Vorgehen bei Nachweis von zystischen Pankreasraumforderungen

Zystische Läsionen des Pankreas sind häufig, meistens harmlos, aber potenziell gefährlich. Die differenzialdiagnostische Einordnung der Läsionen bereitet zuweilen Schwierigkeiten, und eine korrekte Einschätzung des mit der Zyste verbundenen Gesundheitsrisikos ist für die Patienten von hoher Relevanz. Dieser Beitrag soll eine Übersicht über diagnostischen Maßnahmen, Indikationen für die Therapie und Strategien der Überwachung geben.

Abstract

Cystic pancreatic lesions are a frequent incidental finding on ultrasound or cross sectional imaging. The incidence of pancreatic lesions experience a steady climb in recent years due to an increased number of cross sectional imaging and an increasing life expectancy. The clinical challenge is to identify individuals bearing lesions with potentially malignant or pre-malignant features. Indeed, by far most cystic pancreatic lesions are not associated with an increased risk for the development of cancer. Taking into account the increasing incidence rates of cystic pancreatic lesions a rational and economic use of diagnostics is warranted. This review provides an overview on the different types of cystic lesions, the appropriate use of diagnostics and a clinical management algorithm balancing intervention and surveillance.

Schlüsselwörter

Pankreaszyste - IPMN - Pseudozyste - endoskopischer Ultraschall

Key words

cystic pancreatic lesion - IPMN - pancreatic pseudocyst - endoscopic ultrasound

Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
16. Februar 2021

• Literatur

• 1 Kromrey ML, Bulow R, Hubner J. et al Prospective study on the incidence, prevalence and 5-year pancreatic-related mortality of pancreatic cysts in a population-based study. Gut 2018; 67: 138-145 . doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2016-313127
• 2 Budde C, Beyer G, Kuhn JP. et al The Clinical and Socio-Economic Relevance of Increased IPMN Detection Rates and Management Choices. Viszeralmedizin 2015; 31: 47-52 . doi:10.1159/000375455
• 3 Salvia R, Crippa S, Partelli S. et al Differences between main-duct and branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas. World J Gastrointest Surg 2010; 2: 342-346 . doi:10.4240/wjgs.v2.i10.342
• 4 Tanaka M, Chari S, Adsay V. et al International consensus guidelines for management of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms and mucinous cystic neoplasms of the pancreas. Pancreatology 2006; 6: 17-32 . doi:10.1159/000090023
• 5 Tanaka M, Fernandez-Del Castillo C, Kamisawa T. et al Revisions of international consensus Fukuoka guidelines for the management of IPMN of the pancreas. Pancreatology 2017; 17: 738-753 . doi:10.1016/j.pan.2017.07.007
• 6 European Study Group on Cystic Tumours of the P. European evidence-based guidelines on pancreatic cystic neoplasms. Gut 2018; 67: 789-804 . doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2018-316027
• 7 Elta GH, Enestvedt BK, Sauer BG. et al ACG Clinical Guideline: Diagnosis and Management of Pancreatic Cysts. Am J Gastroenterol 2018; 113: 464-479 . doi:10.1038/ajg.2018.14
• 8 Springer S, Wang Y, Dal Molin M. et al A combination of molecular markers and clinical features improve the classification of pancreatic cysts. Gastroenterology 2015; 149: 1501-1510 . doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2015.07.041
• 9 Habashi S, Draganov PV. Pancreatic pseudocyst. World J Gastroenterol 2009; 15: 38-47 . doi:10.3748/wjg.15.38
• 10 Tariq MU, Ahmad Z, Abdul-Ghafar J. et al Serous cystadenoma of pancreas: A clinicopathologic experience of 23 cases from a major tertiary care center. Rare Tumors 2018; 10: 2036361318809183 . doi:10.1177/2036361318809183
• 11 Shuja A, Alkimawi KA. Solid pseudopapillary tumor: a rare neoplasm of the pancreas. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) 2014; 2: 145-149 . doi:10.1093/gastro/gou006
• 12 Jones MJ, Buchanan AS, Neal CP. et al Imaging of indeterminate pancreatic cystic lesions: a systematic review. Pancreatology 2013; 13: 436-442 . doi:10.1016/j.pan.2013.05.007
• 13 de Jong K, van Hooft JE, Nio CY. et al Accuracy of preoperative workup in a prospective series of surgically resected cystic pancreatic lesions. Scand J Gastroenterol 2012; 47: 1056-1063 . doi:10.3109/00365521.2012.674970