Download PDF
OP-Journal 2021; 37(02): 159-173
DOI: 10.1055/a-1253-7896
Fachwissen

Chopart- und Lisfranc-Luxationsverletzungen – operative Zugangswege, Lagerungstechniken sowie intraoperative Erfolgskontrolle

Injuries of the Midfoot and Forefoot. Operative Approaches, Intraoperative Positioning and Imaging
Ingmar Rinas
,
Thomas Mittlmeier
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Eine hohe Zahl von Kombinationsverletzungen der Fußwurzel wird primär nicht erkannt (20 – 25%). Insbesondere Luxationsfrakturen sind folgenschwere Verletzungen und können mit erheblichen funktionellen Einschränkungen verbunden sein. Eine suffiziente Primärdiagnostik beinhaltet Standardröntgenaufnahmen des Fußes in 3 Ebenen. Bei klinischem Verdacht sollte die Indikation zur erweiterten Schnittbildgebung mittels Computertomografie mit multiplanaren Rekonstruktionen großzügig gestellt werden. Die physiologische Rekonstruktion der Gelenkstrukturen und Lagebeziehungen der medialen zur zentralen und lateralen Fußsäule sowie die Erfassung und Therapie ligamentärer Instabilitäten sind elementare Bestandteile einer adäquaten Behandlung. Können diese Prinzipien nicht erreicht werden, sind Korrekturarthrodesen im Verlauf unvermeidlich. Mittels Bildverstärker können latente Instabilitäten auch im Stresstest dynamisch untersucht werden. Bei chronischen Beschwerden können Belastungsaufnahmen im Stehen helfen, Instabilitäten und Fehlstellungen zu erkennen.

Abstract

A high number of combined or isolated injuries of the front- and midfoot including fractures, dislocations and/or fracture dislocations of the Chopart and Lisfranc joint lines are initially misdiagnosed or overlooked (20 – 25%). Especially fracture dislocations are serious injuries leading to massive impaired functional outcome. A sufficient primary diagnosis including standard conventional X-rays in three planes of the foot (dorso-plantar, lateral and lateral oblique views). If an injury of the front- or midfoot is suspected, CAT scanning and multiplanar reconstruction should be obtained broadly. The physiological reconstruction of the medial to the central and lateral coloumn of the foot is essential as well as the recognition and adequate treatment of concomitant ligamentous instabilities. Chronic instabilities can be determined by weight-bearing radiographs or dynamic assessment revealing manifest displacement and malalignment under load.

