Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-1069-2474
Positionspapier der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Pneumologie und Beatmungsmedizin und der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Thoraxchirurgie in Kooperation mit der Deutschen Röntgengesellschaft: Strukturvoraussetzungen von Zentren für die interventionelle Emphysemtherapie
Joint Statement of the German Respiratory Society and German Society of Thoracic Surgery in Cooperation with the German Radiological Society: Structural Prerequisites of Centers for Interventional Treatment of EmphysemaPublication History
Publication Date:
20 January 2020 (online)
Zusammenfassung
Die interventionelle Emphysemtherapie bietet ein breites Spektrum an chirurgischen und endoskopischen Optionen zur Behandlung von Patienten mit fortgeschrittenem Lungenemphysem. Zur Sicherstellung der Behandlungsqualität ist eine interdisziplinäre Zusammenarbeit von Pneumologie, Thoraxchirurgie und bildgebenden Disziplinen in der Auswahl, Therapie und Nachsorge von Emphysem-Patienten erforderlich. Das vorliegende Positionspapier beschreibt erforderliche Struktur- und Qualitätsvoraussetzungen von Behandlungszentren.
Abstract
Interventional treatment of emphysema offers a wide range of surgical and endoscopic options for patientes with advanced disease. Multidsciplinary collaboration of pulmonology, thoracic surgery and imaging disciplines in patient selection, therapy and follow up ensures treatment quality. The present joint statement describes the required structural and quality prerequsites of treatment centres.
-
Literatur
- 1 Brantigan OC, Mueller E. Surgical treatment of pulmonary emphysema. Am Surg 1957; 23: 789-804
- 2 Cooper JD, Trulock EP, Triantafillou AN. et al. Bilateral pneumectomy (volume reduction) for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995; 109: 106-116
- 3 van Geffen WH, Slebos DJ, Herth FJ. et al. Surgical and endoscopic interventions that reduce lung volume for emphysema: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Respir Med 2019; 7: 313-324
- 4 Herth FJ, Slebos DJ, Rabe KF. et al. Endoscopic Lung Volume Reduction: An Expert Panel Recommendation. Respiration 2016; 91: 241-250
- 5 Herth FJF, Slebos DJ, Criner GJ. et al. Endoscopic Lung Volume Reduction: An Expert Panel Recommendation – Update 2017. Respiration 2017; 94: 380-388
- 6 Herth FJF, Slebos DJ, Criner GJ. et al. Endoscopic Lung Volume Reduction: An Expert Panel Recommendation – Update 2019. Respiration 2019; 97: 548-557
- 7 Miller MR, Crapo R, Hankinson J. et al. General considerations for lung function testing. Eur Respir J 2005; 26: 153-161
- 8 Bestall JC, Paul EA, Garrod R. et al. Usefulness of the Medical Research Council (MRC) dyspnoea scale as a measure of disability in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Thorax 1999; 54: 581-586
- 9 Kon SS, Canavan JL, Jones SE. et al. Minimum clinically important difference for the COPD Assessment Test: a prospective analysis. Lancet Respir Med 2014; 2: 195-203
- 10 Meguro M, Barley EA, Spencer S. et al. Development and Validation of an Improved, COPD-Specific Version of the St. George Respiratory Questionnaire. Chest 2007; 132: 456-463
- 11 Koster TD, van Rikxoort EM, Huebner RH. et al. Predicting Lung Volume Reduction after Endobronchial Valve Therapy Is Maximized Using a Combination of Diagnostic Tools. Respiration 2016; 92: 150-157
- 12 Gesierich W, Samitas K, Reichenberger F. et al. Collapse phenomenon during Chartis collateral ventilation assessment. Eur Respir J 2016; 47: 1657-1667
- 13 Herzog D, Thomsen C, Poellinger A. et al. Outcomes of Endobronchial Valve Treatment Based on the Precise Criteria of an Endobronchial Catheter for Detection of Collateral Ventilation under Spontaneous Breathing. Respiration 2016; 91: 69-78
- 14 Vogelmeier C, Buhl R, Burghuber O. et al. [Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of COPD Patients – Issued by the German Respiratory Society and the German Atemwegsliga in Cooperation with the Austrian Society of Pneumology]. Pneumologie 2018; 72: 253-308
