RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/a-1237-4642
Reconstruction of the Coracoacromial Ligament during a Modified Latarjet Procedure for the Treatment of Shoulder Instability: Clinical Outcome at Minimum 5 Years Follow-Up
Behandlung der Schulterinstabilität mit dem Latarjet-VerfahrenAbstract
Objective The function of the coracoacromial ligament (CAL) in superior shoulder stability has been well established, and the release of the CAL with the Latarjet procedure leads to increased superior humeral translation. A surgical technique was developed recently to reconstruct the CAL during a modified Latarjet procedure, and the clinical outcome of this technique at medium-term follow-up is yet to be determined.
Methods Twenty-six patients with chronic post-traumatic anterior shoulder instability were included in this retrospective case-control study. Patients in group 1 (n = 12) were surgically treated with the classic congruent-arc Latarjet, where the CAL is sacrificed. In group 2 (n = 14), the CAL was reconstructed using a pectoralis minor fascia flap (PMFF). Primary outcomes were the return to sports activity and functional assessment based on the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) and the Constant Score (CS) at minimum 5 years follow-up. Patientʼs demographics, sport activities, duration of surgery, the rate of recurrent dislocations, and specific complications related to the surgical technique were recorded as secondary variables.
Results There was a decrease of the WOSI in both groups, indicating a decrease of symptoms at follow-up compared to the preoperative level. There was no statistically significant difference between groups 1 and 2 for the total WOSI as well as for all subscales. There was an increase of the CS in both groups in all four items at follow-up compared to preoperatively, indicating an increase in shoulder function at follow-up. There was a statistically significant difference between groups 1 and 2 for the total CS, as well as for the items power, mobility, and activity, but not for pain. Most patients (n = 20) returned to their preoperative sports activity, 13 at the same level. However, seven patients who used to perform their sports competitively chose to perform their activity at a noncompetitive level after the Latarjet procedure. All were younger than 35 years of age. Six patients did not return to their preoperative sports activity. All except one were over 35 years of age. The duration of surgery ranged from 75 to 125 minutes with a mean ± SD of 94.23 ± 15.06 minutes for both groups with no significant difference between the groups (p = 0.117). None of the patients had intra- or postoperative complications related to the surgical procedure. Especially, no patient had recurrent dislocations of the affected shoulder following the Latarjet procedure.
Conclusion The use of a PMFF is a safe technique for reconstruction of the CAL, which does not result in a longer surgery time or higher rate of complications. The reconstruction of the CAL during the modified Latarjet procedure may lead to better functional results in medium-term follow-up.
Zusammenfassung
Ziel Die Funktion des coraco-acromialen Ligaments (CAL) bei der superioren Schulterstabilität ist hinreichend gut bekannt. Die Resektion des CAL beim Latarjet-Verfahren führt zu einer erhöhten superioren Translation des Humeruskopfes. Daher wurde eine Operationstechnik entwickelt, um das CAL im Rahmen eines modifizierten Latarjet-Verfahrens zu rekonstruieren. Nun soll das mittelfristige klinische Ergebnis dieser Technik ermittelt werden.
Methoden 26 Patienten mit chronischer posttraumatischer ventraler Schulter-Instabilität wurden in diese retrospektive Fall-Kontroll-Studie eingeschlossen. Patienten in Gruppe 1 (n = 12) wurden mit dem klassischen Latarjet behandelt, bei welchem das CAL reseziert wird. In Gruppe 2 (n = 14) wurde das CAL mit einem „Pectoralis minor Fascia Flap“ (PMFF) rekonstruiert. Die primären Parameter waren die Rückkehr zur sportlichen Aktivität und die Funktionsbewertung auf der Grundlage des Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) und des Constant Score (CS) nach mindestens 5 Jahren. Die demografischen Daten der Patienten, die sportlichen Aktivitäten, die Operationsdauer, die Häufigkeit rezidivierender Luxationen und spezifische Komplikationen im Zusammenhang mit der Operationstechnik wurden als sekundäre Variablen erfasst.
