Identifying the low-risk population for metachronous colorectal neoplasia: a first step towards personalized surveillance

Endoscopy 2020; 52(03): 172-173
DOI: 10.1055/a-1070-9226

Editorial

Referring to Frazzoni L et al. p. 220–226

Authors

Jae Gon Lee

Department of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Guri, Korea
Dong Soo Han

Department of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Guri, Korea

References
1 Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL. et al. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 2015; 65: 87-108
2 Mulder SA, Kranse R, Damhuis RA. et al. The incidence and risk factors of metachronous colorectal cancer: an indication for follow-up. Dis Colon Rectum 2012; 55: 522-531
3 Hassan C, Wysocki PT, Fuccio L. et al. Endoscopic surveillance after surgical or endoscopic resection for colorectal cancer: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Digestive Oncology (ESDO) Guideline. Endoscopy 2019; 51: 266-277
4 Kahi CJ, Boland CR, Dominitz JA. et al. Colonoscopy surveillance after colorectal cancer resection: recommendations of the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology 2016; 150: 758-768.e11
5 Fuccio L, Rex D, Ponchon T. et al. New and recurrent colorectal cancers after resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of endoscopic surveillance studies. Gastroenterology 2019; 156: 1309-1323.e3
6 Frazzoni L, Laterza L, Mussetto A. et al. How to identify patients who are less likely to have metachronous neoplasms after a colon cancer: a predictive model. Endoscopy 2020; 52: 220-226
7 Rutter MD, Beintaris I, Valori R. et al. World Endoscopy Organization consensus statements on post-colonoscopy and post-imaging colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 2018; 155: 909-925.e3