Download PDF
Aktuelle Urol 2020; 51(05): 469-474
DOI: 10.1055/a-1185-8179
Übersicht

Prostatakarzinom – chirurgische Komplikationen

Prostate cancer: surgical complications
Friederike Haidl
1   Universitätsklinikum Köln, Urologie, Uro-Onkologie, spezielle urologische und Roboter-assistierte Chirurgie, Köln
,
Rouvier Al-Monajjed
2   Heinrich-Heine Universität Düsseldorf, Klinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, Universitätsklinikum, Düsseldorf
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Die radikale Prostatektomie (RP) als offener, laparoskopischer oder robotergestützter Eingriff stellt nach wie vor den kurativen „Goldstandard“ für Patienten mit einem lokal begrenzten Prostatakarzinom dar. Heutzutage wird die RP zudem als Erstbehandlung für ein lokal fortgeschrittenes Prostatakarzinom, eventuell im Rahmen eines multimodalen Settings mit adjuvanter Strahlen-/Hormontherapie angewendet. Die zunehmende Erfahrung der Chirurgen, die bessere Kenntnis der Anatomie und die Verfeinerungen der Operationstechniken haben die onkologischen sowie funktionellen Ergebnisse immens verbessert. In unserem Artikel möchten wir einen Überblick über die mit der Operation verbundenen Komplikationen geben.

Abstract

Radical prostatectomy (RP), performed as an open, laparoscopic or robotic procedure, remains the “gold standard” for patients with localised prostate cancer who can be cured with surgery and have a life expectancy of at least 10 years. Today, RP is also used as a first-line treatment for locally advanced prostate cancer, possibly in a multimodal setting with adjuvant radiation/hormonal therapy. The increasing experience of surgeons, better knowledge of anatomy and refinements of surgical techniques have greatly improved oncological and functional outcomes. In our article we would like to give an overview of the complications associated with this surgical procedure.

Schlüsselwörter

Prostatakarzinom - Prostatektomie - Robotik - Laparoskopie - Komplikationen

Keywords

prostatectomy - complications - prostate carcinoma - robotics - laparoscopy


Publication History

Article published online:
17 June 2020

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Stuttgart · New York

 

