Structured Reporting of Solid and Cystic Pancreatic Lesions in CT and MRI: Consensus-Based Structured Report Templates of the German Society of Radiology (DRG)

Thorsten Persigehl; Matthias Baumhauer; Bettina Baeßler; Lukas Philipp Beyer; Marc Bludau; Christiane Bruns; Alexander Christian Bunck; Christoph-Thomas Germer; Lars Grenacher; Thomas Hackländer; Stefan Haneder; Stefan Heinrich; Philipp Heusch; Matthias Hoffmann; Markus S. Juchems; Jan Robert Kröger; Elmar Kotter; Günter Layer; David Maintz; Jan Menke; Moritz Palmowski; Dimitrios Pantelis; Daniel Pinto dos Santos; Felix Christoph Popp; Nico Schäfer; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Andreas G. Schreyer; Florian Siedek; Dirk Stippel; Martin Völker; Dirk Thomas Waldschmidt; Tim Frederik Weber; Moritz von Winterfeld; Christian Wybranski; Thomas Zander; Johannes Wessling

doi:10.1055/a-1150-8217

RöFo - Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren, Inhaltsverzeichnis

Rofo 2020; 192(07): 641-656
DOI: 10.1055/a-1150-8217

Consensus

Structured Reporting of Solid and Cystic Pancreatic Lesions in CT and MRI: Consensus-Based Structured Report Templates of the German Society of Radiology (DRG)

Artikel in mehreren Sprachen: English | deutsch

Thorsten Persigehl

¹Department of Radiology, University of Cologne, Germany

,

Matthias Baumhauer

²Mint Medical GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany

,

Bettina Baeßler

¹Department of Radiology, University of Cologne, Germany

²⁷Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland

,

Lukas Philipp Beyer

³Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Regensburg, Germany

,

Marc Bludau

⁴General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University of Cologne, Germany

,

Christiane Bruns

⁴General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University of Cologne, Germany

,

Alexander Christian Bunck

¹Department of Radiology, University of Cologne, Germany

,

Christoph-Thomas Germer

⁵Department of General, Visceral, Vascular and Pediatric Surgery, Würzburg University Hospital, Würzburg, Germany

,

Lars Grenacher

⁶Imaging and Prevention Center, Conradia Radiology Munich, Germany

,

Thomas Hackländer

⁷Department of Radiology, HELIOS-Universitätsklinikum Wuppertal, Germany

,

Stefan Haneder

¹Department of Radiology, University of Cologne, Germany

,

Stefan Heinrich

⁸General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Mainz University, Mainz, Germany

,

Philipp Heusch

⁹Department of Radiology, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Germany

,

Matthias Hoffmann

¹⁰Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Raphaelsklinik Münster, Germany

,

Markus S. Juchems

¹¹Department of Radiology, Hospital Konstanz, Germany

,

Jan Robert Kröger

¹Department of Radiology, University of Cologne, Germany

,

Elmar Kotter

¹²Department of Radiology, Freiburg University Hospital, Freiburg, Germany

,

Günter Layer

¹³Department of Radiology, Hospital Ludwigshafen, Germany

,

David Maintz

¹Department of Radiology, University of Cologne, Germany

,

Jan Menke

¹⁴Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital Göttingen, Germany

,

Moritz Palmowski

¹⁵Department of Radiology, Radiology Baden-Baden, Baden-Baden, Germany

²⁸Institute of Experimental Molecular Imaging (ExMI), RTW Aachen, Germany

,

Dimitrios Pantelis

¹⁶Department of Surgery, Sankt-Marien-Hospital Bonn GmbH, Bonn, Germany

,

Daniel Pinto dos Santos

¹Department of Radiology, University of Cologne, Germany

,

Felix Christoph Popp

⁴General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University of Cologne, Germany

,

Nico Schäfer

¹⁷Department of Surgery, Hospital Leverkusen, Germany

,

Heinz-Peter Schlemmer

¹⁸Department of Radiology, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Heidelberg, Germany

,

Andreas G. Schreyer

¹⁹Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Brandenburg a. d. Havel, Germany

,

Florian Siedek

¹Department of Radiology, University of Cologne, Germany

,

Dirk Stippel

²⁰Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University of Cologne, Germany

,

Martin Völker

²¹DRG, German Roentgen Society “Deutsche Röntgengesellschaft”, Berlin, Germany

,

Dirk Thomas Waldschmidt

²²Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Cologne, Germany

,

Tim Frederik Weber

²³Department of Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany

,

Moritz von Winterfeld

²⁴Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany

,

Christian Wybranski

¹Department of Radiology, University of Cologne, Germany

,

Thomas Zander

²⁵Department of Internal Medicine, University of Cologne, Germany

,

Johannes Wessling

²⁶Department of Radiology, Clemens-Hospital GmbH Münster, Germany

› Institutsangaben

Abstract

Background Radiological reports of pancreatic lesions are currently widely formulated as free texts. However, for optimal characterization, staging and operation planning, a wide range of information is required but is sometimes not captured comprehensively. Structured reporting offers the potential for improvement in terms of completeness, reproducibility and clarity of interdisciplinary communication.

