Endoscopy 2021; 53(04): 383-391
DOI: 10.1055/a-1243-0379
Original article

Incomplete endoscopic resection of colorectal polyps: a prospective quality assurance study

Ina B. Pedersen
1   Department of Medicine, Sorlandet Hospital Kristiansand, Kristiansand, Norway
2   Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
,
Michael Bretthauer
2   Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
3   Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
,
Mette Kalager
2   Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
3   Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
,
Magnus Løberg
2   Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
3   Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
,
Geir Hoff
4   Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
5   Department of Medicine, Telemark Hospital Skien, Skien, Norway
,
Senaria Matapour
6   Department of Medicine, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Gjettum, Norway
,
Silje Hugin
6   Department of Medicine, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Gjettum, Norway
,
Svein O. Frigstad
6   Department of Medicine, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Gjettum, Norway
,
Birgitte Seip
4   Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
7   Department of Medicine, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Tønsberg, Norway
,
Britta A. Kleist
8   Department of Pathology, Sorlandet Hospital Kristiansand, Norway
,
Leif Løvdal
8   Department of Pathology, Sorlandet Hospital Kristiansand, Norway
,
Edoardo Botteri
4   Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
,
Øyvind Holme
1   Department of Medicine, Sorlandet Hospital Kristiansand, Kristiansand, Norway
2   Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
3   Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
4   Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
› Author Affiliations


Abstract

Background Endoscopic screening with polypectomy has been shown to reduce colorectal cancer incidence in randomized trials. Incomplete polyp removal and subsequent development of post-colonoscopy cancers may attenuate the effect of screening. This study aimed to quantify the extent of incomplete polyp removal.

Methods We included patients aged 50–75 years with nonpedunculated polyps ≥ 5 mm removed during colonoscopy at four hospitals in Norway. To evaluate completeness of polyp removal, biopsies from the resection margins were obtained after polypectomy. Logistic regression models were fitted to identify factors explaining incomplete resection.

Results 246 patients with 339 polyps underwent polypectomy between January 2015 and June 2017. A total of 12 polyps were excluded due to biopsy electrocautery damage, and 327 polyps in 246 patients (mean age 67 years [range 42–83]; 52 % male) were included in the analysis. Overall, 54 polyps (15.9 %) in 54 patients were incompletely resected. Histological diagnosis of the polyp (sessile serrated lesions vs. adenoma, odds ratio [OR] 10.9, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 3.9–30.1) and polyp location (proximal vs. distal colon, OR 2.8, 95 %CI 1.0–7.7) were independent risk factors for incomplete removal of polyps 5–19 mm. Board-certified endoscopists were not associated with lower rates of incomplete resection compared with trainees (14.0 % vs. 14.2 %), OR 1.0 (95 %CI 0.5–2.1).

Conclusion Incomplete polyp resection was frequent after polypectomy in routine clinical practice. Serrated histology and proximal location were independent risk factors for incomplete resection. The performance of board-certified gastroenterologists was not superior to that of trainees.

