Komplexe semantische Verarbeitung bei kognitiven Kommunikationsstörungen

Kognitive Kommunikationsstörungen resultieren aus einer beeinträchtigten Interaktion kognitiver und sprachlicher Funktionen, die insbesondere soziale Kommunikation, Text- und Diskursverarbeitung betreffen. Zudem zeigen sich Beeinträchtigungen in der komplexeren semantischen Verarbeitung. Ziel des Artikels ist es, die aktuelle Studienlage und Diagnostikverfahren darzustellen und ein ursächliches Bedingungsgefüge zu diskutieren.

Abstract

Cognitive Communication Disorders (CCD) result from impaired interaction between cognitive and language processing and mainly affect social communication as well as text- and discourse processing. Even though CCD are not defined as directly affecting the language system, difficulties in complex semantic processing are frequently observed. Our article aims to present current research evidence as well as diagnostic tools used in CCD. We further discuss mechanisms potentially underlying CCD.

Schlüsselwörter

Kognitive Kommunikationsstörungen - komplexe semantische Verarbeitung - Pragmatik - Kognition - Diagnostik

Keywords

Cognitive communication disorders - complex semantic processing - pragmatics - cognition - diagnostic

• Literatur

• 1 MacDonald S. Introducing the model of cognitive-communication competence: a model to guide evidence-based communication interventions after brain injury. Brain Inj 2017; 31: 1760-1780
• 2 McDonald S, Togher L, Code C. , eds. Social and communication disorders following traumatic brain injury. Brain, behaviour and cognition. London: Psychology Press Taylor & Francis Group; 2014
• 3 Regenbrecht F, Guthke T. Kognitive Kommunikationsstörungen in der Sprachtherapie und der Neuropsychologie. Aphasie Verwandte Gebiete 2017; 1: 16-30
• 4 Büttner J, Glindemann R. Kognitive Kommunikationsstörungen. Band 19. Fortschritte der Neuropsychologie. Göttingen: Hogrefe; 2019
• 5 Hinchliffe FJ, Murdoch BE, Chenery HJ. Towards a conceptualization of language and cognitive impairment in closed-head injury: use of clinical measures. Brain Inj 1998; 12: 109-132
• 6 Simpson F, Christie J, Mortensen L. et al. Mount Wilga High Level Language Test. Administration & scoring manual plus test form with UK adaptations and large print additions. Unpublished Test; 2006
• 7 Monetta L, Pell MD. Effects of verbal working memory deficits on metaphor comprehension in patients with Parkinsonʼs disease. Brain Lang 2007; 101: 80-89
• 8 Quinting J, Jonas K, Stenneken P. et al. „Aus dem Rahmen gefallen?“ Metaphern und Idiome zur Identifikation Kognitiver Kommunikationsstörungen. Forschung Sprache 2019; 7: 25-38
• 9 Belke E, Stielow A. Cumulative and non-cumulative semantic interference in object naming: evidence from blocked and continuous manipulations of semantic context. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove) 2013; 66: 2135-2160
• 10 Thiele K, Quinting JM, Stenneken P. New ways to analyze word generation performance in brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of additional performance measures. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 2016; 38: 764-781
• 11 Stielow A, Stenneken P. Der Beitrag exekutiver und sprachlicher Teilleistungen in semantischen und formal-lexikalischen Wortflüssigkeitsaufgaben. Sprache Stimme Gehör 2017; 41: 197-203
• 12 Gauthier S, LeBlanc J, Seresova A. et al. Acute prediction of outcome and cognitive-communication impairments following traumatic brain injury: the influence of age, education and site of lesion. J Commun Disord 2018; 73: 77-90
• 13 Berg E, Björnram C, Hartelius L. et al. High-level language difficulties in Parkinsonʼs disease. Clin Linguist Phonet 2003; 17: 63-80
• 14 Huisingh R. The Elementary Word-R Test. A test of expressive vocabulary and semantics. East Moline, Ill.: LinguiSystems, Inc; 1990
• 15 Wong MN, Murdoch B, Whelan BM. Language disorders subsequent to mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI): evidence from four cases. Aphasiology 2010; 24: 1155-1169
• 16 Wiig EH, Secord W. Test of Language Competence-Expanded Edition (TLC-E). San Antonio, TX: Pearson Assessments; 1989
• 17 Frith M, Togher L, Ferguson A. et al. Assessment practices of speech-language pathologists for cognitive communication disorders following traumatic brain injury in adults: an international survey. Brain Inj 2014; 28: 1657-1666
• 18 Ellmo W, Graser J, Krchnavek B. et al. Measure of Cognitive-Linguistic Abilities (MCLA). Norcross, GA: The Speech Bin; 1995
• 19 Scherrer K, Schrott K, Bertoni B. et al. MEC Testverfahren. Köln: ProLog; 2016
• 20 Adamovich BB, Henderson J. SCATBI: Scales of Cognitive Ability for Traumatic Brain Injury. pro-ed; 1992