Ergebnisse In beiden Gruppen ist eine Abnahme des WOSI zu verzeichnen, was auf eine Abnahme der Symptome bei der Nachuntersuchung im Vergleich zum präoperativen Niveau hinweist. Es gibt keinen statistisch signifikanten Unterschied zwischen Gruppe 1 und 2 für den gesamten WOSI sowie für alle Subskalen. Es zeigt sich eine Zunahme des CS in beiden Gruppen in allen 4 Subskalen (Items) bei der Nachuntersuchung im Vergleich zu präoperativ, was auf eine Zunahme der Schulterfunktion bei der Nachuntersuchung hinweist. Es gibt einen statistisch signifikanten Unterschied zwischen Gruppe 1 und 2 für den Gesamt-CS, sowie für die Items Kraft, Mobilität und Aktivität, jedoch nicht für Schmerzen. Die meisten Patienten (n = 20) kehrten zu ihrer präoperativen sportlichen Aktivität zurück, 13 auf dem gleichen Niveau. 7 Patienten, die ihren Sport früher kompetitiv betrieben, entschieden sich jedoch dafür, ihre Aktivität nach dem Latarjet-Verfahren auf einem nicht-kompetitiven Niveau auszuführen. Alle waren jünger als 35 Jahre. Sechs Patienten kehrten nicht zu ihrer präoperativen sportlichen Aktivität zurück. Alle außer einem waren über 35 Jahre alt. Die Operationsdauer lag zwischen 75 und 125 Minuten mit einem Mittelwert ± SD von 94,23 ± 15,06 Minuten für beide Gruppen ohne signifikanten Unterschied zwischen den Gruppen (p = 0,117). Keiner der Patienten hatte intra- oder postoperative Komplikationen im Zusammenhang mit dem chirurgischen Eingriff. Insbesondere hatte kein Patient nach dem Latarjet-Verfahren wiederkehrende Luxationen der betroffenen Schulter.
Schlussfolgerung Die Rekonstruktion des CAL im Rahmen eines modifizierten Latarjet-Verfahrens kann zu besseren mittelfristigen funktionellen Ergebnissen führen. Die Verwendung eines PMFF ist eine sichere Technik zur Rekonstruktion des CAL, die nicht zu einer längeren Operationszeit oder einer höheren Komplikationsrate führt.
Publikationsverlauf
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
27. August 2020
© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Lee TQ, Black AD, Tibone JE. et al. Release of the coracoacromial ligament can lead to glenohumeral laxity: a biomechanical study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2001; 10: 68-72
- 2 Su WR, Budoff JE, Luo ZP. The effect of coracoacromial ligament excision and acromioplasty on superior and anterosuperior glenohumeral stability. Arthroscopy 2009; 25: 13-18
- 3 Torrens C, Lopez JM, Verdier E. et al. Open anterior acromioplasty with preservation of the coracoacromial ligament: A modified surgical technique. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2003; 12: 9-14
- 4 Wellmann M, Petersen W, Zantop T. et al. Effect of coracoacromial ligament resection on glenohumeral stability under active muscle loading in an in vitro model. Arthroscopy 2008; 24: 1258-1264
- 5 Wiley AM. Superior humeral dislocation. A complication following decompression and debridement for rotator cuff tears. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1991; 263: 135-141
- 6 Denard PJ, Bahney TJ, Kirby SB. et al. Contact pressure and glenohumeral translation following subacromial decompression: how much is enough?. Orthopedics 2010; 33: 805
- 7 Hockman DE, Lucas GL, Roth CA. Role of the coracoacromial ligament as restraint after shoulder hemiarthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004; 419: 80-82
- 8 Latarjet M. Treatment of recurrent dislocation of the shoulder. Lyon Chir 1954; 49: 994-997
- 9 Young AA, Maia R, Berhouet J. et al. Open Latarjet procedure for management of bone loss in anterior instability of the glenohumeral joint. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2011; 20: 61-69
- 10 de Beer JF, Roberts C. Glenoid bone defects–open Latarjet with congruent arc modification. Orthop Clin North Am 2010; 41: 407-415
- 11 Armitage MS, Elkinson I, Giles JW. et al. An anatomic, computed tomographic assessment of the coracoid process with special reference to the congruent-arc Latarjet procedure. Arthroscopy 2011; 27: 1485-1489
- 12 Ghodadra N, Gupta A, Romeo AA. et al. Normalization of glenohumeral articular contact pressures after Latarjet or iliac crest bone-grafting. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010; 92: 1478-1489
- 13 Burkhart SS, De Beer JF, Barth JR. et al. Results of modified Latarjet reconstruction in patients with anteroinferior instability and significant bone loss. Arthroscopy 2007; 23: 1033-1041
- 14 Hovelius L, Vikerfors O, Olofsson A. et al. Bristow-Latarjet and Bankart: a comparative study of shoulder stabilization in 185 shoulders during a seventeen-year follow-up. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2011; 20: 1095-1101
- 15 Aurich M, Hofmann GO, Gras F. Reconstruction of the coracoacromial ligament during a modified Latarjet procedure: a case series. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2015; 16: 238
- 16 Fayad F, Mace Y, Lefevre-Colau MM. Shoulder disability questionnaires: a systematic review. Ann Readapt Med Phys 2005; 48: 298-306
