physioscience, Table of Contents physioscience 2021; 17(02): 49-51DOI: 10.1055/a-1392-8428 Editorial Warum wir Forschungsprioritäten zur Vermeidung von Research Waste brauchen Authors Tobias Braun Christian Kopkow Recommend Article Abstract Buy Article(opens in new window) Full Text References Literatur 1 Chalmers I, Glasziou P. Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence. The Lancet 2009; 374: 86-89 2 Altman DG. The scandal of poor medical research. BMJ 1994; 308: 283-284 3 Hachmann J. Forschen für die Tonne? Die Research-Waste-Problematik. Public Health Forum 2019; 27: 236-238 4 Chalmers I, Bracken MB, Djulbegovic B. et al. How to increase value and reduce waste when research priorities are set. Lancet 2014; 383: 156-165 5 Ioannidis JPA, Greenland S, Hlatky MA. et al. Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis. The Lancet 2014; 383: 166-175 6 Glasziou P, Chalmers I. Research waste is still a scandal—an essay by Paul Glasziou and Iain Chalmers. BMJ 2018; 363: k4645 7 Niedermann K. Patient Research Partner – der Einbezug von Betroffenen in der Forschung. Physioscience 2012; 8: 1-2 8 Chalmers I, Glasziou P, Godlee F. All trials must be registered and the results published. BMJ 2013; 346: f105 9 Williamson PR, Altman DG, Blazeby JM. et al. Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: Issues to consider. Trials 2012; 13: 132 10 Altman DG, Simera I, Hoey J. et al. EQUATOR: reporting guidelines for health research. Lancet 2008; 371: 1149-1150 11 Flanagin A, Fontanarosa PB, Bauchner H. Preprints Involving Medical Research-Do the Benefits Outweigh the Challenges?. JAMA 2020; 324: 1840-1843 12 Glasziou P. The role of open access in reducing waste in medical research. PLoS Med 2014; 11: e1001651 13 Cukier S, Lalu M, Bryson GL. et al. Defining predatory journals and responding to the threat they pose: a modified Delphi consensus process. BMJ Open 2020; 10: e035561 14 Bianchini C, Cosentino C, Paci M. et al. Open Access Physical Therapy Journals: Do Predatory Journals Publish Lower-Quality Randomized Controlled Trials?. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2020; 101: 969-977 15 Cook CE, Cleland JA, Mintken PE. Manual Therapy Cures Death: I Think I Read That Somewhere. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2018; 48: 830-832 16 Moher D, Bouter L, Kleinert S. et al. The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity. PLoS Biol 2020; 18: e3000737 17 Cristea IA, Naudet F. Increase value and reduce waste in research on psychological therapies. Behaviour Research and Therapy 2019; 123: 103479 18 Borgetto B, Räbiger J, Rottenecker J. et al. Akademisierung: Die vollständige hochschulische Ausbildung in der Ergotherapie, Logopädie und Physiotherapie ist notwendig und machbar. Physioscience 2019; 15: 41-42 19 Wolf U. Vertagen und Aussitzen – Eigentlich nicht unbedingt eine typische Strategie des Bundesgesundheitsministers. Physioscience 2021; 17: 1-2 20 Heise K-F. Prioritäten der physiotherapeutischen Forschung. Physioscience 2013; 9: 45-46 21 Ewers M, Grewe T, Höppner H. et al. Forschung in den Gesundheitsfachberufen. Dtsch med Wochenschr 2012; 137: S37-S73 22 Crowe S, Fenton M, Hall M. et al. Patients’, clinicians’ and the research communities’ priorities for treatment research: there is an important mismatch. Res Involv Engagem 2015; 1: 2 23 Tallon D, Chard J, Dieppe P. Relation between agendas of the research community and the research consumer. Lancet 2000; 355: 2037-2040 24 Manafò E, Petermann L, Vandall-Walker V. et al. Patient and public engagement in priority setting: A systematic rapid review of the literature. PLoS One 2018; 13: e0193579 25 Tong A, Synnot A, Crowe S. et al. Reporting guideline for priority setting of health research (REPRISE). BMC Med Res Methodol 2019; 19: 243 26 Chalmers I, Atkinson P, Badenoch D. et al. The James Lind Initiative: books, websites and databases to promote critical thinking about treatment claims, 2003 to 2018. Res Involv Engagem 2019; 5: 6 27 Jesus TS, Gianola S, Castellini G. et al. Evolving Trends in Physiotherapy Research Publications between 1995 and 2015. Physiother Can 2020; 72: 122-131 28 da Costa LCM, Koes BW, Pransky G. et al. Primary care research priorities in low back pain: an update. Spine 2013; 38: 148-156 29 Bourne AM, Johnston RV, Cyril S. et al. Scoping review of priority setting of research topics for musculoskeletal conditions. BMJ Open 2018; 8: e023962 30 Nast I, Tal A, Schmid S. et al. Physiotherapy Research Priorities in Switzerland: Views of the Various Stakeholders. Physiother Res Int 2016; 21: 137-146 31 Rankin G, Summers R, Cowan K. et al. Identifying Priorities for Physiotherapy Research in the UK: the James Lind Alliance Physiotherapy Priority Setting Partnership. Physiotherapy 2020; 107: 161-168 32 Rushton A, Moore A. International identification of research priorities for postgraduate theses in musculoskeletal physiotherapy using a modified Delphi technique. Man Ther 2010; 15: 142-148 33 Goldstein MS, Scalzitti DA, Craik RL. et al. The revised research agenda for physical therapy. Phys Ther 2011; 91: 165-174 34 Sharp E, Curlewis K. Research waste is still a scandal-especially in medical students. BMJ 2019; 364: l700
