RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/a-1334-0733
Auftreten von Harnsteinen – alters-, rasse- und geschlechtsspezifische Unterschiede bei Hunden aus Deutschland
Occurrence of uroliths – age-, breed-, and gender-specific differences in dogs from GermanyZusammenfassung
Ergebnisse Bei den Steinen handelte es sich um Struvit (44,7 %), Kalziumoxalat-Monohydrat (Whewellit, 24,5 %), Cystin (15,2 %), Ammoniumurat (5,3 %), Kalziumoxalat-Dihydrat (Weddellit, 4,4 %), Kalziumphosphat (1,6 %), Xanthin (1,2 %), Whewellit/Weddellit (1,1 %), Brushit (0,4 %) und andere Substanzen 1,7 %. Das mediane Alter (Jahre) der Hunde betrug bei Struvit 8, bei Kalziumoxalaten (Whewellit und Weddellit) 10, bei Cystin 5, bei Brushit 11, bei Xanthin 6,5 und bei Ammoniumurat 6. Bei weiblich-intakten (83,8 %) und weiblich-kastrierten (80,8 %) Individuen kamen Struvitsteine am häufigsten vor, während bei männlich-intakten Hunden Cystinsteine (36,7 %) und Kalziumoxalate (35,5 % Whewellit und Weddellit) dominierten. Kastrierte Rüden hatten zu 50,0 % Kalziumoxalat, zu 17,3 % Struvit und zu 10,5 % Cystinsteine. Struvitsteine ließen sich am häufigsten bei den Rassen Mops (75,9 %), Labrador (73,1 %), Shih Tzu (62,2 %), Dackel (50,4 %) und Malteser (36 %) nachweisen, Kalziumoxalate bei den Rassen Zwergschnauzer (54,8 %), Jack Russell Terrier (49,5 %) sowie Yorkshire Terrier (48,2 %). Cystin trat am häufigsten bei den Rassen Französische Bulldogge (47,2 %), Bulldogge (44,8 %), Chihuahua (44,1 %) und Dackel (32,8 %) auf.
Schlussfolgerung und klinische Relevanz Hunde aus Deutschland zeigten alters-, geschlechts- und rassespezifische Unterschiede in der Häufigkeit des Auftretens von Harnsteinen. Die Kenntnis über ein gehäuftes Vorkommen unterschiedlicher Harnsteinarten in Deutschland sowie über eine mögliche Rassedisposition ermöglicht dem Tierarzt, ein zielgerichtetes Monitoring zur Prophylaxe und Metaphylaxe zu etablieren und gemeinsam mit dem Tierbesitzer einen geeigneten Therapieplan zu erstellen.
Abstract
Objectives The aim of this study was to assess the distribution and frequency of uroliths in dogs in Germany and to evaluate age-, gender-, and breed-specific differences.
Material and methods A total of 2772 uroliths from dogs in Germany that had been submitted from veterinary practices during the years 2017–2019 were analyzed by infrared spectroscopy.
Results Uroliths were analyzed as follows: Struvite (44.7 %), calcium oxalate monohydrate (whewellite 24.5 %), cystine (15.2 %), ammonium urate (5.3 %), calcium oxalate dihydrate (weddellite 4.4 %), calcium phosphate (1.6 %), xanthine (1.2 %), whewellite/weddellite (11 %), brushite (0.4 %) and other substances (1.7 %). The dogs’ median age (in years) with regards to the urolith type amounted to: struvite 8, calcium oxalate (whewellite and weddellite) 10, cystine 5, brushite 11, xanthine 6.5, and ammonium urate 6 years. Struvite uroliths were most common in intact females (83.8 %) and neutered females (80.8 %), while cystine uroliths (36.7 %) and calcium oxalates (35.7 % whewellite and weddellite) were most common in intact males. Calcium oxalate (50 %), struvite (17.3 %), and cystine uroliths (10.5 %) were found in male neutered dogs. The most frequent breeds with struvite uroliths were Pug (75.9 %), Labrador (73.1 %), Shih Tzu (62.2 %), Dachshund (50.4 %) and Maltese (36 %). Calcium oxalates were most frequently encountered in the breeds Miniature Schnauzer (54.8 %), Jack Russell Terrier (49.5 %), and Yorkshire Terrier (48.2 %). Cystine uroliths were most frequent in the breeds French Bulldog (47.2 %), Bulldogs (44.8 %), Chihuahua (44.1 %) and Dachshund (32.8 %).