- 17 Kirkley A, Griffin S, McLintock H. et al. The development and evaluation of a disease-specific quality of life measurement tool for shoulder instability. The Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI). Am J Sports Med 1998; 26: 764-772
- 18 Salomonsson B, Ahlström S, Dalén N. et al. The Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI): validity, reliability, and responsiveness retested with a Swedish translation. Acta Orthop 2009; 80: 233-238
- 19 Drerup S, Angst F, Griffin S. et al. [Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI). Translation and cross-cultural adaptation for use by German speakers]. Orthopäde 2010; 39: 711-718
- 20 Breivik EK, Bjornsson GA, Skovlund E. A comparison of pain rating scales by sampling from clinical trial data. Clin J Pain 2000; 16: 22-28
- 21 Constant CR, Murley AH. A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1987; 214: 160-164
- 22 Boehm D, Wollmerstedt N, Doesch M. et al. [Development of a questionnaire based on the Constant-Murley-Score for self-evaluation of shoulder function by patients]. Unfallchirurg 2004; 107: 397-402
- 23 Degen RM, Giles JW, Boons HW. et al. A biomechanical assessment of superior shoulder translation after reconstruction of anterior glenoid bone defects: The Latarjet procedure versus allograft reconstruction. Int J Shoulder Surg 2013; 7: 7-13
- 24 Hansen U, Levy O, Even T. et al. Mechanical properties of regenerated coracoacromial ligament after subacromial decompression. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2004; 13: 51-56
- 25 Levy O, Copeland SA. Regeneration of the coracoacromial ligament after acromioplasty and arthroscopic subacromial decompression. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2001; 10: 317-320
- 26 Helfet AJ. Coracoid transplantation for recurring dislocation of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1958; 40: 198-202
- 27 Allain J, Goutallier D, Glorion C. Long-term results of the Latarjet procedure for the treatment of anterior instability of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998; 80: 841-852
- 28 Barry TP, Lombardo SJ, Kerlan RK. et al. The coracoid transfer for recurrent anterior instability of the shoulder in adolescents. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1985; 67: 383-387
- 29 de Waal Malefijt J, Ooms AJ, van Rens TJ. A comparison of the results of the Bristow-Latarjet procedure and the Bankart/Putti-Platt operation for recurrent anterior dislocation of the shoulder. Acta Orthop Belg 1985; 51: 831-842
- 30 Lombardo SJ, Kerlan RK, Jobe FW. et al. The modified Bristow procedure for recurrent dislocation of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1976; 58: 256-261
- 31 Walch G, Neyret P, Charret P. et al. Lʼopération de Trillat pour luxation récidivante antérieure de lʼépaule. Résultats à long terme de 250 cas avec un recul moyen de 11,3 ans. Lyon Chir 1989; 85: 25-31
- 32 van der Linde JA, Willems WJ, van Kampen DA. et al. Measurement properties of the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index in Dutch patients with shoulder instability. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2014; 15: 211
- 33 Conboy V, Morris R, Kiss J. et al. An evaluation of the Constant-Murley shoulder assessment. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1996; 78: 229-232
- 34 Kirschenbaum D, Coyle MP, Leddy JP. et al. Shoulder strength with rotator cuff tears. Pre- and postoperative analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1993; 288: 174-178
- 35 Richards RR, An KN, Bigliani LU. et al. A standarized method for the assessment of shoulder function. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1994; 3: 347-352
- 36 Giles JW, Boons HW, Elkinson I. et al. Does the dynamic sling effect of the Latarjet procedure improve shoulder stability? A biomechanical evaluation. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2013; 22: 821-827
- 37 Moroder P, Hitzl W, Tauber M. et al. Effect of anatomic bone grafting in post-traumatic recurrent anterior shoulder instability on glenoid morphology. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2013; 22: 1522-1529
- 38 Yamamoto N, Muraki T, Sperling JW. et al. Stabilizing mechanism in bone-grafting of a large glenoid defect. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010; 92: 2059-2066
- 39 Auffarth A, Schauer J, Matis N. et al. The J-bone graft for anatomical glenoid reconstruction in recurrent posttraumatic anterior shoulder dislocation. Am J Sports Med 2008; 36: 638-647
- 40 Warner JJ, Gill TJ, OʼHollerhan JD. et al. Anatomical glenoid reconstruction for recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability with glenoid deficiency using an autogenous tricortical iliac crest bone graft. Am J Sports Med 2006; 34: 205-212
- 41 Moroder P, Schulz E, Wierer G. et al. Neer Award 2019: Latarjet procedure vs. iliac crest bone graft transfer for treatment of anterior shoulder instability with glenoid bone loss: a prospective randomized trial. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2019; 28: 1298-1307