Netzimplantation bei der Chirurgie der Hiatushernie und bei der Anti-Reflux-Chirurgie – Kontra-Statement

Jasmina Kuvendjiska; Jens Höppner

doi:10.1055/a-1403-3558

Zentralblatt für Chirurgie - Zeitschrift für Allgemeine, Viszeral-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Table of Contents

Zentralbl Chir 2021; 146(02): 200-203
DOI: 10.1055/a-1403-3558

Übersicht

Netzimplantation bei der Chirurgie der Hiatushernie und bei der Anti-Reflux-Chirurgie – Kontra-Statement

Mesh Implantation in Anti-Reflux and Hiatal Hernia Surgery – Contra Statement

Jasmina Kuvendjiska

¹Klinik für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Deutschland

,

Jens Höppner

²Klinik für Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Deutschland

› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Zusammenfassung

Bei der chirurgischen Behandlung der gastroösophagealen Refluxerkrankung und der operativen Behandlung von Hiatushernien ist die hohe Rezidivrate der Hiatushernie ein zentrales Problem. Vor diesem Hintergrund werden zur Augmentation des Nahtverschlusses am Hiatus oesophageus verschiedene alloplastische Netze eingesetzt. Es wurden in der Vergangenheit sehr unterschiedliche Ergebnisse berichtet und der Einsatz von Netzen bei der Hiatusrekonstruktion wurde kontrovers diskutiert. Im Vordergrund stehen neben der Rezidivhäufigkeit auch immer wieder Berichte über Komplikationen der Hiatusaugmentation durch alloplastische Netze. Die heutige Datenlage zeigt auf der Grundlage von mehreren prospektiv randomisierten, doppelt verblindeten Vergleichsstudien und von Metaanalysen (Klasse-Ia- und -Ib-Evidenz) keine Vorteile der netzaugmentierten Hiatoplastik für die Verhinderung des Hiatushernienrezidivs. Sie beschreibt gleichzeitig mehr langfristige postoperative Komplikationen – vor allem von Dysphagie – beim Einsatz von Netzen für die Hiatusrekonstruktion. Vom routinemäßigen Einsatz der Netzaugmentation bei der Hiatusrekonstruktion muss daher aktuell abgeraten werden.

Abstract

In the surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease and of hiatal hernias, the high rate of recurrence of hiatal hernias is a central problem. Against this background, various, primarily alloplastic, meshes are used to augment suture closure on the esophageal hiatus. Very different results have been reported in the past and the use of meshes in hiatus reconstruction is controversial. In addition to the frequency of recurrences, reports about complications of mesh augmentation are in the foreground. On the basis of several prospective randomised double-blinded comparative studies and meta-analyses (class Ia and Ib evidence), the current data do not show any advantages of mesh-augmented hiatoplasty for the prevention of recurrence of hiatal hernia. At the same time, there exist reports of more long-term postoperative complications, especially dysphagia, after use of meshes for augmentation of hiatus reconstruction. Therefore, routine use of mesh augmentation for hiatus reconstruction is currently not recommended.

Schlüsselwörter

Hiatushernie - gastroösophageale Refluxkrankheit - Viszeralchirurgie - Komplikation

Key words

hiatus hernia - gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) - complication

