Application Possibilities of a New Preloaded Nasolacrimal Duct Intubation System

Abstract

Introduction The LacriJet (FCI S. A. S. – France Chirurgie Instrumentation, Paris, France) represents a novel, simplified and preloaded system for monocanalicular or monocanaliculonasal nasolacrimal duct intubation. It is a further development of the Masterka and shall reduce the intubation time during the surgical procedure. The aim of the present study was to present first experiences with this system for different indications.

Material and Methods All patients who underwent nasolacrimal duct intubation with the LacriJet at the University of Muenster Medical Center in the period from March to November 2019 were included. The postoperative outcome was evaluated 3 to 6 months later.

Results In total, 12 nasolacrimal duct intubations with the LacriJet were performed at our center in the above-mentioned period. The main indication for intubation was congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO). In addition, intubation was performed in cases with eye lid tumors involving the nasolacrimal duct, in a case of canalicular laceration and in a case of canaliculitis. In 3 cases, there was an early dislocation or a complete loss of intubation. Of these, 2 were cases with CNLDO and the third dislocation was due to manipulation by the patient. All in all, the functional results were satisfying.

Summary The use of the LacriJet is highly suitable for the treatment of CNLDO, stenting in canalicular laceration or lid tumours involving the lacrimal drainage system. However, the known disadvantages of monocanalicular intubation (dislocation, early loss of intubation) also occur with this type of system and a system briefing seems useful. The LacriJet therefore represents a modern and simple method for nasolacrimal duct intubation and can be used for various indications.

Key words

Monoka - congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction - canaliculitis - canalicular laceration - LacriJet