  • Literaturverzeichnis

  • 1 Robert-Koch-Institut (RKI). 2018 www.krebsdaten.de
    PubMed
  • 2 Leicht H. et al. Versorgungs-Report 2015/2016. Stuttgart: Schattauer; 2016: 363-388
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 3 Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2005; 240: 205-213
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Sugihara T, Yasunaga H, Horiguchi H. Robot-assisted versus other types of radical prostatectomy: Population-based safety and cost comparison in Japan, 2012–2013. Cancer Sci 2014; 105: 1421-1426
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Larobina M, Nottle P. Complete evidence regarding major vascular injuries during laparoscopic access. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2005; 15: 119-123
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Stolzenburg JU, Rabenalt R, Do M. et al. Complications of endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy (EERPE): prevention and management. World J Urol 2006; 24: 668-675
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Safi KC, Teber D, Moazen M. et al. Laparoscopic repair of external iliac-artery transection during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Endourol 2006; 20: 237-239
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Guillonneau B, Rozet F, Cathelineau X. et al. Perioperative complications of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris 3-year experience. J Urol 2002; 167: 51-56
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Zorn K, Katz M, Bernstein A. et al. Laparoscopy and robotics pelvic lymphadenectomy during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: assessing nodal yield, perioperative outcomes, and complications. Urology 2009; 74: 296-302
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Wallerstedt A, Tyritzis SI, Thorsteinsdottir T. et al. Short-term results after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy compared to open radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2015; 67: 660-670
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Carlsson S, Nilsson AE, Schumacher MC. et al. Surgery-related complications in 1253 robotassisted and 485 open retropubic radical prostatectomies at the Karolinska University Hospital, Sweden. Urology 2010; 75: 1092-1097
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Borland RN, Walsh PC. The management of rectal injury during radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol 1992; 147: 905-907
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Tewari A, Sooriakumaran P, Bloch DA. et al. Positive surgical margin and perioperative complication rates of primary surgical treatments for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing retro- pubic, laparoscopic, and robotic prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2012; 62: 1-15
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Masuda T, Kinoshita H, Nishida S. et al. Rectal injury during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: detection and management. Int J Urol 2010; 17: 492-495
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Kheterpal E, Bhandari A, Siddiqui S. et al. Management of rectal injury during robotic radical prostatectomy. Urology 2011; 77: 976-979
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Wedmid A, Mendoza P, Sharma S. et al. Rectal injury during robot- assisted radical prostatectomy: incidence and management. J Urol 2011; 186: 1928-1933
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Gotto GT, Yunis LH, Vora K. et al. Impact of prior prostate radiation on complications after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2010; 184: 136-142
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Mandel P, Linnemannstons A, Chun F. et al. Incidence, risk factors, management, and complications of rectal injuries during radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol Focus 2018; 4: 554-557
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 McLaren RH, Barrett DM, Zincke H. Rectal injury occurring at radical retropubic prostatectomy for prostate cancer: etiology and treatment. Urology 1993; 42: 401-405
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Schmitges J, Trinh QD, Abdollah F. et al. A population-based analysis of temporal perioperative complication rates after minimally invasive radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2011; 60: 564-571
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Bishoff JT, Allaf ME, Kirkels W. et al. Laparoscopic bowel injury: incidence and clinical presentation. JUrol 1999; 161: 887-890
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Thomas C, Jones J, Jager W. et al. Incidence, clinical symptoms and mana- gement of rectourethral fistulas after radical prostatec- tomy. J Urol 2010; 183: 608-612
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Martini A, Gandaglia G, Nicita G. et al. A Novel Classification Proposal For Rectourethral Fistulas After Primary Treatment Of Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol Oncol 2018; 1: 510-511
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Chrouser KL, Leibovich BC, Sweat SD. et al. Urinary fistulas following external radiation or permanent brachytherapy for the treatment of prostate cancer. J Urol 2005; 173: 1953-1957
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Hanna JM, Turley R, Castleberry A. et al. Surgical management of complex rectourethral fistulas in irradiated and nonirradiated patients. Dis Colon Rectum 2014; 57: 1105-1112
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Jhaveri JK, Penna FJ, Diaz-Insua M. et al. Ureteral injuries sustained during robot-assisted radical prostatec- tomy. J Endourol 2014; 28: 318-324
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Joniau SG. et al. Complications and Functional Results of Surgery for Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer. Adv Urol 2012; 2012: 706309
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Maffezzini M, Seveso M, Taverna G. et al. Evaluation of complications and results in a contemporary series of 300 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomies with the anatomic approach at a single institution. Urology 2003; 61: 982-986
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Nezhat FR, Chang-Jackson SC, Acholonu Jr. UC. et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic transection and repair of an obturator nerve during pelvic lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 119: 462-464
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Spaliviero M, Steinberg AP, Kaouk JH. et al. Laparoscopic injury and repair of obturator nerve during radical prostatectomy. Urology 2004; 64: 1030
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Tyritzis SI, Katafigiotis I, Constantinides CA. All you need to know about urethrovesical anastomotic urinary leakage following radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2012; 188: 369-376
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Sharma V, Meeks JJ. Open conversion during minimally invasive radical prostatectomy: impact on perioperative complications and predictors from national data. J Urol 2014; 192: 1657-1662
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Ploussard G, Briganti A, de la Taille A. et al. Pelvic lymph node dissection during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: effica- cy, limitations, and complications-a systematic review of the literature. Eur Urol 2014; 65: 7-16
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Orvieto MA, Coelho RF, Chauhan S. et al. Incidence of lymphoceles after robot-assisted pelvic lymph node dissection. BJU Int 2011; 108: 1185-1190
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Raheem OA, Bazzi WM, Parsons JK. et al. Management of pelvic lymphoceles following robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urol Ann 2012; 4: 111-114
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 36 Khoder WY, Trottmann M, Buchner A. et al. Risk factors for pelvic lymphoceles post-radical prostatectomy. Int J Urol 2011; 18: 638-643
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 37 Keegan KA, Cookson MS. Complications of pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer. Curr Urol Rep 2011; 12: 203-208
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 38 Briganti A, Chun FK, Salonia A. et al. Complications and other surgical outcomes associated with extended pelvic lymphadenectomy in men with localized prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2006; 50: 1006-1013
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 39 Naselli A, Andreatta R, Introini C. et al. Predictors of symptomatic lymphocele after lymph node excision and radical prostatectomy. Urology 2010; 75: 630-635
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 40 Swank HA, Mulder IM, la Chapelle CF. et al. Systematic review of trocar-site hernia. Br J Surg 2012; 99: 315-323
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 41 Lim SK, Kim KH, Shin TY. et al. A rare case of interparietal incisional hernia from 8 mm trocar site after robotassisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Hernia 2014; 18: 911-913
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 42 Gainsburg DM, Wax D, Reich DL. et al. Intraoperative management of robotic-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy. JSLS 2010; 14: 1-5
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 43 Du Y. et al. Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Is More Beneficial for Prostate Cancer Patients: A System Review and Meta-Analysis. Med Sci Monit 2018; 24: 272-287
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 44 Pridgeon S, Bishop CV, Adshead J. Lower limb compartment syndrome as a complication of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: the UK experience. BJU Int 2013; 112: 485-488
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar