alvi R. et al. Emerging indications for percutaneous cholecystostomy for the management of acute cholecystitis – a retrospective review. Int J Surg 2011; 9: 456-459
- 72 Ni Q, Chen D, Xu R. et al. The efficacy of percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage on acute cholecystitis in high-risk elderly patients based on the Tokyo Guidelines: a retrospective case–control study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2015; 94: e1442
- 73 Nikfarjam M, Shen L, Fink MA. et al. Percutaneous cholecystostomy for treatment of acute cholecystitis in the era of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2013; 23: 474-480
- 74 Ogawa O, Yoshikumi H, Maruoka N. et al. Predicting the success of endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage for patients with acute cholecystitis during pretreatment evaluation. Can J Gastroenterol 2008; 22: 681-685
- 75 Pang KW, Tan CH, Loh S. et al. Outcomes of percutaneous cholecystostomy for acute cholecystitis. World J Surg 2016; 40: 2735-2744
- 76 Pannala R, Petersen BT, Gostout CJ. et al. Endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage: 10-year single center experience. Minerva Gastroenterol Dietol 2008; 54: 107-113
- 77 Peters R, Kolderman S, Peters B. et al. Percutaneous cholecystostomy: single centre experience in 111 patients with an acute cholecystitis. JBR-BTR 2014; 97: 197-201
- 78 Rodriguez-Sanjuan JC, Arruabarrena A, Sanchez-Moreno L. et al. Acute cholecystitis in high surgical risk patients: percutaneous cholecystostomy or emergency cholecystectomy?. Am J Surg 2012; 204: 54-59
- 79 Sanjay P, Mittapalli D, Marioud A. et al. Clinical outcomes of a percutaneous cholecystostomy for acute cholecystitis: a multicentre analysis. HPB (Oxford) 2013; 15: 511-516
- 80 Schlenker C, Trotter JF, Shah RJ. et al. Endoscopic gallbladder stent placement for treatment of symptomatic cholelithiasis in patients with end-stage liver disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 278-283
- 81 Smith TJ, Manske JG, Mathiason MA. et al. Changing trends and outcomes in the use of percutaneous cholecystostomy tubes for acute cholecystitis. Ann Surg 2013; 257: 1112-1115
- 82 Toyota N, Takada T, Amano H. et al. Endoscopic naso-gallbladder drainage in the treatment of acute cholecystitis: alleviates inflammation and fixes operator’s aim during early laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2006; 13: 80-85
- 83 Viste A, Jensen D, Angelsen JH. et al. Percutaneous cholecystostomy in acute cholecystitis; a retrospective analysis of a large series of 104 patients. BMC Surg 2015; 15: 17
- 84 Wang CH, Wu CY, Yang JC. et al. Long-term outcomes of patients with acute cholecystitis after successful percutaneous cholecystostomy treatment and the risk factors for recurrence: a decade experience at a single center. PLoS One 2016; 11: e0148017
- 85 Widmer J, Alvarez P, Sharaiha RZ. et al. Endoscopic gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis. Clin Endosc 2015; 48: 411-420
- 86 Yane K, Maguchi H, Katanuma A. et al. Feasibility, efficacy, and predictive factors for the technical success of endoscopic nasogallbladder drainage: a prospective study. Gut Liver 2015; 9: 239-246
- 87 Yang MJ, Yoo BM, Kim JH. et al. Endoscopic naso-gallbladder drainage versus gallbladder stenting before cholecystectomy in patients with acute cholecystitis and a high suspicion of choledocholithiasis: a prospective randomised preliminary study. Scand J Gastroenterol 2016; 51: 472-478
- 88 Yeo CS, Tay VW, Low JK. et al. Outcomes of percutaneous cholecystostomy and predictors of eventual cholecystectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2016; 23: 65-73
- 89 Zehetner J, Degnera E, Olasky J. et al. Percutaneous cholecystostomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with acute cholecystitis and failed conservative management: a matched-pair analysis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2014; 24: 523-527
- 90 Zerem E, Omerovic S. Can percutaneous cholecystostomy be a definitive management for acute cholecystitis in high-risk patients?. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2014; 24: 187-191
- 91 Simorov A, Ranade A, Parcells J. et al. Emergent cholecystostomy is superior to open cholecystectomy in extremely ill patients with acalculous cholecystitis: a large multicenter outcome study. Am J Surg 2013; 206: 935-940
- 92 Siddiqui A, Kunda R, Tyberg A. et al. Three-way comparative study of endoscopic ultrasound-guided transmural gallbladder drainage using lumen-apposing metal stents versus endoscopic transpapillary drainage versus percutaneous cholecystostomy for gallbladder drainage in high-risk surgical patients with acute cholecystitis: clinical outcomes and success in an international, multicenter study. Surg Endosc 2019; 33: 1260-1270
- 93 Jang JW, Lee SS, Park DH. et al. Feasibility and safety of EUS-guided transgastric/transduodenal gallbladder drainage with single-step placement of a modified covered self-expandable metal stent in patients unsuitable for cholecystectomy. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74: 176-181
- 94 Kirkegard J, Horn T, Christensen SD. et al. Percutaneous cholecystostomy is an effective definitive treatment option for acute acalculous cholecystitis. Scand J Surg 2015; 104: 238-243
- 95 Mori Y, Itoi T, Baron TH. et al. Tokyo Guidelines 2018: management strategies for gallbladder drainage in patients with acute cholecystitis (with videos). J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2018; 25: 87-95