Publication History

Received: 23 June 2020

Accepted: 11 September 2020

Article published online:
27 January 2021

• References/Literatur

• 1 Förl M, Busse H. Basisdiagnostik bei Tränenwegserkrankungen. Ophthalmologe 2008; 105: 346-350 doi:10.1007/s00347-008-1714-2
• 2 Sobel RK, Aakalu VK, Wladis EJ. et al. A comparison of endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy and external dacryocystorhinostomy: A report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology 2019; 126: 1580-1585 doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.06.009
• 3 Emmerich KH, Emmerich GM, Steinkogler FJ. et al. [How did lacrimal endoscopy influence lacrimal surgery?]. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2010; 227: 559-563
• 4 Meyer-Rüsenberg HW, Vujancevic S, Emmerich KH. Aktueller Stellenwert der Dakryozystorhinostomie. Ophthalmologe 2009; 106: 205-207 210–216 doi:10.1007/s00347-008-1904-y
• 5 Alnawaiseh M, Mihailovic N, Wieneke AC. et al. Long-term outcomes of external dacryocystorhinostomy in the age of transcanalicular microendoscopic techniques. J Ophthalmol 2016; 2016: 5918457 doi:10.1155/2016/5918457
• 6 Emmerich KH, Meyer-Rüsenberg HW. [Endoscopic lacrimal duct surgery]. Ophthalmologe 2001; 98: 607-612
• 7 Mihailovic N, Blumberg AF, Rosenberger F. et al. Long-term outcome of transcanalicular microdrill dacryoplasty: a minimally invasive alternative for dacryocystorhinostomy. Br J Ophthalmol 2020;
• 8 Buttanri IB, Serin D. Silicone intubation indications in external dacryocystorhinostomy. Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol 2014; 3: 101-102
• 9 Schön AG. Diseases of the lacrimal system and therapy in children. Spektrum Augenheilkd 2012; 26: 246-252 doi:10.1007/s00717-012-0125-6
• 10 Heichel J, Bachner F, Schmidt-Pokrzywniak A. et al. [Treatment of congenital lacrimal duct obstruction: A prospective clinical cohort study]. Ophthalmologe 2015; 112: 840-847 doi:10.1007/s00347-015-0067-x
• 11 Atili A, Holke K, Karimdadian D. et al. Rezidivierende Canaliculitis bei einem 22-Jährigen. Ophthalmologe 2011; 108: 1175-1177 doi:10.1007/s00347-011-2437-3
• 12 Busse H. Indications and techniques of implantation of hydrophilic lacrimal tubes. J Maxillofac Surg 1982; 10: 116-118 doi:10.1016/s0301-0503(82)80022-2
• 13 Lawin-Brüssel CA, Hüttenbrink KB, Krebs A. et al. Endonasale Implantation von Silikonfolie verbessert die Langzeitergebnisse der Revisionsoperation bei Tränenwegsrestenosen. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 1995; 206: 33-38 doi:10.1055/s-2008-1035402
• 14 Busse H. Erste Ergebnisse mit hydrophilen Tränenwegsprothesen. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 1979; 174: 215-218
• 15 Rokohl AC, Guo Y, Mor JM. et al. Intubationssysteme in der Tränenwegchirurgie – eine aktuelle Übersicht. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2020; 237: 20-28 doi:10.1055/a-0992-9966
• 16 Fritz Ruck Ophthalmologische Systeme GmbH. Konsequente Weiterentwicklung: Neues System zur Tränenwegbehandlung. Ophthalmologische Nachrichten 2019; 3: 25 Accessed June 15 2020 at: https://digital.biermann-medizin.de/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/1903_OphthaN_K1_i.pdf
• 17 FCI S. A. S. LacriJet. Accessed November 4, 2020 at: https://fci-ophthalmics.com/uploads/files/FCI18.008-ind.-B-LacriJet.pdf
• 18 Kashkouli MB, Karimi N, Khademi B. Surgical management of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction; one procedure for all versus all procedures for one. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2019; 30: 364-371 doi:10.1097/ICU.0000000000000584
• 19 Struck HG. Tränenwegsverletzungen und ihre chirurgische Versorgung. Ophthalmologe 2009; 106: 223-228 doi:10.1007/s00347-008-1906-9
• 20 Kaufman LM, Guay-Bhatia LA. Monocanalicular intubation with Monoka tubes for the treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Ophthalmology 1998; 105: 336-341 doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(98)93445-5
• 21 Rajabi MT, Zavarzadeh N, Mahmoudi A. et al. Bicanalicular versus monocanalicular intubation after failed probing in congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Int J Ophthalmol 2016; 9: 1466-1470 doi:10.18240/ijo.2016.10.16
• 22 Komínek P, Cervenka S, Pniak T. et al. Monocanalicular versus bicanalicular intubation in the treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2011; 249: 1729-1733 doi:10.1007/s00417-011-1700-2
• 23 Lee H, Ahn J, Lee JM. et al. Clinical effectiveness of monocanalicular and bicanalicular silicone intubation for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. J Craniofac Surg 2012; 23: 1010-1014 doi:10.1097/SCS.0b013e31824dfc8a
• 24 Fayet B, Katowitz WR, Racy E. et al. Pushed monocanalicular intubation: an alternative stenting system for the management of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstructions. J AAPOS 2012; 16: 468-472 doi:10.1016/j.jaapos.2012.07.003
• 25 Dotan G, Ohana O, Leibovitch I. et al. Early loss of monocanalicular silicone tubes in congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction: incidence, predictors, and effect on outcome. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2015; 79: 301-304 doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2014.09.027
• 26 Eshraghi B, Jamshidian-Tehrani M, Mirmohammadsadeghi A. Comparison of the success rate between monocanalicular and bicanalicular intubations in incomplete complex congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Orbit 2017; 36: 215-217 doi:10.1080/01676830.2017.1337161
• 27 Heichel J, Struck HG, Viestenz A. Primäre Rekonstruktion der ableitenden Tränenwege nach Trauma – bikanalikulonasale Schienung mit autostabilen Silikonverweilsonden. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2020; 237: 797-803 doi:10.1055/a-0839-5172
• 28 Heichel J, Sandner A, Siebolts U. et al. Konkremente und iatrogene Fremdkörper der ableitenden Tränenwege: Therapeutische Empfehlungen. HNO 2016; 64: 403-416 doi:10.1007/s00106-016-0170-6
• 29 Czyz CN, Cahill KV, Foster JA. et al. Reconstructive options for the medial canthus and eyelids following tumor excision. Saudi J Ophthalmol 2011; 25: 67-74 doi:10.1016/j.sjopt.2010.10.009
• 30 Naik MN, Kelapure A, Rath S. et al. Management of canalicular lacerations: epidemiological aspects and experience with Mini-Monoka monocanalicular stent. Am J Ophthalmol 2008; 145: 375-380 doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2007.09.018
• 31 Hosemann W, Lorenz B, Kühnel T. et al. Ambulante endoskopische Therapie der Dakryozystozele des Neugeborenen. Laryngorhinootologie 2002; 81: 285-288 doi:10.1055/s-2002-25316
• 32 Fayet B, Racy E, Katowitz J. et al. Insertion of a preloaded Monoka^™ stent for congenital nasolacrimal obstruction: Intraoperative observations. A preliminary study. J Fr Ophtalmol 2019; 42: 248-254 doi:10.1016/j.jfo.2018.12.004