Impact of mechanical simulator practice on clinical ERCP performance by novice surgical trainees: a randomized controlled trial

Abstract

Background Lack of forward-viewing endoscopy experience impairs training in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). We evaluated the effect of ERCP mechanical simulator (EMS) practice on ERCP performance by surgical trainees.

Patients and methods 12 surgical trainees without endoscopy experience were randomly allocated to non-EMS (n = 6) programs or to EMS (n = 6) programs with coaching and 20 hours of supervised EMS practice. All trainees then received supervised hands-on clinical ERCP training. Trainers provided verbal instructions and hands-on assistance, and took over if cannulation was not achieved by 20 minutes. Blinded trainers rated clinical performance.

Results Each group performed 150 clinical ERCPs. Biliary cannulation success was significantly higher in the EMS vs. the non-EMS group (P = 0.006), with shorter mean times (in minutes) for intubation, cannulation, and completion (all P < 0.001). EMS trainees showed a significantly better mean performance score (P = 0.006). In multivariate analysis, after adjusting for case sequence, CBD stone, complexity, and EMS training, the effect of EMS practice on odds for successful cannulation remained highly significant (odds ratio [OR] 2.10 [95 %CI 1.46 – 3.01]). At 6 months EMS trainees still had better cannulation success vs. non-EMS controls (P = 0.045); no difference was observed after 1 year.

Conclusions EMS practice shortens the ERCP early learning curve of inexperienced surgical trainees, improves clinical success in selective biliary cannulation, and may reduce complications.

^* Wenbo Meng and Ping Yue contributed equally to this work.

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 29. Dezember 2019

Angenommen: 06. Mai 2020

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
31. August 2020

• References

• 1 Anderson MA, Fisher L, Jain R. et al. Complications of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 57: 633-638
• 2 Mehnert CS, Graessler J, Kamvissi-Lorenz V. et al. Prophylaxis of post-ERCP pancreatitis: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline – Updated June 2014. Endoscopy 2014; 46: 799-815
• 3 Christensen M, Matzen P, Schulze S. et al. Complications of ERCP: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 60: 721-731
• 4 Chandrasekhara V, Khashab MA, Muthusamy VR. et al. Adverse events associated with ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 85: 32-47
• 5 Waller HM, Connor SJ. Cumulative sum (Cusum) analysis provides an objective measure of competency during training in endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP). HPB 2009; 11: 565-569
• 6 Elta GH. GI Training: where are we headed?. Am J Gastroenterol 2011; 106: 395-397
• 7 Feurer ME, Draganov PV. Training for advanced endoscopic procedures. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2016; 30: 397-408
• 8 Kowalski T, Kanchana T, Pungpapong S. Perceptions of gastroenterology fellows regarding ERCP competency and training. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 58: 345-349
• 9 Verma D, Gostout CJ, Petersen BT. et al. Establishing a true assessment of endoscopic competence in ERCP during training and beyond: a single operator learning curve for deep biliary cannulation in patients with native papillary anatomy. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 65: 394-400
• 10 Voiosu T, Voiosu A, Bengus A. et al. Trainee involvement increases precut rates and delays access to the common bile duct without an increase in procedure-related adverse events: a brave new world of ERCP training?. Rom J Intern Med 2018; 56: 55-61
• 11 Shahidi N, Ou G, Telford J. et al. When trainees reach competency in performing ERCP: a systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81: 1337-1342
• 12 Kim J. Training in endoscopy: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Clin Endosc 2017; 50: 334-339
• 13 Sahakian AB, Laine L, Jamidar PA. et al. Can a computerized simulator assess skill level and improvement in performance of ERCP?. Dig Dis Sci 2016; 61: 722-730
• 14 Bekkali NL, Johnson GJ. Training in ERCP and EUS in the UK anno 2017. Frontline Gastroenterol 2017; 8: 124-128
• 15 von Delius S, Thies P, Meining A. et al. Validation of the X-Vision ERCP training system and technical challenges during early training of sphincterotomy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009; 7: 389-396
• 16 Schneider AR, Schepp W. Do it yourself: building an ERCP training system within 30 minutes (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 79: 828-832
• 17 Abdelhafez M, Frimberger E, Klare P. et al. Comparison of endoscopic sphincterotomy techniques after Billroth II gastrectomy using a novel mechanical simulator. Surg Endosc 2017; 31: 5342-5347
• 18 Baillie J. Simulation for ERCP training: A good idea that refuses to die?. Endoscopy 2008; 40: 989-990
• 19 Lim BS, Leung JW, Lee J. et al. Effect of ERCP mechanical simulator (EMS) practice on trainees’ ERCP performance in the early learning period: US multicenter randomized controlled trial. Am J Gastroenterol 2011; 106: 300-306
• 20 Leung JW, Lee W, Wilson R. Comparison of accessory performance using a novel ERCP mechanical simulator. Endoscopy 2008; 40: 983-988
• 21 Leung JW, Lee JG, Rojany M. et al. Development of a novel ERCP mechanical simulator. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 65: 1056-1062
• 22 Liao WC, Leung JW, Wang HP. et al. Coached practice using ERCP mechanical simulator improves trainees' ERCP performance: a randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy 2013; 45: 799-805
• 23 Wani S, Keswani RN, Petersen B. et al. Training in EUS and ERCP: Standardizing methods to assess competence. Gastrointest Endosc 2018; 87, 1371-1382
• 24 Cotton PB, Garrow DA, Gallagher J. et al. Risk factors for complications after ERCP: A multivariate analysis of 11,497 procedures over 12 years. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 70: 80-88
• 25 Cotton PB, Eisen G, Romagnuolo J. et al. Grading the complexity of endoscopic procedures: results of an ASGE working party. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 868-874
• 26 Donner A, Birkett N, Buck C. Randomization by cluster. Sample size requirements and analysis. Am J Epidemiol 1981; 114: 906-914
• 27 Voiosu T, Bălănescu P, Voiosu A. et al. Measuring trainee competence in performing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A systematic review of the literature. United Eur Gastroenterol J 2019; 7: 239-249
• 28 Leung JW, Wang D, Hu B. et al. A head-to-head hands-on comparison of ERCP mechanical simulator (EMS) and ex-vivo porcine stomach model (PSM). J Interv Gastroenterol 2011; 1: 108-113
• 29 Voiosu T, Boskoski I, Voiosu AM. et al. Impact of trainee involvement on the outcome of ERCP procedures: results of a prospective multicenter observational trial. Endoscopy 2020; 52: 115-122
• 30 Rodrigues-Pinto E, Macedo G, Baron TH. Training pathways and competency assessment in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Tech Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 19: 117-124