Schlüsselwörter

Fußwurzel - Dislokation - Fraktur - Arthrodese - Operationstechnik

Key words

midfoot - dislocations - fractures - fracture fixation - arthrodesis


Publication History

Article published online:
15 July 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Mittlmeier T, Beck M. [Injuries of the midfoot]. Chirurg 2011; 82: 169-186 quiz 187–188
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Klaue K. Chopart fractures. Injury 2004; 35 (Suppl. 02) SB64-SB70
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Hansen ST. Functional Reconstruction of the Foot and Ankle. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2000
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 4 Hardcastle PH, Reschauer R, Kutscha-Lissberg E. et al. Injuries to the tarsometatarsal joint. Incidence, classification and treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1982; 64: 349-356
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Mittlmeier T, Beck M. Tarsometatarsal injuries – an often neglected entity. Ther Umsch 2004; 61: 459-465
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Richter M, Wippermann B, Krettek C. et al. Fractures and fracture dislocations of the midfoot: occurrence, causes and long-term results. Foot Ankle Int 2001; 22: 392-398
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Talarico RH, Hamilton GA, Ford LA. et al. Fracture dislocations of the tarsometatarsal joints: Analysis of interrater reliability in using the modified Hardcastle classification system. J Foot Ankle Surg 2006; 45: 300-303
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Zwipp H. Chirurgie des Fußes. Wien: Springer; 1994
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Philbin T, Rosenberg G, Sferra JJ. Complications of missed or untreated Lisfranc injuries. Foot Ankle Clin 2003; 8: 61-71
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Richter M, Thermann H, Huefner T. et al. Chopart joint fracture-dislocation: initial open reduction provides better outcome than closed reduction. Foot Ankle Int 2004; 25: 340-348
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Rammelt S, Grass R, Schikore H. et al. [Injuries of the Chopart joint]. Unfallchirurg 2002; 105: 371-383 quiz 384–385
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Rammelt S, Grass R, Zwipp H. Nutcracker fractures of the navicular and cuboid. Ther Umsch 2004; 61: 451-457
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Swords MP, Schramski M, Switzer K. et al. Chopart fractures and dislocations. Foot Ankle Clin 2008; 13: 679-693 viii
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Gupta RT, Wadhwa RP, Learch TJ. et al. Lisfranc injury: imaging findings for this important but often-missed diagnosis. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2008; 37: 115-126
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Thordarson D. Fractures of the Midfoot and Forefoot. In: Myerson MS. ed. Foot and Ankle Disorders. Vol 2. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2000: 1265-1296
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 16 Peicha G, Labovitz J, Seibert FJ. et al. The anatomy of the joint as a risk factor for Lisfranc dislocation and fracture-dislocation. An anatomical and radiological case control study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2002; 84: 981-985
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Sands AK, Grose A. Lisfranc injuries. Injury 2004; 35 (Suppl. 02) SB71-SB76
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Mittlmeier T, Klaue K, Beck M. [Posttraumatic arthritis in the hind foot]. Unfallchirurg 2006; 109: 125-146 quiz 147–148
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Zwipp H, Rammelt S. [Posttraumatic deformity correction at the foot]. Zentralbl Chir 2003; 128: 218-226
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Grivas TB, Vasiliadis ED, Koufopoulos G. et al. Midfoot fractures. Clin Podiatr Med Surg 2006; 23: 323-341 vi
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Haapamaki V, Kiuru M, Koskinen S. Lisfranc fracture-dislocation in patients with multiple trauma: diagnosis with multidetector computed tomography. Foot Ankle Int 2004; 25: 614-619
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Main BJ, Jowett RL. Injuries of the midtarsal joint. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1975; 57: 89-97
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Nunley JA, Vertullo CJ. Classification, investigation, and management of midfoot sprains: Lisfranc injuries in the athlete. Am J Sports Med 2002; 30: 871-878
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Preidler KW, Peicha G, Lajtai G. et al. Conventional radiography, CT, and MR imaging in patients with hyperflexion injuries of the foot: diagnostic accuracy in the detection of bony and ligamentous changes. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 173: 1673-1677
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Richter M, Geerling J, Zech S. et al. Intraoperative three-dimensional imaging with a motorized mobile C-arm (SIREMOBIL ISO-C-3D) in foot and ankle trauma care: a preliminary report. J Orthop Trauma 2005; 19: 259-266
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Chandran P, Puttaswamaiah R, Dhillon MS. et al. Management of complex open fracture injuries of the midfoot with external fixation. J Foot Ankle Surg 2006; 45: 308-315
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Lisanti M, Rosati M, Nesti C. et al. Our results in the treatment of fractures dislocations of Lisfrancʼs joint. Chir Organi Mov 2001; 86: 281-291
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Rammelt S, Biewener A, Grass R. et al. [Foot injuries in the polytraumatized patient]. Unfallchirurg 2005; 108: 858-865
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Cook KD, Jeffries LC, OʼConnor JP. et al. Determining the strongest orientation for “Lisfrancʼs screw” in transverse plane tarsometatarsal injuries: a cadaveric study. J Foot Ankle Surg 2009; 48: 427-431
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Cottom JM, Hyer CF, Berlet GC. Treatment of Lisfranc fracture dislocations with an interosseous suture button technique: a review of 3 cases. J Foot Ankle Surg 2008; 47: 250-258
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Gaines RJ, Wright G, Stewart J. Injury to the tarsometatarsal joint complex during fixation of Lisfranc fracture dislocations: an anatomic study. J Trauma 2009; 66: 1125-1128
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Ly TV, Coetzee JC. Treatment of primarily ligamentous Lisfranc joint injuries: primary arthrodesis compared with open reduction and internal fixation. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88: 514-520
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Böhler L, Jeschke W. Technik der Knochenbruchbehandlung im Frieden und im Kriege Bd. 2. 8. Auflage der 7. vollst. umg. u. um d. Kriegschirurgie verm. Aufl.. Wien: Maudrich; 1942: 1439
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 34 Ricci WM, Bellabarba C, Sanders R. Transcalcaneal talonavicular dislocation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002; 84: 557-561
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Perugia D, Basile A, Battaglia A. et al. Fracture dislocations of Lisfrancʼs joint treated with closed reduction and percutaneous fixation. Int Orthop 2003; 27: 30-35
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 36 Zgonis T, Roukis TS, Polyzois VD. Lisfranc fracture-dislocations: current treatment and new surgical approaches. Clin Podiatr Med Surg 2006; 23: 303-322 vi
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 37 Teng AL, Pinzur MS, Lomasney L. et al. Functional outcome following anatomic restoration of tarsal-metatarsal fracture dislocation. Foot Ankle Int 2002; 23: 922-926
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 38 Coetzee JC. Making sense of lisfranc injuries. Foot Ankle Clin 2008; 13: 695-704 ix
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 39 Mulier T, Reynders P, Dereymaeker G. et al. Severe Lisfrancs injuries: primary arthrodesis or ORIF?. Foot Ankle Int 2002; 23: 902-905
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 40 Rammelt S, Schneiders W, Schikore H. et al. Primary open reduction and fixation compared with delayed corrective arthrodesis in the treatment of tarsometatarsal (Lisfranc) fracture dislocation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008; 90: 1499-1506
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 41 Henning JA, Jones CB, Sietsema DL. et al. Open reduction internal fixation versus primary arthrodesis for lisfranc injuries: a prospective randomized study. Foot Ankle Int 2009; 30: 913-922
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 42 Buda M, Kink S, Stavenuiter R. et al. Reoperation Rate Differences Between Open Reduction Internal Fixation and Primary Arthrodesis of Lisfranc Injuries. Foot Ankle Int 2018; 39: 1089-1096
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 43 Matar HE, Atkinson HD, Toh EM. et al. Surgical interventions for treating tarsometatarsal (Lisfranc) fracture dislocations. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; (07) CD011235
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 44 Matar HE, Atkinson HD, Toh EM. et al. Surgical interventions for treating tarsometatarsal (Lisfranc) fracture dislocations. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; (09) CD011235
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 45 Alcelik I, Fenton C, Hannant G. et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the treatment of acute lisfranc injuries: Open reduction and internal fixation versus primary arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Surg 2020; 26: 299-307
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 46 Ponkilainen VT, Mattila VM, Laine H-J. et al. Nonoperative, open reduction and internal fixation or primary arthrodesis in the treatment of Lisfranc injuries: a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial – study protocol. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2018; 19: 301
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar