Plazentalokalisationen in aufeinanderfolgenden Schwangerschaften – eine retrospektive Kohortenstudie

Zusammenfassung

Einführung Die Plazentalokalisation ist mit Risiken während einer Schwangerschaft (SS) und Geburt assoziiert. Kenntnisse über die Lage der Plazenta ermöglichen eine auf Risikofaktoren angepasste weitere Betreuung der SS. Verschiedene Studien beschreiben ein höheres Risiko für eine wiederholte Plazenta prävia, gleichartige Daten zu anderen Plazentalokalisationen fehlen. Ziel dieser Studie war es, die Häufigkeitsverteilung der verschiedenen Plazentalokalisationen zu evaluieren und Korrelationen zwischen Plazentalokalisationen in aufeinanderfolgenden SS zu analysieren.

Material und Methodik In einer retrospektiven Kohortenstudie wurden Frauen mit Einlings-SS ≥ 24+0 Schwangerschaftswochen (SSW), mindestens 1 Ultraschalluntersuchung zur Identifikation der Plazentalokalisation sowie Geburt ihres Erstgeborenen und mindestens eines direkt aufeinanderfolgenden Kindes in unserer Klinik zwischen 2007 und 2016 analysiert. Ausschlusskriterien waren Mehrlingsschwangerschaften, Aborte/intrauteriner Fruchttod/Frühgeburten <24+0 SSW.

Resultate Unter 1657 Frauen befand sich die Plazenta am häufigsten anterior gefolgt von posterior, fundal, lateral und dann als prävia. Es zeigten sich keine statistisch signifikanten Korrelationen bezüglich der Plazentalokalisationen in aufeinanderfolgenden SS und kein signifikanter Einfluss einer vorangegangen Curettage oder Sectio.

Konklusion Die Plazentalokalisation scheint nicht durch den Plazentasitz in der vorherigen Schwangerschaft beeinflusst zu werden. Daher kann keine Prognose hinsichtlich der Plazentalokalisation in aufeinanderfolgenden Schwangerschaften gestellt werden.

Abstract

Introduction Different locations of the placenta are associated with specific risks during pregnancy and labor. Knowledge of the placental location helps to provide better care for the expectant mother and her unborn child. Whereas multiple studies show a higher risk for a recurrent placenta previa, hardly any such data is available for any other placental location. The aim of this study was to analyze the frequency of distribution of different placental locations and to evaluate correlations between placental locations in subsequent pregnancies.

Material and Methods In a retrospective cohort study women with singleton pregnancies ≥ 24 gestational weeks who had at least one ultrasound with identification of the placental location and gave birth to their firstborn and at least one more following child at our hospital between 2007 and 2016 were evaluated. Exclusion criteria were multiple pregnancies, abortions, intrauterine fetal death, and fetal malformations. Placental locations were classified into anterior, posterior, fundal, right, left, and previa.

Results Data of 1657 women were analyzed. The most frequent location was anterior, followed by posterior, fundal and lateral, and previa. Statistical analysis showed no significant correlations in subsequent pregnancies regarding placental locations.

Conclusion Placental locations in subsequent pregnancies seem not to be influenced by previous pregnancies. Therefore no prognosis for placental location can be made concerning future pregnancies.

Schlüsselwörter

Plazenta - Plazentalokalisation - aufeinanderfolgende Schwangerschaften - Plazenta prävia - Ultraschall

Key words

Placenta - placental location - subsequent pregnancies - placenta previa - ultrasound

Publication History

Received: 11 November 2019

Accepted after revision: 29 April 2020

Article published online:
26 June 2020

• Literatur

• 1 Fretts RC. Etiology and prevention of stillbirth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193: 1923-1935
• 2 Desoye G. Die Plazenta bei pathologischen Schwangerschaften. J Fertil Reprod 2003; 13: 26-33
• 3 Burton GJ, Jauniaux E. Pathophysiology of placental-derived fetal growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018; 218: 745-761 doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2017.11.577
• 4 Kalanithi LE, Illuzzi JL, Nossov VB. et al. Intrauterine growth restriction and placental location. J Ultrasound Med 2007; 26: 1481-1489
• 5 Lal AK, Hibbard JU. Placenta previa: an outcome-based cohort study in a contemporary obstetric population. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2015; 292: 299-305 doi:10.1007/s00404-015-3628-y
• 6 Magann EF, Doherty DA, Turner K. et al. Second trimester placental location as a predictor of an adverse pregnancy outcome. J Perinatol 2007; 27: 9-14
• 7 Sekiguchi A, Nakai A, Kawabata I. et al. Type and location of placenta previa affect preterm delivery risk related to antepartum hemorrhage. Int J Med Sci 2013; 10: 1683-1688 DOI: 10.7150/ijms.6416.
• 8 Vahanian SA, Lavery JA, Ananth CV. et al. Placental implantation abnormalities and risk of preterm delivery: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 213: 78-90 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.058.
• 9 Fox KA, Lee W. Prenatal Diagnosis and Evaluation of Abnormal Placentation. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2017; 60: 596-607 doi:10.1097/GRF.0000000000000297
• 10 Fuchs I, Dudenhausen JW, Sehouli J. et al. Placenta pathology: disorders of placental location, placental implantation and cord insertion. Ultraschall Med 2008; 29: 4-17 DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1027119.
• 11 Osmundson SS, Wong AE, Gerber SE. Second-trimester placental location and postpartum hemorrhage. J Ultrasound Med 2013; 32: 631-636
• 12 Ananth CV, Demissie K, Smulian JC. et al. Relationship among placenta previa, fetal growth restriction, and preterm delivery: a population-based study. Obstet Gynecol 2001; 98: 299-306
• 13 Seckin KD, Cakmak B, Karsli MF. et al. Is lateral localisation of placenta a risk factor for adverse perinatal outcomes?. J Obstet Gynaecol 2015; 35: 696-698 DOI: 10.3109/01443615.2015.1007343.
• 14 Zia S. Placental location and pregnancy outcome. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc 2013; 14: 190-193 doi:10.5152/jtgga.2013.92609
• 15 Warland J, McCutcheon H, Baghurst P. Placental position and late stillbirth: a case-control study. J Clin Nurs 2009; 18: 1602-1606 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02779.x
• 16 Booth RT, Wood C, Beard RW. et al. Significance of site of placental attachment in uterus. Br Med J 1962; 1: 1732-1734
• 17 Kofinas AD, Penry M, Swain M. et al. Effect of placental laterality on uterine artery resistance and development of preeclampsia and intrauterine growth retardation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 161: 1536-1539
• 18 Bieniarz J. The patho-mechanism of late pregnancy toxemia and obstetrical hemorrhages. II. Placental site and venous drainage of the pregnant uterus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1959; 78: 385-398
• 19 Granfors M, Stephansson O, Endler M. et al. Placental location and pregnancy outcomes in nulliparous women: A population-based cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2019; 98: 988-996 DOI: 10.1111/aogs.13578.
• 20 Torricelli M, Vannuccini S, Moncini I. et al. Anterior placental location influences onset and progress of labor and postpartum outcome. Placenta 2015; 36: 463-466 DOI: 10.1016/j.placenta.2014.12.018.
• 21 Naji O, Daemen A, Smith A. et al. Does the presence of a cesarean section scar influence the site of placental implantation and subsequent migration in future pregnancies: a prospective case-control study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012; 40: 557-561 DOI: 10.1002/uog.11133.
• 22 Gorodeski IG, Bahari CM, Schachter A. et al. Recurrent placenta previa. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1981; 12: 7-11
• 23 Monica G, Lilja C. Placenta previa, maternal smoking and recurrence risk. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1995; 74: 341-345
• 24 Roberts CL, Algert CS, Warrendorf J. et al. Trends and recurrence of placenta praevia: a population-based study. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2012; 52: 483-486 DOI: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2012.01470.x.
• 25 Salama-Bello R, Duncan JR, Howard SL. et al. Placental Location and the Development of Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy. J Ultrasound Med 2019; 38: 173-178 DOI: 10.1002/jum.14681.
• 26 Fidan U, Ulubay M, Bodur S. et al. The effect of anatomical placental location on the third stage of labor. Clin Anat 2017; 30: 508-511 DOI: 10.1002/ca.22868.
• 27 Devarajan K, Kives S, Ray JG. Placental location and newborn weight. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2012; 34: 325-329 doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)35212-4
• 28 Gallagher P, Fagan CJ, Bedi DG. et al. Potential placenta previa: definition, frequency, and significance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1987; 149: 1013-1015
• 29 Hershkowitz R, Fraser D, Mazor M. et al. One or multiple previous cesarean sections are associated with similar increased frequency of placenta previa. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1995; 62: 185-188
• 30 Kainer F, Hasbargen U. Emergencies associated with pregnancy and delivery: peripartum hemorrhage. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2008; 105: 629-638 doi:10.3238/arztebl.2008.0629
• 31 Hisley JC, Mangum C. Placental location in pregnancies following cesarean section. J Clin Ultrasound 1982; 10: 427-428
• 32 Kimmich N, Grauwiler V, Richter A. et al. Birth Lacerations in Different Genital Compartments and their Effect on Maternal Subjective Outcome: A Prospective Observational Study. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol 2019; 223: 359-368 DOI: 10.1055/a-0858-0138.
• 33 Kimmich N, Burkhardt T, Kreft M. et al. Reducing birth trauma by the implementation of novel monitoring and documentation tools. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2019; 98: 1223-1226 DOI: 10.1111/aogs.13660.