Conclusion and clinical relevance Dogs from Germany displayed age-, gender- and breed-specific differences in the frequency of urine calculi occurrence. Knowledge of the frequent occurrence of the distinct uroliths in Germany as well as potential breed dispositions allow the veterinarian to implement an appropriate preventive treatment plan. This would involve a targeted monitoring program for the prevention and follow-up care of the patient in conjunction with the pet owner.
Publikationsverlauf
Eingereicht: 01. September 2020
Angenommen: 09. Dezember 2020
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
15. Februar 2021
© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
Literatur
- 1 Hesse A, Brühl M. Urolithiasis beim Hund, epidemiologische Daten und Analysen der Steine. Kleintierprax 1990; 35: 505-511
- 2 Lulich J, Osborne C, Thumchai R. et al. Epidemiology of canine calcium oxalate uroliths. Identifying risk factors. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1999; 29: 113-122
- 3 Picavet P, Detilleux J, Verschuren S. et al. Analysis of 4495 canine and feline uroliths in the Benelux. A retrospective study: 1994–2004. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr 2007; 91: 247-251
- 4 Hesse A, Neiger R. Hrsg. Harnsteine bei Kleintieren. Stuttgart: Enke; 2008
- 5 Rogers K, Jones B, Roberts L. et al. Composition of uroliths in small domestic animals in the UK. Vet J 2011; 188: 228-230
- 6 Hesse A, Bach D. Hrsg. Harnsteine. Stuttgart: Thieme; 1982
- 7 Türk C, Petrik K, Sarica K. et al. Guidelines on Urolithiasis. European Association of Urology 2015. Eur Urol 2016; 69: 468-474
- 8 Bartges J, Osborne C, Polzin D. Recurrent sterile struvite urocystolithiasis in three related English cocker spaniels. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1992; 28: 459-469
- 9 Brown S. Urolithiasis in Small Animals. 2013 www.msdvetmanual.com/urinary-system/noninfectious-diseases-of-the-urinary-system-in-small-animals/renal-dysfunction-in-small-animals Stand: 14.07.2020
- 10 Lulich J, Berent A, Adams L. et al. ACVIM Small Animal Consensus Recommendations on the Treatment and Prevention of Uroliths in Dogs and Cats. J Vet Intern Med 2016; 30: 1564-1574
- 11 Moore A. Quantitative analysis of urine calculi in dogs and cats. Vet Focus 2007; 17 (01) 22-27
- 12 Osborne C, Lulich J, Polzin D. et al. Analysis of 77,000 canine uroliths. Perspectives from the Minnesota Urolith Center. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1999; 29 (01) 17-38
- 13 Adams L, Syme H. Canine lower urinary tract diseases. In: Ettinger SJ, Feldmann EC. eds. Textbook of Veterinary Internal Medicine. Vol 2. 6th ed.. St. Louis: Elsevier Saunders; 2005: 1850-1875
- 14 Lulich J, Osborne C, Albasan H. et al. Recent shifts in the global proportions of canine uroliths. Vet Rec 2013; 172 (14) 363
- 15 Houston D, Heather E, Weese N. et al. Analysis of canine urolith submissions to the Canadian Veterinary Urolith Centre, 1998–2014. Can Vet J 2017; 58: 45-50
- 16 Brandenberger-Schenk F, Rothenanger E, Reusch C. et al. Urolithen von Hunden in der Schweiz von 2003 bis 2009. Schweiz Arch Tierheilk 2015; 157 (01) 41-48
- 17 Hesse A, Frick M, Orzekowsky H. et al. Canine calcium oxalate urolithiasis: Frequency of whewellite and weddellite stones from 1979 to 2015. Can Vet J 2018; 59: 1305-1310
- 18 Schenk F, Rothenanger E, Reusch C. et al. Analysis of 855 feline and 468 canine uroliths in Switzerland between 2002 and 2009. In: Proceedings of the 20th ECVIM CA Congress. 2010: 304
- 19 Blavier A, Sulter A, Bogey A. et al. Results of infrared spectrophotometry analysis of 1131 canine urinary stones, collected in France from 2007 to 2010. Prat Méd Chir Anim Comp 2012; 47: 7-16
- 20 Vrabelova D, Silvestrini P, Ciudad J. et al. Analysis of 2735 canine uroliths in Spain and Portugal. A retrospective study: 2004–2006. Res Vet Sci 2011; 91: 208-211
- 21 Hesse A, Neiger R. eds. A Colour Handbook of Urinary Stones in Small Animal Medicine. London: Manson; 2009
- 22 Lekcharoensuk C, Lulich J, Osborne C. et al. Patient and environmental factors associated with calcium oxalate urolithiasis in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2000; 217: 515-519
- 23 Bende B, Kovács K, Solymosi N. et al. Characteristics of urolithiasis in the dog population of Hungary from 2001 to 2012. Acta Vet Hung 2015; 63: 323-336
- 24 Osborne C, Lulich J, Kruger J. et al. Analysis of 451,891 canine uroliths, feline uroliths, and feline urethral plugs from 1981 to 2007: perspectives from the Minnesota Urolith Center. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2009; 39: 183-197
- 25 Wolters M. Untersuchungen zu Art und Häufigkeit von Harnsteinen beim Hund und der Chemolitholyse von künstlichen Struvit und Calciumoxalatsteinen (BON(N)-STONES) [Dissertation]. Hannover: Tierärztliche Hochschule Hannover; 2003
- 26 Karmi N, Safra N, Young A. et al. Validation of a urine test and characterization of the putative genetic mutation for hyperuricosuria in Bulldogs and Black Russian Terriers. Am J Res 2010; 71 (08) 909-914
- 27 Welpenstatistik der VDH Mitgliedsvereine. www.vdh.de/ueber-den-vdh/welpenstatistik Stand: 24.7.2020
- 28 Daudon M, Reveilaud R. Whewellit and weddellit: toward a different etiopathogenesis. The significance of morphological typing of calculi. Nephrologie 1984; 5: 195-201
- 29 Hess R, Kass P, Ward C. Association between hyperadrenocorticism and development of calcium-containing uroliths in dogs with urolithiasis. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1998; 212: 1889-1891
- 30 Carotenuto G, Malerba E, Dolfini C. et al. Cushing’s syndrome – an epidemiological study based on a canine population of 21,281 dogs. Open Vet J 2019; 9: 27-32
- 31 Skeldon N, Ristic J. Urine analysis. In: Villiers E, Ristic J. eds. BSAVA Manual of Canine and Feline Clinical Pathology. 3rd ed.. Gloucester, England: BSAVA; 2018: 183-218
- 32 Pedersen N, Pooch A, Liu H. A genetic assessment of the English bulldog. Canine Genet Epidemiol 2016; 3: 6
- 33 Carvalho M, Lulich J, Osborne C. et al. Role of urinary inhibitors of crystallization in uric acid nephrolithiasis: Dalmatian dog model. Urology 2003; 62: 566-570
- 34 Bannasch D, Ling G, Bea J. et al. Inheritance of urinary calculi in the Dalmatian. J Vet Intern Med 2004; 18: 483-487
- 35 Mc Cue J, Langston C, Palma D. et al. Urate Urolithiasis. Comp Vet Com 2009; 10: 468-475
- 36 Furrow E, Tate N, Minor K. et al. Three diverse mutations underlying canine xanthine urolithiasis. J Vet Intern Med 2016; 30 (04) 1520-1551
- 37 Hesse A. Brushitsteine beim Hund – selten, aber eine Herausforderung. Animal Stone Letter 2013; 7: 2