OCT Application for Sterile Corneal Graft Screening in the Eye Bank

Adrien Quintin; Loïc Hamon; Stephanie Mäurer; Achim Langenbucher; Berthold Seitz

doi:10.1055/a-1443-5451

Klinische Monatsblätter für Augenheilkunde, Table of Contents

Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2021; 238(06): 688-692
DOI: 10.1055/a-1443-5451

Klinische Studie

OCT Application for Sterile Corneal Graft Screening in the Eye Bank

Article in several languages: English | deutsch

Authors

Adrien Quintin

¹Department of Ophthalmology, Saarland University Medical Center (UKS), Homburg/Saar, Germany
Loïc Hamon

¹Department of Ophthalmology, Saarland University Medical Center (UKS), Homburg/Saar, Germany
Stephanie Mäurer

²Institute of Experimental Ophthalmology, Saarland University, Homburg/Saar, Germany
Achim Langenbucher

²Institute of Experimental Ophthalmology, Saarland University, Homburg/Saar, Germany
Berthold Seitz

¹Department of Ophthalmology, Saarland University Medical Center (UKS), Homburg/Saar, Germany

Abstract

Background and Objective Sterile donor tomography enables the detection of corneal tissues with refractive anomalies. The aim of this study was to determine the curvature and thickness of donor corneas to support proper selection in the eye bank.

Methods 704 donor corneas (Klaus Faber Center, LIONS Eye Bank Saar-Lor-Lux, Trier/Westpfalz, in Homburg/Saar) were measured using the anterior segment optical coherence tomograph (AS-OCT) CASIA 2 (Tomey Corp., Nagoya, Japan). The corneoscleral discs were measured in their cell culture flask, which was positioned in a holder on the chin rest of the AS-OCT, after conversion to medium II (with 6% dextran T-500). The measured raw data were analysed and processed in MATLAB (MathWorks Inc., Natick, Massachusetts, USA), after which the refractive power of the steep and flat meridian at the anterior and posterior surface and the central corneal thickness (CCT) of the donor corneas were determined. Results values are expressed as mean x̅ ± standard deviation SD.

Results The mean refractive power of the steep/flat meridian at the anterior surface was 45.4 ± 1.8 D/44.0 ± 1.3 D, the corresponding values for the posterior surface were − 6.2 ± 0.3 D/− 5.9 ± 0.2 D, and the mean CCT was 616.3 ± 85.1 µm. Of the 704 (100%) measured donor tissues, 590 (83.8%)/670 (95.2%) donor corneas showed no anomaly beyond respectively x̅ ± 2 SD/x̅ ± 3 SD among the 5 examined parameters. 72 (10.3%)/23 (3.3%) donor corneas had only 1 anomaly, 26 (3.7%)/10 (1.4%) had 2 anomalies, 10 (1.4%)/1 (0.1%), 3 anomalies, 5 (0.7%)/0 (0.0%), 4 anomalies, and 1 (0.1%)/0 (0.0%), 5 anomalies.

Conclusions AS-OCT provides an objective and sterile screening method to identify corneal tissues with curvature anomalies in order to further optimise donor selection in the eye bank. To avoid postoperative refractive surprises, donor corneas with a total refractive power that deviates > ± 3 SD from the mean should not be used for penetrating or anterior lamellar keratoplasty, but may be suitable for posterior lamellar keratoplasty (DMEK or DSAEK). In the future, sterile donor tomography could enable: (1) the harmonisation of donor and recipient tomography, which may minimise residual astigmatism for a particular donor-recipient pair; and (2) the improvement of IOL power calculation in a classical triple procedure by means of regression analysis between pre- and postoperative total refractive power of corneal grafts.

Key words

optical coherence tomography - sterile donor tomography - donor cornea - eye bank - keratoplasty