Supplementary material



Publication History

Received: 09 December 2019

Accepted: 15 July 2020

Article published online:
22 September 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Holme O, Loberg M, Kalager M. et al. Effect of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2014; 312: 606-615
  • 2 Atkin WS, Edwards R, Kralj-Hans I. et al. Once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in prevention of colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2010; 375: 1624-1633
  • 3 Holme O, Schoen RE, Senore C. et al. Effectiveness of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in men and women and different age groups: pooled analysis of randomised trials. BMJ 2017; 356: i6673
  • 4 Lin JS, Piper MA, Perdue LA. et al. Screening for colorectal cancer: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA 2016; 315: 2576-2594
  • 5 Farrar WD, Sawhney MS, Nelson DB. et al. Colorectal cancers found after a complete colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006; 4: 1259-1264
  • 6 Moss A, Williams SJ, Hourigan LF. et al. Long-term adenoma recurrence following wide-field endoscopic mucosal resection (WF-EMR) for advanced colonic mucosal neoplasia is infrequent: results and risk factors in 1000 cases from the Australian Colonic EMR (ACE) study. Gut 2015; 64: 57-65
  • 7 Robertson DJ, Lieberman DA, Winawer SJ. et al. Colorectal cancers soon after colonoscopy: a pooled multicohort analysis. Gut 2014; 63: 949-956
  • 8 le Clercq CM, Bouwens MW, Rondagh EJ. et al. Postcolonoscopy colorectal cancers are preventable: a population-based study. Gut 2014; 63: 957-963
  • 9 Carter D, Beer-Gabel M, Zbar A. et al. A survey of colonoscopic polypectomy practice amongst Israeli gastroenterologists. Ann Gastroenterol 2013; 26: 135-140
  • 10 Singh N, Harrison M, Rex DK. A survey of colonoscopic polypectomy practices among clinical gastroenterologists. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 60: 414-418
  • 11 Pedersen IB, Loberg M, Hoff G. et al. Polypectomy techniques among gastroenterologists in Norway – a nationwide survey. Endosc Int Open 2018; 6: E812-E820
  • 12 Pohl H, Srivastava A, Bensen SP. et al. Incomplete polyp resection during colonoscopy – results of the complete adenoma resection (CARE) study. Gastroenterology 2013; 144: 74-80.e71
  • 13 Zhang Q, Gao P, Han B. et al. Polypectomy for complete endoscopic resection of small colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 2018; 87: 733-740
  • 14 Knabe M, Pohl J, Gerges C. et al. Standardized long-term follow-up after endoscopic resection of large, nonpedunculated colorectal lesions: a prospective two-center study. Am J Gastroenterol 2014; 109: 183-189
  • 15 Tutticci NJ, Hewett DG. Cold EMR of large sessile serrated polyps at colonoscopy (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2018; 87: 837-842
  • 16 Aslan F, Camci M, Alper E. et al. Cold snare polypectomy versus hot snare polypectomy in endoscopic treatment of small polyps. Turk J Gastroenterol 2014; 25: 279-283
  • 17 Kawamura T, Takeuchi Y, Asai S. et al. A comparison of the resection rate for cold and hot snare polypectomy for 4–9 mm colorectal polyps: a multicentre randomised controlled trial (CRESCENT study). Gut 2018; 67: 1950-1957
  • 18 Singh R, Zorron Cheng Tao Pu L, Koay D. et al. Sessile serrated adenoma/polyps: Where are we at in 2016?. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22: 7754-7759
  • 19 Bettington M, Walker N, Clouston A. et al. The serrated pathway to colorectal carcinoma: current concepts and challenges. Histopathology 2013; 62: 367-386
  • 20 Langner C. Serrated and non-serrated precursor lesions of colorectal cancer. Dig Dis 2015; 33: 28-37
  • 21 Djinbachian R, Dube AJ, von Renteln D. Optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps: recent developments. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol 2019; 17: 99-114
  • 22 Picot J, Rose M, Cooper K. et al. Virtual chromoendoscopy for the real-time assessment of colorectal polyps in vivo: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 2017; 21: 1-308
  • 23 Kandel P, Werlang ME, Ahn IR. et al. Prophylactic snare tip soft coagulation and its impact on adenoma recurrence after colonic endoscopic mucosal resection. Dig Dis Sci 2019; 64: 3300-3306
  • 24 Lee SP, Sung IK, Kim JH. et al. Risk factors for incomplete polyp resection during colonoscopic polypectomy. Gut Liver 2015; 9: 66-72
  • 25 Heldwein W, Dollhopf M, Rosch T. et al. The Munich Polypectomy Study (MUPS): prospective analysis of complications and risk factors in 4000 colonic snare polypectomies. Endoscopy 2005; 37: 1116-1122
  • 26 Brenner H, Chang-Claude J, Rickert A. et al. Risk of colorectal cancer after detection and removal of adenomas at colonoscopy: population-based case–control study. J Clin Oncol 2012; 30: 2969-2976
  • 27 Brenner H, Hoffmeister M, Arndt V. et al. Protection from right- and left-sided colorectal neoplasms after colonoscopy: population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst 2010; 102: 89-95
  • 28 Adler J, Robertson DJ. Interval colorectal cancer after colonoscopy: exploring explanations and solutions. Am J Gastroenterol 2015; 110: 1657-1664
  • 29 Pohl H, Robertson DJ. Colorectal cancers detected after colonoscopy frequently result from missed lesions. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010; 8: 858-864
  • 30 van Doorn SC, Bastiaansen BA, Thomas-Gibson S. et al. Polypectomy skills of gastroenterology fellows: can we improve them?. Endosc Int Open 2016; 4: E182-E189
  • 31 Duloy AM, Kaltenbach TR, Wood M. et al. Colon polypectomy report card improves polypectomy competency: results of a prospective quality improvement study (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 89: 1212-1221
  • 32 Gupta S, Bassett P, Man R. et al. Validation of a novel method for assessing competency in polypectomy. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: 568-575
  • 33 Kaminski MF, Thomas-Gibson S, Bugajski M. et al. Performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) quality improvement initiative. United European Gastroenterol J 2017; 5: 309-334
  • 34 Holme O, Bretthauer M, Eide TJ. et al. Long-term risk of colorectal cancer in individuals with serrated polyps. Gut 2015; 64: 929-936
  • 35 Vleugels JLA, Hazewinkel Y, Fockens P. et al. Natural history of diminutive and small colorectal polyps: a systematic literature review. Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 85: 1169-1176.e1161