Zugangswege Hüftendoprothetik – dorsaler Zugang

Der dorsale Zugang ist einer der weltweit am meisten genutzten operativen Zugänge zum Hüftgelenk. Bei guter Operationstechnik ist es ein vielseitiger, sicherer und komplikationsarmer Zugang, der es dem Chirurgen ermöglicht, das Hüftgelenk zu erreichen, ohne wichtige Muskeln und Sehnen zu durchtrennen. Dadurch kann die Erholungszeit nach der Operation verkürzt werden.

Schlüsselwörter

Hüft-TEP - Hüfttotalendoprothese - OP-Zugang - Gelenkersatz - Nervenläsion

• Literatur

• 1 Langenbeck B. Über die Schussfrakturen der Gelenke und ihre Behandlung. Berlin: Verlag von August Hirschwald; 1868
• 2 Kocher T. Operative Surgery. 3. London: Black; 1911
• 3 Moore AT. Metal hip joint; a new self-locking vitallium prosthesis. South Med J 1952; 45: 1015-1019
• 4 Hovelius L, Hussenius A, Thorling J. Posterior versus lateral approach for hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Scand 1977; 48: 47-51
• 5 Robinson RP, Robinson jr. HJ, Salvati EA. Comparison of the transtrochanteric and posterior approaches for total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1980; (147) 143-147
• 6 Poss R, Ewald FC, Thomas WH. et al. Complications of total hip-replacement arthorplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1976; 58: 1130-1133
• 7 Woo RY, Morrey BF. Dislocations after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1982; 64: 1295-1306
• 8 Hedlundh U, Hybbinette CH, Fredin H. Influence of surgical approach on dislocations after Charnley hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 1995; 10: 609-614
• 9 Aggarwal VK, Elbuluk A, Dundon J. et al. Surgical approach significantly affects the complication rates associated with total hip arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 2019; 101-B: 646-651
• 10 Higgins BT, Barlow DR, Heagerty NE. et al. Anterior vs. posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty, a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Arthroplast 2015; 30: 419-434
• 11 Taunton MJ, Trousdale RT, Sierra RJ. et al. John Charnley Award: Randomized Clinical Trial of Direct Anterior and Miniposterior Approach THA: Which Provides Better Functional Recovery?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2018; 476: 216-229
• 12 Putananon C, Tuchinda H, Arirachakaran A. et al. Comparison of direct anterior, lateral, posterior and posterior-2 approaches in total hip arthroplasty: network meta-analysis. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2018; 28: 255-267
• 13 Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, Meneghini RM. et al. Slower recovery after two-incision than mini-posterior-incision total hip arthroplasty. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91 (Suppl. 02) 50-73
• 14 Meneghini RM, Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT. et al. Muscle damage during MIS total hip arthroplasty: Smith-Petersen versus posterior approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; 453: 293-298
• 15 Zawadsky MW, Paulus MC, Murray PJ. et al. Early outcome comparison between the direct anterior approach and the mini-incision posterior approach for primary total hip arthroplasty: 150 consecutive cases. J Arthroplast 2014; 29: 1256-1260
• 16 Bergin PF, Doppelt JD, Kephart CJ. et al. Comparison of minimally invasive direct anterior versus posterior total hip arthroplasty based on inflammation and muscle damage markers. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011; 93: 1392-1398
• 17 Christensen CP, Karthikeyan T, Jacobs CA. Greater prevalence of wound complications requiring reoperation with direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 2014; 29: 1839-1841
• 18 Purcell RL, Parks NL, Cody JP. et al. Comparison of Wound Complications and Deep Infections With Direct Anterior and Posterior Approaches in Obese Hip Arthroplasty Patients. J Arthroplast 2018; 33: 220-223
• 19 Purcell RL, Parks NL, Gargiulo JM. et al. Severely Obese Patients Have a Higher Risk of Infection After Direct Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 2016; 31: 162-165
• 20 Berend KR, Mirza AJ, Morris MJ. et al. Risk of Periprosthetic Fractures With Direct Anterior Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 2016; 31: 2295-2298
• 21 Sheth D, Cafri G, Inacio MC. et al. Anterior and Anterolateral Approaches for THA Are Associated With Lower Dislocation Risk Without Higher Revision Risk. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015; 473: 3401-3408
• 22 Hamilton WG, Parks NL, Huynh C. Comparison of Cup Alignment, Jump Distance, and Complications in Consecutive Series of Anterior Approach and Posterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 2015; 30: 1959-1962