Method Interdisciplinary consensus finding of structured report templates for solid and cystic pancreatic tumors in computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with representatives of the German Society of Radiology (DRG), German Society for General and Visceral Surgery (DGAV), working group Oncological Imaging (ABO) of the German Cancer Society (DKG) and other radiologists, oncologists and surgeons.

Results Among experts in the field of pancreatic imaging, oncology and pancreatic surgery, as well as in a public online survey, structured report templates were developed by consensus. These templates are available on the DRG homepage under www.befundung.drg.de and will be regularly revised to the current state of scientific knowledge by the participating specialist societies and responsible working groups.

Conclusion This article presents structured report templates for solid and cystic pancreatic tumors to improve clinical staging (cTNM, ycTNM) in everyday radiology.

Key Points:

Structured report templates offer the potential of optimized radiological reporting with regard to completeness, reproducibility and differential diagnosis.
This article presents consensus-based, structured reports for solid and cystic pancreatic lesions in CT and MRI.
These structured reports are available open source on the homepage of the German Society of Radiology (DRG) under www.befundung.drg.de.

Citation Format

Persigehl T, Baumhauer M, Baeßler B et al. Structured Reporting of Solid and Cystic Pancreatic Lesions in CT and MRI: Consensus-Based Structured Report Templates of the German Society of Radiology (DRG). Fortschr Röntgenstr 2020; 192: 641 – 655

Key words

pancreas - structured reporting - template - MRI - CT

Volltext

Referenzen

References
1 Pinto Dos Santos D, Hempel JM, Mildenberger P. et al Structured Reporting in Clinical Routine. Rofo 2019; 191: 33-39 . doi:10.1055/a-0636-3851
2 Schwartz LH, Panicek DM, Berk AR. et al Improving communication of diagnostic radiology findings through structured reporting. Radiology 2011; 260: 174-181 . doi:10.1148/radiol.11101913
3 Brook OR, Brook A, Vollmer CM. et al Structured reporting of multiphasic CT for pancreatic cancer: potential effect on staging and surgical planning. Radiology 2015; 274: 464-472 . doi:10.1148/radiol.14140206
4 Kabadi SJ, Krishnaraj A. Strategies for Improving the Value of the Radiology Report: A Retrospective Analysis of Errors in Formally Over-read Studies. J Am Coll Radiol 2016;
5 Al-Hawary MM, Francis IR, Chari ST. et al Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma radiology reporting template: consensus statement of the Society of Abdominal Radiology and the American Pancreatic Association. Radiology 2014; 270: 248-260 . doi:10.1148/radiol.13131184
6 Pancreas ESGoCTot. European evidence-based guidelines on pancreatic cystic neoplasms. Gut 2018; 67: 789-804 . doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2018-316027
7 Qayyum A, Tamm EP. Expert Panel on Gastrointestinal I,. et al ACR Appropriateness Criteria((R)) Staging of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. J Am Coll Radiol 2017; 14: S560-S569 . doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2017.08.050
8 Tempero MA, Malafa MP, Al-Hawary M. et al Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma, Version 2.2017, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2017; 15: 1028-1061 . doi:10.6004/jnccn.2017.0131
9 Ducreux M, Cuhna AS, Caramella C. et al Cancer of the pancreas: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2015; 26 (Suppl. 05) v56-v68 . doi:10.1093/annonc/mdv295
10 Seufferlein T, Porzner M, Becker T. et al S3-guideline exocrine pancreatic cancer. Z Gastroenterol 2013; 51: 1395-1440 . doi:10.1055/s-0033-1356220
11 Tempero MA, Malafa MP, Chiorean EG. et al Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma, Version 1.2019. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2019; 17: 202-210 . doi:10.6004/jnccn.2019.0014
12 Buerke B, Heindel W, Wessling J. Differential diagnosis and radiological management of cystic pancreatic lesions. Rofo 2010; 182: 852-860 . doi:10.1055/s-0029-1245502
13 Brambs HJ, Juchems M. Cystic tumors of the pancreas. Radiologe 2008; 48: 740-751 . doi:10.1007/s00117-008-1671-4
14 Schlitter AMEE, Klöppel G. Klassifikation und Diagnose zystischer Pankreastumoren. Gastrointestinal Medicine and Surgery 2011; 27: 182-188 . doi:10.1159/000329194
15 Buerke B, Domagk D, Heindel W. et al Diagnostic and radiological management of cystic pancreatic lesions: important features for radiologists. Clin Radiol 2012; 67: 727-737 . doi:10.1016/j.crad.2012.02.008
16 Arnold et al. Pankreas. In: Frenzel. Hrsg. Kap. 3.5. Tumorerfassung.. Thieme; 2012. 1. Aufl.
17 Grenacher L, Juchems M. Criteria for resectability of pancreatic cancer and postoperative imaging. Radiologe 2017; 57: 1075-1090 . doi:10.1007/s00117-017-0326-8

Zusatzmaterial