- 15 Heussel CP, Kappes J, Hantusch R. et al. Contrast enhanced CT-scans are not comparable to non-enhanced scans in emphysema quantification. Eur J Radiol 2010; 74: 473-478
- 16 Martin SP, Gariani J, Hachulla AL. et al. Impact of iterative reconstructions on objective and subjective emphysema assessment with computed tomography: a prospective study. Eur Radiol 2017; 27: 2950-2956
- 17 Slebos DJ, Cicenia J, Sciurba FC. et al. Predictors of Response to Endobronchial Coil Therapy in Patients With Advanced Emphysema. Chest 2019; 155: 928-937
- 18 Mascalchi M, Diciotti S, Sverzellati N. et al. Low agreement of visual rating for detailed quantification of pulmonary emphysema in whole-lung CT. Acta Radiol 2012; 53: 53-60
- 19 Mets OM, de Jong PA, van Ginneken B. et al. Quantitative computed tomography in COPD: possibilities and limitations. Lung 2012; 190: 133-145
- 20 Mascalchi M, Camiciottoli G, Diciotti S. Lung densitometry: why, how and when. J Thorac Dis 2017; 9: 3319-3345
- 21 Heussel CP, Herth FJ, Kappes J. et al. Fully automatic quantitative assessment of emphysema in computed tomography: comparison with pulmonary function testing and normal values. Eur Radiol 2009; 19: 2391-2402
- 22 Lim HJ, Weinheimer O, Wielputz MO. et al. Fully Automated Pulmonary Lobar Segmentation: Influence of Different Prototype Software Programs onto Quantitative Evaluation of Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease. PLoS One 2016; 11: e0151498
- 23 MacMahon H, Naidich DP, Goo JM. et al. Guidelines for Management of Incidental Pulmonary Nodules Detected on CT Images: From the Fleischner Society 2017. Radiology 2017; 284: 228-243
- 24 Thomsen C, Theilig D, Herzog D. et al. Lung perfusion and emphysema distribution affect the outcome of endobronchial valve therapy. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2016; 11: 1245-1259
- 25 Argula RG, Strange C, Ramakrishnan V. et al. Baseline regional perfusion impacts exercise response to endobronchial valve therapy in advanced pulmonary emphysema. Chest 2013; 144: 1578-1586
- 26 Chandra D, Lipson DA, Hoffman EA. et al. Perfusion scintigraphy and patient selection for lung volume reduction surgery. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2010; 182: 937-946
- 27 Fishman A, Martinez F, Naunheim K. et al. A randomized trial comparing lung-volume-reduction surgery with medical therapy for severe emphysema. N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 2059-2073
- 28 Stanifer BP, Ginsburg ME. Lung volume reduction surgery in the post-National Emphysema Treatment Trial era. J Thorac Dis 2018; 10: S2744-S7
- 29 Perikleous P, Sharkey A, Oey I. et al. Long-term survival and symptomatic relief in lower lobe lung volume reduction surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2017; 52: 982-988
- 30 Fujimoto T, Teschler H, Hillejan L. et al. Long-term results of lung volume reduction surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2002; 21: 483-488
- 31 Windisch W, Dreher M, Geiseler J. et al. [Guidelines for Non-Invasive and Invasive Home Mechanical Ventilation for Treatment of Chronic Respiratory Failure – Update 2017]. Pneumologie 2017; 71: 722-795
- 32 Herth FJ, Valipour A, Shah PL. et al. Segmental volume reduction using thermal vapour ablation in patients with severe emphysema: 6-month results of the multicentre, parallel-group, open-label, randomised controlled STEP-UP trial. Lancet Respir Med 2016; 4: 185-193
- 33 Come CE, Kramer MR, Dransfield MT. et al. A randomised trial of lung sealant versus medical therapy for advanced emphysema. Eur Respir J 2015; 46: 651-662
- 34 Valipour A, Shah PL, Pison C. et al. Safety and Dose Study of Targeted Lung Denervation in Moderate/Severe COPD Patients. Respiration 2019; 1-11
- 35 Fuehner T, Clajus C, Fuge J. et al. Lung transplantation after endoscopic lung volume reduction. Respiration 2015; 90: 243-250
- 36 Tutic M, Lardinois D, Imfeld S. et al. Lung-volume reduction surgery as an alternative or bridging procedure to lung transplantation. Ann Thorac Surg 2006; 82: 208-213