Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-1346-8645
Endoscopic submucosal dissection for localized amyloidosis of the sigmoid colon
Supported by: This work was supported in part by The National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund (29-A-13 and 2020-A-12). 29-A-13 and 2020-A-12![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/endoscopy/202201/lookinside/thumbnails/2194_10-1055-a-1346-8645-1.jpg)
Amyloidosis is a rare disease caused by the extracellular deposition of amyloid, which results from the self-assembly of various precursor proteins with a highly ordered and abnormal cross-β sheet structure [1] [2].
Gastrointestinal amyloidosis sometimes leads to ulcer, gastrointestinal bleeding, and intestinal obstruction [3] [4]. Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) has been reported as a treatment for localized amyloidosis of the colon which was causing bloody stool [5].
An 82-year-old man underwent colonoscopy for follow-up after colorectal polypectomy, and a submucosal tumor (SMT)-like lesion was detected in the sigmoid colon. The lesion was yellowish-white and appeared to be slightly hard ([Fig. 1 a]). It was covered by nonneoplastic epithelium with slight fold stretching. Magnified chromoendoscopy revealed an elongated type I pit, compatible with SMT, and its surface structure appeared to be stretched by the submucosal lesion ([Fig. 1 b, c]). Narrow band imaging (NBI) with magnification revealed a heterogeneous vessel pattern with uneven caliber and a slightly irregular surface pattern ([Fig. 1 d]). On endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), the lesion was hypoechoic with thickening in the third layer, and the border of the lesion was indistinct and partially mosaic-like ([Fig. 1 e]). Biopsy specimens revealed colonic amyloid deposit. A systematic search including upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and small-bowel capsule endoscopy was performed, but no other lesion was detected.
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/endoscopy/202201/thumbnails/10-1055-a-1346-8645-i2194ev1.jpg)
![Zoom Image](/products/assets/desktop/css/img/icon-figure-zoom.png)
If the amyloid lesion were to increase in size, the patient would be at risk of bowel obstruction and bleeding, so we performed an endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for this SMT ([Video 1]). Histopathological examination showed deposition of eosinophilic unstructured tissue from the mucosa to the submucosa, and orange staining with Congo red staining and amyloid deposition was observed ([Fig. 2 a, b]). Follow-up colonoscopy revealed a scar after ESD but no recurrence was detected.
Video 1 Endoscopic submucosal dissection for localized amyloidosis of the sigmoid colon.
Quality:
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/endoscopy/202201/thumbnails/10-1055-a-1346-8645-i2194ev2.jpg)
![Zoom Image](/products/assets/desktop/css/img/icon-figure-zoom.png)
In conclusion, curative resection may be performed for localized amyloidosis of the colon, and endoscopic treatment could be one option for localized amyloidosis.
Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_CCL_1AD_2A
Endoscopy E-Videos is a free access online section, reporting on interesting cases and new techniques in gastroenterological endoscopy. All papers include a high
quality video and all contributions are
freely accessible online.
This section has its own submission
website at
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/e-videos
Publication History
Article published online:
16 February 2021
© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Lachmann HJ, Hawkins PN. Systemic amyloidosis. Curr Opin Pharmacol 2006; 6: 214-220
- 2 Merlini G. Systemic amyloidosis: are we moving ahead?. Neth J Med 2004; 62: 104-105
- 3 Matsui H, Kato T, Inoue G. et al. Amyloidosis localized in the sigmoid colon. J Gastroenterol 1996; 31: 607-611
- 4 Racanelli V, D’Amore FP. Localized AL amyloidosis of the colon and clinical features of intestinal obstruction. A case report. Ann Ital Med Int 1999; 14: 58-60
- 5 Ogasawara N, Kitagawa W, Obayashi K. et al. Solitary amyloidosis of the sigmoid colon featuring submucosal tumor caused hematochezia. Intern Med 2013; 52: 2523-2527