CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Sports Med Int Open 2020; 4(01): E27-E31
DOI: 10.1055/a-1089-5051
Training & Testing
Eigentümer und Copyright ©Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2019

Relationship between VO2max, under Water Swim Testing and Artistic Swim Solo Performance

Eric Viana
1   Kinesiology, University of Ontario Institute of Technology Faculty of Health Sciences, Oshawa, Canada
,
David J Bentley
2   Discipline of Exercise and Sport Science, University of Newcastle, Ourimbah, Australia
,
Heather M. Logan-Sprenger
1   Kinesiology, University of Ontario Institute of Technology Faculty of Health Sciences, Oshawa, Canada
3   Canadian Sports Institute Ontario, Toronto, Canada
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

received 12 August 2019
revised 25 November 2019

accepted 17 December 2019

Publication Date:
01 April 2020 (online)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between: 1) laboratory-determined cycling peak oxygen consumption (VO2max) and AS performance in a new underwater swim test (UWST), and 2) cycling VO2max and ventilatory threshold (VT) in cycling and performance score during a simulated AS solo routine. Trained artistic swimmers (n=15, 15.8±0.8 yrs., height: 169.1±5.4 cm, body mass: 57.1±6.3 kg) completed (1) a maximal incremental cycle test to exhaustion to determine VO2max, (2) the UWST which comprised 275 m of freestyle and underwater breaststroke, and (3) a simulated solo competition where artistic swimming elements were evaluated by five FINA judges. There was a significant correlation between mean element score and (i) VO2max (48±4 mL. kg.min−1, r=0.44, p=0.05), and (ii) UWST (r=−0.64, p=0.005). However, there was an insignificant relationship between cycling ventilatory threshold and mean element score (r=–0.36, p=0.10). In addition, the results demonstrate a significant relationship between HR at the ventilatory threshold and peak HR of the UWST (r=–0.64, p=0.014). The results of this study demonstrate that VO2max is an important determinant of AS performance. In addition, the UWST appears to be a useful indicator of AS performance.

 
  • References

  • 1 Mountjoy M. The basics of synchronized swimming and its injuries. Clin Sports Med 1999; 18: 321-336
  • 2 Robertson S, Benardot D, Mountjoy M. Nutritional recommendations for synchronized swimming. Int J Sport Nutrition Exerc Metab 2014; 24: 404-413
  • 3 Chatard JC, Mujika I, Chantegraille MC. et al. Performance and physiological responses to a 5-week synchronized swimming technical training programme in humans. Eur J Appl Physiol 1999; 79: 479-483
  • 4 Rodríguez-Zamora L, Iglesias X, Barrero A. et al. Physiological responses in relation to performance during competition in elite synchronized swimmers. PLoS One 2012; 7: e49098
  • 5 Davies B, Donaldson G, Joels N. Do the competition rules of synchronized swimming encourage undesirable levels of hypoxia? Brit. J Sports Med 1995; 29: 16-19
  • 6 FINA FINA Artistic Swimming Rules 2017–2021. 2017 [cited 2018 April 23, 2018]
  • 7 Homma M. The components and the time of ‘face in’of the routines in synchronized swimming. In Mutoh Y, Miyashita M, Richardson AB, Eds. Medicine and Science in Aquatic Sports. 1994: 149-154
  • 8 Alentejano T, Marshall D, Bell G. A time–motion analysis of elite solo synchronized swimming. Int J Sports Physiol Perf 2008; 31-40
  • 9 Bjurstrom R, Schoene RB. Control of ventilation in elite synchronized swimmers. J Appl Physiol 1987; 63: 1019-1024
  • 10 Joyner MJ, Coyle EF. Endurance exercise performance: the physiology of champions. J Physiol 2008; 586: 35-44
  • 11 Yamamura C, Zushi S, Takata K. et al. Physiological characteristics of well-trained synchronized swimmers in relation to performance scores. Int J Sports Med 1999; 20: 246-251
  • 12 Bante S, Bogdanis GC, Chairopoulou C. et al. Cardiorespiratory and metabolic responses to a simulated synchronized swimming routine in senior (>18 years) and comen (13–15 years) national level athletes. J Sports Med Phys Fit 2007; 47: 291-299
  • 13 Roby FB, Buono MJ, Constable SH. Physiological characteristics of champion synchronized swimmers. Phys Sports Med 1983; 11: 136-147
  • 14 Poole G, Crepin B, Sevigny M. Physiological characteristics of elite synchronized swimmers. Can J Appl Sport Sci 1980; 5: 156-160
  • 15 Peric M, Cavar M, Zenic N. et al. Predictors of competitive achievement among pubescent synchronized swimmers: an analysis of the solo-figure competition. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 2014; 54: 16-26
  • 16 Harriss DJ, Macsween A, Atkinson G. Standards for ethics in sport and exercise science research: 2018 update. Int J Sports Med 2017; 38: 1126-1131
  • 17 Gaskill SE, Ruby BC, Walker AJ. et al. Validity and reliability of combining three methods to determine ventilatory threshold. Med Sci Sport Exerc 2001; 33: 1841-1848
  • 18 Simizu M, Myers J, Buchanan BS. et al. The ventilatory threshold: Method, protocol, and evaluator agreement. Amer Heart J 1991; 122: 509-516
  • 19 Batterham A, Hopkins WG. Making meaningful inferences about magnitudes. Int J Sports Physiol Perf 2006; 1: 50-57
  • 20 Craig A, Boomer W, Gibbons J. Use of stroke rate, distance per stroke, and velocity relationships during training for competitive swimming. Swimming III 1979; 265-274
  • 21 Craig A, Pendergast DR. Relationships of stroke rate, distance per stroke, and velocity in competitive swimming. Med Sci Sports 1979; 11: 278-283
  • 22 Pendergast DR, Di Prampero PE, Craig AB. et al. Quantitative analysis of the front crawl in men and women. J Appl Physiol 1977; 43: 475-479
  • 23 Ponciano K, Miranda MLJ, Homma M. et al. Physiological responses during the practice of synchronized swimming: A systematic review. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging 2018; 38: 163-175