Full Text

References

Literatur
1 Kahrilas PJ. The role of hiatus hernia in GERD. Yale J Biol Med 1999; 72: 101-111
2 Hashemi M, Peters JH, Demeester TR. et al. Laparoscopic repair of large type III hiatal hernia: Objective followup reveals high recurrence rate. J Am Coll Surg 2000; 190: 553-560
3 Aly A, Munt J, Jamieson GG. et al. Laparoscopic repair of large hiatal hernias. Br J Surg 2005; 92: 648-653
4 Kuster GG, Gilroy S. Laparoscopic technique for repair of paraesophageal hiatal hernias. J Laparoendosc Surg 1993; 3: 331-338
5 Zehetner J, Demeester SR, Ayazi S. et al. Laparoscopic versus open repair of paraesophageal hernia: The second decade. J Am Coll Surg 2011; 212: 813-820
6 Díez Tabernilla M, Ruiz-Tovar J, Grajal Marino R. et al. Paraesophageal hiatal hernia. Open vs. laparoscopic surgery. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 2009; 101: 706-711
7 Kohn GP, Price RR, Demeester TR. et al. Guidelines for the management of hiatal hernia. Surg Endosc 2013; 27: 4409-4428
8 Watson DI, Davies N, Devitt PG. et al. Importance of dissection of the hernial sac in laparoscopic surgery for large hiatal hernias. Arch Surg 1999; 134: 1069-1073
9 Watson DI, Jamieson GG, Devitt PG. et al. A prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication with anterior vs. posterior hiatal repair. Arch Surg 2001; 136: 745-751
10 Mark LA, Okrainec A, Ferri LE. et al. Comparison of patient-centered outcomes after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease or paraesophageal hernia. Surg Endosc 2008; 22: 343-347
11 Li ZT, Ji F, Han XW. et al. Role of fundoplication in treatment of patients with symptoms of hiatal hernia. Sci Rep 2019; 9: 12544
12 Su F, Zhang C, Ke L. et al. Efficacy comparison of laparoscopic Nissen, Toupet and Dor fundoplication in the treatment of hiatal hernia complicated with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi 2016; 19: 1014-1020
13 Qin M, Ding G, Yang H. A clinical comparison of laparoscopic Nissen and Toupet fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2013; 23: 601-604
14 Huerta CT, Plymale M, Barrett P. et al. Long-term efficacy of laparoscopic Nissen versus Toupet fundoplication for the management of types III and IV hiatal hernias. Surg Endosc 2019; 33: 2895-2900
15 Hagedorn C, Lönroth H, Rydberg L. et al. Long-term efficacy of total (Nissen-Rossetti) and posterior partial (Toupet) fundoplication: Results of a randomized clinical trial. J Gastrointest Surg 2002; 6: 540-545
16 Strate U, Emmermann A, Fibbe C. et al. Laparoscopic fundoplication: Nissen versus Toupet two-year outcome of a prospective randomized study of 200 patients regarding preoperative esophageal motility. Surg Endosc 2008; 22: 21-30
17 Koop H, Fuchs KH, Labenz J. et al. S2 k-Leitlinie: Gastroösophageale Refluxkrankheit unter Federführung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Gastroenterologie, Verdauungs- und Stoffwechselkrankheiten (DGVS): AWMF Register Nr. 021-013. Z Gastroenterol 2014; 52: 1299-1346
18 Frantzides CT, Madan AK, Carlson MA. et al. A prospective, randomized trial of laparoscopic polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) patch repair vs. simple cruroplasty for large hiatal hernia. Arch Surg 2002; 137: 649-652
19 Granderath FA, Schweiger UM, Kamolz T. et al. Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication with prosthetic hiatal closure reduces postoperative intrathoracic wrap herniation: Preliminary results of a prospective randomized functional and clinical study. Arch Surg 2005; 140: 40-48
20 Soricelli E, Basso N, Genco A. et al. Long-term results of hiatal hernia mesh repair and antireflux laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 2009; 23: 2499-2504
21 Campos V, Palacio DS, Glina F. et al. Laparoscopic treatment of giant hiatal hernia with or without mesh reinforcement: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 2020; 77: 97-104
22 Memon MA, Memon B, Yunus RM. et al. Suture Cruroplasty Versus Prosthetic Hiatal Herniorrhaphy for Large Hiatal Hernia: A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials. Ann Surg 2016; 263: 258-266
23 Analatos A, Håkanson BS, Lundell L. et al. Tension-free mesh versus suture-alone cruroplasty in antireflux surgery: A randomized, double-blind clinical trial. Br J Surg 2020; 107: 1731-1740
24 Watson DI, Thompson SK, Devitt PG. et al. Five Year Follow-up of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Laparoscopic Repair of Very Large Hiatus Hernia With Sutures Versus Absorbable Versus Nonabsorbable Mesh. Ann Surg 2020; 272: 241-247
25 Watson DI, Thompson SK, Devitt PG. et al. Laparoscopic repair of very large hiatus hernia with sutures versus absorbable mesh versus nonabsorbable mesh: A randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 2015; 261: 282-289
26 Oor JE, Roks DJ, Koetje JH. et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair using sutures versus sutures reinforced with non-absorbable mesh. Surg Endoscopy 2018; 32: 4579-4589
27 Antoniou SA, Koch OO, Antoniou GA. et al. Mesh-reinforced hiatal hernia repair: A review on the effect on postoperative dysphagia and recurrence. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2012; 397: 19-27
28 Parker M, Bowers SP, Bray JM. et al. Hiatal mesh is associated with major resection at revisional operation. Surg Endosc 2010; 24: 3095-3101
29 Stadlhuber RJ, Sherif AE, Mittal SK. et al. Mesh complications after prosthetic reinforcement of hiatal closure: A 28-case series. Surg Endosc 2009; 23: 1219-1226
30 Spiro C, Quarmby N, Gananadha S. Mesh-related complications in paraoesophageal repair: A systematic review. Surg Endosc 2020; 34: 4257-4280
31 Vidrio Duarte R, Vidrio Duarte E, Gutierrez Ochoa J. et al. Cardiac Tamponade by Tack Fixation of a Hiatal Mesh. Should Tacks Still Be Used in the Diaphragm?. Cureus 2020; 12: e8416
32 Çalıkoğlu İ, Özgen G, Toydemir T. et al. Iatrogenic cardiac tamponade as a mortal complication of peri-hiatal surgery. Analysis of 30 published cases. Heliyon 2019; 5: e01537
33 Köckerling F, Schug-Pass C, Bittner R. A word of caution: Never use tacks for mesh fixation to the diaphragm!. Surg Endosc 2018; 32: 3295-3302