Ethische Aspekte co-intelligenter Assistenztechnologien in der Versorgung von Menschen mit Demenz

Mark Schweda; Silke Schicktanz

doi:10.1055/a-1369-3178

Psychiatrische Praxis, Table of Contents

Psychiatr Prax 2021; 48(S 01): S37-S41
DOI: 10.1055/a-1369-3178

Originalarbeit

Ethische Aspekte co-intelligenter Assistenztechnologien in der Versorgung von Menschen mit Demenz

Ethical Aspects of Co-Intelligent Assisitive Technologies in Dementia Care

Mark Schweda

¹Abteilung Ethik in der Medizin, Department für Versorgungsforschung, Fakultät VI – Medizin und Gesundheitswissenschaften, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg

,

Silke Schicktanz

²Institut für Ethik und Geschichte der Medizin, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen

› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Zusammenfassung

Intelligente technische Assistenzsysteme werden zunehmend als Lösung für die Versorgung von Menschen mit Demenz diskutiert. Der Beitrag betrachtet zentrale ethische Herausforderungen des Einsatzes derartiger Assistenzsysteme. Dabei konzentriert er sich auf Fragen der Privatheit und des Empowerments.

Abstract

Smart assistive technologies are increasingly discussed as a solution for the care of people with dementia. The article considers central ethical challenges of the use of such systems. It focuses on issues of privacy and empowerment.

Schlüsselwörter

Demenz - technische Assistenzsysteme - Ethik - Privatheit - Empowerment

Keywords

dementia - assistive technologies - ethics - privacy - empowerment

Full Text

References

Literatur
1 Frebel L. Roboter gegen das Vergessen? Technische Assistenz bei Altersdemenz im Spielfilm aus medizinethischer Sicht. In: Weber K, Fangerau H, Frommeld D, Manzeschke A. Hrsg. Technisierung des Alltags. Beitrag für ein gutes Leben?. Stuttgart: Steiner; 2015: 99-116
2 Thyrian JR, Stentzel U. Die Entwicklung der geschätzten Anzahl an Demenz erkrankter Menschen auf Kreisebene in Deutschland für 2030. Psychiat Prax 2020;
3 Deutscher Ethikrat. Robotik für Gute Pflege. Berlin: 2020. https://www.ethikrat.org/fileadmin/Publikationen/Stellungnahmen/deutsch/stellungnahme-robotik-fuer-gute-pflege.pdf
4 BMFSFJ/BMG. Nationale Demenzstrategie. Berlin: BMFSFJ/BMG; 2020: 129 https://www.nationale-demenzstrategie.de/
5 Schweda M, Kirste T, Hein A. et al. The Emergence of Co-Intelligent Monitoring and Assistive Technologies in Dementia Care – An Outline of Technological Trends and Ethical Aspects. Bioethica Forum 2020; 12: 29-37
6 Schmidt L, Wahl H-W. Alter und Technik. In: Hank K, Schulz-Nieswandt F, Wagner M, Zank S. Hrsg. Alternsforschung. Berlin: Nomos; 2019: 537-556
7 Bharucha AJ, Anand V, Forlizzi J. et al. Intelligent Assistive Technology Applications to Dementia Care: Current Capabilities, Limitations, and Future Challenges. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2009; 17: 88-104
8 Evans J, Brown M, Coughlan T. et al. A systematic review of dementia focused assistive technology. In: Kurosu M. Hrsg. HCI. Cham: Springer; 2015: 406-417
9 Ashgar I, Cang S, Yu H. A systematic mapping study on assistive technologies for people with dementia. SKIMA 2015; (Suppl. 09) 1-8
10 Ienca M, Fabrice J, Elger B. et al. Intelligent assistive technology for Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias: a systematic review. J Alzheimers Dis 2017; 56: 1301-1340
11 Ray PP, Dash D, De D. A Systematic Review and Implementation of IoT-Based Pervasive Sensor-Enabled Tracking System for Dementia Patients. J Med Syst 2019; 43: 287
12 Koo BM, Vizer LM. Mobile technology for cognitive assessment of older adults: a scoping review. Innov Aging 2019; 3: igy038
13 Husebo BS, Heintz HL, Berge LI. et al. Sensing Technology to Facilitate Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms and to Monitor Treatment Response in People With Dementia. A Systematic Review. Front Pharmacol 2020; 10: 1699
14 D’Onofrio G, Sancarlo D, Ricciardi F. et al. Information and communication technologies for the activities of daily living in older patients with dementia: A systematic review. J Alzheimerʼs Dis 2017; 57: 927-935
15 Mihailidis A, Boger JN, Craig T. et al. The COACH prompting system to assist older adults with dementia through handwashing: An efficacy study. BMC Geriatr 2008; 8: 28
16 Bewernitz MW, Mann WC, Dasler P. et al. Feasibility of machine-based prompting to assist persons with dementia. Assist Technol 2009; 21: 196-207
17 Góngora Alonso S, Hamrioui S, de la Torre Díez I. et al. Social robots for people with aging and dementia: a systematic review of literature. Telemed J E Health 2019; 25: 533-540
18 Leng M, Liu P, Zhang P. et al. Pet robot intervention for people with dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Psychiatry Res 2019; 271: 516-525
19 Martin S, Bengtsson JE, Dröes RM. Assistive technologies and issues relating to privacy, ethics and security. In: Mulvenna MD, Nugent C. eds. Supporting people with dementia using pervasive health technologies. 1. Aufl. London: Springer; 2010: 63-76
20 Rösler B. Der Wert des Privaten. Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp; 2001
21 Beard RL, Fox PJ. Resisting social disenfranchisement: Negotiating collective identities and everyday life with memory loss. Soc Sci Med 2008; 66: 1509-1520
22 Morte Ferrer R, Toboso-Martín M, Aparicio Payá M. et al. Personal autonomy in elderly and disabled: How assistive technologies impact on it. In: Haltaufderheide J, Hovemann J, Vollmann J. eds. Aging between participation and simulation: Ethical dimensions of socially assistive technologies in elderly care. Berlin: De Gruyter; 2020: 185-198
23 Kolkowska E, Kajtazi M. Privacy dimensions in design of smart home systems for elderly people. WISP Proceedings 2015; (Suppl. 17) 526-537
24 Cavoukian A, Fisher A, Killen S. et al. Remote home health care technologies: How to ensure privacy? Build it in: Privacy by design. IDIS 2010; 3: 363-378
25 O’Rourke HM, Duggleby W, Fraser KD. et al. Factors that affect quality of life from the perspective of people with dementia: a metasynthesis. J Am Geriatr Soc 2015; 63: 24-38
26 Elder A. False friends and false coinage: a tool for navigating the ethics of sociable robots. ACM SIGCAS 2016; 45: 248-254
27 Perkins DD, Zimmerman MA. Empowerment theory, research, and application. Am J Community Psychol 1995; 23: 569-579
28 Chiapperino L, Tengland PA. Empowerment in healthcare policy making: Three domains of substantive controversy. Health Prom J A 2015; 26: 210-215
29 Feste C, Anderson RM. Empowerment: From philosophy to practice. Patient Educ Couns 1995; 26: 139-144
30 Kim KI, Gollamudi SS, Steinhubl S. Digital technology to enable aging in place. Exp Gerontol 2017; 88: 25-31
31 Van Dijk J, Hendriks N, Frauenberger C. et al. Empowering people with impairments: How participatory methods can inform the design of empowering artifacts. Participatory Design Conference: Short Papers, Interactive Exhibitions, Workshops-Volume 2 (Suppl. 14): 121-122