Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-1352-2085
Improved wire-guided basket for intrahepatic stone extraction in a patient after pancreatoduodenectomy
A 61-year-old man with symptoms of chills and high fever had undergone pancreatoduodenectomy in 2009 because of pancreatic serous cystadenoma. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography suggested stones in the common and left hepatic duct ([Fig. 1]). The type of the gastrointestinal reconstruction was ascertained from surgical records, and we used a cap-assisted colonoscope (PCF-PQ260; Olympus Medical Systems, Tokyo, Japan) for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). The removal of the common hepatic duct stones followed the ERCP sequence: intubation to the afferent limb, biliary cannulation, balloon dilation of the distal bile duct, and balloon-assisted stone extraction. When the left intrahepatic duct stones could not be removed using to this method, we carried out wire-guided cannulation using an improved single-lumen stone extraction basket, in which a hole was made with the tip of a needle ([Fig. 2]) to allow it to be advanced over the guidewire ([Fig. 3]) into the desired segmental duct ([Fig. 4]). The stones were engaged and dragged into the intestinal tract without removing the guidewire ([Video 1]). This process was repeated until complete removal of the stones was accomplished. The patient was discharged on the 2nd day after the operation. During the following 3 weeks, there were no abnormal symptoms.
Video 1 Extraction of left main intrahepatic duct stones using an improved wire-guided basket.
Quality:
Endoscopic extraction of intrahepatic duct stones with conventional stone retrieval baskets is sometimes difficult [1], especially in patients with surgically altered anatomy [2]. Understanding the reconstruction that has been carried out helps endoscopists to select the appropriate endoscope and achieve biliary access [3] [4]. Intrahepatic duct stone removal can be difficult because of altered anatomy as well as the limitations of stone extraction devices [2]. We offer here an improvement of the single-lumen-type basket that can be used in combination with a guidewire; it is not as rigid as the double-lumen or any other attached types [5]. Its use in our center proves that it is safe, and we think it is an easy and cheap alternative for use in developing countries in patients with intrahepatic duct stones. Prospective randomized controlled trials are warranted in terms of safety, efficacy, and cost effectiveness.
Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_TTT_1AR_2AK
Endoscopy E-Videos is an open access online section, reporting on interesting cases and new techniques in gastroenterological endoscopy. All papers include a high quality video and all contributions are freely accessible online. Processing charges apply (currently EUR 375), discounts and wavers acc. to HINARI are available.
This section has its own submission
website at
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/e-videos
* Wenxia Ding and Yan Chen contributed equally to this work.
Publication History
Article published online:
05 March 2021
© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Chan AC, Chung SC. New wire-guided basket for intrahepatic stone extraction. Gastrointest Endosc 1999; 50: 401-404
- 2 Nakai Y, Kogure H, Yamada A. et al. Endoscopic management of bile duct stones in patients with surgically altered anatomy. Dig Endosc 2018; 30 (Suppl 1): 67-74
- 3 Gasmi M, Gonzalez JM, Barthet M. Endoscopic ultrasound-directed transgastrojejunal ERCP: a new technique to treat biliary stricture through the afferent limb after Whipple surgery. Endoscopy 2020; 52: E441-E442
- 4 Nakaji S, Hirata N, Yamauchi K. et al. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography using a cap-assisted highly flexible colonoscope in patients with Roux-en-Y anastomosis. Endoscopy 2014; 46: 529-532
- 5 Okabe Y, Ishida Y, Kuraoka K. et al. Endoscopic bile duct and/or pancreatic duct cannulation technique for patients with surgically altered gastrointestinal anatomy. Dig Endosc 2014; 26 (Suppl 2): 122-126