Full Text

References

References/Literatur
1 Ousley PJ, Terry MA. Objective screening methods for prior refractive surgery in donor tissue. Cornea 2002; 21: 181-188
2 Ousley PJ, Terry MA. Use of a portable topography machine for screening donor tissue for prior refractive surgery. Cornea 2002; 21: 745-750
3 Stoiber J, Ruckhofer J, Hitzl W. et al. Evaluation of donor tissue with a new videokeratoscope: the Keratron Scout. Cornea 2001; 20: 859-863
4 Terry MA, Ousley PJ. New screening methods for donor eye-bank eyes. Cornea 1999; 18: 430-436
5 Kang SJ, Schmack I, Edelhauser HF. et al. Donor corneas misidentified with prior laser in situ keratomileusis. Cornea 2010; 29: 670-673
6 Mootha VV, Dawson D, Kumar A. et al. Slitlamp, specular, and light microscopic findings of human donor corneas after laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis. Arch Ophthalmol 2004; 122: 686-692
7 Vavra DE, Enzenauer RW. Predictive value of slitlamp examinations in screening donor corneas for prior refractive surgery. Arch Ophthalmol 2005; 123: 707-708 author reply 708–709
8 Mäurer S, Asi F, Rawer A. et al. [Concept for 3D measurement of corneal donor tissue using a clinical OCT]. Ophthalmologe 2019; 116: 640-646
9 Damian A, Seitz B, Langenbucher A. et al. Optical coherence tomography-based topography determination of corneal grafts in eye bank cultivation. J Biomed Opt 2017; 22: 16001
10 Janunts E, Langenbucher A, Seitz B. In vitro corneal tomography of donor cornea using anterior segment OCT. Cornea 2016; 35: 647-653
11 Priglinger SG, Neubauer AS, May CA. et al. Optical coherence tomography for the detection of laser in situ keratomileusis in donor corneas. Cornea 2003; 22: 46-50
12 Seitz B, Asi F, Mäurer S, Hamon L, Quintin A, Langenbucher A. Anterior Segment OCT: Application to improve Graft Selection for corneal Transplantation. In: Alió JL. ed. Atlas of anterior Segment optical Coherence Tomography. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2021: 223-236
13 European Eye Bank Association (EEBA). Minimum Medical Standards (MMS). 02.01.2020 Accessed December 2, 2020 at: https://www.eeba.eu/files/pdf/EEBA Minimum Medical Standards Revision 5 Final.pdf
14 Bundesärztekammer – Wissenschaftlicher Beirat. Richtlinie zur Gewinnung von Spenderhornhauten und zum Führen einer Augenhornhautbank, Erste Fortschreibung. Dtsch Arztebl; 2018 Accessed December 2, 2020 at: https://www.bundesaerztekammer.de/fileadmin/user_upload/downloads/pdf-Ordner/RL/Rili-Hornhaut.pdf
15 Hamon L, Daas L, Mäurer S. et al. Thickness and curvature changes of human corneal grafts in dextran-containing organ culture medium before keratoplasty. Cornea 2020;
16 Hoppenreijs VP, Van Rij G, Beekhuis WH. et al. Causes of high astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty. Doc Ophthalmol 1993; 85: 21-34
17 Naumann GOH. The Bowman Lecture. Eye (Lond) 1995; 9: 395-421
18 Seitz B, Langenbucher A, Küchle M. et al. Impact of graft diameter on corneal power and the regularity of postkeratoplasty astigmatism before and after suture removal. Ophthalmology 2003; 110: 2162-2167
19 van Rij G, Cornell FM, Waring 3rd GO. et al. Postoperative astigmatism after central vs. eccentric penetrating keratoplasties. Am J Ophthalmol 1985; 99: 317-320
20 van Rij G, Waring 3rd GO. Configuration of corneal trephine opening using five different trephines in human donor eyes. Arch Ophthalmol 1998; 106: 1228-1233
21 Abdin A, Daas L, Pattmöller M. et al. Negative impact of dextran in organ culture media for pre-stripped tissue preservation on DMEK (Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty) outcome. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2018; 256: 2135-2142
22 Schnitzler AC, Salla S, Hamsley N. et al. Role of the endothelial layer in the deswelling process of organ-cultured human corneas before transplantation. Cornea 2016; 35: 1216-1221
23 Mäurer S, Seitz B, Langenbucher A. “Harmonization” of donor and recipient tomography in corneal transplantation. Z Med Phys 2021; 31: 73-77
24 Seitz B, Langenbucher A, Naumann GOH. Astigmatismus bei Keratoplastik. In: Seiler T. Hrsg. Refraktive Chirurgie der Hornhaut. Stuttgart: Enke; 2000: 197-252
25 Quintin A, Hamon L, Mäurer S. et al. [Comparison of sterile donor tomography in the eye bank and graft tomography after penetrating keratoplasty]. Ophthalmologe 2020;